Develop Reference

SteamSocket TCP to check for device connectivity

I am using 'StreamSocket' 'Tcp' connection to communicate between my host and client devices on Windows IoT Core. Currently I am using polling every second to check for connectivity status of client devices. I would like to know if there is any better and efficient way of doing it. Thanks.

As I know there is no better way to do that. There are two ways of detect StreamSocket disconnect:
send heartbeat message to monitor if the other side(server) is closed.
read 0-length means end of the stream.
In addition, you can detect the network connection via NetworkInformation.NetworkStatusChanged.By this, the app is able to know if the network is invalid, as the main reason causes the StreamSocket disconnected. More information please see Reacting to network status changes.
If you change the host as server, all of your device as a client which connected to your host, you can start listening a tcp port via StreamSocketListener. The event ConnectionReceived could detect the connection incoming and status changed.
StreamSocketListener listener = new StreamSocketListener();
listener.ConnectionReceived += OnConnection;
private async void OnConnection(
StreamSocketListener sender,
StreamSocketListenerConnectionReceivedEventArgs args)
{
DataReader reader = new DataReader(args.Socket.InputStream);
try
{
while (true)
{
// Read first 4 bytes (length of the subsequent string).
uint sizeFieldCount = await reader.LoadAsync(sizeof(uint));
if (sizeFieldCount != sizeof(uint))
{
// The underlying socket was closed before we were able to read the whole data.
//Detect disconnection
return;
}
// Read the string.
uint stringLength = reader.ReadUInt32();
uint actualStringLength = await reader.LoadAsync(stringLength);
if (stringLength != actualStringLength)
{
// The underlying socket was closed before we were able to read the whole data.
//Detect disconnection
return;
}
//TO DO SOMETHING
}
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
//TO DO SOMETHING
}
}

