Say there is a pair model that has a FirstId and a SecondId Guid property. I want to create a list of ids. Right now I am doing it like this:
var ids = new List<Guid> { };
payload.Pairs
.ToList()
.ForEach(x =>
{
ids.Add(x.FirstId);
ids.Add(x.SecondId);
});
Is there some magic method within linq that can do that instead of ForEach?
Use SelectMany:
ids = payload.Pairs.SelectMany(p => new[]{ p.FirstId, p.SecondId }).ToList();
Your approach could be translated to Linq's Aggregate function
var ids = payload.Pairs.Aggregate(
seed: new List<Guid>(),
func: (agg, item) => {
agg.AddRange(new[] { item.FirstId, item.SecondId });
return agg;
},
resultSelector: agg => agg);
If your payload.Pairs is already materialized and it is not an IEnumerable then you can do some memory optimisation like this
var ids = payload.Pairs.Aggregate(
seed: new List<Guid>(payload.Pairs.Count * 2),
func: (agg, item) => {
agg.Add(item.FirstId);
agg.Add(item.SecondId);
return agg;
},
resultSelector: agg => agg);
Here is a working example on dotnet fiddle.
Yet another type of solution could be to use two stream of guids
var firstIds = payload.Pairs.Select(item => item.FirstId);
var secondIds = payload.Pairs.Select(item => item.SecondId);
and then depending on the fact the ordering matters or not you can use Zip or Concat respectively.
firstIds.Concat(secondIds);
//OR
firstIds.Zip(secondIds, (f, s) => new[] { f, s }).SelectMany(x => x);
Related dotnet fiddle
Alongside SelectMany, if you're looking to add them to an existing list, the AddRange function is the best to use:
ids.AddRange(payload.Pairs.SelectMany(p => new[] { p.FirstId, p.SecondId }));
Related
Below i have a snippet of code which outputs a list of Appointments based on clients, some clients can have more than one appointment but the latest one is the one that needs to be outputted for said client
the output is not grouping at all and for some reason i cannot figure why the heck not
foreach (ClientRecord client in clients)
{
List<ReturnRecord> records = db.Appointments
.AsNoTracking()
.Include(rec => rec.Property)
.Include(rec => rec.Property.Address)
.Include(rec => rec.AppointmentType)
.ToList()
.Where(rec => rec.ClientID == client.ID)
.Select(rec => new ReturnRecord
{
ClientName = $"{client.FirstNames} {client.Surnames}",
PropertyAddress = $"{rec.Property.Address.FormattedAddress}",
AppStatus = $"{rec.AppointmentStatus.Name}",
StockStatus = $"{rec.Property.Stocks.FirstOrDefault().StockStatus.Name}",
LastUpdated = rec.LastUpdated
})
.ToList();
returnList.AddRange(records);
}
returnList.GroupBy(rec => rec.PropertyAddress);
return Ok(returnList);
here is an attachment of the screen grab of the output
You need to assign result of GroupBy() to variable:
returnList = returnList.GroupBy(rec => rec.PropertyAddress).ToList();
Make sure to actually use the new IEnumerable that the .GroupBy() Method returned.
If you want to return a List you need to use a workaround:
Get the IEnumerable<IGrouping<int, ReturnRecord>> from the .GroupBy()
Use .SelectMany() to select all elements and save them into an IEnumerable
Now you can convert your IEnumerable into a List with .List()
Example:
// Longer Alternative
IEnumerable<IGrouping<int, ReturnRecord>> groups = resultList
.GroupBy((rec => rec.PropertyAddress);
IEnumerable<ReturnRecord> result = groups.SelectMany(group => group);
List<ReturnRecord> listResult = result.ToList();
return Ok(listResult);
// Shorter Alternative
IEnumerable<IGrouping<int, ReturnRecord>> groups = resultList
.GroupBy((rec => rec.PropertyAddress);
IEnumerable<ReturnRecord> result = groups.SelectMany(group => group);
return Ok(result.ToList());
I'm new to c# so go easy on me. Anyways, I made a list of numbers
List<int> numbers = new List<int>();
and I want to make a list of each number and its count/frequency.
var grouped = numbers
.GroupBy(i => i)
.Select(i => new { Number = i.Key, Count = i.Count() });
In locals, I can see the group, which has an IEnumerator interface with all of the numbers and their count values image of what I'm talking about. So is there a way to make a list with the numbers and their frequency/count?
