Develop Reference

My Asp.net core app Event handlers not working

I'm creating an ASP.net Core application with onion architecture.I want to raise some events in Business Logic layer and subscribe to these events from infrastructure layer.(layers from inner to outer: Domain - Contracts - Business Logic - Infrastructure - API)
one of my BL classes and event implementation:
public class LiveStreamBusinessLogic : ILiveStreamBusinessLogic
{
public event ILiveStreamBusinessLogic.LiveStreamEventHandler LiveStreamEventOccured;
public async Task<IBusinessLogicResult<PagedList<LiveStreamForShowDto>>> GetAllLiveStreamAsync(LiveStreamParameters liveStreamParameters)
{
// some logic
OnDomainEventOccured();
return new BusinessLogicResult<PagedList<LiveStreamForShowDto>>
{Success = true, Result = livesListForTransferPaged};
}
protected virtual void OnDomainEventOccured()
{
LiveStreamEventOccured?.Invoke(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
also i'm using DI for creating upper class with this interface :
public interface ILiveStreamBusinessLogic
{
public delegate void LiveStreamEventHandler(object sender, EventArgs args);
public event LiveStreamEventHandler LiveStreamEventOccured;
Task<IBusinessLogicResult<PagedList<LiveStreamForShowDto>>> GetAllLiveStreamAsync(LiveStreamParameters liveStreamParameters);
}
and this class will instantiated through StartUp class:
services.AddScoped<ILiveStreamBusinessLogic, LiveStreamBusinessLogic>();
and my subscriber is :
public class ElasticLogger
{
private readonly ILoggerManager _loggerManager;
private readonly ILiveStreamBusinessLogic _liveStreamBusinessLogic;
public ElasticLogger(ILoggerManager loggerManager, ILiveStreamBusinessLogic liveStreamBusinessLogic)
{
_loggerManager = loggerManager;
_liveStreamBusinessLogic = liveStreamBusinessLogic;
Subscribe();
}
private void Subscribe()
{
_liveStreamBusinessLogic.LiveStreamEventOccured += OnDomainEventOccured;
}
private void OnDomainEventOccured(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
_loggerManager.LogInfo(Serialize(e).ToString());
}
}
and StartUp :
services.AddScoped<ElasticLogger>();
the problem is event will raise correctly but the handler does not execute. I guess there is a problem with the procedure of instantiating my classes in startup but have no idea how to solve it? any solution or even better pattern for this problem?

By looking at your example codes here, I cannot see that you are creating an instance of the ElasticLogger. That means no ElasticLogger is created, therefore it couldn't Subscribe.
You can check if my theory is correct or not, by putting a breakpoint in the constructor of ElasticLogger. If you never hit the breakpoint, then I'm right.
I suggest you to refactor ElasticLogger, don't call Subscribe from the constructor. But do like this:
public class ElasticLogger
{
private readonly ILoggerManager _loggerManager;
private readonly ILiveStreamBusinessLogic _liveStreamBusinessLogic;
public ElasticLogger(ILoggerManager loggerManager, ILiveStreamBusinessLogic liveStreamBusinessLogic)
{
_loggerManager = loggerManager;
_liveStreamBusinessLogic = liveStreamBusinessLogic;
}
public void Subscribe()
{
_liveStreamBusinessLogic.LiveStreamEventOccured += OnDomainEventOccured;
}
private void OnDomainEventOccured(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
_loggerManager.LogInfo(Serialize(e).ToString());
}
}
But, make sure you call it externally, after your application starts, call it like: elasticLogger.Subscribe() externally. Then your event should be handled.

Update a form in parallel with an installation script?

I currently have an installation "framework" that does specific things. What I need now to do is be able to call my form in parallel with my script. Something like this:
InstallationForm f = new InstallationForm();
Application.Run(f);
InstallSoftware(f);
private static void InstallSoftware(InstallationForm f) {
f.WriteToTextbox("Starting installation...");
Utils.Execute(#"C:\temp\setup.msi", #"-s C:\temp\instructions.xml");
...
f.WriteToTextbox("Installation finished");
The current way I can do this is by adding the Form.Shown handler in InstallSoftware, but that seems really messy. Is there anyway I can do this better?

