My requirement is to create a website in which any number of user can login and click on a button. The task inside that button click will be a long running process (May take hours or days to finish the task). User can logout from the website and can login occasionally to check the status of the task.Is it good to use the idea in this article. Please give some suggestion on this.
Thanks.
MSMQ or SQL Service Broker used to communicate with a Windows Service.
asp.net page sends start request
------------MSMQ------------>
Windows service picks up message
and starts the long running job.
As progress is made, it can be
recorded in a "Jobs" table
client checks status from the Jobs table
IIS app pool recycles
.... days pass
Service completes work, and records
the job as Completed
Service might send email notification
with a link to the webpage
client can later retrieve the rendered job
If you really must stay within IIS, I would still use MSMQ or SQL Server, but you would just have to put your service code in Application_Start.
Related
I develop an ASP .NET/C# MVC4 application where users can click on a button (post) a let the server running his algorithm`.
The process can be long (several minutes) and if the user closes his window/stop the loading the server keeps running and, in my application, insert data in the DB.
I asked myself how it is possible to stop this server process with the application ? I mean, if the user realizes he doesn't want to run this process anymore and he likes to stop insertion in database, how can he do that ?
You can create static class/singleton in service layer with methods which will run and stop your long process. In controller you can make some actions which will manage this singleton by user requests.
I have written a web application in asp.net. It has some user roles. There are 3 roles which are Manager, Accountant and Employee. The employees write their expenses in a form and send it to Manager. When manager approves it, it'll be sent to Accountant to pay it. I need to have an idea that when manager doesn't approve the employee's expense in 48 hours, it should send an automatic e-mail to Manager's mail.
I thought that I can write another small console application to handle that by checking every hour. But it would waste resources and decrease performance.
I need a good idea to handle that. How should I do?
There are several options, but if I were you I would go with first or second options.
Console App & scheduler
I would create that console application that every time is run perform the check for you.
Then I will have it run using Windows Scheduler in a daily basis (at 00:05) or a hourly basis if you prefer so. This way Windows Scheduler daemon will launch it every hour and the rest of the time your app is not running.
Check this Microsoft link to see how a scheduled task is created in windows.
Restful Web Service & scheduler
As suggested in #marapet answer, having a restful web service that allow you to perform this action instead of a console application would give you the advantage of having all code in your web application.
Similar as previous one, you should only invoke the restful uri to have your action done. As possible disadvantage, you have to get sure that that uri is not accessible to end users. In usual architecture (Web Server --> Application Server --> DB) this restful service should be in the Application Servers, far away from end user access.
Windows Service
Another option is creating a Windows Service that runs all the time and check the time itself so every hour perform the job (maybe using Quartz or similar). But this does not meet your performance requirements.
The performance hit will be small anyway as your service should check every minute to see if an hour has pass and is time to do its job.. a task pretty easy.
The advantage is that a windows service is easier to control and monitor than a Scheduled tasks
DB job
Yet another option... If your app uses SQL Server you can have a t-sql job that runs daily or hourly. I wouldn't recommend this option unless you really have performance problems.
The problem with this is that you would be splitting the logic and responsibilities of your code. A future developer or admin would find hard to maintain your app.
If you'd like to keep the logic within the web application for simplicity (depending on the total size of your solution, this may or may not be desired):
For a given URL, have the web app check for due approvals and sends emails out if needed. Be sure to keep track of emails sent in order to prevent sending the same email multiple times.
Call this URL in a regular interval. You may use a scheduled task or a third party url monitoring service to do this.
You may call the URL with a simple VBScript (or wget, or curl, or powershell, or whatever is fastest for you), which in turn you can automate by using the task scheduler (see also).
An example script in vbscript for calling an URL:
Function LoadUrl(url)
Dim objRequest
Set objRequest = CreateObject("MSXML2.ServerXMLHTTP.6.0")
objRequest.open "POST", url , false
objRequest.Send
LoadUrl = objRequest.responseText
Set objRequest = Nothing
End Function
Checking every hour won't affect performance. Even checking every minute is probably fine, depending on your database. The simplest option is a console program fired as a Scheduled Task. You can also try a Windows Service but they're a bit trickier.
Also give some thought how you'll count the 48 hours. If an employee puts in expenses just before the weekend then 48 hours will probably elapse every time and you'll end up with a manager having lots of emails in their Inbox on Monday morning. That could cause some friction :)
We have a data transfer between 2 systems that can take upto a few hours. The code for doing this transfer is written in C#.
We would like to trigger the transfer with a WCF web service call.
