Related
When building a Windows Console App in C#, is it possible to write to the console without having to extend a current line or go to a new line? For example, if I want to show a percentage representing how close a process is to completion, I'd just like to update the value on the same line as the cursor, and not have to put each percentage on a new line.
Can this be done with a "standard" C# console app?
If you print only "\r" to the console the cursor goes back to the beginning of the current line and then you can rewrite it. This should do the trick:
for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{
Console.Write("\r{0}% ", i);
}
Notice the few spaces after the number to make sure that whatever was there before is erased.
Also notice the use of Write() instead of WriteLine() since you don't want to add an "\n" at the end of the line.
You can use Console.SetCursorPosition to set the position of the cursor and then write at the current position.
Here is an example showing a simple "spinner":
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var spin = new ConsoleSpinner();
Console.Write("Working....");
while (true)
{
spin.Turn();
}
}
public class ConsoleSpinner
{
int counter;
public void Turn()
{
counter++;
switch (counter % 4)
{
case 0: Console.Write("/"); counter = 0; break;
case 1: Console.Write("-"); break;
case 2: Console.Write("\\"); break;
case 3: Console.Write("|"); break;
}
Thread.Sleep(100);
Console.SetCursorPosition(Console.CursorLeft - 1, Console.CursorTop);
}
}
Note that you will have to make sure to overwrite any existing output with new output or blanks.
Update: As it has been criticized that the example moves the cursor only back by one character, I will add this for clarification: Using SetCursorPosition you may set the cursor to any position in the console window.
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, Console.CursorTop);
will set the cursor to the beginning of the current line (or you can use Console.CursorLeft = 0 directly).
So far we have three competing alternatives for how to do this:
Console.Write("\r{0} ", value); // Option 1: carriage return
Console.Write("\b\b\b\b\b{0}", value); // Option 2: backspace
{ // Option 3 in two parts:
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, Console.CursorTop); // - Move cursor
Console.Write(value); // - Rewrite
}
I've always used Console.CursorLeft = 0, a variation on the third option, so I decided to do some tests. Here's the code I used:
public static void CursorTest()
{
int testsize = 1000000;
Console.WriteLine("Testing cursor position");
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
{
Console.Write("\rCounting: {0} ", i);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("\nTime using \\r: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
int top = Console.CursorTop;
for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, top);
Console.Write("Counting: {0} ", i);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("\nTime using CursorLeft: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
Console.Write("Counting: ");
for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
{
Console.Write("\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b{0,8}", i);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("\nTime using \\b: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
On my machine, I get the following results:
Backspaces: 25.0 seconds
Carriage Returns: 28.7 seconds
SetCursorPosition: 49.7 seconds
Additionally, SetCursorPosition caused noticeable flicker that I didn't observe with either of the alternatives. So, the moral is to use backspaces or carriage returns when possible, and thanks for teaching me a faster way to do this, SO!
Update: In the comments, Joel suggests that SetCursorPosition is constant with respect to the distance moved while the other methods are linear. Further testing confirms that this is the case, however constant time and slow is still slow. In my tests, writing a long string of backspaces to the console is faster than SetCursorPosition until somewhere around 60 characters. So backspace is faster for replacing portions of the line shorter than 60 characters (or so), and it doesn't flicker, so I'm going to stand by my initial endorsement of \b over \r and SetCursorPosition.
You can use the \b (backspace) escape sequence to backup a particular number of characters on the current line. This just moves the current location, it does not remove the characters.
For example:
string line="";
for(int i=0; i<100; i++)
{
string backup=new string('\b',line.Length);
Console.Write(backup);
line=string.Format("{0}%",i);
Console.Write(line);
}
Here, line is the percentage line to write to the console. The trick is to generate the correct number of \b characters for the previous output.
The advantage of this over the \r approach is that if works even if your percentage output is not at the beginning of the line.
\r is used for these scenarios.
\r represents a carriage return which means the cursor returns to the start of the line.
That's why Windows uses \n\r as its new line marker.
\n moves you down a line, and \r returns you to the start of the line.
I just had to play with the divo's ConsoleSpinner class. Mine is nowhere near as concise, but it just didn't sit well with me that users of that class have to write their own while(true) loop. I'm shooting for an experience more like this:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.Write("Working....");
ConsoleSpinner spin = new ConsoleSpinner();
spin.Start();
// Do some work...
spin.Stop();
}
And I realized it with the code below. Since I don't want my Start() method to block, I don't want the user to have to worry about writing a while(spinFlag) -like loop, and I want to allow multiple spinners at the same time I had to spawn a separate thread to handle the spinning. And that means the code has to be a lot more complicated.