HoloLens unable to send or receive data via BT and TCP

I am working on HoloLens (Unity-UWP) and trying to make a connection with PC (UWP) or Android phone work (Xamarin). So far I tried client and host with both Bluetooth and TCP (even two versions with different libraries) on Android and UWP. I kept the code entirely separated from user interface, so that it is easier to use, to understand and modular. An Action<string> is used to output results (error logs and sent messages).
Everything that is not on the HoloLens works fine (even though it's exactly the same code). It worked from PC (UWP) to Android with client and host switched. But it doesn't even work between HoloLens and PC (UWP). The behavior ranged from crashes (mostly for Bluetooth) to instant disconnection. The last tests resulted in disconnection once bytes are about to be received. It could even read the first 4 bytes (uint for the length of the following UTF-8 message), but then it was disconnected. The other devices seemed to work fine.
What I know: Capabilities are set, the code works, the issue is likely something that is common for everything that has to do with networking and HoloLens.
So the question is, is Unity or HoloLens incompatible with something I am using? What I used which is worth mentioning: StreamSocket, BinaryWriter, BinaryReader, Task (async, await). Or is HoloLens actively blocking communication with applications on other devices? I know it can connect to devices with Bluetooth and that it can connect via TCP, and it looks like people succeed to get it to work. Are there known issues? Or is there something with Unity that causes this - a bad setting maybe? Do I have to use async methods or only sync? Are there incompatibility issues with Tasks/Threads and Unity? Is this possibly the issue (inability to consent to permissions)?
Another thing to note is that I cannot ping HoloLens via its IP by using the cmd, even though the IP is correct.
I'd appreciate any advice, answer or guess. I can provide more information if requested (see also the comments below). I would suggest to focus on the TCP connection as it seemed to be working better and appears to be more "basic." Here is the code:
using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.IO;
using Windows.Networking;
using Windows.Networking.Sockets;
#region Common
public abstract class TcpCore
{
protected StreamSocket Socket;
protected BinaryWriter BWriter;
protected BinaryReader BReader;
protected Task ReadingTask;
public bool DetailedInfos { get; set; } = false;
public bool Listening { get; protected set; }
public ActionSingle<string> MessageOutput { get; protected set; } = new ActionSingle<string> (); // Used for message and debug output. They wrap an Action and allow safer use.
public ActionSingle<string> LogOutput { get; protected set; } = new ActionSingle<string> ();
protected const string USED_PORT = "1337";
protected readonly Encoding USED_ENCODING = Encoding.UTF8;
public abstract void Disconnect ();
protected void StartCommunication ()
{
Stream streamOut = Socket.OutputStream.AsStreamForWrite ();
Stream streamIn = Socket.InputStream.AsStreamForRead ();
BWriter = new BinaryWriter (streamOut); //{ AutoFlush = true };
BReader = new BinaryReader (streamIn);
LogOutput.Trigger ("Connection established.");
ReadingTask = new Task (() => StartReading ());
ReadingTask.Start ();
}
public void SendMessage (string message)
{
// There's no need to send a zero length message.
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty (message)) return;
// Make sure that the connection is still up and there is a message to send.
if (Socket == null || BWriter == null) { LogOutput.Trigger ("Cannot send message: No clients connected."); return; }
uint length = (uint) message.Length;
byte[] countBuffer = BitConverter.GetBytes (length);
byte[] buffer = USED_ENCODING.GetBytes (message);
if (DetailedInfos) LogOutput.Trigger ("Sending: " + message);
BWriter.Write (countBuffer);
BWriter.Write (buffer);
BWriter.Flush ();
}
protected void StartReading ()
{
if (DetailedInfos) LogOutput.Trigger ("Starting to listen for input.");
Listening = true;
while (Listening)
{
try
{
if (DetailedInfos) LogOutput.Trigger ("Starting a listen iteration.");
// Based on the protocol we've defined, the first uint is the size of the message. [UInt (4)] + [Message (1*n)] - The UInt describes the length of the message (=n).
uint length = BReader.ReadUInt32 ();
if (DetailedInfos) LogOutput.Trigger ("ReadLength: " + length.ToString ());
MessageOutput.Trigger ("A");
byte[] messageBuffer = BReader.ReadBytes ((int) length);
MessageOutput.Trigger ("B");
string message = USED_ENCODING.GetString (messageBuffer);
MessageOutput.Trigger ("Received Message: " + message);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// If this is an unknown status it means that the error is fatal and retry will likely fail.
if (SocketError.GetStatus (e.HResult) == SocketErrorStatus.Unknown)
{
// Seems to occur on disconnects. Let's not throw().
Listening = false;
Disconnect ();
LogOutput.Trigger ("Unknown error occurred: " + e.Message);
break;
}
else
{
Listening = false;
Disconnect ();
break;
}
}
}
LogOutput.Trigger ("Stopped to listen for input.");
}
}
#endregion
#region Client
public class GTcpClient : TcpCore
{
public async void Connect (string target, string port = USED_PORT) // Target is IP address.
{
try
{
Socket = new StreamSocket ();
HostName serverHost = new HostName (target);
await Socket.ConnectAsync (serverHost, port);
LogOutput.Trigger ("Connection successful to: " + target + ":" + port);
StartCommunication ();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
LogOutput.Trigger ("Connection error: " + e.Message);
}
}
public override void Disconnect ()
{
Listening = false;
if (BWriter != null) { BWriter.Dispose (); BWriter.Dispose (); BWriter = null; }
if (BReader != null) { BReader.Dispose (); BReader.Dispose (); BReader = null; }
if (Socket != null) { Socket.Dispose (); Socket = null; }
if (ReadingTask != null) { ReadingTask = null; }
}
}
#endregion
#region Server
public class GTcpServer : TcpCore
{
private StreamSocketListener socketListener;
public bool AutoResponse { get; set; } = false;
public async void StartServer ()
{
try
{
//Create a StreamSocketListener to start listening for TCP connections.
socketListener = new StreamSocketListener ();
//Hook up an event handler to call when connections are received.
socketListener.ConnectionReceived += ConnectionReceived;
//Start listening for incoming TCP connections on the specified port. You can specify any port that's not currently in use.
await socketListener.BindServiceNameAsync (USED_PORT);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
LogOutput.Trigger ("Connection error: " + e.Message);
}
}
private void ConnectionReceived (StreamSocketListener listener, StreamSocketListenerConnectionReceivedEventArgs args)
{
try
{
listener.Dispose ();
Socket = args.Socket;
if (DetailedInfos) LogOutput.Trigger ("Connection received from: " + Socket.Information.RemoteAddress + ":" + Socket.Information.RemotePort);
StartCommunication ();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
LogOutput.Trigger ("Connection Received error: " + e.Message);
}
}
public override void Disconnect ()
{
Listening = false;
if (socketListener != null) { socketListener.Dispose (); socketListener = null; }
if (BWriter != null) { BWriter.Dispose (); BWriter.Dispose (); BWriter = null; }
if (BReader != null) { BReader.Dispose (); BReader.Dispose (); BReader = null; }
if (Socket != null) { Socket.Dispose (); Socket = null; }
if (ReadingTask != null) { ReadingTask = null; }
}
}
#endregion