Thank you.
IEnumerable<T> is a sequence so it doesn't own a count. But Enumerable.Count is an extension method of IEnumerable<T>
That is, you don't necessarily need to convert an IEnumerable<T> into a List<T>:
var grouped = numbers
.GroupBy(i => i)
.Select(i => new { Number = i.Key, Count = i.Count() });
var groupedCount = grouped.Count();
// You may iterate grouped
foreach(var value in grouped)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{value.Number} {value.Count}");
}
If you really need List<T> semantics, you just need to call Enumerable.ToList:
var grouped = numbers
.GroupBy(i => i)
.Select(i => new { Number = i.Key, Count = i.Count() })
.ToList();
In the other hand, you may directly convert everything into a string as follows:
var groupText = string.Join("\n", numbers
.GroupBy(i => i)
.Select(i => $"Number: {i.Key} Count: {i.Count()}"))
To get a list, you just need to call ToList(), for example:
var grouped = numbers
.GroupBy(i => i)
.Select(i => new { Number = i.Key, Count = i.Count() })
.ToList();
However, you really don't need to do that, you can simply loop over the enumerable as it stands:
foreach(var item in grouped)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{item.Number} occurs {item.Count} times");
}
Sounds like you want ToDictionary with the number as key and the frequency as value:
var grouped = numbers
.GroupBy(i => i)
.Select(i => new { Number = i.Key, Count = i.Count() })
.ToDictionary(x => x.Number, x => x.Count);
Now you can easily print every number and its frequency by looping the dictionary.
In fact you donĀ“t even need neither ToDictionary nor your Select, as the IGrouping returned from GroupBy also derives from IEnumerable which is why you can iterate over it.
foreach(var g in grouped = numbers.GroupBy(i => i))
{
var number = g.Key;
var freq = g.Count();
}
List<MyObject> objects = await item.tables.ToAsyncEnumerable()
.Where(p => p.field1 == value)
.Select(p => new MyObject(p.field1,p.field2))
.ToList();
^ I have something like that, but what i'm wondering, is there anyway way to add a second object creation, in the same select? eg. new MyObject(p.field3,p.field4) ? and add it to the same list? order does not matter.
I know could do this with multiple calls to database or splitting up lists into sections, but is there way to do this in single line?
You could create it as a tuple.
List<Tuple<MyObject1, MyObject2>> = query.Select(x => Tuple.Create(
new MyObject1
{
// fields
},
new MyObject2
{
//fields
}))
.ToList();
From my testing in Linqpad, it seems that this will only hit the database once.
Alternatively, you could just select all the fields you know you'll need from the database to create both:
var myList = query.Select(x => new { FieldA = x.FieldA, FieldB = x.FieldB }).ToList(); //hits db once
var object1s = myList.Select(x => new MyObject1(x.FieldA));
var object2s = myList.Select(x => new MyObject1(x.FieldB));
var bothLists = object1s.Concat(object2s).ToList();
What you'd want to do is use the SelectMany method in linq. Which will select all the items from an array. The array can be created anonymously as seen below.
List<MyObject> objects = await item.tables.ToAsyncEnumerable()
.Where(p => p.field1 == value)
.SelectMany(p => new []{new MyObject(p.field1,p.field2), new MyObject(p.field3,p.field4)})
.ToList();
Hope that solves you problem!
If you use query syntax instead of method chaining, you can use the let operator to accomplish this. Note that the SQL generated may not be exactly performant as this article shows, but it should work for you if you're after a subquery.
