I have the following code inside my asp.net console application, to call a method named gettingCustomerInfo in parallel of 20 requests, as follow:
class Program
{
static SemaphoreSlim throttler = new SemaphoreSlim(initialCount: 20);
private static async Task<ScanInfo> gettingCustomerInfo(string website,
string phone, long companyId)
{
await throttler.WaitAsync();
ScanInfo si = new ScanInfo() { companyId = companyId };
try
{
//code goes here...
}
finally
{
throttler.Release();
}
}
static async Task Main(string[] args)
{
bool hasmore = true;
string offset = string.Empty;
bool first = true;
try
{
while (hasmore || first)
{
Marketing ipfd = new Marketing();
first = false;
try
{
// call the PM API to get the account id
using (WebClient wc = new WebClient())
{
wc.Encoding = Encoding.UTF8;
string url = "https://api.hubapi.com/companies/v2/companies/" +
"paged?hapikey=******properties=website" +
"&properties=mse_scan&properties=phone" +
"&limit=" + 100 + "&offset=" + offset;
string tempurl = url.Trim();
var json = wc.DownloadString(tempurl);
ipfd = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Marketing>(json);
int rrr = ipfd.companies.Count();
offset = ipfd.offset;
hasmore = ipfd.hasmore;
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
}
var tasks = ipfd.companies
.Select(c => Task.Run(() => gettingCustomerInfo
(
c.properties.website.value,
(
c.properties.phone != null &&
!String.IsNullOrEmpty(c.properties.phone.value) ?
c.properties.phone.value : null
),
c.companyId
)
));
var results = await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
}
}
}
}
Now I got lost of how the logic and the flow of my code will run? Now inside the API call I am getting 100 items, then inside the gettingCustomerInfo I have defined a SemaphoreSlim = 20. but I am not sure how the flow of my code will be? Can anyone advice?
Edit-1
now i added the following inside my gettingCustomerInfo method:-
private static async Task<ScanInfo> gettingCustomerInfo(string website,string phone, long compnayId)
{
Console.WriteLine("a");
await throttler.WaitAsync();
ScanInfo si = new ScanInfo() { companyId = compnayId };
Console.WriteLine("b");
and i got this pattern:-
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
b
b
a
b
a
b
b
b
a
b
a
b
b
a
b
b
b
a
b
a
b
a
b
a
b
a
b
now inside the api call i am getting 100 items, then inside the gettingCustomerInfo i have defined a SemaphoreSlim = 20. but i am not sure how the flow of my code will be?
So companies has 100 items, and those items are each Selected into tasks.
When this code calls Task.WhenAll, all 100 tasks are created, and gettingCustomerInfo is invoked 100 times.
The first 20 calls to await throttler.WaitAsync will complete immediately and continue executing, running //code goes here. As each one completes, it will call Release, which completes one of the 80 calls waiting at await throttler.WaitAsync.
Eventually, all 100 calls will finish running //code goes here (no more than 20 at a time), and then the await Task.WhenAll completes.
Related
My telegram bot is necessary so that the user can answer questions in order and save these answers in the same order for a specific user in parallel.
