I have a use case that I'm not sure how to solve in a nice way.
I'm currently developing a .Net Core WebApi that is receiving data from various current systems, from a cross the whole world. Which I then process and lastly I commit it to SAP through oData endpoint.
The problem I'm having is on of parameters I'm receiving in the body payload, is a DateTime. Previous I have not have any issues. But not long ago I started getting data from a other system which deliverers it in a slightly differently way.
Previously this was the format I got: 2020-09-16T16:30:00 not problem with it. But the new system looks like this: 2020-09-16T16:00:00 -05:00 Could also end in +08:00.
The problem I'm facing is that SAP needs to get in local time. But in the my code it converts this: 2020-09-16T16:00:00 -05:00 to 2020-09-16T23:00:00 when I see the incoming payload in the controller.
I have searched quite a bit to find a solution. But 99% only suggest using UTC time, which is not a option for me.
Another option is to use DateTimeOffset, which I have tried but can't the time conversion to use localTime.
My question is. Are it not possible to custom convert to strip the timezone before it hits the controller?
Generarally when you're working with datetime data that includes offsets for time zone the DateTimeOffset type is a good place to start. The sample string 2020-09-16T16:00:00 -05:00 can be passed to DateTimeOffset.Parse() to get a correct DTO value with timezone information attached. From there you can get the local time, UTC time or a DateTime value with the timezone stripped.
string source = "2020-09-16T16:00:00 -05:00";
string fmt = #"yyyy-MM-dd\THH:mm:ss zzz"
// Same as input
Console.WriteLine(DateTimeOffset.Parse(source).ToString(fmt));
// Adjusted to your local timezone
Console.WriteLine(DateTimeOffset.Parse(source).ToLocalTime().ToString(fmt));
// DateTime portion of the source, timezone offset ignored
Console.WriteLine(DateTimeOffset.Parse(source).DateTime.ToString());
Getting the UTC time is simple too via the UtcDateTime property.
It sounds like what you want is the last one - just the date and time from the inputt string with the timezone offset stripped. If you just want the corresponding local time then DateTime.Parse should give that to you directly.
The JsonSerializer class doesn't support this format for DateTimeOffset so you might have some trouble getting it converted before hitting your controller. In that case you'd need to accept a string and do the conversion by hand in your code. You also might need to investigate the TryParseExact method.
Use DateTime.Parse() , for example
string timeInString1 = "2020-09-16T16:00:00 -05:00";
DateTime moment1 = DateTime.Parse(timeInString1);
string timeInString2 = "2020-09-16T16:00:00 +08:00";
DateTime moment2 = DateTime.Parse(timeInString2);
string timeInString3 = "2020-09-16T16:30:00";
DateTime moment3 = DateTime.Parse(timeInString3);
but momen1, momen2, or moment3 is non-timezone awareness value.
I've seen so many different standards for the JSON date format:
"\"\\/Date(1335205592410)\\/\"" .NET JavaScriptSerializer
"\"\\/Date(1335205592410-0500)\\/\"" .NET DataContractJsonSerializer
"2012-04-23T18:25:43.511Z" JavaScript built-in JSON object
"2012-04-21T18:25:43-05:00" ISO 8601
Which one is the right one? Or best? Is there any sort of standard on this?
JSON itself does not specify how dates should be represented, but JavaScript does.
You should use the format emitted by Date's toJSON method:
2012-04-23T18:25:43.511Z
Here's why:
It's human readable but also succinct
It sorts correctly
It includes fractional seconds, which can help re-establish chronology
It conforms to ISO 8601
ISO 8601 has been well-established internationally for more than a decade
ISO 8601 is endorsed by W3C, RFC3339, and XKCD
That being said, every date library ever written can understand "milliseconds since 1970". So for easy portability, ThiefMaster is right.
JSON does not know anything about dates. What .NET does is a non-standard hack/extension.
I would use a format that can be easily converted to a Date object in JavaScript, i.e. one that can be passed to new Date(...). The easiest and probably most portable format is the timestamp containing milliseconds since 1970.
There is no right format; The JSON specification does not specify a format for exchanging dates which is why there are so many different ways to do it.
The best format is arguably a date represented in ISO 8601 format (see Wikipedia); it is a well known and widely used format and can be handled across many different languages, making it very well suited for interoperability. If you have control over the generated json, for example, you provide data to other systems in json format, choosing 8601 as the date interchange format is a good choice.