Also, I haven't done that much multi-threading so it's possible (likely even) that I've left a subtle bug or three in there. But it seems to work pretty well so far:
public class ConsoleSpinner : IDisposable
{
public ConsoleSpinner()
{
CursorLeft = Console.CursorLeft;
CursorTop = Console.CursorTop;
}
public ConsoleSpinner(bool start)
: this()
{
if (start) Start();
}
public void Start()
{
// prevent two conflicting Start() calls ot the same instance
lock (instanceLocker)
{
if (!running )
{
running = true;
turner = new Thread(Turn);
turner.Start();
}
}
}
public void StartHere()
{
SetPosition();
Start();
}
public void Stop()
{
lock (instanceLocker)
{
if (!running) return;
running = false;
if (! turner.Join(250))
turner.Abort();
}
}
public void SetPosition()
{
SetPosition(Console.CursorLeft, Console.CursorTop);
}
public void SetPosition(int left, int top)
{
bool wasRunning;
//prevent other start/stops during move
lock (instanceLocker)
{
wasRunning = running;
Stop();
CursorLeft = left;
CursorTop = top;
if (wasRunning) Start();
}
}
public bool IsSpinning { get { return running;} }
/* --- PRIVATE --- */
private int counter=-1;
private Thread turner;
private bool running = false;
private int rate = 100;
private int CursorLeft;
private int CursorTop;
private Object instanceLocker = new Object();
private static Object console = new Object();
private void Turn()
{
while (running)
{
counter++;
// prevent two instances from overlapping cursor position updates
// weird things can still happen if the main ui thread moves the cursor during an update and context switch
lock (console)
{
int OldLeft = Console.CursorLeft;
int OldTop = Console.CursorTop;
Console.SetCursorPosition(CursorLeft, CursorTop);
switch (counter)
{
case 0: Console.Write("/"); break;
case 1: Console.Write("-"); break;
case 2: Console.Write("\\"); break;
case 3: Console.Write("|"); counter = -1; break;
}
Console.SetCursorPosition(OldLeft, OldTop);
}
Thread.Sleep(rate);
}
lock (console)
{ // clean up
int OldLeft = Console.CursorLeft;
int OldTop = Console.CursorTop;
Console.SetCursorPosition(CursorLeft, CursorTop);
Console.Write(' ');
Console.SetCursorPosition(OldLeft, OldTop);
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
Stop();
}
}
Explicitly using a Carrage Return (\r) at the beginning of the line rather than (implicitly or explicitly) using a New Line (\n) at the end should get what you want. For example:
void demoPercentDone() {
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
System.Console.Write( "\rProcessing {0}%...", i );
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep( 1000 );
}
System.Console.WriteLine();
}
public void Update(string data)
{
Console.Write(string.Format("\r{0}", "".PadLeft(Console.CursorLeft, ' ')));
Console.Write(string.Format("\r{0}", data));
}
From the Console docs in MSDN:
You can solve this problem by setting
the TextWriter.NewLine property of the
Out or Error property to another line
termination string. For example, the
C# statement, Console.Error.NewLine =
"\r\n\r\n";, sets the line termination
string for the standard error output
stream to two carriage return and line
feed sequences. Then you can
explicitly call the WriteLine method
of the error output stream object, as
in the C# statement,
Console.Error.WriteLine();
So - I did this:
Console.Out.Newline = String.Empty;
Then I am able to control the output myself;
Console.WriteLine("Starting item 1:");
Item1();
Console.WriteLine("OK.\nStarting Item2:");
Another way of getting there.
This works if you want to make generating files look cool .
int num = 1;
var spin = new ConsoleSpinner();
Console.ForegroundColor = ConsoleColor.Green;
Console.Write("");
while (true)
{
spin.Turn();
Console.Write("\r{0} Generating Files ", num);
num++;
}
And this is the method that i got from some answer below and modified it
public class ConsoleSpinner
{
int counter;
public void Turn()
{
counter++;
switch (counter % 4)
{
case 0: Console.Write("."); counter = 0; break;
case 1: Console.Write(".."); break;
case 2: Console.Write("..."); break;
case 3: Console.Write("...."); break;
case 4: Console.Write("\r"); break;
}
Thread.Sleep(100);
Console.SetCursorPosition(23, Console.CursorTop);
}
}
Here's another one :D
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.Write("Working... ");
int spinIndex = 0;
while (true)
{
// obfuscate FTW! Let's hope overflow is disabled or testers are impatient
Console.Write("\b" + #"/-\|"[(spinIndex++) & 3]);
}
}
}
If you want update one line, but the information is too long to show on one line, it may need some new lines. I've encountered this problem, and below is one way to solve this.
