I have my JSON as
{{
"attributes": {
"type": "User",
"url": "/services/data/v44.0/sobjects/User/0052F000002bO32QAE"
},
"Name": "demo Site Guest User",
"UserType": "Guest",
"Profile": {
"attributes": {
"type": "Profile",
"url": "/services/data/v44.0/sobjects/Profile/00e2F000000DuoFQAS"
},
"Id": "00e2F000000DuoFQAS",
"Name": "demo Profile"
}
}}
{{
"attributes": {
"type": "User",
"url": "/services/data/v44.0/sobjects/User/00541000006I1JyAAK"
},
"Name": "Scheduler Site Guest User",
"UserType": "Guest",
"Profile": {
"attributes": {
"type": "Profile",
"url": "/services/data/v44.0/sobjects/Profile/00e41000000GhKdAAK"
},
"Id": "00e41000000GhKdAAK",
"Name": "Scheduler Profile"
}
}}
In the above JSON, I want to fetch parent elements 'Name' and 'UserType' and child elements'Id' and 'Name' and convert into datatable. These parent and child elements are anonymous so I can't create classes for those.
I got up to here
dynamic responseRecs = (responseDetails.records as IEnumerable<object>).Cast<object>().ToList();
which is giving me the response but not sure how to loop through the dynamic and get parent and child line items (ignoring the type and url) so that I can build a datatable.
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Related
I have a message card payload pushed from service now which is not rendering properly on MS Teams through bot framework. It only displays the content but not the button.Below is the payload, pls suggest what could be the issue.
BotFramework:V3
.Net SDK
Bot Builder package:3.12.2.4
Bot Connector:3.12.2.4
Bot.Connector.Teams:0.9.0
{
"contentType": "application/vnd.microsoft.teams.card.o365connector",
"content": {
"#type": "MessageCard",
"#context": "http://schema.org/extensions",
"title": "Incident Updated - INC0010010",
"summary": "Incident Updated - INC0010010",
"themeColor": "D1222B",
"sections": [
{
"title": "",
"text": "",
"activityTitle": "",
"activitySubtitle": "",
"activityText": "",
"facts": [
{
"name": "Category",
"value": "Software"
},
{
"name": "State",
"value": "New"
},
{
"name": "Priority",
"value": "5 - Planning"
},
{
"name": "Assignment group",
"value": "Software"
}
]
},
{
"text": "Please check the details"
}
],
"potentialAction": [
{
"#type": "OpenUri",
"name": "View Incident in ServiceNow",
"targets": [
{
"os": "default",
"uri": "https://dev62584.service-now.com/incident.do?sys_id=XXXXXXX&sysparm_stack=incident_list.do?sysparm_query=active=true"
},
{
"os": "iOS",
"uri": "https://dev62584.service-now.com/incident.do?sys_id=XXXXXXX&sysparm_stack=incident_list.do?sysparm_query=active=true"
},
{
"os": "android",
"uri": "https://dev62584.service-now.com/incident.do?sys_id=XXXXXXX&sysparm_stack=incident_list.do?sysparm_query=active=true"
},
{
"os": "windows",
"uri": "https://dev62584.service-now.com/incident.do?sys_id=7ec9865adb711010fcff8809489619b4&sysparm_stack=incident_list.do?sysparm_query=active=true"
}
]
}
]
}
}
Microsoft Troubleshooting and recommendation:
We were finally able to repro this issue. It is a bug in the team's scope and doesn't repro in the personal scope. An easy way to unblock you would be to add in the potentialAction section an #id field like so:
"potentialAction": [
{
"#id":"1",
"#type": "OpenUri",
Nothing stands out as a bug in your code or problem with your configuration. Linking to the GitHub issue where it is being investigated/troubleshot:
https://github.com/microsoft/BotBuilder-V3/issues/208
I'm trying to create a water fall model with the help of Adaptive cards in C# version 4.0.