Coincidentially, I just implemented a BT connection between HoloLens and an UWP app. I followed the sample at https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-universal-samples/tree/master/Samples/BluetoothRfcommChat.
As capabilities, I set "Bluetooth" (of course), "Internet (Client & Server)" and "Private Networks (Client & Server)". The steps on the server side then are:
Create an RfcommServiceProvider for your own or an existing (eg OBEX object push) service ID.
Create a StreamSocketListener and wire its ConnectionReceived Event.
Bind the service Name on the listener: listener.BindServiceNameAsync(provider.ServiceId.AsString(), SocketProtectionLevel.BluetoothEncryptionAllowNullAuthentication);
If you have a custom service ID, set its name along with other attributes you may want to configure. See the sample linked above for this. I think, this is mostly optional.
Start advertising the BT service: provider.StartAdvertising(listener, true);
Once a client connects, there is a StreamSocket in the StreamSocketListenerConnectionReceivedEventArgs that you can use to create a DataReader and DataWriter on like on any other stream. If you only want to allow one client, you can also stop advertising now.
On the client side, you would:
Show the DevicePicker and let the user select the peer device. Do not forget setting a filter like picker.Filter.SupportedDeviceSelectors.Add(BluetoothDevice.GetDeviceSelectorFromPairingState(true)); You can also allow unpaired devices, but you need to call PairAsync before you can continue in step 2. Also, I think there is no way to circumvent the user consent dialogue in this case, so I would recommend pairing before. To be honest, I did not check whether the unpaired stuff works on HoloLens.
You get a DeviceInformation instance from the picker, which you can use to obtain a BT device like await BluetoothDevice.FromIdAsync(info.Id);
Get the services from the device like device.GetRfcommServicesAsync(BluetoothCacheMode.Uncached); and select the one you are interested in. Note that I found that the built-in filtering did not behave as expected, so I just enumerated the result and compared the UUIDs manually. I believe that the UWP implementation performs a case-sensitive string comparison at some point, which might lead to the requested service not showing up although it is there.
Once you found your service, which I will call s from now on, create a StreamSocket and connect using socket.ConnectAsync(s.ConnectionHostName, s.ConnectionServiceName, SocketProtectionLevel.PlainSocket);
Again, you can not create the stream readers and writers like on the server side.