Your code will not work, because Application.Run(f) returns not until the form was closed.
You may use a simplified Model/View/Controller pattern. Create an InstallationFormController class that has several events, e.g. for textual notifications to be written to your textbox. The InstallationForm registers on these events in it's OnLoad() method and then calls InstallationFormController.Initialize(). That method starts your installation (on a worker thread/task). That installation callback method fires several text events.
InstallationForm f = new InstallationForm(new InstallationFormController());
Application.Run(f);
internal class InstallationFormController
{
public event EventHandler<DataEventArgsT<string>> NotificationTextChanged;
public InstallationFormController()
{
}
public void Initialize()
{
Task.Factory.StartNew(DoInstallation);
}
private void DoInstallation()
{
...
OnNotificationTextChanged(new DataEventArgsT<string>("Installation finished"));
}
private void OnNotificationTextChanged(DataEventArgsT<string> e)
{
if(NotificationTextChanged != null)
NotificationTextChanged(this, e);
}
}
public class DataEventArgsT<T> : EventArgs
{
...
public T Data { get; set; }
}
internal class InstallationForm : Form
{
private readonly InstallationFormController _controller;
public InstallationForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public InstallationForm(InstallationFormController controller) : this()
{
if(controller == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("controller")
_controller = controller;
}
protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e)
{
base.OnLoad(e);
_controller.NotificationTextChanged += Controller_NotificationTextChanged;
_controller.Initialize();
}
protected virtual void Controller_NotificationTextChanged(object sender, DataEventArgsT<string> e)
{
if(this.InvokeRequired)
{ // call this method on UI thread!!!
var callback = new EventHandler<DataEventArgsT<string>>(Controller_NotificationTextChanged);
this.Invoke(callback, new object[] {sender, e});
}
else
{
_myTextBox.Text = e.Data;
}
}
...
}

Unit testing a background thread with an interface

I have created a class, SenderClass, which will start and run a background worker from its constructor.
The method, RunWorker(), runs is a while(true) loop which will pop elements from a queue, send them through the method SendMessage(), and sleep for a small amount of time to allow new elements to be added to the queue.
Here lies the problem: How do I test the method that sends the element from the queue, without exposing it to those who uses the class?
Implementation:
public class SenderClass : ISenderClass
{
private Queue<int> _myQueue = new Queue<int>();
private Thread _worker;
public SenderClass()
{
//Create a background worker
_worker = new Thread(RunWorker) {IsBackground = true};
_worker.Start();
}
private void RunWorker() //This is the background worker's method
{
while (true) //Keep it running
{
lock (_myQueue) //No fiddling from other threads
{
while (_myQueue.Count != 0) //Pop elements if found
SendMessage(_myQueue.Dequeue()); //Send the element
}
Thread.Sleep(50); //Allow new elements to be inserted
}
}
private void SendMessage(int element)
{
//This is what we want to test
}
public void AddToQueue(int element)
{
Task.Run(() => //Async method will return at ones, not slowing the caller
{
lock (_myQueue) //Lock queue to insert into it
{
_myQueue.Enqueue(element);
}
});
}
}
Wanted interface:
public interface ISenderClass
{
void AddToQueue(int element);
}
Needed interface for test purpose:
public interface ISenderClass
{
void SendMessage(int element);
void AddToQueue(int element);
}
There's a very simple solution, saying I have created my class incorrect due to the Single Responsability Principle, and my class' purpose is not to send messages, but actually run what sends them.
What I should have, is another class, TransmittingClass, which exposes the method SendMessage(int) through its own interface.
This way I can test that class, and SenderClass should just call the method through that interface.
But what other options do I have with the current implementation?
I can make all private methods I wish to test (all of them) have a [assembly:InternalsVisibleTo("MyTests")], but does a third option exist?