My scenario is like following:
On loading bot following cards will be shown:
1. SharePoint
2. Azure
3. O365
Once I click on any of them then new set of cards will be shown like:
On selecting "SharePoint" following cards will be shown:
1. Create a Site
2. Create a sub site.
and on selecting any of the above choices a form is called with set of questions like:
1. what is site title
2. site owner
and so on..
UI as shown below:
I tried creating the structure on https://adaptivecards.io/, but couldnt find any relevant code related to this type of scenario.
If any one has done it before please share the documentation or code snippet.
Thanks
Here's a basic card with Input.ChoiceSet:
{
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"body": [
{
"type": "Container",
"items": [
{
"type": "Input.ChoiceSet",
"id": "first",
"placeholder": "Placeholder text",
"choices": [
{
"title": "SharePoint",
"value": "SharePoint"
},
{
"title": "Azure",
"value": "Azure"
},
{
"title": "O365",
"value": "O365"
}
],
"style": "expanded"
}
]
}
],
"actions": [
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "Submit"
}
],
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"version": "1.0"
}
Then, in your bot, follow these answers for dealing with User Input:
Using Adaptive Cards in Waterfall Dialogs
(optional) Dynamically Changing The Card Before Sending
Basically, you'll want to:
Send the card
Capture the card's input by sending a blank text prompt right after sending the card (as explained in the first link)
Use if or switch statements in the next step to determine which card to display next based off of the user's input. You could optionally create the card more dynamically using the second link
The AdaptiveCards Designer is pretty good, but it lacks the ability to set the actions property. You can do so manually, by adding (like I did above):
"actions": [
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "Submit"
}
],
Using Images
If you'd like to use images instead of a ChoiceSet, you can do something like this:
{
"type": "AdaptiveCard",
"body": [
{
"type": "Container",
"items": [
{
"type": "Image",
"id": "choice1",
"selectAction": {
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "choice1",
"data": {
"choice": 1
}
},
"url": "https://acuvate.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Microsoft-Botframework.fw_-thegem-person.png",
"altText": ""
},
{
"type": "Image",
"id": "choice2",
"selectAction": {
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "choice2",
"data": {
"choice": 2
}
},
"url": "https://acuvate.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Microsoft-Botframework.fw_-thegem-person.png",
"altText": ""
},
{
"type": "Image",
"id": "choice3",
"selectAction": {
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "choice3",
"data": {
"choice": 3
}
},
"url": "https://acuvate.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Microsoft-Botframework.fw_-thegem-person.png",
"altText": ""
}
]
}
],
"$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json",
"version": "1.0"
}
The important part is making sure that the Action.Submit:
Is on the image
Has data that you would use to capture which choice the user selected
When I retrieve a checklist instance, I got the following section related to attachment.
{
"type": "instance_item_attachments",
"id": "5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee",
"attributes": {
"name": "6856ad10-6ab0-11e9-9150-9fda3da0626e.png",
"attachmentType": "OSS",
"mimeType": "image/png",
"uploadStatus": "COMPLETED",
"urns": [
{
"urn": "urn:adsk.wipprod:fs.file:vf.gy4mB910SneymU86Gc4O0A?version=1",
"type": "WIP"
},
{
"urn": "urn:adsk.objects:os.object:wip.dm.prod/ede3de59-1b68-485c-82fe-f1f2af3442fe.png",
"type": "OSS"
},
{
"urn": "urn:adsk.checklists.cs.attachment:58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b/5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee",
"type": "CHECKLIST"
}
],
"createdAt": "2019-04-29T18:55:51.334Z",
"updatedAt": "2019-04-29T18:55:54.137Z",
"createdBy": "TAKCJQU6HGXW",
"modifiedBy": "TAKCJQU6HGXW",
"permittedActions": [
"canArchive",
"canEdit"
],
"permittedAttributes": [
"mimeType",
"uploadStatus"
]
},
"links": {
"self": "/containers/58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b/instance_item_attachments/5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee"
},
"relationships": {
"container": {
"meta": {
"relation": "primary",
"readOnly": false
},
"links": {
"self": "/containers/58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b/instance_item_attachments/5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee/relationships/container",
"related": "/containers/58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b/instance_item_attachments/5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee/container"
},
"data": {
"type": "containers",
"id": "58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b"
}
},
"item": {
"meta": {
"relation": "primary",
"readOnly": false
},
"links": {
"self": "/containers/58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b/instance_item_attachments/5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee/relationships/item",
"related": "/containers/58b8afcf-d7cd-49ad-aa10-78c50610761b/instance_item_attachments/5a0a2acf-b02a-4b88-86cc-962c3831bdee/item"
},
"data": null
}
}
}
Now, I want to download this attachment, the provided URN is: wip.dm.prod/ede3de59-1b68-485c-82fe-f1f2af3442fe.png
If I try to access it using the following link, it says not found
developer.api.autodesk.com/oss/v2/buckets/wip.dm.prod/b30e3ffe-333b-446c-b834-e2f2141096b4.png
However, if I changed the URL a bit (by adding objects), it works fine.
