Multiple connection strings running one by one c# - c#

guys, I'm pretty new, actually a beginner in coding and I got a project from my boss for an app that's gonna access a client's database and send mail with the past activity executing a stored procedure. I've done the application, but now I have a better idea, why configure this and install it on every client's pc when we have Hamachi and we can run in from one our servers by adding multiple connections string especially that every client has the same data base where are creating the stored procedure and execute it. But my question is, how do I add multiple connection strings and make them being accessed one by one by the program (he takes a connection string, he finishes executing, then takes another one and so one until it's finished)

It's a little hard to tell from your description, which is not very clear and contains several logical leaps, but it sounds like you want to do something like this:
List<string> connectionStrings = new List<string>();
connectionStrings.Add("Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase1;User Id=myUsername;Password=myPassword;");
connectionStrings.Add("Server=myServerAddress;Database=myDataBase2;User Id=myUsername;Password=myPassword;");
foreach (string connectionString in connectionStrings)
{
using (var conn = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
using (var command = new SqlCommand("ProcedureName", conn))
{
command.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
conn.Open();
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
}
}

Related

how to properly create a postgres database connection class in c#?

I am new to working with databases.I am using postgres database.I want to connect it to c# for my project.Since I have multiple form screen in my project, I assume it is better to create a seperate database connection class instead of using the same code in every other classes.I want to learn how to create an effective postgres database connection class in c#
There's no need to create a connection class since database connections and commands aren't complicated or expensive to create. The best practice is to create a connection and command, execute the SQL, and then dispose of both of them. The typical pattern is:
string connString = {connection string from config};
using (OdbcConnection conn = new OdbcConnection(connString)) {
using(OdbcCommand cmd = new OdbcCommand(sql, conn) {
// execute command
}
}
The using construct ensures that the connection and command are closed een if there is a database error.
Take a look at this website: https://www.connectionstrings.com/postgresql/
This is a great resource for finding connection strings to a variety of different databases! I reference it quite a bit. There are a couple of different connection strings for postgreSql, so you will need to dtermine which one is best to use for your use case.
I wouldn't set up a special class for a connection. Instead I recommend that you use an appsettings.json or web.config file to store the connection string and call it when you need it. Check out the documentation from Microsoft: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/configuration/?view=aspnetcore-6.0