Send message logic should be implemented in a separate class with a separate interface. This class should take the new class as a dependency. You can test the new class separately.
public interface IMessageQueue
{
void AddToQueue(int element);
}
public interface IMessageSender
{
void SendMessage(object message);
}
public class SenderClass : IMessageQueue
{
private readonly IMessageSender _sender;
public SenderClass(IMessageSender sender)
{
_sender = sender;
}
public void AddToQueue(int element)
{
/*...*/
}
private void SendMessage()
{
_sender.SendMessage(new object());
}
}
public class DummyMessageSender : IMessageSender
{
//you can use this in your test harness to check for the messages sent
public Queue<object> Messages { get; private set; }
public DummyMessageSender()
{
Messages = new Queue<object>();
}
public void SendMessage(object message)
{
Messages.Enqueue(message);
//obviously you'll need to do some locking here too
}
}
Edit
To address your comment, here is an implementation using Action<int>. This allows you to define your message sending action in your test class to mock the SendMessage method without worrying about creating another class. (Personally, I'd still prefer to define the classes/interfaces explicitly).
public class SenderClass : ISenderClass
{
private Queue<int> _myQueue = new Queue<int>();
private Thread _worker;
private readonly Action<int> _senderAction;
public SenderClass()
{
_worker = new Thread(RunWorker) { IsBackground = true };
_worker.Start();
_senderAction = DefaultMessageSendingAction;
}
public SenderClass(Action<int> senderAction)
{
//Create a background worker
_worker = new Thread(RunWorker) { IsBackground = true };
_worker.Start();
_senderAction = senderAction;
}
private void RunWorker() //This is the background worker's method
{
while (true) //Keep it running
{
lock (_myQueue) //No fiddling from other threads
{
while (_myQueue.Count != 0) //Pop elements if found
SendMessage(_myQueue.Dequeue()); //Send the element
}
Thread.Sleep(50); //Allow new elements to be inserted
}
}
private void SendMessage(int element)
{
_senderAction(element);
}
private void DefaultMessageSendingAction(int item)
{
/* whatever happens during sending */
}
public void AddToQueue(int element)
{
Task.Run(() => //Async method will return at ones, not slowing the caller
{
lock (_myQueue) //Lock queue to insert into it
{
_myQueue.Enqueue(element);
}
});
}
}
public class TestClass
{
private SenderClass _sender;
private Queue<int> _messages;
[TestInitialize]
public void SetUp()
{
_messages = new Queue<int>();
_sender = new SenderClass(DummyMessageSendingAction);
}
private void DummyMessageSendingAction(int item)
{
_messages.Enqueue(item);
}
[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
//This isn't a great test, but I think you get the idea
int message = 42;
_sender.AddToQueue(message);
Thread.Sleep(100);
CollectionAssert.Contains(_messages, 42);
}
}

It looks like SenderClass should not perform any sending at all. It should simply maintain the queue. Inject an Action<int> through the constructor that does the sending. That way you can move SendMessage somewhere else and call it however you like.
As an added benefit your test of SendMessage is not cluttered with queue management.
Seeing your edit you don't seem to like this approach and you don't seem to like the InternalsVisibleTo approach either. You could expose SendMessage through a separate interface and implement that interface explicitly. That way SendMessage is still callable through that interface but by default it is not accessible without some casting contortions. It also does not show up in the intellisense autocomplete list.

How to make an event which gets triggered in another class

In my code for the PluginManager the event PluginEvent gets triggered after
a plugin has been added. But I want to get the event also triggered in the test class.
Somehow I cant solve this problem. The event only gets triggered in the PluginManager class. I read some articles how to create events and so on, but I got even more confused
PluginManager class
public class PluginEventArgs
{
public PluginEventArgs(string s) { Text = s; }
public String Text { get; private set; } // readonly
}
public class PluginManager
{
// Declare the delegate (if using non-generic pattern).
public delegate void PluginEventHandler(object sender, PluginEventArgs e);
// Declare the event.
public event PluginEventHandler PluginEvent;
protected virtual void RaiseSampleEvent(string message)
{
if (PluginEvent != null)
PluginEvent(this, new PluginEventArgs(message));
}
public PluginManager()
{
PluginEvent += PluginManager_PluginEvent;
SomeMethod();
}
void PluginManager_PluginEvent(object sender, PluginEventArgs e)
{
//This event gets triggered =)
}
public void SomeMethod()
{
//Code
RaiseSampleEvent("Name of the Plugin");
//Code
}
}
My test class:
class test
{
public test()
{
PluginManager pluginMg = new PluginManager();
pluginMg.PluginEvent += pluginMg_PluginEvent;
}
//I want this event to get triggered when a new plugin has been found
void pluginMg_PluginEvent(object sender, PluginEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(e.Text);
}
}
How can I manage to get the event triggered in the test class?
Thanks for any advise!

