I want to configure our pipeline to allow one build to be used for multiple environments without having to create separate builds. According to the docs, it seems like it is possible, as it says:
You can use this technique to create a default package and deploy it to multiple stages.
I named my stage as my environment (preview), and I created a web.config file for that environment (web.preview.config) file. All my environment configuration files in the same path as Web.Config file.
The logs say transformation was complete:
2018-11-17T00:26:52.0383966Z [command]D:\a_tasks\AzureRmWebAppDeployment_497d490f-eea7-4f2b-ab94-48d9c1acdcb1\3.4.13\ctt\ctt.exe s:D:\a_temp\temp_web_package_06958915987488234\Content\D_C\a\1\s\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp.Api\obj\Preview\Package\PackageTmp\bin\Web.config t:D:\a_temp\temp_web_package_06958915987488234\Content\D_C\a\1\s\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp.Api\obj\Preview\Package\PackageTmp\bin\Web.Release.config d:D:\a_temp\temp_web_package_06958915987488234\Content\D_C\a\1\s\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp.Api\obj\Preview\Package\PackageTmp\bin\Web.config pw i
2018-11-17T00:26:52.4335280Z [command]D:\a_tasks\AzureRmWebAppDeployment_497d490f-eea7-4f2b-ab94-48d9c1acdcb1\3.4.13\ctt\ctt.exe s:D:\a_temp\temp_web_package_06958915987488234\Content\D_C\a\1\s\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp.Api\obj\Preview\Package\PackageTmp\bin\Web.config t:D:\a_temp\temp_web_package_06958915987488234\Content\D_C\a\1\s\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp.Api\obj\Preview\Package\PackageTmp\bin\Web.Preview.config d:D:\a_temp\temp_web_package_06958915987488234\Content\D_C\a\1\s\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp\Microsoft.Xbox.Mvp.Api\obj\Preview\Package\PackageTmp\bin\Web.config pw i
2018-11-17T00:26:52.5443873Z XML Transformations applied successfully
I can see that it first transformed to release and then it applied preview as the doc says (release then environment). However, although it says XML Transformations applied successfully, when I check the config variables, they are not changed. The only way I could make the transformation work was to define the buildConfiguration variable when I queue a new build, which blocks me from using the same build for different environments.
When I was researching, I found this from this link:
Web.config is transformed during the build process, if you generate the deployment package from "Build" and then deploy it in "Release", then you cannot transform it before deployment.
But the doc said I can use one default package for multiple stages...Does that still mean I have to create separate build for each environment? Is XML transformation not what I should be looking at for the scenario I wanna solve?
Thank you in advance!
++ Edit:
Release Settings:
Release steps (I think? I have a strong feeling that this is what you are looking for...):
1) Make sure you transform works. Test it
here.
2) Ensure in your VS project that you are including the transform file, Web.Preview.config, and copying to output dir.
3) Disable the config transform during the build, you just need to add argument /p:TransformWebConfigEnabled=False in MSBuild Arguments section of your Build task. You also need to add /p:AutoParameterizationWebConfigConnectionStrings=False if you want to update the connection string during the release. This will use the Web.Preview.config to "transform" the web.config.
4) Double check that in your release for the IIS Web App Deploy task under File Transforms & Variable Substitution Options you have XML transformation checked.
None of the answers I found on the internet worked for me on their own for my build and release pipeline. The web.config I got from the release pipeline was always pointing to the non transformed values.
After a few hours pulling my hair I got it to work though.
Some short info about my setup
I want to be able to deploy on all environments with just one build and one release pipeline.
My setup:
One build pipeline that builds all of our standard branches (test,
release, master).
One release pipeline that has different stages
depending on branch that started the release.
Our test stage releases the test branch on our test server.
Stage/Production comes from the same release branch but have their own transform files.
Solution
I followed some of the guide from Microsoft and set up my web.<environment_name>.config to match the release stage names.
I did not need to remove the <Dependent Upon> rows from my .csproj for each transform. Instead all I did was set the property Build Action of each transform to Content as shown by the image bellow.
I then added these commands to the build pipeline's Build Solution -> MSBuild Arguments:
/p:MarkWebConfigAssistFilesAsExclude=false
/p:TransformWebConfigEnabled=false
/p:AutoParameterizationWebConfigConnectionStrings=False
The build now does not try to transform the .config on it's own and also does not exclude the transform files from the artifact, allowing the release pipeline to do the transformation instead. Also, keeping the <Dependent On> for the transform files lets us have a "cleaner" look inside our code editors.
I just got this working so I could have one build with deployment to multiple environments. This is what I did.
In the code, I set each Web.<Environment>.config property to Build Action = "Content". I also set all mine to Copy to Output Directory = "Copy Always". I also unloaded the project and edit the csproj file, then removed the <DependendUpon>Web.config</DependentUpon> lines. This dumps all your web.configs to the root (no file nesting).