public class DumpOutPutInforInSameLine
{
//content show in how many lines
int TotalLine = 0;
//start cursor line
int cursorTop = 0;
// use to set character number show in one line
int OneLineCharNum = 75;
public void DumpInformation(string content)
{
OutPutInSameLine(content);
SetBackSpace();
}
static void backspace(int n)
{
for (var i = 0; i < n; ++i)
Console.Write("\b \b");
}
public void SetBackSpace()
{
if (TotalLine == 0)
{
backspace(OneLineCharNum);
}
else
{
TotalLine--;
while (TotalLine >= 0)
{
backspace(OneLineCharNum);
TotalLine--;
if (TotalLine >= 0)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(OneLineCharNum, cursorTop + TotalLine);
}
}
}
}
private void OutPutInSameLine(string content)
{
//Console.WriteLine(TotalNum);
cursorTop = Console.CursorTop;
TotalLine = content.Length / OneLineCharNum;
if (content.Length % OneLineCharNum > 0)
{
TotalLine++;
}
if (TotalLine == 0)
{
Console.Write("{0}", content);
return;
}
int i = 0;
while (i < TotalLine)
{
int cNum = i * OneLineCharNum;
if (i < TotalLine - 1)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0}", content.Substring(cNum, OneLineCharNum));
}
else
{
Console.Write("{0}", content.Substring(cNum, content.Length - cNum));
}
i++;
}
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
DumpOutPutInforInSameLine outPutInSameLine = new DumpOutPutInforInSameLine();
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
//need several lines
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
}
}
i was looking for same solution in vb.net and i found this one and it's great.
however as #JohnOdom suggested a better way to handle the blanks space if previous one is larger than current one..
i make a function in vb.net and thought someone could get helped ..
here is my code:
Private Sub sPrintStatus(strTextToPrint As String, Optional boolIsNewLine As Boolean = False)
REM intLastLength is declared as public variable on global scope like below
REM intLastLength As Integer
If boolIsNewLine = True Then
intLastLength = 0
End If
If intLastLength > strTextToPrint.Length Then
Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(13) & strTextToPrint.PadRight(strTextToPrint.Length + (intLastLength - strTextToPrint.Length), Convert.ToChar(" ")))
Else
Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(13) & strTextToPrint)
End If
intLastLength = strTextToPrint.Length
End Sub
I was doing a search for this to see if the solution I wrote could be optimised for speed. What I wanted was a countdown timer, not just updating the current line.
Here's what I came up with. Might be useful to someone
int sleepTime = 5 * 60; // 5 minutes
for (int secondsRemaining = sleepTime; secondsRemaining > 0; secondsRemaining --)
{
double minutesPrecise = secondsRemaining / 60;
double minutesRounded = Math.Round(minutesPrecise, 0);
int seconds = Convert.ToInt32((minutesRounded * 60) - secondsRemaining);
Console.Write($"\rProcess will resume in {minutesRounded}:{String.Format("{0:D2}", -seconds)} ");
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
Console.WriteLine("");
Inspired by #E.Lahu Solution, implementation of a bar progress with percentage.
public class ConsoleSpinner
{
private int _counter;
public void Turn(Color color, int max, string prefix = "Completed", string symbol = "■",int position = 0)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, position);
Console.Write($"{prefix} {ComputeSpinner(_counter, max, symbol)}", color);
_counter = _counter == max ? 0 : _counter + 1;
}
public string ComputeSpinner(int nmb, int max, string symbol)
{
var spinner = new StringBuilder();
if (nmb == 0)
return "\r ";
spinner.Append($"[{nmb}%] [");
for (var i = 0; i < max; i++)
{
spinner.Append(i < nmb ? symbol : ".");
}
spinner.Append("]");
return spinner.ToString();
}
}
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
var progressBar= new ConsoleSpinner();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
progressBar.Turn(Color.Aqua,100);
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
}
Here is my take on s soosh's and 0xA3's answers.
It can update the console with user messages while updating the spinner and has an elapsed time indicator aswell.
public class ConsoleSpiner : IDisposable
{
private static readonly string INDICATOR = "/-\\|";
private static readonly string MASK = "\r{0} {1:c} {2}";
int counter;
Timer timer;
string message;
public ConsoleSpiner() {
counter = 0;
timer = new Timer(200);
timer.Elapsed += TimerTick;
}
public void Start() {
timer.Start();
}
public void Stop() {
timer.Stop();
counter = 0;
}
public string Message {
get { return message; }
set { message = value; }
}
private void TimerTick(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) {
Turn();
}
private void Turn() {
counter++;
var elapsed = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(counter * 200);
Console.Write(MASK, INDICATOR[counter % 4], elapsed, this.Message);
}
public void Dispose() {
Stop();
timer.Elapsed -= TimerTick;
this.timer.Dispose();
}
}
usage is something like this:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var spinner = new ConsoleSpiner())
{
spinner.Start();
spinner.Message = "About to do some heavy staff :-)"
DoWork();
spinner.Message = "Now processing other staff".