If you do not have control over the generated json, for example, you are the consumer of json from several different existing systems, the best way of handling this is to have a date parsing utility function to handle the different formats expected.
When in doubt simply go to the javascript web console of a modern browser by pressing F12 (Ctrl+Shift+K in Firefox) and write the following:
new Date().toISOString()
Will output:
"2019-07-04T13:33:03.969Z"
Ta-da!!
From RFC 7493 (The I-JSON Message Format ):
I-JSON stands for either Internet JSON or Interoperable JSON, depending on who you ask.
Protocols often contain data items that are designed to contain
timestamps or time durations. It is RECOMMENDED that all such data
items be expressed as string values in ISO 8601 format, as specified
in RFC 3339, with the additional restrictions that uppercase rather
than lowercase letters be used, that the timezone be included not
defaulted, and that optional trailing seconds be included even when
their value is "00". It is also RECOMMENDED that all data items
containing time durations conform to the "duration" production in
Appendix A of RFC 3339, with the same additional restrictions.
Just for reference I've seen this format used:
Date.UTC(2017,2,22)
It works with JSONP which is supported by the $.getJSON() function. Not sure I would go so far as to recommend this approach... just throwing it out there as a possibility because people are doing it this way.
FWIW: Never use seconds since epoch in a communication protocol, nor milliseconds since epoch, because these are fraught with danger thanks to the randomized implementation of leap seconds (you have no idea whether sender and receiver both properly implement UTC leap seconds).
Kind of a pet hate, but many people believe that UTC is just the new name for GMT -- wrong! If your system does not implement leap seconds then you are using GMT (often called UTC despite being incorrect). If you do fully implement leap seconds you really are using UTC. Future leap seconds cannot be known; they get published by the IERS as necessary and require constant updates. If you are running a system that attempts to implement leap seconds but contains and out-of-date reference table (more common than you might think) then you have neither GMT, nor UTC, you have a wonky system pretending to be UTC.
These date counters are only compatible when expressed in a broken down format (y, m, d, etc). They are NEVER compatible in an epoch format. Keep that in mind.
"2014-01-01T23:28:56.782Z"
The date is represented in a standard and sortable format that represents a UTC time (indicated by the Z). ISO 8601 also supports time zones by replacing the Z with + or – value for the timezone offset:
"2014-02-01T09:28:56.321-10:00"
There are other variations of the timezone encoding in the ISO 8601 spec, but the –10:00 format is the only TZ format that current JSON parsers support. In general it’s best to use the UTC based format (Z) unless you have a specific need for figuring out the time zone in which the date was produced (possible only in server side generation).
NB:
var date = new Date();
console.log(date); // Wed Jan 01 2014 13:28:56 GMT-
1000 (Hawaiian Standard Time)
var json = JSON.stringify(date);
console.log(json); // "2014-01-01T23:28:56.782Z"
To tell you that's the preferred way even though JavaScript doesn't have a standard format for it
// JSON encoded date
var json = "\"2014-01-01T23:28:56.782Z\"";
var dateStr = JSON.parse(json);
console.log(dateStr); // 2014-01-01T23:28:56.782Z
JSON itself has no date format, it does not care how anyone stores dates. However, since this question is tagged with javascript, I assume you want to know how to store javascript dates in JSON. You can just pass in a date to the JSON.stringify method, and it will use Date.prototype.toJSON by default, which in turns uses Date.prototype.toISOString (MDN on Date.toJSON):
const json = JSON.stringify(new Date());
const parsed = JSON.parse(json); //2015-10-26T07:46:36.611Z
const date = new Date(parsed); // Back to date object
I also found it useful to use the reviver parameter of JSON.parse (MDN on JSON.parse) to automatically convert ISO strings back to javascript dates whenever I read JSON strings.
const isoDatePattern = new RegExp(/\d{4}-[01]\d-[0-3]\dT[0-2]\d:[0-5]\d:[0-5]\d\.\d+([+-][0-2]\d:[0-5]\d|Z)/);
const obj = {
a: 'foo',
b: new Date(1500000000000) // Fri Jul 14 2017, etc...
}
const json = JSON.stringify(obj);
// Convert back, use reviver function:
const parsed = JSON.parse(json, (key, value) => {
if (typeof value === 'string' && value.match(isoDatePattern)){
return new Date(value); // isostring, so cast to js date
}
return value; // leave any other value as-is
});
console.log(parsed.b); // // Fri Jul 14 2017, etc...
The prefered way is using 2018-04-23T18:25:43.511Z...
