I was wondering if there was a way to combine these two. There are two multiple db sets. I've already tried putting with the same variable. Any ideas?
public JsonResult GetProductByPDLN(int pdlnId, int copcCode)
{
_context.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;
var prod = _context.ProductLines
.Where(pl => pl.Id == pdlnId)
.Select(p => p.Products)
.ToList();
var copc = _context.ProfitCenters
.Where(c => c.Id == copcCode)
.Select(p => p.ProductLines)
.ToList();
return Json(prod && copc, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
Either create a new class or an anonymous. Something along these lines:
public JsonResult GetProductByPDLN(int pdlnId, int copcCode)
{
_context.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false;
var prod = _context.ProductLines
.Where(pl => pl.Id == pdlnId)
.Select(p => p.Products)
.ToList();
var copc = _context.ProfitCenters
.Where(c => c.Id == copcCode)
.Select(p => p.ProductLines)
.ToList();
return Json(new {ProductLines = prod, ProfitCenters = copc}, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
Related
I have a following query
return _context.Table1
.Where(x => x.ContactId == contactKey.Id)
.Include(x => x.Table2)
.Include(x => x.Table3.Table4)
.Select(a =>
new MyReadModel
{
PriorityAssignment = true,
LastContactedDate = (a.Table3.Table4 != null && a.Table3.Table4.FirstOrDefault(h =>
h.Id == a.Table2.FkId
) != null ?
a.Table3.Table4.FirstOrDefault(h => && h.Id == a.Table2.FkId
).LastContactedDatetime : default
)
}
)
.ToListAsync();
What i wants is to simplify LastContactedDate assignment with in select. I think we can assign
a.Table3.Table4.FirstOrDefault(h =>
h.Id == a.Table2.FkId
)
to some variable but can't able to do it
can someone identify what is needed
With EF Core you don't have to check for null, LINQ Translator do not execute your code, but uses it for translation to the SQL. Also Includes is not needed if you do not retrieve whole objects.
return await _context.Table1
.Where(x => x.ContactId == contactKey.Id)
.Select(a => new MyReadModel
{
PriorityAssignment = true,
LastContactedDate = (DateTime?)a.Table3.Table4.Where(h => h.Id == a.Table2.FkId)
.OrderByDescending(h => LastContactedDatetime)
.Select(h => LastContactedDatetime)
.FirstOrDefault()
}).ToListAsync();
you can use it like this example
List<string> someList= new List<string>();
someList= someList.Select(x =>
{
var newVariable= "newVariable";
return newVariable;
}).ToList();
in your case
return _context.Table1
.Where(x => x.ContactId == contactKey.Id)
.Include(x => x.Table2)
.Include(x => x.Table3.Table4)
.Select(a => {
Table4 newVariable = null;
if(a.Table3.Table4 != null)
newVariable = a.Table3.Table4.FirstOrDefault(h => h.Id == a.Table2.FkId;
var result = new MyReadModel
{
PriorityAssignment = true,
LastContactedDate = (newVariable != null ? newVariable.LastContactedDatetime : default
)
};
}
) .ToListAsync();
In my data service I want to return just max dateTime and only query the database for that data I need. This will help cutting down the data that the server is returning. But I am not sure about when I use the Get() and the model if that is returning the full data base on the model?
Model
[global::System.Data.Linq.Mapping.TableAttribute(Name="dbo.Templates")]
DataService
public DateTime? GetTemplateMaxModifiedDat()
{
var result = UnitOfWork.GetRepository<Template>().Get()
.Where(t=>t.IsCurrentVersion && t.Status == (short)TemplateMode.Published)
.OrderBy(t => t.TemplateIdMain)
.ThenBy(t => t.TemplateIdNumeric)
.ThenBy(t => t.TemplateIdAlt)
.ToList()
.Select(t => new
{
Modified = t.Modified
})
.Distinct().ToList();
var q = result.OrderByDescending(T => T.Modified).FirstOrDefault();
return q.Modified;
}
updated method
public DateTime? GetTemplateMaxModifiedDate()
{
var result = UnitOfWork.GetRepository<Template>()
.Get(x => x.IsCurrentVersion && x.Status == (short)TemplateMode.Published)
.Max(x => x.Modified);
return result;
}
I have a list of FlightTicketRequestDocument used for both Patients and their Escorts requesting a plane ticket. Theses are grouped with a GUID named GroupId.