OtherWork();
spinner.Stop();
}
Console.WriteLine("COMPLETED!!!!!\nPress any key to exit.");
}
}
The SetCursorPosition method works in multi-threading scenario, where the other two methods don't
I have a time sensitive application where I get the rank of each object and work out who won or tied for first. With my current algorithm I get some lag in my program so am hoping to speed it up. In this demo version I just get a random number for the ranks as the real rank calc requires too much code to post.
Can anybody suggest how I might do this more quickly as the Update method can get called tens of thousands of times for a single run?
class Program
{
static int runOuts = 0;
static Dictionary<RankedObject, int> dictionaryWins = new Dictionary<RankedObject, int>();
static Dictionary<RankedObject, int> dictionaryDraws = new Dictionary<RankedObject, int>();
static Random random = new Random();
static List<RankedObject> rankedObjects = new List<RankedObject>();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// create some objects for demo
rankedObjects.Add(new RankedObject());
rankedObjects.Add(new RankedObject());
rankedObjects.Add(new RankedObject());
// add each object to the win/draw dictionaries so we can count wins/draws for each
foreach (RankedObject rankedObj in rankedObjects)
{
dictionaryWins.Add(rankedObj, 0);
dictionaryDraws.Add(rankedObj, 0);
}
// calculate wins/draws many times
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
{
Update();
}
// set equity results in each ranked combo and print results
foreach (RankedObject rankedCombo in rankedObjects)
{
rankedCombo.WinEquity = dictionaryWins[rankedCombo] / (double)runOuts;
rankedCombo.DrawEquity = dictionaryDraws[rankedCombo] / (double)runOuts;
Console.WriteLine(rankedCombo);
}
}
private static void Update()
{
// keep a list of ranks for each object so we can get max/winning value easily
List<int> ranks = new List<int>();
// get a rank for each object
foreach (RankedObject rankedCombo in rankedObjects)
{
int rank = random.Next(3);
ranks.Add(rank);
rankedCombo.Rank = rank;
}
// get the maximum rank and how many times it occurs, so we know if their is a tie for the win
int max = ranks.Max();
int maxOccurences = 0;
foreach (int i in ranks)
{
if (i == max)
{
maxOccurences++;
}
}
// loop over each object to record if the object won or tied for win
foreach (RankedObject rankedObj in rankedObjects)
{
if (rankedObj.Rank == max && maxOccurences == 1) // current rankedObj was winner
{
dictionaryWins[rankedObj] += 1;
}
else if (rankedObj.Rank == max && maxOccurences > 1) // current rankedObj Tied for win
{
dictionaryDraws[rankedObj] += 1;
}
}
runOuts++;
}
}
class RankedObject
{
int rank;
double winEquity;
double drawEquity;
public int Rank { get => rank; set => rank = value; }
public double WinEquity { get => winEquity; set => winEquity = value; }
public double DrawEquity { get => drawEquity; set => drawEquity = value; }
public override string ToString()
{
return "Win Equity: " + winEquity + ", Draw Equity: " + drawEquity;
}
}
I have a stream of data at approx. 500 Hz coming from serial port. The data are sent by a microprocessor which is controlling a machine. The data are filtered out and shown in different text boxes by a class that strips out the header characters used by the transmission protocol.
This is the code that assigns the four variables I get to the different text boxes.
private void SetText(string text)
{
if (this.txtOutput.InvokeRequired)
{
SetTextCallback d = new SetTextCallback(SetText);
this.BeginInvoke(d, new object[] { text });
}
else
{
txtOutput.AppendText(text + "\r\n");
string a = "", b = "", c = "", d="";
string invia = text.ToString();
Stripper strp = new Stripper();
strp.Distri(invia, out a, out b, out c, out d);
if (a != "")
{
textBox7.Text = a; //currentRes
}
if (b != "")
{
textBox2.Text = b; //temperature
}
if (d != "" )
{
textBox3.Text = d; //motor current
}
if (c == "1\r") //motor RPM
{
timer3.Start();
}
}
}
The problem I am facing is that I get hundred of values "a", "b" and "d" per second and obviously the relevant text boxes are flickering. Moreover I would like to average the value for each variable taking 100 samples of each type before showing them in the relevant text box. This would avoid flickering and would give a more accurate reading.
How can I average each of the variable "a", "b" and "d" to x samples without freezing the application which meanwhile has to provide control for other features?
Samples code will be really appreciated.
average the value for each variable taking 100 samples ... would give a more accurate reading
So where does this number 100 come from, just from the GUI design or is it somehow related to the data?