The picture below shows why this is the prefered way:
So as you see Date has a native Method toJSON, which return in this format and can be easily converted to Date again...
In Sharepoint 2013, getting data in JSON there is no format to convert date into date only format, because in that date should be in ISO format
yourDate.substring(0,10)
This may be helpful for you
I believe that the best format for universal interoperability is not the ISO-8601 string, but rather the format used by EJSON:
{ "myDateField": { "$date" : <ms-since-epoch> } }
As described here: https://docs.meteor.com/api/ejson.html
Benefits
Parsing performance: If you store dates as ISO-8601 strings, this is great if you are expecting a date value under that particular field, but if you have a system which must determine value types without context, you're parsing every string for a date format.
No Need for Date Validation: You need not worry about validation and verification of the date. Even if a string matches ISO-8601 format, it may not be a real date; this can never happen with an EJSON date.
Unambiguous Type Declaration: as far as generic data systems go, if you wanted to store an ISO string as a string in one case, and a real system date in another, generic systems adopting the ISO-8601 string format will not allow this, mechanically (without escape tricks or similar awful solutions).
Conclusion
I understand that a human-readable format (ISO-8601 string) is helpful and more convenient for 80% of use cases, and indeed no-one should ever be told not to store their dates as ISO-8601 strings if that's what their applications understand, but for a universally accepted transport format which should guarantee certain values to for sure be dates, how can we allow for ambiguity and need for so much validation?
it is work for me with parse Server
{
"ContractID": "203-17-DC0101-00003-10011",
"Supplier":"Sample Co., Ltd",
"Value":12345.80,
"Curency":"USD",
"StartDate": {
"__type": "Date",
"iso": "2017-08-22T06:11:00.000Z"
}
}
There is only one correct answer to this and most systems get it wrong. Number of milliseconds since epoch, aka a 64 bit integer. Time Zone is a UI concern and has no business in the app layer or db layer. Why does your db care what time zone something is, when you know it's going to store it as a 64 bit integer then do the transformation calculations.
Strip out the extraneous bits and just treat dates as numbers up to the UI. You can use simple arithmetic operators to do queries and logic.
The following code has worked for me. This code will print date in DD-MM-YYYY format.
DateValue=DateValue.substring(6,8)+"-"+DateValue.substring(4,6)+"-"+DateValue.substring(0,4);
else, you can also use:
DateValue=DateValue.substring(0,4)+"-"+DateValue.substring(4,6)+"-"+DateValue.substring(6,8);
I think that really depends on the use case. In many cases it might be more beneficial to use a proper object model (instead of rendering the date to a string), like so:
{
"person" :
{
"name" : {
"first": "Tom",
"middle": "M",
...
}
"dob" : {
"year": 2012,
"month": 4,
"day": 23,
"hour": 18,
"minute": 25,
"second": 43,
"timeZone": "America/New_York"
}
}
}
Admittedly this is more verbose than RFC 3339 but:
it's human readable as well
it implements a proper object model (as in OOP, as far as JSON permits it)
it supports time zones (not just the UTC offset at the given date and time)
it can support smaller units like milliseconds, nanoseconds, ... or simply fractional seconds
it doesn't require a separate parsing step (to parse the date-time string), the JSON parser will do everything for you
easy creation with any date-time framework or implementation in any language
can easily be extended to support other calendar scales (Hebrew, Chinese, Islamic ...) and eras (AD, BC, ...)
it's year 10000 safe ;-) (RFC 3339 isn't)
supports all-day dates and floating times (Javascript's Date.toJSON() doesn't)
I don't think that correct sorting (as noted by funroll for RFC 3339) is a feature that's really needed when serializing a date to JSON. Also that's only true for date-times having the same time zone offset.
I want datetime.now to return the datetime object in UK format. It does so on my local computer but when I upload the code to the server it does it in US format
DateTime doesn't have any format associated with it. Formatting is just for presentation. You can do:
string formattedDate = DateTime.Now.ToString(CultureInfo.CreateSpecificCulture("en-GB"));
Or supply a specific/custom format like:
string formattedDate = DateTime.Now.ToString("dd/MM/yyyy HH:mm:ss",
CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
I want datetime.now to return the datetime object in UK format.
There's no such concept, any more than an int is a value "in hex" or "in decimal". A DateTime is just a DateTime - you can specify the format when you convert it to a string. It's really important to understand the difference between an inherent value, and what it looks like after it's converted to text - very few types are aware of a custom, modifiable format to use when converting themselves - it's either provided externally (as for DateTime, numbers etc) or simply fixed.
