Develop Reference

one process waiting for another process's output via the file system

I have a process A that reads in some data produced by some other process B. The data is 'exchanged' via the file system. To ensure that the file exists, process A currently checks for the file's existence like this:
while (!File.Exists(FileLocation))
{
Thread.Sleep(100);
}
This only seems to work 99 percent of the time. The other 1 percent of the time, process A establishes that the file exists but process B has not written everything yet (i.e. some data is missing).
Is there another simpler way to make the above situation more bullet proofed? Thanks.

Is there another simpler way to make the above situation more bullet proofed?
You could use a Mutex for reliable inter-process synchronization. Another possibility is to use a FileSystemWatcher.

After determining that the file exists, you can try opening the file for exclusive access, which will fail if another process still has the file open:
try
{
File.Open("foo",FileMode.Open,FileAccess.Read,FileShare.None);
}
catch(IOException ex)
{
// go back to
}

Given that you say that you can change both processes' code, you can use an EventWaitHandle to communicate between the processes.
In your program that creates the file, in the Main() method you can create an EventWaitHandle and keep it around until the end of the program. You'll need to pass the EventWaitHandle object around in your program so that it is available to the bit of code that creates the file (or provide some method that the file-creating code can call to set the event).
using (EventWaitHandle readySignaller = new EventWaitHandle(false, EventResetMode.ManualReset, "MySignalName"))
{
// Rest of program goes here...
// When your program creates the file, do this:
readySignaller.Set();
}
Then have some code like this in the program that's waiting for the file:
// Returns true if the wait was successful.
// Once this has returned true, it will return false until the file is created again.
public static bool WaitForFileToBeCreated(int timeoutMilliseconds) // Pass Timeout.Infinite to wait infinitely.
{
using (EventWaitHandle readySignaller = new EventWaitHandle(false, EventResetMode.ManualReset, "MySignalName"))
{
bool result = readySignaller.WaitOne(timeoutMilliseconds);
if (result)
{
readySignaller.Reset();
}
return result;
}
}
NOTE: If we successfully wait note that I am resetting the signal and it will remain reset until the other process sets it again. You can handle the logic differently if you need to; this is just an example.
Essentially what we are (logically) doing here is sharing a bool between two processes. You have to be careful about the order in which you set and reset that shared bool.

Try the FileSystemWatcher.
Listens to the file system change notifications and raises events when
a directory, or file in a directory, changes.

Process.WaitForExit hangs while another installation is run

Good day!
I'm working on installer, which installs additional dependencies for my software using Process.Start.
foreach dependency:
var process = System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(processStartInfo);
process.WaitForExit();
The problem is when another msi installation is runned, WaitForExit hangs (and when I close this another msi installation, WaitForExit also exits).
I can't use timeouts, because dependencies are different with very different installation time.
Is there any ways to handle this situation and correctly kill process (actually I want to know is dependency is installing or just hanging)?
Many thanks.
Solution: in my case the problem is solved by checking if 'msiexec' process is running.

The solution to my problem - check global mutex, created by msiexec. This is also a correct way to check if another msi installation is running.
public static bool WaitAnotherMsiInstallation(int timeout)
{
const string MsiMutexName = "Global\\_MSIExecute";
try
{
using (var msiMutex = Mutex.OpenExisting(MsiMutexName, MutexRights.Synchronize))
{
return msiMutex.WaitOne(timeout);
}
}
catch (WaitHandleCannotBeOpenedException)
{
// The named mutex does not exist.
return true;
}
catch (ObjectDisposedException)
{
// Mutex was disposed between opening it and attempting to wait on it
return true;
}
}
Here is some details http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372909(VS.85).aspx

Verify that another application is always running

I'm trying to make a console app in c# that will confirm that another application is always running. The other application periodically crashes, and I need to check every few minutes and relaunch it if it has stopped working.
There are many questions on SO that address making sure than no more than one instance of the application is running. I'm trying to confirm that one (no more or less) is running at all times.
Does anybody know how to even begin approaching this?

I would suggest using System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcessesByName to see if your process is running and then, if not, using System.Diagnostics.Process.Start to start the process.
var processes = Process.GetProcessesByName("yourProcessName");
if(processes.Length == 0)
{
Process.Start(#"C:\Path\To\Your\Process.exe");
}
// Kill the extras
for(int i = 1; i < process.Length; i++)
{
processes[i].Kill();
}

These commands are useful to control processes:
// check for processes
Process[] processes = Process.GetProcessesByName("nameOfExecutable");
foreach (Process proc in processes)
{
// do stuff
}
// start process (need path)
Process.Start("pathToExecutable");
// close gui process gently (if needed)
bool status = proc.CloseMainWindow();
// wait for process to close gently
bool status = proc.WaitForExit(killTimeMS);
// force close (kill) process
proc.Kill();

If you implement a "no more than one" rule (which is well-documented, as you point out) and then implement the periodic crash-checker, that should be sufficient to ensure that one and only one copy is running.
In fact, the periodic process doesn't even have to check for a crash. It can just fire up an instance, which will immediately exit if another instance is already running, thanks to whatever "no more than one" mechanism you implement. This has the added benefit of avoiding a possible race-condition between detecting a dead process and starting a new one.

You have a few options. The first is checking for a running process using the Process class. I got this from a Microsoft site, but it looks like it works:
public bool IsProcessRunning(string name)
{
//here we're going to get a list of all running processes on
//the computer
foreach (Process clsProcess in Process.GetProcesses())
{
if (clsProcess.ProcessName.StartsWith(name))
{
//process found so it's running so return true
return true;
}
}
//process not found, return false
return false;
}
You could also use interprocess communications. This is something we do in house. We have a watcher application that sends a message to a service being monitored. If the service doesn't return an ACK in a timeout period, we attempt to restart it.