The answer is Threading.
For whoever may have similar issues, I found the solution. It was due to Unity itself, not HoloLens specifically. My issue was that I wrote my code separately in an own class instead of commingle it with UI code, which would have made it 1. unreadable and 2. not modular to use. So I tried a better coding approach (in my opinion). Everybody could download it and easily integrate it and have basic code for text messaging. While this was no issue for Xamarin and UWP, it was an issue for Unity itself (and there the Unity-UWP solution as well).
The receiving end of Bluetooth and TCP seemed to create an own thread (maybe even something else, but I didn't do it actively), which was unable to write on the main thread in Unity, which solely handles GameObjects (like the output log). Thus I got weird log outputs when I tested it on HoloLens.
I created a new TCP code which works for Unity but not the Unity-UWP solution, using TcpClient/TcpListener, in order to try another version with TCP connection. Luckily when I ran that in the editor it finally pointed on the issue itself: The main thread could not be accessed, which would have written into the UI - the text box for the log output. In order to solve that, I just had to use Unity's Update() method in order to set the text to the output. The variables themselves still could be accessed, but not the GameObjects.

Websocket server on Azure

I'm trying to host a websockets server on Azure. I'm a bit confused and was hoping you could help me.
I've followed many articles but my code is close to the one from this article : https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/introduction-to-websockets-on-windows-azure-web-sites/
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
if (context.IsWebSocketRequest)
{
context.AcceptWebSocketRequest(ProcessWS);
}
}
public bool IsReusable { get { return false; } }
private async Task ProcessWS(AspNetWebSocketContext context)
{
try
{
WebSocket socket = context.WebSocket;
while (true)
{
var url = context.RequestUri;
ArraySegment<byte> buffer = new ArraySegment<byte>(new byte[1024]);
WebSocketReceiveResult result = await socket.ReceiveAsync(buffer, CancellationToken.None);
if (socket.State == WebSocketState.Open)
{
string userMessage = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(buffer.Array, 0, result.Count)
.Trim(new char[] { ' ' }); // We remove the spaces before and after
// DO SOMETHING
}
else
{
break;
}
}
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Log.Info("Exception" + e.Message + " >>>" + e.StackTrace);
}
}
This works fine, I'm able to get the messages from my devices and answer to them.
But in some cases I need to send a message to another device, example :
DEVICE A sends "Tell Device B to blink"
Since it's a websockets server and Device B has already talked with the server I should have somewhere a connection opened with Device B. And when Device A asks me for it I can send a message to Device B.
But how can I achieve that with my code ? How can I find the connection to device B ? If not possible how should I do it ?
I hope my problem is described enough to be understood.
Thank you,

But how can I achieve that with my code ? How can I find the connection to device B ? If not possible how should I do it ?
According to your scenario, I followed this tutorial about webapi-and-websockets and implement my Web API project that could establish connection between clients. Here is the screenshoot for test, you could refer to it:
Additionally, you could leverage SignalR and map your client (user) to signalR connections. For more details, you could refer to Mapping SignalR Users to Connections. Also, you could refer to the git sample Microsoft.AspNet.SignalR.Samples.
UPDATE:
How would you use signalR in that case ?
For a simple way, we could retain connection and user info stored in memory, For more details, you could refer to In-memory storage. Based on this scenario, I wrote a sample project AspDotNet-SignalR-Chat, you could refer to it, and here is the screenshot for test:

C# async persistent WebClient example

I need to make a simple http client in C# that must be asynchronous and must support a persistent connection to the server. So i'm trying to use the WebClient class, but i'm having some problems, my code is this:
void sendMessage()
{
ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback += new System.Net.Security.RemoteCertificateValidationCallback(bypassAllCertificateStuff);
string loginRequest = #"{'IDENTIFIER':'patient1','PASSWORD':'asdasd','DEVICE_ID':'knt-01'}";
client = new WebClient();
// add event handlers for completed and progress changed
client.UploadProgressChanged += new UploadProgressChangedEventHandler(client_UploadProgressChanged);
client.UploadStringCompleted += new UploadStringCompletedEventHandler(client_UploadStringCompleted);
client.DownloadProgressChanged += new DownloadProgressChangedEventHandler(client_DownloadProgressChanged);
// carry out the operation as normal
client.UploadStringAsync(new Uri("Https://192.168.1.100/PaLogin"), "POST", loginRequest);
}
void client_DownloadProgressChanged(object sender, DownloadProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine("downloadProgressChanged");
}
void client_UploadProgressChanged(object sender, UploadProgressChangedEventArgs e)
{
// Console.WriteLine(e.ProgressPercentage);
if (e.ProgressPercentage != 50)
{
Console.WriteLine("uploadProgressChanged");
}
}
void client_UploadStringCompleted(object sender, UploadStringCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Result != null)
{
Console.WriteLine("Done");
}
}
The problem is that i should receive a response from the server, but neither the client_UploadStringCompleted nor client_DownloadProgressChanged callbacks are ever called.
The only thing I see on the console is: client_DownloadProgressChanged
So basically what i'm trying to do is:
1- I send some data to the server without closing the connection
2- I receive the server response but the connection must still be open when i have received it.
What am I missing?
Thank you. :-)

You are missing the whole HTTP protocol here.
HTTP is a stateless request-response protocol. HTTP 1.1 provides optional guidelines for keeping connections open purely for the sake of performance - although as for the request response paradigm, there is no change. [Yet I have seen many cases where client or server have decided not to respect it and closed the connection.] It also provides chunked encoding to facilitate streaming, but that is all it is as far as HTTP is concerned.
So basically in HTTP, client will wait for a reply (and keep connection open) until it receives a response or timeout. There is no way to change/better this behaviour.
NOW, back to you problem.
I think something is going wrong with connecting to the server so you need to use Fiddler to see what is happening. My hunch is it does not connect to server (firewall, server down, etc) since the certificate check is not even called.

Http server push mechanism can do this.
See this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_(programming))
c# client:
using (var client = new WebClient())
using (var reader = new StreamReader(client.OpenRead(uri), Encoding.UTF8, true))
{
string line;
while ((line = reader.ReadLine()) != null)
{
Console.WriteLine(line);
}
}
(che è quello che vi dicevo questo pomeriggio)

How to connect to modems with tcp clients, in multiple port or other way?

I have around 5000 modem (thin clients), and I want to communicate with them, one of a my method is like this : string GetModemData(modemID), now I have an open port in server that listens to modem and I'm using socket programming to send data to modems (calling related function), but when i want send data to multiple modem in a same time and get response from them, I don't know what should i do? I can send data to one modem and waiting for its response and then send another data to other modems (sequential), but the problem is client should be wait long time to get answer(may be some different client want to get some information from modems so they all will be wait into the Q or something like this), I think one way to solving this problem is to use multiple port and listen for each modem to related port, but it takes too many ports and also may be memory usage going up and exceed my available memory space, so some lost may be occurred (is this true?). what should to do ? I'd thinking about Parallelism, but i think its not related i should to wait for one port, because i don't know should to pass current received data to which client. I'm using asp.net.
currently I'm doing like this:
private void StartListener()
{
ModemTcpListener = new TcpListener(ModemPort);
//ClientTcpListener = new TcpListener(ClientPort);
ModemTcpListener.Start();
ModemTcpListener.BeginAcceptTcpClient(new AsyncCallback(DoAcceptModemCallback), ModemTcpListener);
}
and in return
private void DoReadModemCallback(IAsyncResult ar)
{
try
{
bool bRet = ar.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne(420000);
Modem modem = ar.AsyncState as Modem;
if (!bRet || modem == null)
{
return;
}
}
catch{}
// now send data to which client?????? if i'm going to use async????
}
and :
private void DoAcceptModemCallback(IAsyncResult ar)
{
try
{
ModemTcpListener.BeginAcceptTcpClient(new AsyncCallback(DoAcceptModemCallback), ModemTcpListener);
TcpClient tcpClient = ModemTcpListener.EndAcceptTcpClient(ar);
Modem modem= new Modem(tcpClient, "");
tcpClient.GetStream().BeginRead(modem.Buffer, 0, tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize, new AsyncCallback(DoReadModemCallback), modem);
ModemTcpListener.BeginAcceptTcpClient(new AsyncCallback(DoAcceptModemCallback), ModemTcpListener);
Log.Write("a Modem connect ...");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
}