You could try creating an array of objects and then flattening with SelectMany:
List<MyObject> objects = await item.tables.ToAsyncEnumerable()
.Where(p => p.field1 == value)
.Select(p => new [] {
new MyObject(p.field1,p.field2),
new MyObject(p.field3,p.field4)
})
.SelectMany(g => g)
.ToList();
But I suspect you'll have problems getting EF to translate that to a query.
If I have a set of entities with 3 properties (Id, Type, Size) all of which are strings.
Is there a way using Linq to Entities where I can do a group query which gives me the Size + Type as the key and then a list of the related Id's for that Size + Type?
Example below of getting the count:
Items.GroupBy(x => new { x.Size, x.Type})
.Select(x => new { Key = x.Key, Count = x.Count() })
but I am looking to get a list of the Ids for each grouping?
I am looking to see if it is possible using Linq-to-EF before I decide to iterate through this in code and build up the result instead.
If you want to get List of Ids for each group then you have to select x.Select(r => r.Id) like:
var result = Items.GroupBy(x => new { x.Size, x.Type })
.Select(x => new
{
Key = x.Key,
Ids = x.Select(r => r.Id)
});
Another way to build up a Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<string?>> in dotnet 6.0 according to the docs;
where we have the dictionary Key as {Size, Type} and Value the list of Ids, you can write:
Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<string?>> result = Items.GroupBy(item => new { item.Size, item.Type }
item => item.Id),
(itemKey, itemIds) =>
{
Key = itemKey,
Ids = itemIds
})
.ToDictionary(x => x.Key, x=> x.Ids);
I am trying to determine if there is a better way to execute the following query:
I have a List of Pair objects.
A Pair is defined as
public class Pair
{
public int IDA;
public int IDB;
public double Stability;
}
I would like to extract a list of all distinct ID's (ints) contained in the List<Pair>.
I am currently using
var pIndices = pairs.SelectMany(p => new List<int>() { p.IDA, p.IDB }).Distinct().ToList();
Which works, but it seems unintuitive to me to create a new List<int> only to have it flattened out by SelectMany.
This is another option I find unelegant to say the least:
var pIndices = pairs.Select(p => p.IDA).ToList();
pIndices.AddRange(pairs.Select((p => p.IDB).ToList());
pIndices = pIndices.Distinct().ToList();
Is there a better way? And if not, which would you prefer?
You could use Union() to get both the A's and B's after selecting them individually.
var pIndices = pairs.Select(p => p.IDA).Union(pairs.Select(p => p.IDB));
You could possibly shorten the inner expression to p => new [] { p.IDA, p.IDB }.
If you don't want to create a 2-element array/list for each Pair, and don't want to iterate your pairs list twice, you could just do it by hand:
HashSet<int> distinctIDs = new HashSet<int>();
foreach (var pair in pairs)
{
distinctIDs.Add(pair.IDA);
distinctIDs.Add(pair.IDB);
}
This is one without a new collection:
var pIndices = pairs.Select(p => p.IDA)
.Concat(pairs.Select(p => p.IDB))
.Distinct();
Shorten it like this:
var pIndices = pairs.SelectMany(p => new[] { p.IDA, p.IDB }).Distinct().ToList();
Using Enumerable.Repeat is a little unorthodox, but here it is anyway:
var pIndices = pairs
.SelectMany(
p => Enumerable.Repeat(p.IDA, 1).Concat(Enumerable.Repeat(p.IDB, 1))
).Distinct()
.ToList();
Finally, if you do not mind a little helper class, you can do this:
public static class EnumerableHelper {
// usage: EnumerableHelper.AsEnumerable(obj1, obj2);
public static IEnumerable<T> AsEnumerable<T>(params T[] items) {
return items;
}
}
Now you can do this:
var pIndices = pairs
.SelectMany(p => EnumerableHelper.AsEnumerable(p.IDA, p.IDB))
.Distinct()
.ToList();