I suggest you to check if your application is in the list of running processes:
System.Diagnostics.Process.GetProcesses();

Checking if a console application is still running using the Process class

I'm making an application that will monitor the state of another process and restart it when it stops responding, exits, or throws an error.
However, I'm having trouble to make it reliably check if the process (Being a C++ Console window) has stopped responding.
My code looks like this:
public void monitorserver()
{
while (true)
{
server.StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo(textbox_srcdsexe.Text, startstring);
server.Start();
log("server started");
log("Monitor started.");
while (server.Responding)
{
if (server.HasExited)
{
log("server exitted, Restarting.");
break;
}
log("server is running: " + server.Responding.ToString());
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
log("Server stopped responding, terminating..");
try
{ server.Kill(); }
catch (Exception) { }
}
}
The application I'm monitoring is Valve's Source Dedicated Server, running Garry's Mod, and I'm over stressing the physics engine to simulate it stopping responding.
However, this never triggers the process class recognizing it as 'stopped responding'.
I know there are ways to directly query the source server using their own protocol, but i'd like to keep it simple and universal (So that i can maybe use it for different applications in the future).
Any help appreciated

The Responding property indicates whether the process is running a Windows message loop which isn't hung.
As the documentation states,
If the process does not have a MainWindowHandle, this property returns true.
It is not possible to check whether an arbitrary process is doing an arbitrary thing, as you're trying to.

Why would Application.Exit fail to work?

I have an application that has been getting strange errors when canceling out of a dialog box. The application can't continue if the box is cancelled out of, so it exits, but it is not working for some reason, and thus it keeps running and crashes.
I debugged this problem, and somehow the application runs right past the Application.Exit call. I'm running in Debug mode, and this is relevant because of a small amount of code that depends on the RELEASE variable being defined. Here is my app exit code. I have traced the code and it entered the ExitApp method, and keeps on going, returning control to the caller and eventually crashing.
This is an application which provides reports over a remote desktop connection, so that's why the exit code is a bit weird. Its trying to terminate the remote session, but only when running under release because I don't want to shut down my dev machine for every test run.
private void ExitApp()
{
HardTerminalExit();
Application.Exit();
}
// When in Debug mode running on a development computer, this will not run to avoid shutting down the dev computer
// When in release mode the Remote Connection or other computer this is run on will be shut down.
[Conditional("RELEASE")]
private void HardTerminalExit()
{
WTSLogoffSession(WTS_CURRENT_SERVER_HANDLE, WTS_CURRENT_SESSION, false);
}
I've run a debugger right past the Application.Exit line and nothing happens, then control returns to the caller after I step past that line.
What's going on? This is a Windows Forms application.

This is an article which expands on the same train of thought you are going through: http://www.dev102.com/2008/06/24/how-do-you-exit-your-net-application/
Basically:
Environment.Exit - From MSDN: Terminates this process and gives the
underlying operating system the
specified exit code. This is the code
to call when you are using console
application.
Application.Exit - From MSDN: Informs all message pumps that they
must terminate, and then closes all
application windows after the messages
have been processed. This is the code
to use if you are have called
Application.Run (WinForms
applications), this method stops all
running message loops on all threads
and closes all windows of the
application. There are some more
issues about this method, read about
it in the MSDN page.
Another discussion of this: Link
This article points out a good tip:
You can determine if System.Windows.Forms.Application.Run has been called by checking the System.Windows.Forms.Application.MessageLoop property. If true, then Run has been called and you can assume that a WinForms application is executing as follows.
if (System.Windows.Forms.Application.MessageLoop)
{
// Use this since we are a WinForms app
System.Windows.Forms.Application.Exit();
}
else
{
// Use this since we are a console app
System.Environment.Exit(1);
}

Having had this problem recently (that Application.Exit was failing to correctly terminate message pumps for win-forms with Application.Run(new Form())), I discovered that if you are spawning new threads or starting background workers within the constructor, this will prevent Application.Exit from running.
Move all 'RunWorkerAsync' calls from the constructor to a form Load method:
public Form()
{
this.Worker.RunWorkerAsync();
}
Move to:
public void Form_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.Worker.RunWorkerAsync();
}

Try Environment.Exit(exitCode).

I have went though this situation in many cases I use Thread.CurrentThread.Abort()
and the process is closed. It seems that Application.Exit isn't hooking up properly with current thread.

Also ensure any threads running in your application have the IsBackground property set to true. Non-background threads will easily block the application from exiting.

Make sure you have no Console.ReadLine(); in your app and Environment.Exit(1); will work and close your app.

I created the following that will exit the app anywhere. You don't have to worry if the Form is running or not, the test determines that and calls appropriate Exit.
public void exit(int exitCode)
{
if (System.Windows.Forms.Application.MessageLoop)
{
// Use this since we are a WinForms app
System.Windows.Forms.Application.Exit()
}
else
{
// Use this since we are a console app
System.Environment.Exit(exitCode);
}
} //* end exit()

Is this application run (in the Main method) using Application.Run()? Otherwise, Application.Exit() won't work.
If you wrote your own Main method and you want to stop the application, you can only stop by returning from the Main method (or killing the process).

Try this :
in Program.cs file :
after Application.Run(new form());
add Application.Exit();

private void frmLogin_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e)
{
if (e.CloseReason == CloseReason.UserClosing)
{
DialogResult result = MessageBox.Show("Do you really want to exit?", "Dialog Title", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo);
if (result == DialogResult.Yes)
{
Environment.Exit(0);
}
else
{
e.Cancel = true;
}
}
else
{
e.Cancel = true;
}
}