I'm using sql profiler to see sql generated by Ef core2.1,
this is my linq query :
var resulat = (from a in A
join b in B equals a.level=b.level
where ...
select new M1 {AId = a.id}).Distinct();
(from r in resulat
join c in C equals r.AId = c.AId
select new M2
{
CId = c.Id,
level = _helper(c.level)
}).Distinct();
Sql generated:
select t.AId,c.Id,c.level
from
(
select distinct a.id
from A a
inner join B b on a.level=b.level
where ...
) as t
inner join C c on t.AId = c.AId
What i want as result is :
select distinct c.Id,c.level
from
(
select distinct a.id
from A a
inner join B b on a.level=b.level
where ...
) as t
inner join C c on t.AId = c.AId
I have tried also using select/distinct with result IQueryable, but the sql generated is the same.
what i missed in my linq query or what i have to add to have this sql query
That's what worked for me:
Delete Distinct() from result query, this avoid adding t.AId to my selection.
Delete a helper method from one of my selection fields performe adding Distinct() to final query.
This is my query after correction:
var resulat = from a in A
join b in B equals a.level=b.level
where ...
select new M1 {AId = a.id};
(from r in resulat
join c in C equals r.AId = c.AId
select new M2
{
CId = c.Id
level = c.level
}).Distinct();
Many thanks for your comments, it really helped me.
I'm always a fan of querying the data you want directly from the table (well, DbSet) that returns the data. The process looks a bit like these steps:
I want C.Id and C.Level
That's context.Cs.
Which Cs do I want?
The ones that have a parent A, of which at least one B has the same 'level' as A and meets a couple of other criteria (the where ...).
That amounts to:
from c in context.Cs
where context.Bs.Any(b => b.level == c.A.level && <other criteria>)
select new { c.Id, c.Level }
If the where ... also contains filter criteria for A you can add predicates like && c.A == ... to the where.
Note that I assume a navigation property c.A to be present, otherwise to be created, because C has AId.
I would like to use my entity class properties in my linq query that return some value with it.
so this my linq query;
List<PvmBarChartData> BaseofSegmentIPPGMR = (from si in db.ScoreItem
join s in db.Score on si.ScoreId equals s.Id
join prg in db.ProjectResearchGroup on si.ProjectResearchGroupId equals prg.Id
join rg in db.RgClone on prg.RgCloneId equals rg.Id
join sp in db.SalesPoint on s.SalesPointId equals sp.Id
join c in db.Channel on sp.ChannelId equals c.Id
where (si.ResearchGroupType == ResearchGroupType.ScoreCard && spIds.Contains(s.SalesPointId))
group si by c.Name into g
select new PvmBarChartData
{
GroupName = g.Key,
DataValues = new List<CvmNameValuePair>{ new CvmNameValuePair{
Name = "",
Value = g.Average(x => x.TotalScore)
}
}
})
.ToList();
so for instance I would like to set Name properties with my entity framework model class' properties' value, Name = s.Name,
How can I implement this on my code?
A way that you can access s.Name is by doing another linq query on g, since g is now a data set of grouped objects.
Name = (from gx in g select gx.Name).FirstorDefault();
Imagine a simple Entity Framework query with a context generated from the database such as:
var q = from a in context.Accounts
join c in context.Contracts
on a.Id equals c.AccountId
select new CustomAccount {
Id = a.Id,
Name = a.Name,
...
Contracts = //How do I easily populate the related contracts?
};
The query looks for accounts and joins to contracts. The relationship is not enforced in the database (I can't change the schema) so I can't use navigational properties. Is there an easy way that I can populate the related objects?
Just use a group by clause. Something like this (untested):
var q = from a in context.Accounts
join c in context.Contracts on a.Id equals c.AccountId
group a by new { a.Id, a.Name, a.Etc } into g
select new CustomAccount
{
Id = g.Key.Id,
Name = g.Key.Name,
Etc = g.Key.Etc,
Contracts = g.SelectMany(x => x.Contracts)
};
I'm not sure if I understand correctly but you can execute a query that return anonymous type objects
EDIT : you can create a custom class to hold the data member of your result and return in linq result.