In the build, I set pipeline variable BuildConfiguration = "Release". I don't have a Web.Release.config in my project.
In the release, I named the deployment stage after the environment (in my case, Development, Staging, and Production). In all stages, on the Azure deployment task, I checked the XML transform checkbox.
In Azure, I set the ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT to the naming of the staging environment, in my case, Development, Staging, and Production).
I just got this working as well. My issue was actually at the Visual Studio Solution level. I had the MVC project pointed to a different Configuration than the others. So always double check the configs!
Related
Anyone have a preferred method for making web.config transforms? I am curious as to what others have done for this. I hate having to continuously update the web.config every time I update or republish.
A few years ago Scott Hanselman gave a solution using pre-build events and batch files:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ManagingMultipleConfigurationFileEnvironmentsWithPreBuildEvents.aspx
Basically you maintain a separate different configuration for each build and run the batch script pre-build to copy over the Web.Config. The obvious disadvantage is that if you have thirty different build configurations you need thirty different configs, but I find it's nice for projects where you only have two or three configs (like hobby projects, or tools you'll only ever be publishing to internal servers). Plus, it's nice knowing that if you want to you can take extra control of the build process if you want to.
The easiest way to use VS built in support:
You have versions of web.config, for your build versions, (by default Debug and Release)
In the release version you can define transforms what are applied during build. The effective web.config will be the result.
Look into the nuget package for slow cheetah: https://www.nuget.org/packages/SlowCheetah/ This does what you are looking for quite nicely. Be aware that it is for publish transformations only, switching to a different config for local debugging will have no affect.
Create a build configuration for each server you want to deploy to
Example
-Dev Server "copy from debug"-
-Prod Server Debug "copy from debug"-
-Prod Server Release "copy from release"-
Then right click your web.config and select "add config transforms"
You will get new transforms for each configuration you added above.
Now configure your web config transforms for each environment.
Now when you publish you can just select the configuration "Dev, Prod Debug, or Prod Release" and out it goes, no need to update them after that.
Now, the base web.config should always be configured for your local environment, so if you set up in IIS locally it will use web.config without any transforms. Your transforms should transform your local settings in the base web.config to w/e they need to be.
How to pass a parameter to a TeamCity Test Runner?
I've added a build configuration to my teamcity project which copies out a test project from TFS into a local location on the server then it runs the tests with NUnit and display the results.
The problem is that when the tests run from my local pc, they should be using some configurations, when they run from Dev Automated Build and Test Automated Build, they should be using other configurations and all should be in TFS.
For example, BaseUrl and Connection string configurations...
private static readonly string BaseUrl = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[AppSettingKey.BaseUrl];
Currently, I've added a web.config file to my project which works fine only locally.
So, how to pass these parameters to a TeamCity Build Configuration which is configured on Dev and Test environemnts?
Even if I create separate web.config files (e.g. dev.web.config and staging.web.config), I need a way to tell the Build Configuration to use which configuration file?
Hope the question is clear.
many thanks.
Enlightened, found a solution (should have thought more before submiting a question here)!
I'd just create separate dev.app.config and staging.app.config files then on the "Version Control Settings" page on teamcity I can define rules such as copy this file somewhere.
So I just Copy the file onto the root app.config; that's it!
Rule:
+: SolutionName\Tests\ConfigFiles\Dev\App.config=>SolutionName\Tests\App.config
Consider using the configuration parameter i.e. Build | Release
Use your debug build locally and release on TeamCity. You can do this with an MSBuild parameter (/p:Configuration=Release)
Then use the solution here (How to select different app.config for several build configurations) to use the correct app.config.
I prefer this solution as it keeps the definitions within the solution / projects rather than within the build.
[I'm adding this just for completeness - I had originally followed this approach but then found the other solution]
Rules in Version Control Settings works only for directories so the better approach is to use Build step - command line
Go to Build Step in Settings section
and Add Build Step with following settings
Command Line
Custom script: copy TeamCity.App.config App.config
Execute: Only if all previous steps were successful
Reorder this step and run it before compilation step
I am curious if it is possible to specify in a web.config file to have visual studio not publish certain files or a certain directory.
The use case that I am trying to solve for is that I have a Test folder on a web app, that provides a series of useful pages for testing and debugging. The pages are very useful for development and qa. However in production they should not exist. What I would like is that when I publish my code with the release config that these files, or the entire folder is not published.
It doesn't really matter where the build conditions are stored, what is important is how you're gonna use them during build/publish. A conditional msbuild script would easily solve your issue - one of build tasks would be to publish/discard files depending of the value of some internal msbuild property and the property value comes from the web.config or any other external source (build script parameter, external XML file, etc.)