Oracle Managed DataAccess connection object is keeping the connection open

I'm using Oracle.ManagedDataAccess Nuget package version 18.3.0. I tried many things. I tried to dispose everything I can think of, even oracle parameters objects. And wrapped everything inside a using block but to no avail. The only thing that actually worked for me is that the commented line OracleConnection.ClearPool(oracle);. Is this a bug, or some configuration related issue, or am I misunderstand things here? Also, I tried to remove the reference of Oracle.ManagedDataAccess and replaced it with a reference to System.Data.OracleClient and that actually worked for me. It automatically closed the connection, so no connection left with "In-Active" status. The code below I moved it into a simple, single button, Windows Forms application to make 100% sure nothing is interfering and the problem still occurring.
using (var oracle = new OracleConnection("Data Source=(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=myhost)(PORT=SomePortHere))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=SHARED)(SERVICE_NAME=anotherHost)))", new OracleCredential(userName,password)))
{
oracle.Open();
using (var command = new OracleCommand())
{
var query = "SELECT x from y where z=:param1";
command.Connection = oracle;
command.CommandText = query;
command.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.Text;
var param1 = new OracleParameter(":param1", xyz);
command.Parameters.Add(param1);
using (var reader = command.ExecuteReader())
{
if (reader.Read())
{
//read the data from the reader
}
}
param1.Dispose();
}
//If this line is commented, there will be a connection left open, with InActive status
//OracleConnection.ClearPool(oracle);
}
password.Dispose();
return myData;
And this is an image to show the opened connection through Toad.
Of course, for each click to that button, the code above will execute and a new session will remain open, until what you see in the image.
The name "TheTesterOfAllTests.exe" is the Windows Forms app.
Is this a configuration problem?
Is there any way to solve this issue other than using ClearPool method? Because it affects the performance of the app.
P.S. The application that is originally using the code above is a WCF Service that is consumed by a Web application.
P.S. 2 There is some kind of memory leakage, with each click to that button the memory usage increases
I ran into the same problem.
I solved it by changing the initialization of the OracleConnection.
from
var con = new OracleConnection(
"Data Source=(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=myhost)(PORT=SomePortHere))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=SHARED)(SERVICE_NAME=anotherHost)))",
new OracleCredential(userName,password));
to
var con = new OracleConnection(
"USER ID=myuser;PASSWORD=mypwd;Data Source=(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=myhost)(PORT=SomePortHere))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=SHARED)(SERVICE_NAME=anotherHost)))");
To me, this different behavior looks like a bug.
As a result, i can no longer use OracleCredential and must store the password as a string. That's okay for me.
remark: SecureString shouldn't be used
It turns out the problem is in the way internally oracle creates connection, since for each newly created OracleConnection object, a new Connection is added to the Connection pool. I counted 91 connection entry in the connection pool.
The solution was to use one OracleConnection instance for each request "Per Request Scope". I implemented that by using a simple generic IDatabase<TConnection> interface with one TConnection GetConnection<TConnection>() method and of course for each method that will be called on that same request's instance, a pair of Open/Close call will take place so we don't keep the connection open the whole time.
Regarding the memory leak, I'm still not able to 100% confirm this, but when I used the Oracle.DataAccess.Client library instead of Oracle.ManagedDataAccess the memory usage reduced dramatically. So, I switched back to Oracle.DataAccess.Client.
P.S. I will update this answer in case of new information regarding these two issues, and contributions are very welcome, maybe I misunderstand something regarding how Oracle deals with the database connection.

c# : one class to connect to sql server

Hello there I hope you're having a great time.
I have a question And I will break it down into 3 points:
1: create a class to connect to sql server the connection should be made using sql server authentication.
This class should contain several variables for connection parameters.
2: create a user form that shows the current connection parameters. And allow the user to update those parameters. In this form there should be a button to test the connect and another button to save the user changes to the connection parameters.
3: how to share the connection, created by the class we made in point 1, between different forms in the application. Without keeping too many open connections ideally only one connection should be open.
I will add the code that can solve this problem I hope that you can help me refine it.
I am new to all of this.
Thank you all for help.
already exists; SqlConnection and maybe SqlConnectionStringBuilder
that kinda already exists, via the IDE, but last time I checked this was not a redistributable dll. You could, however, simply hook a SqlConnectionStringBuilder to a PropertyGrid - or just write the UI from scratch
even "only one connection should be open" is wrong, IMO - let the inbuilt connection pooling deal with that; all you need is some configuration class with the connection string - and just deal with the connections as you need them, very locally - i.e.
using(var conn = new SqlConnection(Config.ConnectionString))
{
conn.Open();
// NOT SHOWN: do a couple of related operations
} // <== and here, it dies
1 : go to MSDN website you'll find what you need :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/fr-fr/library/system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.aspx?cs-save-lang=1&cs-lang=csharp#code-snippet-2
private static void ReadOrderData(string connectionString)
{
string queryString =
"SELECT OrderID, CustomerID FROM dbo.Orders;";
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(
connectionString))
{
SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(
queryString, connection);
connection.Open();
SqlDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader();
try
{
while (reader.Read())
{
Console.WriteLine(String.Format("{0}, {1}",
reader[0], reader[1]));
}
}
finally
{
// Always call Close when done reading.
reader.Close();
}
}
}
2: look at your connection properties (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection_properties.aspx) and fill a listView or equivalent with it
3: Use previous SqlConnection.Open() to deal with it