EDIT : using group by on account name (e.g)
var q = from a in context.Accounts
join c in context.Contracts
on a.Id equals c.AccountId
group a by new { a.Name } into g
select new AccountContracts
{
AccountName = g.Key.Id, // Account name
Contracts = g.SelectMany(x => x.Contracts)
};
I am trying to write a query that grabs information from one database and joins it to information in a different database.
TableA
idA
valueA
idB
TableB
idB
valueB
The tricky part is that in TableA, idB isn't always defined, so when I do a normal join, I only get results where TableA has a idB value. What I want is to be able to grab all of the information from TableA even if it doesn't have a corresponding idB value.
Here is a query expression syntax version of the left join to follow up on tvanfosson's answer.
var query = from rowA in db.TableA
join rowB in db.TableB
on rowA.idB equals rowB.idB into b
from item in b.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
idA = rowA.idA,
valueA = rowA.valueA,
idB = rowA.idB,
valueB = item != null ? item.valueB : 0 // or other default value
};
Use a left outer join by checking if the value returned from the right hand side is null and supplying a default value for that case.
var q = db.TableA.Join( db.TableA,
a => a.idB,
b => b.idB,
(a,b) => new
{
A = a.ValueA,
B = b == null ? null : b.ValueB
});
You can do a left outer join in LINQ with SelectMany (directly calling Queryable methods) or in comprehension syntax join ... into:
var results = from a in db.TableA
join b in db.TableB on a.idB equals b.idB
into found
select new {
A = a,
Bs = found
};
In the output Bs will be IEnumerable<typeof-db-TableB>
Left Join Example:
var leftOuterJoinQuery =
from category in categories
join prod in products on category.ID equals prod.CategoryID into prodGroup
from item in prodGroup.DefaultIfEmpty(new Product{Name = String.Empty, CategoryID = 0})
select new { CatName = category.Name, ProdName = item.Name };
I'm writing a LINQ to SQL statement, and I'm after the standard syntax for a normal inner join with an ON clause in C#.
How do you represent the following in LINQ to SQL:
select DealerContact.*
from Dealer
inner join DealerContact on Dealer.DealerID = DealerContact.DealerID
It goes something like:
from t1 in db.Table1
join t2 in db.Table2 on t1.field equals t2.field
select new { t1.field2, t2.field3}
It would be nice to have sensible names and fields for your tables for a better example. :)
Update
I think for your query this might be more appropriate:
var dealercontacts = from contact in DealerContact
join dealer in Dealer on contact.DealerId equals dealer.ID
select contact;
Since you are looking for the contacts, not the dealers.
And because I prefer the expression chain syntax, here is how you do it with that:
var dealerContracts = DealerContact.Join(Dealer,
contact => contact.DealerId,
dealer => dealer.DealerId,
(contact, dealer) => contact);
To extend the expression chain syntax answer by Clever Human:
If you wanted to do things (like filter or select) on fields from both tables being joined together -- instead on just one of those two tables -- you could create a new object in the lambda expression of the final parameter to the Join method incorporating both of those tables, for example:
var dealerInfo = DealerContact.Join(Dealer,
dc => dc.DealerId,
d => d.DealerId,
(dc, d) => new { DealerContact = dc, Dealer = d })
.Where(dc_d => dc_d.Dealer.FirstName == "Glenn"
&& dc_d.DealerContact.City == "Chicago")
.Select(dc_d => new {
dc_d.Dealer.DealerID,
dc_d.Dealer.FirstName,
dc_d.Dealer.LastName,
dc_d.DealerContact.City,
dc_d.DealerContact.State });
The interesting part is the lambda expression in line 4 of that example:
(dc, d) => new { DealerContact = dc, Dealer = d }
...where we construct a new anonymous-type object which has as properties the DealerContact and Dealer records, along with all of their fields.
