Getting error while running stored procedure from DbContext in C# - c#

I am trying to run the SQL Server procedure from C#:
try
{
ExecWithStoredProcedure("storedprocName #Message, #ProviderCode", message, providecode);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
}
public int ExecWithStoredProcedure(string query, params object[] parameters)
{
return Context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(query, parameters);
}
But I am getting this error:
Message handler encountered an exception
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException (0x80131904): Cannot roll back ORU_Trans. No transaction or savepoint of that name was found.
Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements. Previous count = 1, current count = 2.
Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements. Previous count = 1, current count = 2.
Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements. Previous count = 1, current count = 2.
I have tried to run the procedure manually and its running without error in SSMS, but while trying in C# code I am getting this error.

Related

Execute One SQL Block Without Interruption

Say I have the following SQL statements that I'm executing using ExecuteNonQuery(DbCommand) from C# in a Web Application
DECLARE #InsertedProductID INT -- this is passed as a parameter
DECLARE #GroupID INT -- this is passed as a parameter
DECLARE #total INT
SET #total = (SELECT COUNT (*) FROM Products WHERE GroupID = #GroupID)
UPDATE Products SET ProdName = 'Prod_'+ CAST(#total as varchar(15))
WHERE ProductID = #InsertedProductID
My problem is that I want to ensure that the whole block executes at one. My goal is to always have the ProdName unique per group. If I leave everything the way it is, there is a good chance that I will get duplicate product names if an insert took place in between getting the #total and performing the UPDATE. Is there a way to make sure that the whole SQL block executes at once with no interruption. Will exec or sp_executesql achieve this? My last resort would be to put a lock around the ExecuteNonQuery(DbCommand) But I don't like that since it would create a bottleneck. I don't think that using a sql transaction is helpful here because I'm not worried about the integrity of the commands, I'm rather worried about the parallelism of the commands.
Generally any DML statement (UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE) places a lock (row level / table level) on the particular table but if you want to explicitly guarantee that your operation shouldn't interfere with other executing statement then you should consider placing that entire SQL block inside a transaction block saying
Begin transaction
begin try
DECLARE #InsertedProductID INT -- this is passed as a parameter
DECLARE #GroupID INT -- this is passed as a parameter
DECLARE #total INT
SET #total = (SELECT COUNT (*) FROM Products WHERE GroupID = #GroupID)
UPDATE Products SET ProdName = 'Prod_'+ CAST(#total as varchar(15)) WHERE ProductID = #InsertedProductID
commit; // commits the transaction
end try
begin catch
rollback; //Rolls back the transaction
end catch
end
You should also consider making the Transaction Isolation Level to READ COMMITTED to avoid dirty reads. Also, obviously you should wrap this entire logic in a stored procedure rather executing them as adhoc SQL
If you have control of the creation of your SqlConnection objects, consider relying on database locks using Transactions and an appropriate IsolationLevel. Using Snapshot, for example, will cause the second transaction committed to fail if a separate transaction touched the data before the commit occurred.
Something like:
var c = new SqlConnection(...);
var tran1 = c.BeginTransaction(IsolationLevel.Snapshot);
var tran2 = c.BeginTransaction(IsolationLevel.Snapshot);
DoStuff(c, tran1);//Touch some database data
tran1.Commit();
DoStuff(c, tran2);//Change the same data
tran2.Commit();//Error!
not so sure you could not just do this
UPDATE Products
SET ProdName = 'Prod_'+ CAST((SELECT COUNT (*)
FROM Products
WHERE GroupID = #GroupID) as varchar(15))
WHERE ProductID = #InsertedProductID
But to me that is an odd update
Using a transaction is the right way to go. Along with the other answers, you can also use TransactionScope. The TransactionScope implicitly enrolls the connection and SQL command(s) into a transaction. A rollback will happen automatically if there is an issue since the TransactionScope is in a using block.
Example:
try
{
using (var scope = new TransactionScope())
{
using (var conn = new SqlConnection("your connection string"))
{
conn.Open();
var cmd = new SqlCommand("your SQL here", conn);
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
scope.Complete();
}
}
catch (TransactionAbortedException ex)
{
}
catch (ApplicationException ex)
{
}

