My code already gets the table without containing a string. How can I get a list without containing a list of strings? I want to get the result of SELECT * FROM table WHERE column NOT IN ('x' ,'y');
public IEnumerable<keyart1> Get(string keyword)
{
List<keyart1> keylist;
using (dbEntities5 entities = new dbEntities5())
{
keylist = entities.keyart1.Where(e => e.keyword != keyword).ToList();
var result = keylist.Distinct(new ItemEqualityComparer());
return result;
}
}
I think i found the answer if anybody interested
public IEnumerable<keyart1> Get([FromUri] string[] keyword1)
{
List<keyart1> keylist;
List<IEnumerable<keyart1>> ll;
using (dbEntities5 entities = new dbEntities5())
{
ll = new List<IEnumerable<keyart1>>();
foreach (var item in keyword1)
{
keylist = entities.keyart1.Where(e => e.keyword != item).ToList();
var result = keylist.Distinct(new ItemEqualityComparer());
ll.Add(result);
}
var intersection = ll.Aggregate((p, n) => p.Intersect(n).ToList());
return intersection;
}
}
Related
I'm new to using Linq so I don't understand some things or its syntax. I want to group a list and then loop through it with foreach, like my logic below. Obviously my logic doesn't work.
My code:
var final = finalv.Union(finalc);
final = final.GroupBy(x => x.Clave);
foreach (var articulo in final)
{
Articulo articulo2 = new Articulo();
articulo2.ArtID = articulo.ArtID;
articulo2.Clave = articulo.Clave;
articulo2.ClaveAlterna = articulo.ClaveAlterna;
lista.Add(articulo2);
}
First, such usage is syntactically consistent with this overloaded method of GroupBy: GroupBy<TSource,TKey>(IEnumerable<TSource>, Func<TSource,TKey>), and it will return a IEnumerable<IGrouping<TKey,TSource>> variable.
That means, if you run final.GroupBy(x => x.Clave), let's assume he returns finalWithGrouped, then finalWithGrouped.Key is the key and finalWithGrouped.ToList() is a collection of all variables with the same key(at here, it is with the same Clave).
And for your code, try this:
var final = finalv.Union(finalc);
var finalWithGrouped = final.GroupBy(x => x.Clave);
foreach (var articulosWithSameClavePair in finalWithGrouped)
{
var clave = articulosWithSameClavePair.Key;
var articulos = articulosWithSameClavePair.ToList();
foreach(var articulo in articulos)
{
Articulo articulo2 = new Articulo();
articulo2.ArtID = articulo.ArtID;
articulo2.Clave = articulo.Clave;
articulo2.ClaveAlterna = articulo.ClaveAlterna;
lista.Add(articulo2);
}
}
I suggest you read some examples of using GroupBy.
When you group a list, it will return a key and groued list and you are trying reach a single property of a list.
When you group an data, you can convert it to dictionary, It is not nessesary but better way for me. You can try this code:
var final = finalv.Union(finalc);
final = final.GroupBy(x => x.Clave).ToDictionary(s=> s.Key, s=> s.ToList();
foreach (var articulo in final)
{
foreach (var articuloItem in articulo.value)
{
Articulo articulo2 = new Articulo();
articulo2.ArtID = articuloItem.ArtID;
articulo2.Clave = articuloItem.Clave;
articulo2.ClaveAlterna = articuloItem.ClaveAlterna;
lista.Add(articulo2);
}
}
my question is simple but I got stuck with something. Can you tell me how can I reduce 2 select into 1 select LINQ in c#? I am using CloudNative.CloudEvents NuGet package for cloud-native events.
var orderEvents = input
.Select(_ => new OrderDocument(_.Id, _.ToString()).ToOrderEvent())
.Select(_ =>
new CloudEvent()
{
Type = _.EventType,
Subject = _.Subject,
Source = _.Source,
Data = _
});
input is a parameter from cosmosDbTrigger it`s type : IReadOnlyList
OrderDocument.cs
public class OrderDocument
{
public string Id { get; private set; }
public string Json { get; private set; }
public OrderDocument(string id, string json)
{
Id = id;
Json = json;
}
public OrderEvent ToOrderEvent() => OrderEventHelper.ToOrderEvent(Json);
}
OrderEventHelper.cs
public static OrderEvent ToOrderEvent(string json)
{
ArgumentHelper.ThrowIfNullOrEmpty(json);
var orderEvent = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<OrderEvent>(json);
var eventDefinition = OrderEvents.EventDefinitions.SingleOrDefault(_ => _.EventType == orderEvent.EventType);
return eventDefinition == null
? orderEvent
: new OrderEvent(
orderEvent.Id,
orderEvent.Source,
orderEvent.EventType,
orderEvent.Subject,
orderEvent.DataContentType,
orderEvent.DataSchema,
orderEvent.Timestamp,
JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(orderEvent.Payload.ToString(), eventDefinition.PayloadType),
orderEvent.TraceId);
}
linq extensions are basically for loops in the background. If you want to perform multiple actions against a list, perhaps making your own simple for loop where you can manage that yourself would work.