Before you convert start hard-coding a UK format though, I would strongly advise you to consider exactly what you're doing:
Ideally, avoid the conversion in the first place. A lot of the time, string conversions are unnecessary and can be problematic.
Is the text going to be consumed by another machine? Use an ISO-8601 standard format.
Is the text going to be consumed by a person? Use their culture rather than some arbitrary one you decide on.
... Or display it in a dedicated control...
You can use the overload of the ToString method: ToString("dd/MM/yyyy"), or: ToString("yy/MMM/dd"), etc. etc.
Read more about it here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zdtaw1bw%28v=vs.110%29.aspx
Also sounds to me that you might want to configure your (UI-)Culture in the web.config? Then it will always be in the same format regardless of the culture of your US/Japanese/european server culture..
More about that here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bz9tc508%28v=vs.140%29.aspx
LogDate = DateTime.UtcNow.AddHours(1);
I have a DateTime variable that holds the following value: 5/11/2014 7:56:26 am
I am currently using the following code to format this as a string: uDate.ToString("s"). Using this code, I get the following value: 2014-11-05T07:56:26
I need this to be more accurate. The exact value I am wanting to get is in the following range of accuracy: 2014-11-05T07:56:26.4
I have done some research at the following link: http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
Here is what I have found:
This profile does not specify how many digits may be used to represent
the decimal fraction of a second. An adopting standard that permits
fractions of a second must specify both the minimum number of digits
(a number greater than or equal to one) and the maximum number of
digits (the maximum may be stated to be "unlimited").
The value I am wanting to get is the value used on Azure when displaying a DateTime variable in a web service request.
How can I format my own DateTime strings so that they are the same format as the format used on Azure? Is there a specific format that Azure uses?
Basically, how can I format a DateTime string to be more accurate than the code: uDate.ToString("s")
Thanks in advance.
I believe the most "complete" information would be to use the "O" value, including fractions and also TimeZone (when available).
var myDate = DateTime.Now.ToString("o");
See also this article. Microsoft states that "complies with ISO 8601" and every .Net platform (also Azure) is able to read this string as DateTime, and also properly set the 'DateTimeKind' when available.
"s" standard format specifier uses SortableDateTimePattern property of your CurrentCulture and it doesn't includes miliseconds part.
This format specifier is always the same regardless the culture you use and it is "yyyy'-'MM'-'dd'T'HH':'mm':'ss" format.
You can just use custom date and time format strings like;
uDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.f");
I am trying to simply change the date format from the datatable to universal time format but it formats it wrongly as if I have date for August 7 it changed it to August 8 after formatting it to universal date time. My code for formatting date is,
DateVar[runs] = DateTime.Parse(Convert.ToString(output.Tables[0].Rows[runs][0])).ToUniversalTime().ToString();
Don't get in to code its correct and its a part of loop so "run" is loop and output is data set having one table I have first data in table is "Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:52 PM" and it was converted to "8/8/2011 5:52:00 AM" after implementing universal time format.
Hopes for your suggestions
Universal time isn't a format - it's a time zone, effectively. It's not clear what you're trying to do, but converting a "local" DateTime to "universal" DateTime will usually change the time. If you don't want that to happen, don't call ToUniversalTime.
It's a pity that the .NET date/time API isn't as clear as it could be - the DateTime type itself has some horrible ambiguities about it. I'm trying to improve the situation with my Noda Time project, but you will need to understand what time zones are about etc.
Personally I would suggest not using simply DateTime.Parse or just calling ToString unless you're absolutely sure that the default format is what you want. I usually call DateTime.ParseExact and specify the expected format (and usually CultureInfo.InvariantCulture unless it's a user-entered string) - and likewise I provide a format string to the ToString call.
In your code you're simply converting a string to a string - what are you attempting to accomplish? If you're just trying to change the format (e.g. to dd/MM/yyyyTHH:mm:ss) then you don't need to call ToUniversalTime but you do need to provide the format string.
I suggest you split your code out into several statements to help you debug this (and for general code clarity):
Fetch the string from the DataTable, if you really need to (if it's already a DateTime, there's no point in converting it to a string and then back again)
Parse the string (again, assuming you need to)
Perform any conversions you need to
Format the DateTime with an explicit format string
Now if any single operation is causing a problem, you can isolate it more easily.
If I run ToUniversalTime() from Greenwich it will give same time but if i do it while I live some where else it will get an offset date time object of + or - hours depending on position.