Logging not Persisting When Exception Occurs in Method Executed in a Trigger

I have been stuck all day on this issue and cannot seem to find anything online pointing me to what might be causing it.
I have the below logging method in a Logger class and the below code calling the logger. When no exception occurs all the log statements work perfectly, however when an exception occurs the log statements do not run at all (however they do run from the web service call).
Logger Log Method:
public static Guid WriteToSLXLog(string ascendId, string masterDataId, string masterDataType, int? status,
string request, string requestRecieved, Exception ex, bool isError)
{
var connection = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["AscendConnectionString"];
string connectionString = "context connection=true";
// define INSERT query with parameters
var query =
"INSERT INTO " + AscendTable.SmartLogixLogDataTableName +
" (LogID, LogDate, AscendId, MasterDataId, MasterDataType, Status, Details, Request, RequestRecieved, StackTrace, IsError) " +
"VALUES (#LogID, #LogDate, #AscendId, #MasterDataId, #MasterDataType, #Status, #Details, #Request, #RequestRecieved, #StackTrace, #IsError)";
var logId = Guid.NewGuid();
using (var cn = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
if (!cn.State.Equals(ConnectionState.Open))
{
cn.Open();
}
// create command
using (var cmd = new SqlCommand(query, cn))
{
try
{
// define parameters and their values
cmd.Parameters.Add("#LogID", SqlDbType.UniqueIdentifier).Value = logId;
cmd.Parameters.Add("#LogDate", SqlDbType.DateTime).Value = DateTime.Now;
if (ascendId != null)
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#AscendId", SqlDbType.VarChar, 24).Value = ascendId;
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#AscendId", SqlDbType.VarChar, 24).Value = DBNull.Value;
}
cmd.Parameters.Add("#MasterDataId", SqlDbType.VarChar, 50).Value = masterDataId;
cmd.Parameters.Add("#MasterDataType", SqlDbType.VarChar, 50).Value = masterDataType;
if (ex == null)
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Status", SqlDbType.VarChar, 50).Value = status.ToString();
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Status", SqlDbType.VarChar, 50).Value = "2";
}
if (ex != null)
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Details", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = ex.Message;
if (ex.StackTrace != null)
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#StackTrace", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value =
ex.StackTrace;
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#StackTrace", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = DBNull.Value;
}
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Details", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = "Success";
cmd.Parameters.Add("#StackTrace", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = DBNull.Value;
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(request))
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Request", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = request;
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Request", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = DBNull.Value;
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(requestRecieved))
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#RequestRecieved", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = requestRecieved;
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#RequestRecieved", SqlDbType.VarChar, -1).Value = DBNull.Value;
}
if (isError)
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#IsError", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = 1;
}
else
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#IsError", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = 0;
}
// open connection, execute INSERT, close connection
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// Do not want to throw an error if something goes wrong logging
}
}
}
return logId;
}
My Method where the logging issues occur:
public static void CallInsertTruckService(string id, string code, string vinNumber, string licPlateNo)
{
Logger.WriteToSLXLog(id, code, MasterDataType.TruckType, 4, "1", "", null, false);
try
{
var truckList = new TruckList();
var truck = new Truck();
truck.TruckId = code;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(vinNumber))
{
truck.VIN = vinNumber;
}
else
{
truck.VIN = "";
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(licPlateNo))
{
truck.Tag = licPlateNo;
}
else
{
truck.Tag = "";
}
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(code))
{
truck.BackOfficeTruckId = code;
}
truckList.Add(truck);
Logger.WriteToSLXLog(id, code, MasterDataType.TruckType, 4, "2", "", null, false);
if (truckList.Any())
{
// Call SLX web service
using (var client = new WebClient())
{
var uri = SmartLogixConstants.LocalSmartLogixIntUrl;
uri += "SmartLogixApi/PushTruck";
client.Headers.Clear();
client.Headers.Add("content-type", "application/json");