developer.api.autodesk.com/oss/v2/buckets/wip.dm.prod/objects/b30e3ffe-333b-446c-b834-e2f2141096b4.png
Am I doing something wrong here? or this is a bug in the provided urn?
Adding to Adam Nagy reply, you would need to break the URN. From your original question:
urn:adsk.objects:os.object:wip.dm.prod/ede3de59-1b68-485c-82fe-f1f2af3442fe.png
In .NET you can try (using System.Linq):
string bucketKey = urn.Split("/").First().Split(":").Last();
string objectName = urn.Split("/").Last();
Then rebuild as:
string attachemtnUrl = string.Format("{0}/oss/v2/buckets/{1}/objects/{2}", BASE_URL, bucketKey, objectName);
And you'll also need the Authorization header with a valid access token.
The id / urn of an object in OSS (Object Storage Service) contains the bucket name and object name after the "urn:adsk.objects:os.object:" section.
There is a tutorial on downloading a file https://forge.autodesk.com/en/docs/data/v2/tutorials/download-file/
It shows that the reply concerning an item contains both the id and the actual URL of the download link under the storage section:
"storage": {
"data": {
"type": "objects",
"id": "urn:adsk.objects:os.object:wip.dm.prod/977d69b1-43e7-40fa-8ece-6ec4602892f3.rvt"
},
"meta": {
"link": {
"href": "https://developer.api.autodesk.com/oss/v2/buckets/wip.dm.prod/objects/977d69b1-43e7-40fa-8ece-6ec4602892f3.rvt"
}
}
}
There you can see the connection between the id and the URL you can use to download the file
I'm trying to retrieve the available options for fields through the Jira REST API but I'm getting stuck on the custom fields.
A normal field returns something like this:
{[priority, {
"required": false,
"schema": {
"type": "priority",
"system": "priority"
},
"name": "Priority",
"key": "priority",
"hasDefaultValue": true,
"operations": [
"set"
],
"allowedValues": [
{
"self": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/priority/1",
"iconUrl": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/images/icons/priorities/highest.svg",
"name": "Highest",
"id": "1"
},
{
"self": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/priority/2",
"iconUrl": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/images/icons/priorities/high.svg",
"name": "High",
"id": "2"
},
{
"self": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/priority/3",
"iconUrl": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg",
"name": "Medium",
"id": "3"
},
{
"self": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/priority/4",
"iconUrl": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/images/icons/priorities/low.svg",
"name": "Low",
"id": "4"
},
{
"self": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/priority/5",
"iconUrl": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/images/icons/priorities/lowest.svg",
"name": "Lowest",
"id": "5"
}
],
"defaultValue": {
"self": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/priority/3",
"iconUrl": "https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/images/icons/priorities/medium.svg",
"name": "Medium",
"id": "3"
}
}]}
The custom fields on the other hand return a much "smaller" set!