And do you want to average independent (adjacent) blocks or do you need a moving average?
A simple approach:
class Accum
{
private int sum, count;
public event AverageChanged;
public void Add(int value)
{
sum += value;
count += 1;
if (count >= 100)
{
OnAvarerageChanged(sum/count);
sum = 0;
count = 0;
}
}
....
}
You will need to create 3 instances of this on your form. Since all SerialPort data will happen on the same thread you'll only need to synchronize when handling the event.
Update:
The easiest but less general approach:
class Accum
{
private int sum, count;
//public event AverageChanged;
public void Add(int value)
{
sum += value;
count += 1;
if (count >= 100)
{
OnAvarerageChanged(sum/count);
sum = 0;
count = 0;
}
}
public Label MyLabel { get; set; }
private void OnAvarerageChanged(int av)
{
SetTextCallback d = new SetTextCallback(SetText);
string text = av.ToString();
MyLabel.BeginInvoke(d, new object[] { text });
}
private void SetText(string text)
{
this.MyLabel.Text = text;
}
}
Why do I see people implement properties like this?
What is the point of checking if the value is equal to the current value?
public double? Price
{
get
{
return _price;
}
set
{
if (_price == value)
return;
_price = value;
}
}
In this case it would be moot; however, in the case where there is an associated side-effect (typically an event), it avoids trivial events. For example:
set
{
if (_price == value)
return;
_price = value;
OnPriceChanged(); // invokes the Price event
}
Now, if we do:
foo.Price = 16;
foo.Price = 16;
foo.Price = 16;
foo.Price = 16;
we don't get 4 events; we get at most 1 (maybe 0 if it is already 16).
In more complex examples there could be validation, pre-change actions and post-change actions. All of these can be avoided if you know that it isn't actually a change.
set
{
if (_price == value)
return;
if(value < 0 || value > MaxPrice) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException();
OnPriceChanging();
_price = value;
OnPriceChanged();
}
This is not an answer, more: it is an evidence-based response to the claim (in another answer) that it is quicker to check than to assign. In short: no, it isn't. No difference whatsoever. I get (for non-nullable int):
AutoProp: 356ms
Field: 356ms
BasicProp: 357ms
CheckedProp: 356ms
(with some small variations on successive runs - but essentially they all take exactly the same time within any sensible rounding - when doing something 500 MILLION times, we can ignore 1ms difference)
In fact, if we change to int? I get:
AutoProp: 714ms
Field: 536ms
BasicProp: 714ms
CheckedProp: 2323ms
or double? (like in the question):
AutoProp: 535ms
Field: 535ms
BasicProp: 539ms
CheckedProp: 3035ms
so this is not a performance helper!
with tests
class Test
{
static void Main()
{
var obj = new Test();
Stopwatch watch;
const int LOOP = 500000000;
watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (int i = 0; i < LOOP; i++)
{
obj.AutoProp = 17;
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("AutoProp: {0}ms", watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);
watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (int i = 0; i < LOOP; i++)
{
obj.Field = 17;
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("Field: {0}ms", watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);
watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (int i = 0; i < LOOP; i++)
{
obj.BasicProp = 17;
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("BasicProp: {0}ms", watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);
watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
for (int i = 0; i < LOOP; i++)
{
obj.CheckedProp = 17;
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("CheckedProp: {0}ms", watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);
Console.ReadLine();
}
public int AutoProp { get; set; }
public int Field;
private int basicProp;
public int BasicProp
{
get { return basicProp; }
set { basicProp = value; }
}
private int checkedProp;
public int CheckedProp
{
get { return checkedProp; }
set { if (value != checkedProp) checkedProp = value; }
}
}
Let's suppose we don't handle any change related events.
I don't think comparing is faster than assingment. It depends on the data type. Let's say you have a string, Comparison is much longer in the worst case than a simple assignment where the member simply changes reference to the ref of the new string.
So my guess is that it's better in that case to assign right away.
In the case of simple data types it doesn't have a real impact.
Such that, you dont have to re-assign the same value. Its just faster execution for comparing values. AFAIK
When building a Windows Console App in C#, is it possible to write to the console without having to extend a current line or go to a new line? For example, if I want to show a percentage representing how close a process is to completion, I'd just like to update the value on the same line as the cursor, and not have to put each percentage on a new line.
Can this be done with a "standard" C# console app?
If you print only "\r" to the console the cursor goes back to the beginning of the current line and then you can rewrite it. This should do the trick:
for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{
Console.Write("\r{0}% ", i);
}
Notice the few spaces after the number to make sure that whatever was there before is erased.
Also notice the use of Write() instead of WriteLine() since you don't want to add an "\n" at the end of the line.