Your code:
var orderEvents = input
.Select(_ => new OrderDocument(_.Id, _.ToString()).ToOrderEvent())
.Select(_ =>
new CloudEvent()
{
Type = _.EventType,
Subject = _.Subject,
Source = _.Source,
Data = _
});
could be changed to:
// our result set, rather than the one returned from linq Select
var results = new List<CloudEvent>();
foreach(var x in input){
// create the order event here
var temporaryOrderEvent = new OrderDocument(x.Id, x.ToString()).ToOrderEvent();
// add the Cloud event to our result set
results.Add(new CloudEvent()
{
Type = temporaryOrderEvent .EventType,
Subject = temporaryOrderEvent .Subject,
Source = temporaryOrderEvent .Source,
Data = temporaryOrderEvent
});
}
where you then have a result list to work with.
If you wanted to keep it all in linq, you could instead perform all of your logic in the first Select, and ensure that it returns a CloudEvent. Notice here that you can employ the use of curly brackets in the linq statement to evaluate a function rather than a single variable value:
var orderEvents = input
.Select(x =>
{
// create the order event here
var temporaryOrderEvent = new OrderDocument(x.Id, x.ToString()).ToOrderEvent();
// return the Cloud event here
return new CloudEvent()
{
Type = temporaryOrderEvent .EventType,
Subject = temporaryOrderEvent .Subject,
Source = temporaryOrderEvent .Source,
Data = temporaryOrderEvent
};
});
How about putting conversion to OrderEvent and using ToCloudEvent in the same Select?
var orderEvents = input
.Select(_ => new OrderDocument(_.Id, _.ToString()).ToOrderEvent().ToCloudEvent())
public class OrderEvent
{
public CloudEvent ToCloudEvent()
{
new CloudEvent()
{
Type = this.EventType,
Subject = this.Subject,
Source = this.Source,
Data = this
};
}
}
I need some help to calculate a property inside my Linq query.
I know I need to use "let" somewhere, but I can't figure it out!
So, first I have this method to get my list from Database:
public BindingList<Builders> GetListBuilders()
{
BindingList<Builders> builderList = new BindingList<Builders>();
var ctx = new IWMJEntities();
var query = (from l in ctx.tblBuilders
select new Builders
{
ID = l.BuilderID,
Projeto = l.NomeProjeto,
Status = l.Status,
DataPedido = l.DataPedido,
DataPendente = l.DataPendente,
DataEntregue = l.DataEntregue,
DataAnulado = l.DataAnulado
});
foreach (var list in query)
builderList.Add(list);
return builderList;
}
Then, I have a function to calculate the Days between Dates accordingly to Status:
public int GetDays()
{
int Dias = 0;
foreach (var record in GetListBuilders)
{
if (record.Status == "Recebido")
{
Dias = GetBusinessDays(record.DataPedido, DateTime.Now);
}
else if (record.Status == "Pendente")
{
Dias = GetBusinessDays(record.DataPedido, (DateTime)record.DataPendente);
}
else if (record.Status == "Entregue")
{
Dias = GetBusinessDays(record.DataPedido, (DateTime)record.DataEntregue);
}
else if (record.Status == "Anulado")
{
Dias = GetBusinessDays(record.DataPedido, (DateTime)record.DataAnulado);
}
}
return Dias;
}
I need to call the GetDays in a DataGridView to give the days for each record.
My big problem is, How do I get this? include it in Linq Query? Calling GetDays() (need to pass the ID from each record to GetDays() function)!?
Any help?
Thanks
I think it would be easier to create an extension method:
public static int GetBusinessDays(this Builders builder) // or type of ctx.tblBuilders if not the same
{
if (builder == null) return 0;
switch(builder.status)
{
case "Recebido": return GetBusinessDays(builder.DataPedido, DateTime.Now);
case "Pendente": return GetBusinessDays(builder.DataPedido, (DateTime)builder.DataPendente);
case "Entregue": return GetBusinessDays(builder.DataPedido, (DateTime)builder.DataEntregue);
case "Anulado": GetBusinessDays(builder.DataPedido, (DateTime)builder.DataAnulado);
default: return 0;
}
}
Then, call it like that:
public BindingList<Builders> GetListBuilders()
{
BindingList<Builders> builderList = new BindingList<Builders>();
var ctx = new IWMJEntities();
var query = (from l in ctx.tblBuilders
select new Builders
{
ID = l.BuilderID,
Projeto = l.NomeProjeto,
Status = l.Status,
DataPedido = l.DataPedido,
DataPendente = l.DataPendente,
DataEntregue = l.DataEntregue,
DataAnulado = l.DataAnulado,
Dias = l.GetBusinessDays()
});
foreach (var list in query)
builderList.Add(list);
return builderList;
}
To do better, to convert a object to a new one, you should create a mapper.