Heres an example keeping track of all your clients. I've compacted it for readability. You should really split it up into multiple classes.
I'm using Pool (which I just created and commited) and SimpleServer. Both classes are part of a library that I'm currently building (but far from done).
Don't be afraid of having 5000 sockets open, they do not consume much resources when you are using asynchronous operations.
public class SuperServer
{
private List<ClientContext> _clients = new List<ClientContext>();
private SimpleServer _server;
private Pool<byte[]> _bufferPool;
public SuperServer()
{
// Create a buffer pool to be able to reuse buffers
// since your clients will most likely connect and disconnect
// often.
//
// The pool takes a anonymous function which should return a new buffer.
_bufferPool = new Pool<byte[]>(() => new byte[65535]);
}
public void Start(IPEndPoint listenAddress)
{
_server = new SimpleServer(listenAddress, OnAcceptedSocket);
// Allow five connections to be queued (to be accepted)
_server.Start(5);
}
// you should handle exceptions for the BeginSend
// and remove the client accordingly.
public void SendToAll(byte[] info)
{
lock (_clients)
{
foreach (var client in _clients)
client.Socket.BeginSend(info, 0, info.Length, SocketFlags.None, null, null);
}
}
// Server have accepted a new client.
private void OnAcceptedSocket(Socket socket)
{
var context = new ClientContext();
context.Inbuffer = _bufferPool.Dequeue();
context.Socket = socket;
lock (_clients)
_clients.Add(context);
// this method will eat very few resources and
// there should be no problem having 5000 waiting sockets.
context.Socket.BeginReceive(context.Inbuffer, 0, context.Inbuffer.Length, SocketFlags.None, OnRead,
context);
}
//Woho! You have received data from one of the clients.
private void OnRead(IAsyncResult ar)
{
var context = (ClientContext) ar.AsyncState;
try
{
var bytesRead = context.Socket.EndReceive(ar);
if (bytesRead == 0)
{
HandleClientDisconnection(context);
return;
}
// process context.Inbuffer here.
}
catch (Exception err)
{
//log exception here.
HandleClientDisconnection(context);
return;
}
// use a new try/catch to make sure that we start
// read again event if processing of last bytes failed.
try
{
context.Socket.BeginReceive(context.Inbuffer, 0, context.Inbuffer.Length, SocketFlags.None, OnRead,
context);
}
catch (Exception err)
{
//log exception here.
HandleClientDisconnection(context);
}
}
// A client have disconnected.
private void HandleClientDisconnection(ClientContext context)
{
_bufferPool.Enqueue(context.Inbuffer);
try
{
context.Socket.Close();
lock (_clients)
_clients.Remove(context);
}
catch(Exception err)
{
//log exception
}
}
// One of your modems
// add your own state info.
private class ClientContext
{
public byte[] Inbuffer;
public Socket Socket;
}
}
Used classes:
Pool: http://fadd.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/58858#1054902
SimpleServer: http://fadd.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/58859#1054893

You need to use the asynchronous tcp/ip methods. This article shows how:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/IP/asyncsockets.aspx
The critical piece is the BeginReceive() and related callback functions. Any more q's, please leave comments to this answer ;) BEST OF LUCK!

You need multi threading, whenever a client establishes a connection to the server start a new thread for it and start communication send/receive.
Here are some articles explaining multithreading in c#,
c-sharpcorner
codeproject
And here's a sample server application with multithreading,
http://www.dotnetspider.com/resources/2829-A-multi-readed-server-C-which-finds-prime-num.aspx