You can use Console.SetCursorPosition to set the position of the cursor and then write at the current position.
Here is an example showing a simple "spinner":
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var spin = new ConsoleSpinner();
Console.Write("Working....");
while (true)
{
spin.Turn();
}
}
public class ConsoleSpinner
{
int counter;
public void Turn()
{
counter++;
switch (counter % 4)
{
case 0: Console.Write("/"); counter = 0; break;
case 1: Console.Write("-"); break;
case 2: Console.Write("\\"); break;
case 3: Console.Write("|"); break;
}
Thread.Sleep(100);
Console.SetCursorPosition(Console.CursorLeft - 1, Console.CursorTop);
}
}
Note that you will have to make sure to overwrite any existing output with new output or blanks.
Update: As it has been criticized that the example moves the cursor only back by one character, I will add this for clarification: Using SetCursorPosition you may set the cursor to any position in the console window.
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, Console.CursorTop);
will set the cursor to the beginning of the current line (or you can use Console.CursorLeft = 0 directly).
So far we have three competing alternatives for how to do this:
Console.Write("\r{0} ", value); // Option 1: carriage return
Console.Write("\b\b\b\b\b{0}", value); // Option 2: backspace
{ // Option 3 in two parts:
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, Console.CursorTop); // - Move cursor
Console.Write(value); // - Rewrite
}
I've always used Console.CursorLeft = 0, a variation on the third option, so I decided to do some tests. Here's the code I used:
public static void CursorTest()
{
int testsize = 1000000;
Console.WriteLine("Testing cursor position");
Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
{
Console.Write("\rCounting: {0} ", i);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("\nTime using \\r: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
int top = Console.CursorTop;
for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, top);
Console.Write("Counting: {0} ", i);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("\nTime using CursorLeft: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
sw.Reset();
sw.Start();
Console.Write("Counting: ");
for (int i = 0; i < testsize; i++)
{
Console.Write("\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b{0,8}", i);
}
sw.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("\nTime using \\b: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
}
On my machine, I get the following results:
Backspaces: 25.0 seconds
Carriage Returns: 28.7 seconds
SetCursorPosition: 49.7 seconds
Additionally, SetCursorPosition caused noticeable flicker that I didn't observe with either of the alternatives. So, the moral is to use backspaces or carriage returns when possible, and thanks for teaching me a faster way to do this, SO!
Update: In the comments, Joel suggests that SetCursorPosition is constant with respect to the distance moved while the other methods are linear. Further testing confirms that this is the case, however constant time and slow is still slow. In my tests, writing a long string of backspaces to the console is faster than SetCursorPosition until somewhere around 60 characters. So backspace is faster for replacing portions of the line shorter than 60 characters (or so), and it doesn't flicker, so I'm going to stand by my initial endorsement of \b over \r and SetCursorPosition.
You can use the \b (backspace) escape sequence to backup a particular number of characters on the current line. This just moves the current location, it does not remove the characters.
For example:
string line="";
for(int i=0; i<100; i++)
{
string backup=new string('\b',line.Length);
Console.Write(backup);
line=string.Format("{0}%",i);
Console.Write(line);
}
Here, line is the percentage line to write to the console. The trick is to generate the correct number of \b characters for the previous output.
The advantage of this over the \r approach is that if works even if your percentage output is not at the beginning of the line.
\r is used for these scenarios.
\r represents a carriage return which means the cursor returns to the start of the line.
That's why Windows uses \n\r as its new line marker.
\n moves you down a line, and \r returns you to the start of the line.
I just had to play with the divo's ConsoleSpinner class. Mine is nowhere near as concise, but it just didn't sit well with me that users of that class have to write their own while(true) loop. I'm shooting for an experience more like this:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.Write("Working....");
ConsoleSpinner spin = new ConsoleSpinner();
spin.Start();
// Do some work...
spin.Stop();
}
And I realized it with the code below. Since I don't want my Start() method to block, I don't want the user to have to worry about writing a while(spinFlag) -like loop, and I want to allow multiple spinners at the same time I had to spawn a separate thread to handle the spinning. And that means the code has to be a lot more complicated.