We can then use fields from those records as we filter and select the results, as demonstrated by the remainder of the example, which uses dc_d as a name for the anonymous object we built which has both the DealerContact and Dealer records as its properties.
var results = from c in db.Companies
join cn in db.Countries on c.CountryID equals cn.ID
join ct in db.Cities on c.CityID equals ct.ID
join sect in db.Sectors on c.SectorID equals sect.ID
where (c.CountryID == cn.ID) && (c.CityID == ct.ID) && (c.SectorID == company.SectorID) && (company.SectorID == sect.ID)
select new { country = cn.Name, city = ct.Name, c.ID, c.Name, c.Address1, c.Address2, c.Address3, c.CountryID, c.CityID, c.Region, c.PostCode, c.Telephone, c.Website, c.SectorID, Status = (ContactStatus)c.StatusID, sector = sect.Name };
return results.ToList();
You create a foreign key, and LINQ-to-SQL creates navigation properties for you. Each Dealer will then have a collection of DealerContacts which you can select, filter, and manipulate.
from contact in dealer.DealerContacts select contact
or
context.Dealers.Select(d => d.DealerContacts)
If you're not using navigation properties, you're missing out one of the main benefits on LINQ-to-SQL - the part that maps the object graph.
Use Linq Join operator:
var q = from d in Dealer
join dc in DealerConact on d.DealerID equals dc.DealerID
select dc;
basically LINQ join operator provides no benefit for SQL. I.e. the following query
var r = from dealer in db.Dealers
from contact in db.DealerContact
where dealer.DealerID == contact.DealerID
select dealerContact;
will result in INNER JOIN in SQL
join is useful for IEnumerable<> because it is more efficient:
from contact in db.DealerContact
clause would be re-executed for every dealer
But for IQueryable<> it is not the case. Also join is less flexible.
Actually, often it is better not to join, in linq that is. When there are navigation properties a very succinct way to write your linq statement is:
from dealer in db.Dealers
from contact in dealer.DealerContacts
select new { whatever you need from dealer or contact }
It translates to a where clause:
SELECT <columns>
FROM Dealer, DealerContact
WHERE Dealer.DealerID = DealerContact.DealerID
Inner join two tables in linq C#
var result = from q1 in table1
join q2 in table2
on q1.Customer_Id equals q2.Customer_Id
select new { q1.Name, q1.Mobile, q2.Purchase, q2.Dates }
Use LINQ joins to perform Inner Join.
var employeeInfo = from emp in db.Employees
join dept in db.Departments
on emp.Eid equals dept.Eid
select new
{
emp.Ename,
dept.Dname,
emp.Elocation
};
Try this :
var data =(from t1 in dataContext.Table1 join
t2 in dataContext.Table2 on
t1.field equals t2.field
orderby t1.Id select t1).ToList();
OperationDataContext odDataContext = new OperationDataContext();
var studentInfo = from student in odDataContext.STUDENTs
join course in odDataContext.COURSEs
on student.course_id equals course.course_id
select new { student.student_name, student.student_city, course.course_name, course.course_desc };
Where student and course tables have primary key and foreign key relationship
try instead this,
var dealer = from d in Dealer
join dc in DealerContact on d.DealerID equals dc.DealerID
select d;
var Data= (from dealer in Dealer join dealercontact in DealerContact on dealer.ID equals dealercontact.DealerID
select new{
dealer.Id,
dealercontact.ContactName
}).ToList();
var data=(from t in db.your tableName(t1)
join s in db.yourothertablename(t2) on t1.fieldname equals t2.feldname
(where condtion)).tolist();
var list = (from u in db.Users join c in db.Customers on u.CustomerId equals c.CustomerId where u.Username == username
select new {u.UserId, u.CustomerId, u.ClientId, u.RoleId, u.Username, u.Email, u.Password, u.Salt, u.Hint1, u.Hint2, u.Hint3, u.Locked, u.Active,c.ProfilePic}).First();
Write table names you want, and initialize the select to get the result of fields.
from d1 in DealerContrac join d2 in DealerContrac on d1.dealearid equals d2.dealerid select new {dealercontract.*}
One Best example
Table Names : TBL_Emp and TBL_Dep
var result = from emp in TBL_Emp join dep in TBL_Dep on emp.id=dep.id
select new
{
emp.Name;
emp.Address
dep.Department_Name
}
foreach(char item in result)
{ // to do}