client.Headers.Add("FirestreamSecretToken", SmartLogixConstants.FirestreamSecretToken);
var serialisedData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(truckList, new JsonSerializerSettings
{
ReferenceLoopHandling = ReferenceLoopHandling.Serialize
});
// HTTP POST
var response = client.UploadString(uri, serialisedData);
var result = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<SmartLogixResponse>(response);
Logger.WriteToSLXLog(id, code, MasterDataType.TruckType, 4, "3", "", null, false);
if (result == null || result.ResponseStatus != 1)
{
// Something went wrong
throw new ApplicationException("Error in SLX");
}
Logger.WriteToSLXLog(id, code, MasterDataType.TruckType, result.ResponseStatus, serialisedData,
null, null, false);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Logger.WriteToSLXLog(id, code, MasterDataType.TruckType, 4, "4", "", null, false);
throw;
}
finally
{
Logger.WriteToSLXLog(id, code, MasterDataType.TruckType, 4, "5", "", null, false);
}
}
As you can see I have added several log statements throughout the method. All of these log statements except the one in the catch block are successful if no exception is thrown. If an exception is thrown then none of them are successful. For most of them the values are exactly the same whether or not there is an exception so I know its not an issue with the values being passed. I am thinking something weird is happening that causes a rollback or something, but I am not using a transaction or anything here. One last thing this DLL is being run through the SQL CLR which is why I am using "context connection=true" for my connection string.
Thanks in advance.
Edit:
I tried adding the following as my connection string but I get an exception when trying to .Open the connection now that says "Transaction context in use by another session". I am thinking this has to do with me calling this SQL CLR procedure through a trigger. The connection string I tried is
connectionString = "Trusted_Connection=true;Data Source=(local)\\AARONSQLSERVER;Initial Catalog=Demo409;Integrated Security=True;";
Also here is the trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[PushToSLXOnVehicleInsert]
ON [dbo].[Vehicle] AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE #returnValue int
DECLARE #newLastModifiedDate datetime = null
DECLARE #currentId bigint = null
DECLARE #counter int = 0;
DECLARE #maxCounter int
DECLARE #currentCode varchar(24) = null
DECLARE #currentVinNumber varchar(24)
DECLARE #currentLicPlateNo varchar(30)
declare #tmp table
(
id int not null
primary key(id)
)
insert #tmp
select VehicleID from INSERTED
SELECT #maxCounter = Count(*) FROM INSERTED GROUP BY VehicleID
BEGIN TRY
WHILE (#counter < #maxCounter)
BEGIN
select top 1 #currentId = id from #tmp
SELECT #currentCode = Code, #currentVinNumber = VINNumber, #currentLicPlateNo = LicPlateNo FROM INSERTED WHERE INSERTED.VehicleID = #currentId
if (#currentId is not null)
BEGIN
EXEC dbo.SLX_CallInsertTruckService
#id = #currentId,
#code = #currentCode,
#vinNumber = #currentVinNumber,
#licPlateNo = #currentLicPlateNo
END
delete from #tmp where id = #currentId
set #counter = #counter + 1;
END
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
DECLARE #ErrorMessage NVARCHAR(4000);
DECLARE #ErrorSeverity INT;
DECLARE #ErrorState INT;
SELECT
#ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE(),
#ErrorSeverity = ERROR_SEVERITY(),
#ErrorState = ERROR_STATE();
IF (#ErrorMessage like '%Error in SLX%')
BEGIN
SET #ErrorMessage = 'Error in SLX. Please contact SLX for more information.'
END
RAISERROR (#ErrorMessage, -- Message text.
#ErrorSeverity, -- Severity.
#ErrorState -- State.
);
END CATCH;
END
GO
The main issue here is that the SQLCLR Stored Procedure is being called from within a Trigger. A Trigger always runs within the context of a Transaction (to bind it to the DML operation that initiated the Trigger). A Trigger also implicitly sets XACT_ABORT to ON which cancels the Transaction if any error occurs. This is why none of the logging statements persist when an exception is thrown: the Transaction is auto-rolled-back, taking with it any changes made in the same Session, including the logging statements (because the Context Connection is the same Session), as well as the original DML statement.
You have three fairly simple options, though they leave you with an overall architectural problem, or a not-so-difficult-but-a-little-more-work option that solves the immediate issue as well as the larger architectural problem. First, the three simple options:
You can execute SET XACT_ABORT OFF; at the beginning of the Trigger. This will allow the TRY ... CATCH construct to work as you are expecting it to. HOWEVER, this also shifts the responsibility to you issue a ROLLBACK (usually in the CATCH block), unless you want the original DML statement to succeed no matter what, even if the Web Service calls and logging fail. Of course, if you issue a ROLLBACK, then none of the logging statements will persist, even if the Web Service still registers all of the calls that were successful, if any were.