Also, I haven't done that much multi-threading so it's possible (likely even) that I've left a subtle bug or three in there. But it seems to work pretty well so far:
public class ConsoleSpinner : IDisposable
{
public ConsoleSpinner()
{
CursorLeft = Console.CursorLeft;
CursorTop = Console.CursorTop;
}
public ConsoleSpinner(bool start)
: this()
{
if (start) Start();
}
public void Start()
{
// prevent two conflicting Start() calls ot the same instance
lock (instanceLocker)
{
if (!running )
{
running = true;
turner = new Thread(Turn);
turner.Start();
}
}
}
public void StartHere()
{
SetPosition();
Start();
}
public void Stop()
{
lock (instanceLocker)
{
if (!running) return;
running = false;
if (! turner.Join(250))
turner.Abort();
}
}
public void SetPosition()
{
SetPosition(Console.CursorLeft, Console.CursorTop);
}
public void SetPosition(int left, int top)
{
bool wasRunning;
//prevent other start/stops during move
lock (instanceLocker)
{
wasRunning = running;
Stop();
CursorLeft = left;
CursorTop = top;
if (wasRunning) Start();
}
}
public bool IsSpinning { get { return running;} }
/* --- PRIVATE --- */
private int counter=-1;
private Thread turner;
private bool running = false;
private int rate = 100;
private int CursorLeft;
private int CursorTop;
private Object instanceLocker = new Object();
private static Object console = new Object();
private void Turn()
{
while (running)
{
counter++;
// prevent two instances from overlapping cursor position updates
// weird things can still happen if the main ui thread moves the cursor during an update and context switch
lock (console)
{
int OldLeft = Console.CursorLeft;
int OldTop = Console.CursorTop;
Console.SetCursorPosition(CursorLeft, CursorTop);
switch (counter)
{
case 0: Console.Write("/"); break;
case 1: Console.Write("-"); break;
case 2: Console.Write("\\"); break;
case 3: Console.Write("|"); counter = -1; break;
}
Console.SetCursorPosition(OldLeft, OldTop);
}
Thread.Sleep(rate);
}
lock (console)
{ // clean up
int OldLeft = Console.CursorLeft;
int OldTop = Console.CursorTop;
Console.SetCursorPosition(CursorLeft, CursorTop);
Console.Write(' ');
Console.SetCursorPosition(OldLeft, OldTop);
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
Stop();
}
}
Explicitly using a Carrage Return (\r) at the beginning of the line rather than (implicitly or explicitly) using a New Line (\n) at the end should get what you want. For example:
void demoPercentDone() {
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
System.Console.Write( "\rProcessing {0}%...", i );
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep( 1000 );
}
System.Console.WriteLine();
}
public void Update(string data)
{
Console.Write(string.Format("\r{0}", "".PadLeft(Console.CursorLeft, ' ')));
Console.Write(string.Format("\r{0}", data));
}
From the Console docs in MSDN:
You can solve this problem by setting
the TextWriter.NewLine property of the
Out or Error property to another line
termination string. For example, the
C# statement, Console.Error.NewLine =
"\r\n\r\n";, sets the line termination
string for the standard error output
stream to two carriage return and line
feed sequences. Then you can
explicitly call the WriteLine method
of the error output stream object, as
in the C# statement,
Console.Error.WriteLine();
So - I did this:
Console.Out.Newline = String.Empty;
Then I am able to control the output myself;
Console.WriteLine("Starting item 1:");
Item1();
Console.WriteLine("OK.\nStarting Item2:");
Another way of getting there.
This works if you want to make generating files look cool .
int num = 1;
var spin = new ConsoleSpinner();
Console.ForegroundColor = ConsoleColor.Green;
Console.Write("");
while (true)
{
spin.Turn();
Console.Write("\r{0} Generating Files ", num);
num++;
}
And this is the method that i got from some answer below and modified it
public class ConsoleSpinner
{
int counter;
public void Turn()
{
counter++;
switch (counter % 4)
{
case 0: Console.Write("."); counter = 0; break;
case 1: Console.Write(".."); break;
case 2: Console.Write("..."); break;
case 3: Console.Write("...."); break;
case 4: Console.Write("\r"); break;
}
Thread.Sleep(100);
Console.SetCursorPosition(23, Console.CursorTop);
}
}
Here's another one :D
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.Write("Working... ");
int spinIndex = 0;
while (true)
{
// obfuscate FTW! Let's hope overflow is disabled or testers are impatient
Console.Write("\b" + #"/-\|"[(spinIndex++) & 3]);
}
}
}
If you want update one line, but the information is too long to show on one line, it may need some new lines. I've encountered this problem, and below is one way to solve this.
