The following code is my Scenario:
Scenario: TradeOrders
Given Order 'SellOrder' Has Been Registerd
| Side | Price | Amount | IsFillAndKill | ExpireTime |
| 0 | 100 | 5 | false | 2024-02-05 09:30:26.2080000 |
And Order 'BuyOrder' Has Been Defined
| Side | Price | Amount | IsFillAndKill | ExpireTime |
| <Buy> | <Price> | <Amount> | <IsFillAndKill> | <ExpireTime> |
When I Register The Order 'BuyOrder'
Then The following 'Trade' will be created
| BuyOrderId | SellOrderId | Amount | Price |
| <BuyOrderId> | <SellOrderId> | <TradeAmount> | <TradePrice> |
And BuyOrder 'BuyOrder' Should Be Modified like this
| Side | Price | Amount | IsFillAndKill | ExpireTime |
| 1 | 100 | 0 | false | 2024-02-05 09:30:26.2080000 |
Examples:
| Buy | Price | Amount | IsFillAndKill | ExpireTime |
| 1 | 100 | 5 | false | 2024-02-05 09:30:26.2080000 |
Examples:
| <BuyOrderId> | <SellOrderId> | <TradeAmount> | <TradePrice> |
| 1 | 2 | 5 | 100 |
I want to add some examples with different columns but I have faced with below error:
Severity Code Description Project File Line Suppression State
Error Generation error: Message: The example sets must provide the
same parameters.
I appreciate you in advance.
This is not supported in SpecFlow. Since both tables are used in the same scenario, they need to go in the same row. It makes for a wide table, but there isn't anything you can do about it. Second of all, you cannot have < or > tokens in the column headers.
Examples:
| Buy | Price | Amount | IsFillAndKill | ExpireTime | BuyOrderId | SellOrderId | TradeAmount | TradePrice |
| 1 | 100 | 5 | false | 2024-02-05 09:30:26.2080000 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 100 |
You can also put spaces in the column headers so they are easier to read:
Examples:
| Buy | Price | Amount | Is Fill And Kill | Expire Time | Buy Order Id | Sell Order Id | Trade Amount | Trade Price |
| 1 | 100 | 5 | false | 2024-02-05 09:30:26.2080000 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 100 |
The choice to include spaces in column headers is subjective. It is supported to aid readability, but feel free to omit spaces if this does not make the examples table easier to understand.
Related
how to query the total count per skill.
I have 2 two table listed below;
TABLE: SkillList
+----------+
| Skills |
+----------+
| Skill_1 |
+----------+
| Skill_2 |
+----------+
| Skill_3 |
+----------+
| Skill_4 |
+----------+
| Skill_5 |
+----------+
TABLE: Skill Available (1/0 = true/false)
+----------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
| Username | Skill_1| Skill_2 | Skill_3 | Skill_4 |
+----------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
| Mark | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
+----------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
| Kent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
+----------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
| Mick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
+----------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
| John | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
+----------+--------+---------+---------+---------+
I want to query the total count per skill by using the 2 tables above how could I achieved this result?
+-----------+-----------+
| SkillList |Total COUNT|
+-----------+-----------+
| Skill_1 | 4 |
+-----------+-----------+
| Skill_2 | 3 |
+-----------+-----------+
| Skill_3 | 2 |
+-----------+-----------+
| Skill_4 | 1 |
+-----------+-----------+
| Skill_5 | 0 |
+-----------+-----------+
The design of this table is way off, wich really just adds a load of issues. Skills and Characters are in a N:M realtionship and this is how you solve those:
Skill Available is a table with:
ID, Integer, Primary Key
FKUserID, Integer, Foreign Key from the user table
FKSkillID, Integer, Foreign Key from the SkillList table
Then the answer is simple: SELECT COUNT(SkillKey) WHERE SkillKey == #SkillKeyToCount (Note that you can count anything, including *. It does not really mater outside of minor optimisations).
I'm using sqlite, I've setup three tables.
Table for list of skills this can be expand.
+----+----------+
| ID | Skills |
+----+----------+
| 1 | Swimming |
| 2 | Running |
| 3 | Boxing |
| 4 | Dancing |
| 5 | Singing |
+----+----------+
Table for availability of each person. 0 represents the person is not available.