static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<int, string[]> Answers = new ConcurrentDictionary<int, string[]>();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
Task t1 = CreateHostBuilder(args).Build().RunAsync();
Task t2 = BotOnMessage();
await Task.WhenAll(t1, t2);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine("Error" + ex);
}
}
here is my BotOnMessage() method to receive and process messages from users
async static Task BotOnMessage()
{
int offset = 0;
int timeout = 0;
try
{
await bot.SetWebhookAsync("");
while (true)
{
var updates = await bot.GetUpdatesAsync(offset, timeout);
foreach (var update in updates)
{
var message = update.Message;
if (message.Text == "/start")
{
Registration(message.Chat.Id.ToString(), message.Chat.FirstName.ToString(), createdDateNoTime.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
var replyKeyboard = new ReplyKeyboardMarkup
{
Keyboard = new[]
{
new[]
{
new KeyboardButton("eng"),
new KeyboardButton("ger")
},
}
};
replyKeyboard.OneTimeKeyboard = true;
await bot.SendTextMessageAsync(message.Chat.Id, "choose language", replyMarkup: replyKeyboard);
}
switch (message.Text)
{
case "eng":
var replyKeyboardEN = new ReplyKeyboardMarkup
{
Keyboard = new[]
{
new[]
{
new KeyboardButton("choice1"),
new KeyboardButton("choice2")
},
}
};
replyKeyboardEN.OneTimeKeyboard = true;
await bot.SendTextMessageAsync(message.Chat.Id, "Enter choice", replyMarkup: replyKeyboardEN);
await AnonymEN();
break;
case "ger":
var replyKeyboardGR = new ReplyKeyboardMarkup
{
Keyboard = new[]
{
new[]
{
new KeyboardButton("choice1.1"),
new KeyboardButton("choice2.2")
},
}
};
replyKeyboardGR.OneTimeKeyboard = true;
await bot.SendTextMessageAsync(message.Chat.Id, "Enter choice", replyMarkup: replyKeyboardGR);
await AnonymGR();
break;
}
offset = update.Id + 1;
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine("Error" + ex);
}
}
and AnonymEN() method for eng case in switch. The problem appears here when I call this method from switch case in BotOnMessage(). Until switch (message.Text) multiple users can asynchronously send messages and get response. When first user enters AnonymEN() second user can't get response from this method until first user will finish it till the end. Also I call BotOnMessage() in the end of AnonymEN() to get back for initial point with possibility to start bot again. For the ordered structure of questions and answers I used ConcurrentDictionary way from here Save user messages sent to bot and send finished form to other user. Any suggestion and solution how to edit code to make this bot available for multiple users at one time?
async static Task AnonymEN()
{
int offset = 0;
int timeout = 0;
try
{
await bot.SetWebhookAsync("");
while (true)
{
var updates = await bot.GetUpdatesAsync(offset, timeout);
foreach (var update in updates)
{
var message = update.Message;
int userId = (int)message.From.Id;
if (message.Type == MessageType.Text)
{
if (Answers.TryGetValue(userId, out string[] answers))
{
var title = message.Text;
if (answers[0] == null)
{
answers[0] = message.Text;
await bot.SendTextMessageAsync(message.Chat, "Enter age");
}
else
{
SaveMessage(message.Chat.Id.ToString(), "anonym", "anonym", "anonym", answers[0].ToString(), title.ToString(), createdDateNoTime.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture));
Answers.TryRemove(userId, out string[] _);
await bot.SendTextMessageAsync(message.Chat.Id, "ty for request click /start");
await BotOnMessage();
}
}
else if (message.Text == "choice1")
{
Answers.TryAdd(userId, new string[1]);
await bot.SendTextMessageAsync(message.Chat.Id, "Enter name");
}
}
offset = update.Id + 1;
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine("Error" + ex);
}
}
I can see multiple issues with your code:
It is hard to read. While this is a personal preference I strongly advise to write short concise methods that have 1 responsibility. This will make it easier to understand and maintain your code. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-responsibility_principle
Everything is static. This makes it very hard to keep track of any state such as language that should be tracked per user.
Using infinite loops and recursion with no escape. I highly doubt this was intended but you could get an infinite chain of calls like this BotOnMessage -> AnonymEN -> BotOnMessage -> AnonymEN. I think you want to exit the AnonymEN function using either a return, break or while(someVar) approach instead of calling the BotOnMessage function.
If two users are sending messages you get mixed responses. Example message flow user1: /start, user1: eng, user2: hello. The bot will now give an english response to user2. I'm sure this is not intended
The code below is a minimal example that addresses the issues I mentioned. It is not perfect code but should help you get started.
private Dictionaty<string, UserSession> userSessions = new ();
async Task BotOnMessage()
{
try
{
while(true)
{
var message = await GetMessage(timeout);
var userSession = GetUserSession(message.user);
userSession.ProcessMessage(message);
}
}
catch(){}
}
async void GetUserSession(string user)
{
if(!userSessions.HasKey(user))
{
userSessions[user](new Session());
}
return userSessions[user];
}
public class UserSession
{
public async Task ProcessMessage(message)
{
// Existing message processing code goes here.
// Do not use a loop or recursion.
// Instead track the state (e.g. languge) using fields.
}
}
How to get the individual API call status success response in C#.
I am creating a mobile application using Xamarin Forms,
In my application, I need to prefetch certain information when app launches to use the mobile application.