You can leave SET XACT_ABORT alone and use a regular / external connection to SQL Server. A regular connection will be an entirely separate Connection and Session, hence it can operate independantly with regards to the Transaction. Unlike the SET XACT_ABORT OFF; option, this would allow the Trigger to operate "normally" (i.e. any error would roll-back any changes made natively in the Trigger as well as the original DML statement) while still allowing the logging INSERT statements to persist (since they were made outside of the local Transaction).
You are already calling a Web Service so the Assembly already has the necessary permissions to do this without making any additional changes. You just need to use a proper connection string (there are a few errors in your syntax), probably something along the lines of:
connectionString = #"Trusted_Connection=True; Server=(local)\AARONSQLSERVER; Database=Demo409; Enlist=False;";
The "Enlist=False;" part (scroll to the far right) is very important: without it you will continue to get the "Transaction context in use by another session" error.
If you want to stick with the Context Connection (it is a little faster) and allow for any errors outside of the Web Service to roll-back the original DML statement and all logging statements, while ignoring errors from the Web Service, or even from the logging INSERT statements, then you can simply not re-throw the exception in the catch block of CallInsertTruckService. You could instead set a variable to indicate a return code. Since this is a Stored Procedure, it can return SqlInt32 instead of void. Then you can get that value by declaring an INT variable and including it in the EXEC call as follows:
EXEC #ReturnCode = dbo.SLX_CallInsertTruckService ...;
Just declare a variable at the top of CallInsertTruckService and initialize it to 0. Then set it to some other value in the catch block. And at the end of the method, include a return _ReturnCode;.
That being said, no matter which of those choices you pick, you are still left with two fairly large problems:
The DML statement and its system-initiated Transaction are impeded by the Web Service calls. The Transaction will be left open for much longer than it should be, and this could at the very least increase blocking related to the Vehicle Table. While I am certainly an advocate of doing Web Service calls via SQLCLR, I would strongly recommend against doing so within a Trigger.
If each VehicleID that is inserted should be passed over to the Web Service, then if there is an error in one Web Service call, the remaining VehicleIDs will be skipped, and even if they aren't (option # 3 above would continue processing the rows in #tmp) then at the very least the one that just had the error won't ever be retried later.
Hence the ideal approach, which solves these two rather important issues as well the initial logging issue, is to move to a disconnected asynchronous model. You can set up a queue table to hold the Vehile info to process based on each INSERT. The Trigger would do a simple:
INSERT INTO dbo.PushToSLXQueue (VehicleID, Code, VINNumber, LicPlateNo)
SELECT VehicleID, Code, VINNumber, LicPlateNo
FROM INSERTED;
Then create a Stored Procedure that reads an item from the queue table, calls the Web Service, and if successful, then deletes that entry from the queue table. Schedule this Stored Procedure from a SQL Server Agent job to run every 10 minutes or something like that.
If there are records that will never process, then you can add a RetryCount column to the queue table, default it to 0, and upon the Web Service getting an error, increment RetryCount instead of removing the row. Then you can update the "get entry to process" SELECT query to include WHERE RetryCount < 5 or whatever limit you want to set.
There are a few issues here, with various levels of impact:
Why is id a BIGINT in the T-SQL code yet a string in the C# code?
Just FYI, the WHILE (#counter < #maxCounter) loop is inefficient and error prone compared to using an actual CURSOR. I would get rid of the #tmp Table Variable and #maxCounter.
At the very least change SELECT #maxCounter = Count(*) FROM INSERTED GROUP BY VehicleID to be just SET #maxCounter = ##ROWCOUNT; ;-). But swapping out for a real CURSOR would be best.
If the CallInsertTruckService(string id, string code, string vinNumber, string licPlateNo) signature is the actual method decorated with [SqlProcedure()], then you really should be using SqlString instead of string. Get the native string value from each parameter using the .Value property of the SqlString parameter. You can then set the proper size using the [SqlFacet()] attribute as follows:
[SqlFacet(MaxSize=24)] SqlString vinNumber
For more info on working with SQLCLR in general, please see the series that I am writing on this topic over at SQL Server Central: Stairway to SQLCLR (free registration is required to read content on that site).