I'm trying to group them inside this object:
public class FlightTicketRequestDocumentGroup
{
public Guid GroupId { get; set; }
public FlightTicketRequestDocument PrincipalDocument { get; set; }
public List<FlightTicketRequestDocument> GroupDocuments { get; set; }
}
PrincipalDocument holds the Patient if there's one. (If there isn't we just want the first Escort)
GroupDocuments holds the Escorts. (Except the first one that is placed in PrincipalDocument)
I'm attempting to use different expressions to set my values inside a Select New statement depending if there's a Patient or not but I'm getting the error:
The nested query is not supported. Operation1='Case' Operation2='VarRef'
Here's the code (Note: StayEscortId is null when the person is a Patient.):
var indexGroups = await _db.FlightTicketRequests
.OrderBy(f => f.FirstName)
.ProjectTo<FlightTicketRequestDocument>()
.GroupBy(f => f.GroupId)
.Select(g => new FlightTicketRequestDocumentGroup
{
GroupId = g.Key,
PrincipalDocument = g.Any(f => f.StayEscortId == null)
? g.FirstOrDefault(f => f.StayEscortId == null)
: g.FirstOrDefault(),
GroupDocuments = g.Any(f => f.StayEscortId == null)
? g.Where(c => c.StayEscortId != null).ToList()
: g.Where(c => c.StayEscortId != null).OrderBy(f => f.FullName).Skip(1).ToList()
})
.ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
What can I use instead of the conditional operator ?: ?
The solution that I ended up using:
As specified by #mjwills, since I simply want the values where StayEscordId is null first, all I need to do is to sort as a boolean (false values end up at the top).
For the rest of the group, I do the same operation while Skipping 1 (the first one I chose).
Modified code:
var indexGroups = await _db.FlightTicketRequests
.OrderBy(f => f.FirstName)
.ProjectTo<FlightTicketRequestDocument>()
.GroupBy(f => f.GroupId)
.Select(g => new FlightTicketRequestDocumentGroup
{
GroupId = g.Key,
PrincipalDocument = g.OrderBy(f => f.StayEscortId != null).ThenBy(f => f.FullName).FirstOrDefault(),
GroupDocuments = g.OrderBy(f => f.StayEscortId != null).ThenBy(f => f.FullName).Skip(1).ToList()
})
.ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
Here's what the query would look like if you were to use if/else instead of the ternary conditions. You would just use a code block inside of the .Select() to return the results:
var flightTicketRequestDocuments = await _db.FlightTicketRequests
.OrderBy(f => f.FirstName)
.ProjectTo<FlightTicketRequestDocument>()
.GroupBy(f => f.GroupId)
.ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
var indexGroups = flightTicketRequestDocuments
.Select(g =>
{
FlightTicketRequestDocument principalDocument;
List<FlightTicketRequestDocument> groupDocuments;
if (g.Any(f => f.StayEscortId == null))
{
principalDocument = g.FirstOrDefault(f => f.StayEscortId == null);
groupDocuments = g.Where(c => c.StayEscortId != null).ToList();
}
else
{
principalDocument = g.FirstOrDefault();
groupDocuments = g.Where(c => c.StayEscortId != null).OrderBy(f => f.FullName).Skip(1).ToList();
}
return new FlightTicketRequestDocumentGroup
{
GroupId = g.Key,
PrincipalDocument = principalDocument,
GroupDocuments = groupDocuments
};
})
.ToList();
Note that this approach requires enumerating the IQueryable before performing the .Select() so that it's applied against an IEnumerable.
Needs a check or two (or a tweak or two) but if i remember correctly expression trees accept null coalescence operator you may try to swap in the place of the ternary.
Starting (and BASING) from your example, maybe something like the following?
var indexGroups = await _db.FlightTicketRequests
.OrderBy(f => f.FirstName)
.ProjectTo<FlightTicketRequestDocument>()
.GroupBy(f => f.GroupId)
.Select(g => new FlightTicketRequestDocumentGroup
{
GroupId = g.Key,
PrincipalDocument = g.FirstOrDefault(f => f.StayEscortId == null) ?? g.OrderBy(f => f.FullName).FirstOrDefault(),
GroupDocuments = g.Where(c => c.StayEscortId != null).OrderBy(f => f.FullName).Skip(Math.Max(x.Count(y => y.StayEscortId == null), 1)).ToList()
})
.ToListAsync(cancellationToken);
Here's a Linq-to-SQL query that uses only one table from my SQL Server database and works perfectly:
private void GetData()
{
DateTime d = DateTime.Now;
using (DataClasses1DataContext dc = new DataClasses1DataContext())
{
var qte = dc.ENTREES_STOCKS.AsEnumerable()
.Where(x => x.ENTSTK_LOT == lot)
.Where(x => x.ART_CODE == artCode)
.Where(x => x.ENTSTK_USER == null)
.Select(s => new
{
art = s.ART_CODE,
date = s.ENTSTK_DTENTREE,
numLot = s.ENTSTK_LOT,
pnet = s.ENTSTK_PNET,
nbu = s.ENTSTK_NBU
})
.GroupBy(g => new { g.art, g.date, g.numLot })
.Select(n => new
{
n.Key.art,
n.Key.date,
n.Key.numLot,
pnet = n.Sum(x => Math.Round(Convert.ToDecimal(x.pnet), 2)),
nbu = n.Sum(x => Math.Round(Convert.ToDecimal(x.nbu), 2)),
});
QEntreeTB.Text = qte.First().pnet.ToString();
NbuEntreeTB.Text = qte.First().nbu.ToString();
}
}
How could I modify this code to join other tables to this query like :
private void GetData()
{
DateTime d = DateTime.Now;
using (DataClasses1DataContext dc = new DataClasses1DataContext())
{
var qte = dc.ENTREES_STOCKS.AsEnumerable()
// Thoseline of codes of course doesn't work
join art in dc.FICHES_ARTICLES on ENTREES_STOCKS.ART_CODE equals art.ART_CODE
join ent in dc.STK_ENT on art.ART_CODE equals ent.ART_CODE
....