Right now, I am calling the details like this,
public async Task<Response> GetAllVasInformationAsync()
{
var userDetails = GetUserDetailsAsync();
var getWageInfo = GetUserWageInfoAsync();
var getSalaryInfo = GetSalaryInfoAsync();
await Task.WhenAll(userDetails,
getWageInfo,
getSalaryInfo,
);
var resultToReturn = new Response
{
IsuserDetailsSucceeded = userDetails.Result,
IsgetWageInfoSucceeded = getWageInfo.Result,
IsgetSalaryInfoSucceeded = getSalaryInfo.Result,
};
return resultToReturn;
}
In my app I need to update details based on the success response. Something like this (2/5) completed. And the text should be updated whenever we get a new response.
What is the best way to implement this feature? Is it possible to use along with Task.WhenAll. Because I am trying to wrap everything in one method call.
In my app I need to update details based on the success response.
The proper way to do this is IProgress<string>. The calling code should supply a Progress<string> that updates the UI accordingly.
public async Task<Response> GetAllVasInformationAsync(IProgress<string> progress)
{
var userDetails = UpdateWhenComplete(GetUserDetailsAsync(), "user details");
var getWageInfo = UpdateWhenComplete(GetUserWageInfoAsync(), "wage information");
var getSalaryInfo = UpdateWhenComplete(GetSalaryInfoAsync(), "salary information");
await Task.WhenAll(userDetails, getWageInfo, getSalaryInfo);
return new Response
{
IsuserDetailsSucceeded = await userDetails,
IsgetWageInfoSucceeded = await getWageInfo,
IsgetSalaryInfoSucceeded = await getSalaryInfo,
};
async Task<T> UpdateWhenComplete<T>(Task<T> task, string taskName)
{
try { return await task; }
finally { progress?.Report($"Completed {taskName}"); }
}
}
If you also need a count, you can either use IProgress<(int, string)> or change how the report progress string is built to include the count.
So here's what I would do in C# 8 and .NET Standard 2.1:
First, I create the method which will produce the async enumerable:
static async IAsyncEnumerable<bool> TasksToPerform() {
Task[] tasks = new Task[3] { userDetails, getWageInfo, getSalaryInfo };
for (i = 0; i < tasks.Length; i++) {
await tasks[i];
yield return true;
}
}
So now you need to await foreach on this task enumerable. Every time you get a return, you know that a task has been finished.
int numberOfFinishedTasks = 0;
await foreach (var b in TasksToPerform()) {
numberOfFinishedTasks++;
//Update UI here to reflect the finished task number
}
No need to over-complicate this. This code will show how many of your tasks had exceptions. Your await task.whenall just triggers them and waits for them to finish. So after that you can do whatever you want with the tasks :)
var task = Task.Delay(300);
var tasks = new List<Task> { task };
var faultedTasks = 0;
tasks.ForEach(t =>
{
t.ContinueWith(t2 =>
{
//do something with a field / property holding ViewModel state
//that your view is listening to
});
});
await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
//use this to respond with a finished count
tasks.ForEach(_ => { if (_.IsFaulted) faultedTasks++; });
Console.WriteLine($"{tasks.Count() - faultedTasks} / {tasks.Count()} completed.");
.WhenAll() will allow you to determine if /any/ of the tasks failed, they you just count the tasks that have failed.
public async Task<Response> GetAllVasInformationAsync()
{
var userDetails = GetUserDetailsAsync();
var getWageInfo = GetUserWageInfoAsync();
var getSalaryInfo = GetSalaryInfoAsync();
await Task.WhenAll(userDetails, getWaitInfo, getSalaryInfo)
.ContinueWith((task) =>
{
if(task.IsFaulted)
{
int failedCount = 0;
if(userDetails.IsFaulted) failedCount++;
if(getWaitInfo.IsFaulted) failedCount++;
if(getSalaryInfo.IsFaulted) failedCount++;
return $"{failedCount} tasks failed";
}
});
var resultToReturn = new Response
{
IsuserDetailsSucceeded = userDetails.Result,
IsgetWageInfoSucceeded = getWageInfo.Result,
IsgetSalaryInfoSucceeded = getSalaryInfo.Result,
};
return resultToReturn;
}
I'm trying to run a Thread infinitely, but it's not working ...