GET DIAGNOSTICS Mysql how to catch the variable

I'm writing one update statement in my procedure but there are chances that CommandTimeout(30 sec for testing my code) may expire. So I was looking for a solution.
Then I came to know that in mysql Diagnostic is available. So i tried that. It is working fine in my workbench. It is returning the variable with message that after which count it is failing.
To execute the procedure failure I putted a condition that if it is true then say signal error
I'm executing this line of code in c#
object Result = _DBCommand.ExecuteScalar();
And after this when timeout is happening mysql error in coming.
I'm wondering how can i catch the variable that I'm throwing from Procedure.
DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS udsp_Test;
DELIMITER //
CREATE PROCEDURE udsp_Test(
-- paramters...
)
BEGIN
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 00 Declaration
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECLARE error_InvalidInputs CONDITION FOR SQLSTATE 'HY000';
DECLARE EXIT HANDLER FOR SQLEXCEPTION
BEGIN
ROLLBACK;
GET DIAGNOSTICS CONDITION 1 #var_SqlState = RETURNED_SQLSTATE, #var_MessageText = MESSAGE_TEXT, #var_MySqlErrorNo = MYSQL_ERRNO, #var_SchemaName = SCHEMA_NAME, #var_TableName = TABLE_NAME;
SET #var_FullError = CONCAT("ERROR: ", #var_MySqlErrorNo, " (", #var_SqlState, "): ", #var_MessageText, "Scheman Name: ", #var_SchemaName, "Table Name: ",#var_TableName);
SET #var_ErrorMessage = CONCAT(#var_ErrorMessage,';;;;;', #var_FullError);
SELECT #var_ErrorMessage;
RESIGNAL ;
END;
SET #var_ErrorMessage = '';
SET #var_ErrorMessage = CONCAT(#var_ErrorMessage,'Error message: = Now; ');
-- update statement here
SET #var_ErrorMessage = CONCAT(#var_ErrorMessage,'Error message: = Now; ');
SELECT 1 as UpdatedSuccessfully;
END//
DELIMITER ;

How to check for errors in C# using ExecuteStoreQuery executing a stored procedure?

I have a stored procedure that I am calling using the ObjectContext ExecuteStoreQuery method so that I can get the result set that the stored procedure returns.
I have it inside of a try/catch block, however even though the stored procedure returns the following error it doesn't fall into the catch block.
How do I trap for this type of error?
Or is there another way of executing a stored procedure and getting a result set back?
Error when executed in SQL:
Msg 50000, Level 16, State 2, Procedure ComputeCharges, Line 6440
The following error occurred while computing charges:
Error Number: 515, Line Number: 5867
Error Message: Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'TransactionAmount', table 'Transactions'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
Calling code:
using (DbContext dbContext = GetDbContext())
{
using (ObjectContext objContext = ((System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.IObjectContextAdapter)dbContext).ObjectContext)
{
try
{
IEnumerable<ResultSet> results = objContext.ExecuteStoreQuery<ResultSet>(sqlString).ToList();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
EventLogger.LogException(e, title: "An error occurred while computing charges.", silent: false);
}
}
}
An exception will be thrown in C# correctly in this case as long as the result set has yet to be selected/returned. The stored procedure was selecting the result set in the middle of the process and not at the end of the try block. Once the select statement for the result set was moved to the end of the try block it threw the exception in C#.

Firebird: Alter table and create stored procedure from out C#

I'm trying to create a stored procedure from out C# into Firebird 2.1.
The code is:
String sql = #"EXECUTE BLOCK AS BEGIN " +
"ALTER TABLE EXAMPLE ALTER FIELD1 TYPE Char(50); " +
"SET TERM ^ ; CREATE PROCEDURE name ( input_parameter_name < datatype>, ... )" +
"RETURNS ( output_parameter_name < datatype>, ... ) AS DECLARE VARIABLE variable_name < datatype>;" +
"BEGIN /* write your code here */ END^ SET TERM ; ^" +
" END";
public int Execute(string sql)
{
int result = 0;
if (this.OpenConnection() == true)
{
FbTransaction transaction = Fbconnection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
FbCommand command = new FbCommand(sql, Fbconnection, transaction);
int rc = command.ExecuteNonQuery();
result = rc;
transaction.Commit();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
globals.logfile.log(e.ToString());
globals.logfile.flush();
result = 0;
}
finally
{
this.CloseConnection();
}
}
return result;
}
The error message given is:
FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.FbException (0x80004005):
Dynamic SQL Error SQL error code = -104 Token unknown - line 1, column 24 ALTER
Must be something small, but I can't get it.
DDL is not allowed in PSQL (stored procedures, triggers, execute block), so executing an ALTER TABLE like this is rejected.
Also SET TERM is not part of the Firebird statement syntax. It is specific to query tools like isql and FlameRobin, as they use statement terminators like ; to know when they end of a statement is reached and can be sent to the server. When executing PSQL blocks those tools need to watch for a different statement terminator to prevent them from sending incomplete statements to the server. In the actual Firebird statement syntax ; is only part of PSQL blocks.
You will need to execute the ALTER TABLE and the CREATE PROCEDURE separately without an EXECUTE BLOCK.

Categories

Resources