"Sprint" Custom Field:
{[customfield_10113, {
"required": false,
"schema": {
"type": "array",
"items": "string",
"custom": "com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-sprint",
"customId": 10113
},
"name": "Sprint",
"key": "customfield_10113",
"hasDefaultValue": false,
"operations": [
"set"
]
}]}
"Epic Link"
{[customfield_10006, {
"required": false,
"schema": {
"type": "any",
"custom": "com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-epic-link",
"customId": 10006
},
"name": "Epic Link",
"key": "customfield_10006",
"hasDefaultValue": false,
"operations": [
"set"
]
}]}
As you can see there are no options available, but i know that there are.
How can I get to these values through rest?
I have tried checking the request that the cloud server makes but it's pretty different for each of the custom fields and i cannot find a relation between them. For example:
To get the sprint possible values: https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/greenhopper/1.0/sprint/picker?query=
and to get the Epic values: https://inn-inw.atlassian.net/rest/greenhopper/1.0/epics
I'm trying to make things as clean as possible and I would prefer not to hard code the request, specially because i would probably need to update the code every time a new custom field is created.
PS: I have tried some of the solutions presented in other questions but couldn't find one that fits what i need. eg: https://inn-inw.atlassian.net//rest/api/2/issue/createmeta?projectKeys=PROJKEY&issuetypeNames=Bug&expand=projects.issuetypes.fields returns only the short description that is displayed above.
I am creating the mappings for an index I will be using in a project.
Given the domain of the features, I'd like most of the fields to be searchable through case-insensitive term queries.
I had worked through a custom analyzer (like the one suggested here: Elasticsearch Map case insensitive to not_analyzed documents) but when I try to index a document, the process hangs for 60 seconds until a timeout happens and the whole process fails.
I see the same behavior when I test on Sense.
Here is the index definition:
put /emails
{
"mappings": {
"email": {
"properties": {
"createdOn": {
"type": "date",
"store": true,
"format": "strict_date_optional_time||epoch_millis"
},
"data": {
"type": "object",
"dynamic": "true"
},
"from": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"id": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"sentOn": {
"type": "date",
"store": true,
"format": "strict_date_optional_time||epoch_millis"
},
"sesId": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"subject": {
"type": "string",
"store": true,
"analyzer": "standard"
},
"templates": {
"properties": {
"html": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"plainText": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
}
}
},
"to": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"type": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
}
}
},
"event": {
"_parent": {
"type": "email"
},
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"origin": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"time": {
"type": "date",
"store": true,
"format": "strict_date_optional_time||epoch_millis"
},
"type": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
},
"userAgent": {
"type": "string",
"store": true
}
}
}
},
"settings": {
"number_of_shards": "5",
"number_of_replicas": "0",
"analysis": {
"analyzer": {
"default": {
"tokenizer": "keyword",
"filter": [
"lowercase"
],
"type": "custom"
}
}
}
}
}
As you can see, I define an analyzer as "default" (if I try to use another name and define it as a default analyzer for each of the two types, I get a "Root mapping definition has unsupported parameters: [analyzer : my_analyzer]" error).
And this is me trying to add a document to the index
post /emails/email/1
{
"from": "email-address-1",
"to": "email-address-2",
"subject": "Hello world",
"data":{
"status": "SENT"
}
}
I really can't understand why this timeout is happening.
I also tried using NEST via a C# console application. Same behavior.
Thanks.
PS: for testing I am using both Elasticsearch 2.3 hosted by AWS and Elasticsearch 2.3 hosted in a local docker container.
The problem is that you have 1 node and an index with 1 primary shard and 5 replica shards.
Since replicas of a primary will not be assigned on the same node as the primary, the 5 replicas will all be unassigned. This is an issue when indexing a document; by default, the write consistency for an index operation is quorum, and a quorum of 6 (1 primary + 5 replicas) is 4 (n/2 + 1). This means the document needs to have been written to the primary and 3 replicas of the same shard in order to succeed. With unassigned shards, it won't be possible to satisfy this. You'll see a UnavailableShardsException in the logs with an error message for this.
Changing your index to 5 shards and 1 replica will solve the problem.