Follow the code:
namespace BTCPrice
{
public static class Price
{
private static volatile bool _shouldStop = false;
public static void RequestStop()
{
_shouldStop = true;
}
public static void Refresh(out string value, int tipo = 0, string source = "https://www.mercadobitcoin.net/api/")
{
while (_shouldStop == false)
{
JavaScriptSerializer serializer = new System.Web.Script.Serialization.JavaScriptSerializer();
WebClient cliente = new WebClient();
string json = cliente.DownloadString(string.Format("{0}/{1}/{2}", source, "BTC", "ticker"));
JObject j = JObject.Parse(json);
switch (tipo)
{
//Get High Price
case 0:
value = j["ticker"]["high"].ToString();
break;
//Get Low Price
case 1:
value = j["ticker"]["low"].ToString();
break;
default:
value = "default";
break;
}
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
value = "Stopped";
}
}
}
On Start:
string result = "";
Thread workerThread = new Thread(() => {
Price.Refresh(out result);
MessageBox.Show(result);
Invoke(textBox1, result);
Thread.Sleep(1000);
});
No exception occurs ... as long as I remove the While (_shouldStop == false) class the code works perfectly. However, I would like that, while the program is open, it executes the code and updates the textbox with the value that I get by the API.
result without While(_shouldStop == false) in class:
Expected Result with While
You really shouldn't be using threads these days when there are excellent alternatives that handle all of the mess for you.
I'd suggest using Microsoft's Reactive Framework (aka "Rx"). Just NuGet "System.Reactive", "System.Reactive.Windows.Forms" (Windows Forms), "System.Reactive.Windows.Threading" (WPF).
Then you can do this:
int tipo = 0;
string source = "https://www.mercadobitcoin.net/api/";
string url = string.Format("{0}/{1}/{2}", source, "BTC", "ticker");
IObservable<string> feed =
from n in Observable.Interval(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1.0))
from json in Observable.Using<string, WebClient>(() => new WebClient(), cliente => cliente.DownloadStringTaskAsync(url).ToObservable())
let j = JObject.Parse(json)
let high = j["ticker"]["high"].ToString()
let low = j["ticker"]["low"].ToString()
select tipo == 0 ? high : (tipo == 1 ? low : "default");
IDisposable subscription =
feed
.ObserveOn(this); // for Windows Forms OR .ObservableOnDispatcher() for WPF
.Subscribe(value =>
{
/* Do something with `value` */
});
You'll now get a steady stream of the string value every second. A thread is started automatically and the results are automatically pasted to the UI thread.
When you want to stop the feed producing values just call subscription.Dispose();.
This code entirely replaces your Price class.
Change your while loop in Price.Refresh to inside the thread. Have Price.Refresh return a string instead.
Thread workerThread = new Thread(() => {
while (true)
{
String result = Price.Refresh();
MessageBox.Show(result);
Invoke(textBox1, result);
Thread.Sleep(1000);
});
I agree with Scott Chamberlain in that you should use a timer instead and rewrite this but this will work for you.
I have a string array which contains addresses of websites:
string[] arr = new string[]
{
"https://www/google.com",
"https://www.yahoo.com",
"https://www.microsoft.com"
};
I have to send these URLs as argument to the asynctask method so that I will be able to calculate the loading time of each website. I don't have to show the website pages, so I am not using webview.
I can use stopwatch or httprequest to calculate the loading time and my ultimate goal is that all the websites need to start loading at the same time asynchronously, and output has to look like the following
Loading time
google - 00:00:04:092345 (hr:min:sec:millisec) yahoo - 00:00:06:028458
How can I send an array to asynctask and how I can generate loading time without using await?
Here is a brief solution of what you could do.
This is not complete nor perfect. It will will give you the loading time of one URL. Also there is a suggestion of how you could extend this to multiple URLs.
You will need a WebView, either in code or from UI.
Load the URL into the WebView using webview.LoadUrl("https://www/google.com");.