Why does it need to be a part of the query? You can't execute C# code on the database. If you want the calculation to be done at the DB you could create a view.
You're query is executed as soon as the IQueryable is enumerated at the foreach loop. Why not just perform the calculation on each item as they are enumerated and set the property when you are adding each item to the list?
I'm using Directory.EnumerateFiles to list files in two separate directories. Some of the files exist in both folders. How can I remove any duplicate files from the combined list?
try
{
corporateFiles = Directory.EnumerateFiles(#"\\" + corporateServer, "*.pdf", SearchOption.AllDirectories).ToList();
}
catch
{
corporateFiles = new List<string>();
}
try {
functionalFiles = Directory.EnumerateFiles(#"\\" + functionalServer, "*.pdf", SearchOption.AllDirectories).ToList();
}
catch
{
functionalFiles = new List<String>();
}
var combinedFiles = corporateFiles.Concat(functionalFiles);
It seems I cannot satisfy my lust for LINQ.
Here's a one-liner:
var combinedFiles = corporateFiles.Concat(functionalFiles.Where(x => !(corporateFiles.Select(y => y.Split('\\').Last()).ToList().Intersect(functionalFiles.Select(y => y.Split('\\').Last()))).Contains(x.Split('\\').Last())));
This keeps the filepaths from corporateFiles. You can swap them if you prefer otherwise.
I'll attempt to format this to be more readable.
EDIT: Here's the code abstracted out a bit, hopefully more readable:
// Get common file names:
var duplicateFileNames = corporateFiles.Select(y => y.Split('\\').Last()).ToList().Intersect(functionalFiles.Select(y => y.Split('\\').Last()));
// Remove entries in 'functionalFiles' that are duplicates:
var functionalFilesWithoutDuplicates = functionalFiles.Where(x => !duplicateFileNames.Contains(x.Split('\\').Last()));
// Combine the un-touched 'corporateFiles' with the filtered 'functionalFiles':
var combinedFiles = corporateFiles.Concat(functionalFilesWithoutDuplicates);
Use Union instead of Concat:
var combinedFiles = corporateFiles.Union(functionalFiles);
You can use the overload passing an IEqualityComparer<string> to compare using only the name part:
var combined = corporateFiles.Union(functionalFiles, new FileNameComparer())
class FileNameComparer : EqualityComparer<string>
{
public override bool Equals(string x, string y)
{
var name1 = Path.GetFileName(x);
var name2 = Path.GetFileName(y);
return name1 == name2;
}
public override int GetHashCode(string obj)
{
var name = Path.GetFileName(obj);
return name.GetHashCode();
}
}
I created code to load definitions from an external API. The code iterates through a list of words, looks up a definition for each and then I thought to use EF to insert these into my SQL Server database.
However if I run this twice it will load the same definitions the second time. Is there a way that I could make it so that EF does not add the row if it already exists?
public IHttpActionResult LoadDefinitions()
{
var words = db.Words
.AsNoTracking()
.ToList();
foreach (var word in words)
{
HttpResponse<string> response = Unirest.get("https://wordsapiv1.p.mashape.com/words/" + word)
.header("X-Mashape-Key", "xxxx")
.header("Accept", "application/json")
.asJson<string>();
RootObject rootObject = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<RootObject>(response.Body);
var results = rootObject.results;
foreach (var result in results)
{
var definition = new WordDefinition()
{
WordId = word.WordId,
Definition = result.definition
};
db.WordDefinitions.Add(definition);
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
return Ok();
}
Also would appreciate if anyone has any suggestions as to how I could better implement this loading.
foreach (var result in results)
{
if(!(from d in db.WordDefinitions where d.Definition == result.definition select d).Any())
{
var definition = new WordDefinition()
{
WordId = word.WordId,
Definition = result.definition
};
db.WordDefinitions.Add(definition);
}
}
You can search for Definition value.
var wd = db.WordDefinition.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Definition == result.definition);
if(wd == null) {
var definition = new WordDefinition() {
WordId = word.WordId,
Definition = result.definition
};
db.WordDefinitions.Add(definition);
}
In this way you can get a WordDefinition that already have your value.
If you can also use WordId in the same way:
var wd = db.WordDefinition.FirstOrDefault(x => x.WordId == word.WordId);