+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| Names | SUN | MON | TUE | WED | THU | FRI | SAT |
+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| Mark | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | (MON-FRI)
| Robin | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | (MON-FRI)
| James | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | (TUE-SAT)
+-------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Table for each person skill possess. 1/0 is a boolean value.
+-------+----------+---------+--------+---------+---------+
| Names | Swimming | Running | Boxing | Dancing | Singing |
+-------+----------+---------+--------+---------+---------+
| Mark | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Robin | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| James | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
+-------+----------+---------+--------+---------+---------+
By using the tables above how could I achieved this result to sum each person's availability base on their skill.
Expected Results:
+----------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| Skills | SUN | MON | TUE | WED | THU | FRI | SAT |
+----------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
| Swimming | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Running | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Boxing | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Dancing | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Singing | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
+----------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
I have a table which is called Signer :
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
| Name | User | Order | Signed | CompanyName | Status | InvoiceId |
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
| Anders | aa | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26650 |
| Peyman | pm | 2 | 1 | OvnAnd2 | 1 | 26650 |
| Siw Ericsson | se | 3 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26650 |
| test | test | 4 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26650 |
|Siw Ericsson | se | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26652 |
| test | test | 2 | 1 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26652 |
|Siw Ericsson | se | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 25365 |
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
Goal:
As you can see I have 3 different InvoiceId's. For each InvoiceId, I would like to find a row with minimum order number that Status column's value is 0 and User column has to be se.
( It means, Show the current users related invoices which are ready to be signed based on his/her username, order, signed columns)
I came up with this T-SQL which works fine :
select * from Signer s1
where s1.User = 'se' and Order = (select min(Order) from Signer s2 where s2.InvoiceId = s1.InvoiceId and Signed = 0)
And the result:
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
| Name | User | Order | Signed | CompanyName | Status | InvoiceId |
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
|Siw Ericsson | se | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26652 |
|Siw Ericsson | se | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 25365 |
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
I would like to convert this query from T-Sql to Linq or EntityFramework :
This is my solution:
var temp = from x in db.Signers
where x.User == Me.UserName &&
x.Signed == 0
group x by x.InvoiceId
into item
select new
{
item.Key,
item = item.Min(x => x.Order)
};
Which returns 3 rows which is wrong because Siw should see the related invoices that are ready to be signed by her. (It means the first row should not be in the list)
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
| Name | User | Order | Signed | CompanyName | Status | InvoiceId |
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
| Anders | aa | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26650 |
|Siw Ericsson | se | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 26652 |
|Siw Ericsson | se | 1 | 0 | OvnAnd2 | 0 | 25365 |
+--------------+----------+---------+--------+--------------+---------+-----------+
More info:
- As you can see in the first table, we have a special logic that someone can sign invoices out of order and Peyman is one of them.
- I don't want to use SqlQuery() method in Entityframework in order to execute t-sql queries.
I appreciate any help to find a solution for my goal.
Best regards
I think this is one of those situations where "let" come in handy:
var result = from s in Signers
let minToSign = Signers.Where(si =>
si.InvoiceId == s.InvoiceId && si.Signed == 0
).Min(si => si.Order)
where s.User == "se" && s.Order == minToSign
select s;
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a predefined List<string> Wellnames = new List<string>(){"CAM1","CAM2","CAM3"};
I have a text file, which is always in the same format as shown. How do I extract/read the highlighted numbers in the example? i,e. for CAM1 and similarly for CAM2 and CAM3.