Create a new class by extending it from WebViewClient as follows:
public class myWebViewClient : WebViewClient
{
public override void OnPageFinished(WebView view, string url)
{
base.OnPageFinished(view, url);
Console.WriteLine("OnPageFinished for url : " + url + " at : " + DateTime.Now);
}
}
In your OnCreate() method add the following line of code :
webview.SetWebViewClient(new myWebViewClient());
So from here what you have to do is, Create a Dictionary with URL as key and Loading time as value. Set all the loading time to 0 initially. Update the value corresponding to each URL in the OnPageFinished(). Create an async Task function which would return you the populated dictionary.
public async Task<Dictionary<string, double>> myAsyncFunction()
{
await Task.Delay(5); //to make it async
//Wait till all the OnPageFinished events have fired.
while (myDictionary.Any(x=>x.Value == 0) == true)
{
//there are still websites which have not fully loaded.
await Task.Delay(1); //wait a millisecond before checking again
}
return myDictionary;
}
You can call myAsyncFunction() in a seprate thread than your UI and implement the ContinueWith() or just let it run in a separate thread and write that output into somewhere that you can check when required.
eg : Task.Run(async () => await myAsyncFunction());
UPDATE : based on OP's comments
In the UI thread :
var myClassList = new List<myClass>
{
new myClass{URL = "https://www/google.com", TimeTaken = null},
new myClass{URL = "https://www.yahoo.com", TimeTaken = null},
new myClass{URL = "https://www.microsoft.com", TimeTaken = null}
};
Console.WriteLine("Started at : " + DateTime.Now.ToShortTimeString());
var business = new BusinessLogic();
var loadtimetask = business.GetLoadTimeTakenAsync(myClassList);
await loadtimetask;
Console.WriteLine("Completed at : " + DateTime.Now.ToShortTimeString());
And implementation class :
public async Task<List<myClass>> GetLoadTimeTakenAsync(List<myClass> myClassList)
{
Parallel.ForEach(myClassList, myClassObj =>
{
using (var client = new HttpClient())
{
myClassObj.StartTime = DateTime.Now;
var stream = client.GetStreamAsync(myClassObj.URL)
.ContinueWith((s) =>
{
if (s.IsCompleted)
{
var myClassObjCompleted = myClassList.Where(x => x.URL == myClassObj.URL).First();
myClassObjCompleted.EndTime = DateTime.Now;
myClassObjCompleted.TimeTaken = myClassObj.EndTime - myClassObj.StartTime;
}
});
Task.Run(async () => await stream);
}
});
while (myClassList.Any(x => x.TimeTaken == null))
{
await Task.Delay(1);
}
return myClassList;
}
//Create TextView to display status of Wifi
TextView wifitext = FindViewById<TextView>(Resource.Id.WifiTextView);
//Configuring Wifi connection
var connectivityManager = (ConnectivityManager)GetSystemService(ConnectivityService);
var activeConnection = connectivityManager.ActiveNetworkInfo;
if (activeConnection != null && activeConnection.IsConnected)
{
wifitext.Text = "WIFI AVAILABLE";
string[] urladdress = new string[] { "https://www.google.com/", "https://www.yahoo.com/"};
for (int i = 0; i < urladdress.Length; i++)
{
string url = urladdress[i];
//Call async method
Task returnedTask = Task_MethodAsync(url);
}
}
else
wifitext.Text = "WIFI UNAVAILABLE";
}
public async Task Task_MethodAsync(string url)
{
LinearLayout ll = FindViewById<LinearLayout>(Resource.Id.linearLayout1);
WebClient client = new WebClient();
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
Stream listurl = client.OpenRead(url);
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(listurl);
stopwatch.Stop();
// listurl.Close();
var time = Convert.ToString(stopwatch.Elapsed);
There're Task.WaitAll method which waits for all tasks and Task.WaitAny method which waits for one task. How to wait for any N tasks?
Use case: search result pages are downloaded, each result needs a separate task to download and process it. If I use WaitAll to wait for the results of the subtasks before getting next search result page, I will not use all available resources (one long task will delay the rest). Not waiting at all can cause thousands of tasks to be queued which isn't the best idea either.
So, how to wait for a subset of tasks to be completed? Or, alternatively, how to wait for the task scheduler queue to have only N tasks?
This looks like an excellent problem for TPL Dataflow, which will allow you to control parallelism and buffering to process at maximum speed.
Here's some (untested) code to show you what I mean:
static void Process()
{
var searchReader =
new TransformManyBlock<SearchResult, SearchResult>(async uri =>
{
// return a list of search results at uri.
return new[]
{
new SearchResult
{
IsResult = true,
Uri = "http://foo.com"
},
new SearchResult
{
// return the next search result page here.