Ideally we would like the web service call to return at once, with a message "OK job started", and then the job to run on the server untill it is complete.
What is the best way to do this?
The possible problems we see are:
web service timing out before job finished
job stops after returning result
Although not entirely similar to your predicament, I had a similar scenario with my MVC application. There are lots of "Jobs" to do that involve importing data, batch emails, financial processes etc.
Basically, I created a windows service which had a job manager, and obviously the various jobs that could be done. It also ran a light HttpServer. This allowed the main MVC application to talk to the service. One sends a request to start jobs and get the status of all jobs or a particular job (when a job is started it is given a unique ID).
So if I was going to implement it in your case, I'd add a download job which did the actual work, and instigate it from the MVC App via a JSON call. The status of the download could be queried at any time by using the ID passed back from the "StartJob" JSON call. Your main web request is therefore handled and over immediately.
I'd write a console application that does this job and let the Web Service call that application.
Running heavy processes within the web server itself is never a good idea.
You may use background thread on the WebServce call.
What if I have website with a button. User clicks on the button and starts a long running process. After a few hours (or minutes) user update webpage and see results. What is the best (and any other) way to implement long running operation on website?
From the user experience point of view I suggest you implement the job like you would implement order handling in an online shop.
When the user starts the job he should be able to track the state of the job. Is the job complete? Did the job fail? What is the progress of the job? He should probably also be able to cancel the job and perhaps modify properties of the job. You could implement an notification mechanism using e-mail or an SMS and the user should be able to control that.
By using JavaScript/AJAX you can provide a more interactive user experience where the job status web page is automatically refreshed at regular intervals in the background without forcing the user to refresh his browser.
The user should be able to leave his computer and later connect to the website from another computer and still be able to get information about pending and completed jobs. This requires some form of user login.
I suggest that you separate the job handling code from the website code. You could expose the job handling user a web service or another similar technology. The website should query the service and display the results providing a user interface on top of the job service.
How long? If it's really going to take hours, you don't want that code running in the web server. Have the server spawn an external process or start a service or something along that line, and put the long running code in there.
You could have that code put status updates somewhere (like in the database) as it runs, and the website can check that when the user comes back to see how it's doing.
I suggest you read up on Threading in asp.Net. For website performance, time consuming processes can be put on a different thread.
A different approach is executing the task with AJAX. This way, you can present the user interface to the user, and start an asynchronous process which handles the request.
Scenario: A WCF service receives an XDocument from clients, processes it and inserts a row in an MS SQL Table.
Multiple clients could be calling the WCF service simultaneously. The call usually doesn't take long (a few secs).
Now I need something to poll the SQL Table and run another set of processes in an asynchronous way.
The 2nd process doesn't have to callback anything nor is related to the WCF in any way. It just needs to read the table and perform a series of methods and maybe a Web Service call (if there are records of course), but that's all.
The WCF service clients consuming the above mentioned service have no idea of this and don't care about it.
I've read about this question in StackOverflow and I also know that a Windows Service would be ideal, but this WCF Service will be hosted on a Shared Hosting (discountasp or similar) and therefore, installing a Windows Service will not be an option (as far as I know).
Given that the architecture is fixed (I.E.: I cannot change the table, it comes from a legacy format, nor change the mechanism of the WCF Service), what would be your suggestion to poll/process this table?
I'd say I need it to check every 10 minutes or so. It doesn't need to be instant.
Thanks.
Cheat. Expose this process as another WCF service and fire a go command from a box under your control at a scheduled time.
Whilst you can fire up background threads in WCF, or use cache expiry as a poor man's scheduler those will stop when your app pool recycles until the next hit on your web site and the app pool spins up again. At least firing the request from a machine you control means you know the app pool will come back up every 10 minutes or so because you've sent a request in its direction.
A web application is not suited at all to be running something at a fixed interval. If there are no requests coming in, there is no code running in the application, and if the application is inactive for a while the IIS can decide to shut it down completely until the next request comes in.
For some applications it isn't at all important that something is run at a specific interval, only that it has been run recently. If that is the case for your application then you could just keep track of when the table was last polled, and for every request check if enough time has passed for the table to be polled again.
If you have access to administer the database, there is a scheduler in SQL Server. It can run queries, stored procedures, and even start processes if you have permission (which is very unlikely on a shared hosting, though).
If you need the code on a specific interval, and you can't access the server to schedule it or run it as a service, or can't use the SQL Server scheduler, it's simply not doable.
Make you application pool "always active" and do whatever you want with your threads.