You could exclude the folder from your solution, then in publish it would not push it out. Then, if you want it back in your solution, it will still be there. Just right click the folder and include it.
I don't really if this is the "right" way or even possible to do what you are asking.
What I would suggest is to create a second project for your test. I usually go that way and just deploy the second "project" in my test environement.
I have a Deployment Project for my VS2008 C# application. When installing a new version of my application I want to make sure that files are updated with the files contained in the installer.
I want my installer to automatically remove any old version of the installed application. To do that I follow this procedure (also described here):
Set RemovePreviousVersions to True
Set DetectNewerInstalledVersion to
True
Increment the Version of the
installer
Choose Yes to change the ProductCode
For the assemblies I make sure the AssemblyVersion is set to a higher version:
[assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.0.*")]
Everything is working as intended except for my configuration files (xml files). Since I cannot find a way to "version" these files I cannot make sure that the files are updated if they have been modified on the target machine.
Is there any way to do this and how?
UPDATE: I have tried the approach/solution/workaround found here
Include the file directly in a
project with the following
properties: "Build Action -> Content
file" and "Copy to Output Directory
-> Copy always"
Then add it to the deployment
project via Project
Output->Database->Content Files
Unfortunately it did not make any difference. The behavior is exactly the same.
Add the following property to the Property table of the MSI:
Property REINSTALLMODE with Value amus
Note: This will cause all the files in the MSI (versioned and nonversioned) to overwrite the files that are on the system.
If you're willing to use Orca (there may be another way to do this method, but it's the only one I know of) you may be able to set up RemoveFile directives.
See here for a typically light-weight MSDN document -- could be a starting point.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371201.aspx
Alternatively you could always create a very simple bootstrapper executable that simply calls "msiexec /i REINSTALLMODE=oums" (or whichever command-line switches are needed). Call it setup.exe if you like...
Better option long-term may be to switch to InstallShield or similar -- VS2010 includes a light version of IS and I believe they're moving away from vdproj projects.
Have you tried the approach/solution/workaround found here?
Include the file directly in a
project with the following
properties: "Build Action -> Content
file" and "Copy to Output Directory
-> Copy always"
Then add it to the deployment
project via Project
Output->Database->Content Files
I may be incorrect here, and therefore I am exposing myself to down votes, but here goes anyway!
I believe it is on purpose that config files do not automatically get overwritten; the principle there being that you would not normally want your application's configuration overwritten when you install the new version of the program... at least not without numerous warnings and/or chances to merge configuration first.
Having your application configuration get overwritten by an updated version of a program could make for a very upset end user (in this case, web site admin).
Further, I know that sometimes, the developer may be the person doing the deployment. In such a case, this behavior might not seem so logical when deploying a single site to a single server; but when roles are split and/or you have multiple servers with different configurations, this can be a life saver.
You need to include the new version of your files in your custom installer and manually install these file during Custom Install routine is called
This must be applied to any file that does not have version that can be tracked by the installer.
In VS2008 (and earlier if I'm not mistaking) I have dropdown that lets me choose between Debug and Release mode. All well.
When I switch VS to Release, the debug attribute in my web.config files isn't set to false at all though.
Is this the way it is supposed to be? I am bound to forget to set it to the correct value on deploying.. What measures should I take to make sure this is working like it should?
This is one solution to this problem:
http://blog.aggregatedintelligence.com/2009/04/aspnet-never-again-fear-publishing-your.html
Well your web.config would probably be different for debug and release (connection string, passwords, etc...) but if it's not, look at a postbuild event which would copy over a different file.
Also check this blog post from Scott Guthrie.
Changing release mode will not change web.config, however when you build your web app, it will build the dll for only C# files in release mode where else your web.config's debug on/off is used by IIS to build debug/release version of ASPX markup files.
The build flavour just affects how the code is compiled, it does not affect your configuration files. So yes, to answer your question, this is how it is supposd to be.
The element is a good solution if you have access to the machine.config of your server, which hosts only production applications.
I usually modify the web.config file when generating the deployed files as part of the automated build process. For example web deployment projects can perform web.config section replacement. There are a number of reasons I don't like web deployment projects and I tend to do it with a simple VBS file that modifies the file using MSXML.
The answer you selected from Bobby is not correct. Visual Studio builds the files for you in release while you are in VStudio.
IIS compiles the code at startup with that setting when you deploy. Not the bin directory, but the App_Code and the code behind files.
You should precompile your app before deployment which will compile your code behinds and App_Code dir into dlls in the bin directory.
The deployment tools automatically switch that setting if you set the deployment tool to Release
I use web deployment projects. http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/01/28/vs-2008-web-deployment-project-support-released.aspx