IsResult = false,
Uri = "http://google.com/next"
}
};
}, new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
BoundedCapacity = 8, // restrict buffer size.
MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 4 // control parallelism.
});
// link "next" pages back to the searchReader.
searchReader.LinkTo(searchReader, x => !x.IsResult);
var resultActor = new ActionBlock<SearchResult>(async uri =>
{
// do something with the search result.
}, new ExecutionDataflowBlockOptions
{
BoundedCapacity = 64,
MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 16
});
// link search results into resultActor.
searchReader.LinkTo(resultActor, x => x.IsResult);
// put in the first piece of input.
searchReader.Post(new SearchResult { Uri = "http://google/first" });
}
struct SearchResult
{
public bool IsResult { get; set; }
public string Uri { get; set; }
}
I think you should independently limit the number of parallel download tasks and the number of concurrent result processing tasks. I would do it using two SemaphoreSlim objects, like below. This version doesn't use the synchronous SemaphoreSlim.Wait (thanks #svick for making the point). It was only slightly tested, the exception handling can be improved; substitute your own DownloadNextPageAsync and ProcessResults:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Console_21666797
{
partial class Program
{
// the actual download method
// async Task<string> DownloadNextPageAsync(string url) { ... }
// the actual process methods
// void ProcessResults(string data) { ... }
// download and process all pages
async Task DownloadAndProcessAllAsync(
string startUrl, int maxDownloads, int maxProcesses)
{
// max parallel downloads
var downloadSemaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(maxDownloads);
// max parallel processing tasks
var processSemaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(maxProcesses);
var tasks = new HashSet<Task>();
var complete = false;
var protect = new Object(); // protect tasks
var page = 0;
// do the page
Func<string, Task> doPageAsync = async (url) =>
{
bool downloadSemaphoreAcquired = true;
try
{
// download the page
var data = await DownloadNextPageAsync(
url).ConfigureAwait(false);
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(data))
{
Volatile.Write(ref complete, true);
}
else
{
// enable the next download to happen
downloadSemaphore.Release();
downloadSemaphoreAcquired = false;
// process this download
await processSemaphore.WaitAsync();
try
{
await Task.Run(() => ProcessResults(data));
}
finally
{
processSemaphore.Release();
}
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
Volatile.Write(ref complete, true);
throw;
}
finally
{
if (downloadSemaphoreAcquired)
downloadSemaphore.Release();
}
};
// do the page and save the task
Func<string, Task> queuePageAsync = async (url) =>
{
var task = doPageAsync(url);
lock (protect)
tasks.Add(task);
await task;
lock (protect)
tasks.Remove(task);
};
// process pages in a loop until complete is true
while (!Volatile.Read(ref complete))
{
page++;
// acquire download semaphore synchrnously
await downloadSemaphore.WaitAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
// do the page
var task = queuePageAsync(startUrl + "?page=" + page);
}
// await completion of the pending tasks
Task[] pendingTasks;
lock (protect)
pendingTasks = tasks.ToArray();
await Task.WhenAll(pendingTasks);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
new Program().DownloadAndProcessAllAsync("http://google.com", 10, 5).Wait();
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
Something like this should work. There might be some edge cases, but all in all it should ensure a minimum of completions.
public static async Task WhenN(IEnumerable<Task> tasks, int n, CancellationTokenSource cts = null)
{
var pending = new HashSet<Task>(tasks);
if (n > pending.Count)
{
n = pending.Count;
// or throw
}
var completed = 0;
while (completed != n)
{
var completedTask = await Task.WhenAny(pending);
pending.Remove(completedTask);
completed++;
}
if (cts != null)
{
cts.Cancel();
}
}
Usage:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var tasks = new List<Task>();
var completed = 0;
var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
{
tasks.Add(Task.Run(async () =>
{
await Task.Delay(temp * 100, cts.Token);
Console.WriteLine("Completed task {0}", i);
completed++;
}, cts.Token));
}
Extensions.WhenN(tasks, 30, cts).Wait();
Console.WriteLine(completed);
Console.ReadLine();
}
Task[] runningTasks = MyTasksFactory.StartTasks();
while(runningTasks.Any())
{
int finished = Task.WaitAny(runningTasks);
Task.Factory.StareNew(()=> {Consume(runningTasks[Finished].Result);})
runningTasks.RemoveAt(finished);
}