public class DumpOutPutInforInSameLine
{
//content show in how many lines
int TotalLine = 0;
//start cursor line
int cursorTop = 0;
// use to set character number show in one line
int OneLineCharNum = 75;
public void DumpInformation(string content)
{
OutPutInSameLine(content);
SetBackSpace();
}
static void backspace(int n)
{
for (var i = 0; i < n; ++i)
Console.Write("\b \b");
}
public void SetBackSpace()
{
if (TotalLine == 0)
{
backspace(OneLineCharNum);
}
else
{
TotalLine--;
while (TotalLine >= 0)
{
backspace(OneLineCharNum);
TotalLine--;
if (TotalLine >= 0)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(OneLineCharNum, cursorTop + TotalLine);
}
}
}
}
private void OutPutInSameLine(string content)
{
//Console.WriteLine(TotalNum);
cursorTop = Console.CursorTop;
TotalLine = content.Length / OneLineCharNum;
if (content.Length % OneLineCharNum > 0)
{
TotalLine++;
}
if (TotalLine == 0)
{
Console.Write("{0}", content);
return;
}
int i = 0;
while (i < TotalLine)
{
int cNum = i * OneLineCharNum;
if (i < TotalLine - 1)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0}", content.Substring(cNum, OneLineCharNum));
}
else
{
Console.Write("{0}", content.Substring(cNum, content.Length - cNum));
}
i++;
}
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
DumpOutPutInforInSameLine outPutInSameLine = new DumpOutPutInforInSameLine();
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
//need several lines
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa");
outPutInSameLine.DumpInformation("bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb");
}
}
i was looking for same solution in vb.net and i found this one and it's great.
however as #JohnOdom suggested a better way to handle the blanks space if previous one is larger than current one..
i make a function in vb.net and thought someone could get helped ..
here is my code:
Private Sub sPrintStatus(strTextToPrint As String, Optional boolIsNewLine As Boolean = False)
REM intLastLength is declared as public variable on global scope like below
REM intLastLength As Integer
If boolIsNewLine = True Then
intLastLength = 0
End If
If intLastLength > strTextToPrint.Length Then
Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(13) & strTextToPrint.PadRight(strTextToPrint.Length + (intLastLength - strTextToPrint.Length), Convert.ToChar(" ")))
Else
Console.Write(Convert.ToChar(13) & strTextToPrint)
End If
intLastLength = strTextToPrint.Length
End Sub
I was doing a search for this to see if the solution I wrote could be optimised for speed. What I wanted was a countdown timer, not just updating the current line.
Here's what I came up with. Might be useful to someone
int sleepTime = 5 * 60; // 5 minutes
for (int secondsRemaining = sleepTime; secondsRemaining > 0; secondsRemaining --)
{
double minutesPrecise = secondsRemaining / 60;
double minutesRounded = Math.Round(minutesPrecise, 0);
int seconds = Convert.ToInt32((minutesRounded * 60) - secondsRemaining);
Console.Write($"\rProcess will resume in {minutesRounded}:{String.Format("{0:D2}", -seconds)} ");
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
Console.WriteLine("");
Inspired by #E.Lahu Solution, implementation of a bar progress with percentage.
public class ConsoleSpinner
{
private int _counter;
public void Turn(Color color, int max, string prefix = "Completed", string symbol = "■",int position = 0)
{
Console.SetCursorPosition(0, position);
Console.Write($"{prefix} {ComputeSpinner(_counter, max, symbol)}", color);
_counter = _counter == max ? 0 : _counter + 1;
}
public string ComputeSpinner(int nmb, int max, string symbol)
{
var spinner = new StringBuilder();
if (nmb == 0)
return "\r ";
spinner.Append($"[{nmb}%] [");
for (var i = 0; i < max; i++)
{
spinner.Append(i < nmb ? symbol : ".");
}
spinner.Append("]");
return spinner.ToString();
}
}
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
var progressBar= new ConsoleSpinner();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
progressBar.Turn(Color.Aqua,100);
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
}
Here is my take on s soosh's and 0xA3's answers.
It can update the console with user messages while updating the spinner and has an elapsed time indicator aswell.
public class ConsoleSpiner : IDisposable
{
private static readonly string INDICATOR = "/-\\|";
private static readonly string MASK = "\r{0} {1:c} {2}";
int counter;
Timer timer;
string message;
public ConsoleSpiner() {
counter = 0;
timer = new Timer(200);
timer.Elapsed += TimerTick;
}
public void Start() {
timer.Start();
}
public void Stop() {
timer.Stop();
counter = 0;
}
public string Message {
get { return message; }
set { message = value; }
}
private void TimerTick(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e) {
Turn();
}
private void Turn() {
counter++;
var elapsed = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(counter * 200);
Console.Write(MASK, INDICATOR[counter % 4], elapsed, this.Message);
}
public void Dispose() {
Stop();
timer.Elapsed -= TimerTick;
this.timer.Dispose();
}
}
usage is something like this:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
using (var spinner = new ConsoleSpiner())
{
spinner.Start();
spinner.Message = "About to do some heavy staff :-)"
DoWork();
spinner.Message = "Now processing other staff".
OtherWork();
spinner.Stop();
}
Console.WriteLine("COMPLETED!!!!!\nPress any key to exit.");
}
}
The SetCursorPosition method works in multi-threading scenario, where the other two methods don't