here is the excerpt of the file:
1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------913
ALLOC Allocation/bundle report 10835.0000 Days report step 228, 1 Sep 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Streamline | | | | | | |
| Bundle | | Surface Rate | Surface Volumes | | | |
|------------------------| Flow |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Total Reservoir | Pore |PV weighted|
| Start | End | Direct | Oil | Water | Gas | Oil | Water | Gas | Rate | Volume | Pressure |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | SM3/D | Fraction | SM3/D | Fraction | SM3/D | Fraction | SM3 | SM3 | SM3 | RM3/D | Fraction | RM3 | Bar |
| |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CAM1 | | 9.13e-001 | | 3.14e+001 | | 9.13e-001 | | 7.55e+004 | 1.50e+005 | 7.55e+004 | 3.26e+001 | 1.06e+000 | 2.29e+005 | 6.21e+001 |
| CAM1 CAM138 | Outflow | 2.82e-001 | 3.09e-001 | 9.63e+000 | 3.07e-001 | 2.82e-001 | 3.09e-001 | 1.99e+004 | 3.88e+004 | 1.99e+004 | 1.00e+001 | 3.07e-001 | 5.96e+004 | 6.17e+001 |
| CAM1 CAM255 | Outflow | 3.34e-002 | 3.66e-002 | 3.00e+000 | 9.57e-002 | 3.34e-002 | 3.66e-002 | 1.86e+004 | 4.05e+004 | 1.86e+004 | 3.07e+000 | 9.40e-002 | 6.00e+004 | 6.30e+001 |
| CAM1 CAM177 | Outflow | 2.12e-001 | 2.32e-001 | 1.10e+001 | 3.50e-001 | 2.12e-001 | 2.32e-001 | 1.94e+004 | 3.66e+004 | 1.94e+004 | 1.13e+001 | 3.46e-001 | 5.68e+004 | 6.13e+001 |
| CAM1 CAM582 | Outflow | 3.17e-001 | 3.47e-001 | 5.72e+000 | 1.82e-001 | 3.17e-001 | 3.47e-001 | 7.77e+003 | 1.33e+004 | 7.77e+003 | 6.10e+000 | 1.87e-001 | 2.14e+004 | 6.13e+001 |
| CAM1 CAM354 | Outflow | 6.87e-002 | 7.53e-002 | 2.05e+000 | 6.53e-002 | 6.87e-002 | 7.53e-002 | 9.80e+003 | 2.04e+004 | 9.80e+003 | 2.14e+000 | 6.56e-002 | 3.07e+004 | 6.34e+001 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
this Regex will get you what you need.
#"\|\s+CAM1\s+(\S+)\s+\|\s+\S+\s+\|\s+(\S+)\s+\|\s+\S+\s+\|\s+(\S+)\s+\|\s+\S+\s+\|\s+(\S+)"
just change CAM1 for what you are looking for.
I put together an example for you here
I'm assuming you know how to read the file line-by-line. Once you have a particular data line in a string, you can use the Split() method on the '|' character. You'll get back a zero-based array, with each element holding the data from one column. Index into the array at index 0 and trim the value to check for your identifier CAM1, etc. If it's the one you want, you can grab the other values from their indexes in the array.
Seems like the simplest approach given the rigid data format.
IMO the best approach for solving this, is to iterate the file line by line using a StreamReader and then parsing out the necessary information.
public dynamic Read(string file)
{
using (var streamReader = new StreamReader(File.OpenRead(file))
{
while ((var line = streamReader.ReadLine()) != null)
{
if (line.StartsWith("| CAM", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
var columns = line.Split('|').Select(x => x.Trim());
// Parse the values here, put them in a DTO
}
}
}
}
I have two tables.
Menu
+----------------+----------------+
| menu_id | menu_desc |
+----------------+----------------+
| 1 | menu1 |
| 2 | menu2 |
| 3 | menu3 |
| 4 | menu4 |
| 5 | menu5 |
+----------------+----------------+
Rights
+----------+--------------+---------+
| Role_id | menu_id | Rights |
+----------+--------------+---------+
| 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 | 3 |
+----------+--------------+---------+
I want the output something like this,
+----------+------------------+------------+-----------+
| menu_id | menu_desc | Role_id | Rights |
+----------+------------------+------------+-----------+
| 1 | menu1 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | menu2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | menu3 | 1 | 3 |
| 4 | menu4 | 1 | null |
| 5 | menu5 | 1 | null |
+----------+------------------+------------+-----------+
Is it possible?
This gives NULL for both Role_id and Rights
SELECT Menu.menu_id, Menu.menu_desc, Role.Role_id, Role.Rights
FROM Menu LEFT OUTER JOIN Role ON Menu.menu_id=Role.menu_id
ORDER BY Menu.menu_id
try below, if not getting required results then share problem:
SELECT m.menu_id, m.menu_desc, r.Role_id, r. Rights FROM Menu m LEFT JOIN `Rights` r ON m.menu_id=r.menu_id order by m.menu_id;
You have to use join:
select Menu.menu_id, menu_desc, Role_id, Rights.menu_id, Rights.Rights from Menu join Rights on Menu.menu_id=Rights.menu_id;