Connecting a MS Access (.mdb) Database to a MVC3 Web Application

Right, I have been tasked with developing a new application in MVC3 that unfortunately has to integrate very slightly with a classic asp web site. This won't be forever as the old site will get an update at some point, but not yet. In the mean time however the new MVC3 application will need a little bit of access to the database for the old site, which is a old MS Access .mdb whereas the new app will be using sql server 2008.
I would greatly appreciate it if someone could give me some examples of how to connect to the access db, aswell as how to execute sql queries (i am fine writing the sql, just got no idea how to execute against the database from my mvc3 app).
thanks in advance
EDIT: I've not got much experience with the old site, but it appears to use the JET adaptor if that helps! ;-)
Your question requires an answer too extensive to be given in detail
I will give you a check list of things and class to research
Define the connection string used to reach your database [see
here]
Create and open the OleDbConnection
Define your OleDbCommand and the command text to be executed
Create and use an OleDbDataReader to read your data line by line
Create and use an OleDbDataAdapter to read your data and load a
DataSet or DataTable
Now don't forget to close your connection and use parametrized query
string connectionString = Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;Data Source=C:\mydatabase.mdb;Jet OLEDB:Database Password=MyDbPassword;
public void InsertRow(string connectionString, string insertSQL)
{
using (OleDbConnection connection = new OleDbConnection(connectionString))
{
// The insertSQL string contains a SQL statement that
// inserts a new row in the source table.
OleDbCommand command = new OleDbCommand(insertSQL);
// Set the Connection to the new OleDbConnection.
command.Connection = connection;
// Open the connection and execute the insert command.
try
{
connection.Open();
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
// The connection is automatically closed when the
// code exits the using block.
}
}

Managing SQL Server Connections

What is the the best practice for SQL connections?
Currently I am using the following:
using (SqlConnection sqlConn = new SqlConnection(CONNECTIONSTRING))
{
sqlConn.Open();
// DB CODE GOES HERE
}
I have read that this is a very effective way of doing SQL connections. By default the SQL pooling is active, so how I understand it is that when the using code ends the SqlConnection object is closed and disposed but the actual connection to the DB is put in the SQL connection pool. Am i wrong about this?
That's most of it. Some additional points to consider:
Where do you get your connection string? You don't want that hard-coded all over the place and you may need to secure it.
You often have other objects to create as well before your really use the connection (SqlCommand, SqlParameter, DataSet, SqlDataAdapter), and you want to wait as long as possible to open the connection. The full pattern needs to account for that.
You want to make sure your database access is forced into it's own data layer class or assembly. So a common thing to do is express this as a private function call:
.
private static string connectionString = "load from encrypted config file";
private SqlConnection getConnection()
{
return new SqlConnection(connectionString);
}
And then write your sample like this:
using (SqlConnection sqlConn = getConnection())
{
// create command and add parameters
// open the connection
sqlConn.Open();
// run the command
}
That sample can only exist in your data access class. An alternative is to mark it internal and spread the data layer over an entire assembly. The main thing is that a clean separation of your database code is strictly enforced.
A real implementation might look like this:
public IEnumerable<IDataRecord> GetSomeData(string filter)
{
string sql = "SELECT * FROM [SomeTable] WHERE [SomeColumn] LIKE #Filter + '%'";
using (SqlConnection cn = getConnection())
using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(sql, cn))
{
cmd.Parameters.Add("#Filter", SqlDbType.NVarChar, 255).Value = filter;
cn.Open();
using (IDataReader rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
while (rdr.Read())
{
yield return (IDataRecord)rdr;
}
}
}
}
Notice that I was also able to "stack" the creation of the cn and cmd objects, and thus reduce nesting and only create one scope block.
Finally, a word of caution about using the yield return code in this specific sample. If you call the method and don't complete your DataBinding or other use right away it could hold the connection open for a long time. An example of this is using it to set a data source in the Load event of an ASP.NET page. Since the actual data binding event won't occur until later you could hold the connection open much longer than needed.
Microsoft's Patterns and Practices libraries are an excellent approach to handling database connectivity. The libraries encapsulate most of the mechanisms involved with opening a connection, which in turn will make your life easier.
Your understanding of using is correct, and that method of usage is the recommended way of doing so. You can also call close in your code as well.
Also : Open late, close early.
Don't open the connection until there are no more steps left before calling the database. And close the connection as soon as you're done.

Categories

Resources