You're actually doing things right except for one logical Mistake.
In your test class you're creating the PluginManager by using the constructor. The constructor of PluginManager first subscribes to the event and then raises it.
AFTERWARDS you're subscribing to that event.
The simple Problem is that when you are raising the event your test class has not subscribed yet. When you raise that event again everything should work out just fine.
Another thing is that I would use the generic EventHandler class instead of creating your own delegates. This keeps your code cleaner and everyone knows that this is meant to be an event at first glance.
Just inherit PlugInEventArgs from EventArgs and then use EventHandler.

In your PluginManager class you shouldn't subscribe to your own event PluginEvent, you should subscribe to an external event or just raise the PluginEvent.
Let me give you an example:
public class PluginEventArgs
{
public PluginEventArgs(string s) { Text = s; }
public String Text { get; private set; } // readonly
}
public class OtherClass
{
public event PluginEventHandler PluginEvent;
private void RaiseEvent()
{
if (null != PluginEvent)
PluginEvent(this, new PluginEventArgs("some message"));
}
}
public delegate void PluginEventHandler(object sender, PluginEventArgs e);
public class PluginManager
{
public event PluginEventHandler PluginEvent;
private OtherClass otherClass;
protected virtual void RaiseSampleEvent(string message)
{
if (PluginEvent != null)
PluginEvent(this, new PluginEventArgs(message));
}
public PluginManager(OtherClass otherClass)
{
this.otherClass = otherClass;
this.otherClass.PluginEvent += otherClass_PluginEvent;
SomeMethod();
}
void otherClass_PluginEvent(object sender, PluginEventArgs e)
{
if (PluginEvent != null)
PluginEvent(sender, e); // this way the original sender and args are transferred.
}
public void SomeMethod()
{
//Code
RaiseSampleEvent("Name of the Plugin");
//Code
}
}
class test
{
public test()
{
OtherClass otherClass = new OtherClass();
PluginManager pluginMg = new PluginManager(otherClass);
pluginMg.PluginEvent += pluginMg_PluginEvent;
}
//I want this event to get triggered when a new plugin has been found
void pluginMg_PluginEvent(object sender, PluginEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(e.Text);
}
}

Why is subscribed event always null?

I declare a subscription to event in:
public class MainClass
{
public void btndel_bar_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
SomeClass sc = new SomeClass();
sc.FieldUpdate += new SomeClass.FieldUpdateHandler(sc_FieldUpdate);
}
void sc_FieldUpdate(object sender, ValueEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(e.Smth_property);
}
}
And here is I want to listen event:
public class Someclass
{
public delegate void FieldUpdateHandler(object sender, ValueEventArgs e);
public event FieldUpdateHandler FieldUpdate;
void Somemethod()
{
string str = "Steel";
ValueEventArgs args = new ValueEventArgs(str);
FieldUpdate(this, args);
}
}
A class which carries data:
public class ValueEventArgs : EventArgs
{
private string smth;
public ValueEventArgs(string smth)
{
this.smth = smth;
}
public string Smth_property
{
get { return smth; }
}
}
I always have FieldUpdate=null. How to solve it?

You're calling Somemethod() in the constructor, before the calling code gets a chance to add the event handler.
Therefore, the event is still null.

The moment you create the object of SomeClass your event would get reinitialized.
Make your event a static so that multiple objects of SomeClass would share it
public static event FieldUpdateHandler FieldUpdate;

I've read articles about delegates and events and after reading I always I thought to make all operations again. I did all over again and it works! Consequently I done something wrong when I did at the beginning of.