//
.Where(x => x.ENTSTK_LOT == lot)
.Where(x => x.ART_CODE == artCode)
.Where(x => x.ENTSTK_USER == null)
.Select(s =>
new
{
art = s.ART_CODE,
date = s.ENTSTK_DTENTREE,
numLot = s.ENTSTK_LOT,
pnet = s.ENTSTK_PNET,
nbu = s.ENTSTK_NBU
}
)
.GroupBy(g => new { g.art, g.date, g.numLot })
.Select(n =>
new
{
n.Key.art,
n.Key.date,
n.Key.numLot,
pnet = n.Sum(x => Math.Round(Convert.ToDecimal(x.pnet), 2)),
nbu = n.Sum(x => Math.Round(Convert.ToDecimal(x.nbu), 2)),
}
);
QEntreeTB.Text = qte.First().pnet.ToString();
NbuEntreeTB.Text = qte.First().nbu.ToString();
}
}
Or is there à way to code this query another way ??
Because in fact i just want to join multiples tables, groupby some fields and sum others fields.
Firstly, calling AsEnumerable is a bit redundent. Then you can simply use the Join extension method.
var qte = dc.ENTREES_STOCKS
.JOIN(dc.FICHES_ARTICLES,art=>art.ART_CODE, stock => stock.ART_CODE)
.JOIN(dc.STK_ENT,ent => ent.ART_CODE,stock => stock.ART_CODE)
.Where(x => x.ENTSTK_LOT == lot)
.Where(x => x.ART_CODE == artCode)
.Where(x => x.ENTSTK_USER == null)
....
You can find more answers here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/data/adonet/ef/language-reference/method-based-query-syntax-examples-join-operators
I have a LINQ query which has three Where clauses. In each Where clause I am looking up the same set of items in order to compare values:
var items = _umbracoHelper.GetPage(ItemsPage.ModelTypeAlias).Children
.Where(x => level1Category == 0 || x
.GetPropertyValue<IEnumerable<IPublishedContent>>(UmbracoAlias.Item.Categories)
.Select(y => y.Id).Contains(level1Category))
.Where(x => !level2Categories.Any() || x
.GetPropertyValue<IEnumerable<IPublishedContent>>(UmbracoAlias.Item.Categories)
.Select(y => y.Id).Intersect(level2Categories.AsEnumerable()).Any())
.Where(x => !level3Categories.Any() || x
.GetPropertyValue<IEnumerable<IPublishedContent>>(UmbracoAlias.Item.Categories)
.Select(y => y.Id).Intersect(level3Categories.AsEnumerable()).Any());
Is there a way I can get the value of UmbracoAlias.Items.Categories once and store that value to be used in the other where clauses without causing the GetPropertyValue method to execute more than once?
You can pair up each item with category IDs, like this:
var items = _umbracoHelper.GetPage(ItemsPage.ModelTypeAlias).Children
.Select(c => new {
Child = c
, CategoryIds = c
.GetPropertyValue<IEnumerable<IPublishedContent>>(UmbracoAlias.Item.Categories)
.Select(y => y.Id)
.ToList()
})
.Where(x => level1Category == 0 || x.CategoryIds.Contains(level1Category))
.Where(x => !level2Categories.Any() || x.CategoryIds.Intersect(level2Categories.AsEnumerable()).Any())
.Where(x => !level3Categories.Any() || x.CategoryIds.Intersect(level3Categories.AsEnumerable()).Any())
.Select(x => x.Child);
This does the filtering on children paired up with their category IDs, and then keeps only the Child object in the final projection.
You could further simplify this by combining all three Where clauses:
var items = _umbracoHelper.GetPage(ItemsPage.ModelTypeAlias).Children
.Where(c => {
var categoryIds = c
.GetPropertyValue<IEnumerable<IPublishedContent>>(UmbracoAlias.Item.Categories)
.Select(y => y.Id)
.ToList();
if (level1Category != 0 && !categoryIds.Contains(level1Category)) {
return false;
}
if (level2Categories.Any() && !categoryIds.Intersect(level2Categories.AsEnumerable()).Any()) {
return false;
}
if (level3Categories.Any() && !categoryIds.Intersect(level3Categories.AsEnumerable()).Any()) {
return false;
}
return true;
});