I want to camel case specific properties of an object using Json.NET rather than all of the properties.
I have an object like this:
class A {
public object B { get; set; }
public object C { get; set; } // this property should be camel cased
}
I want it to get serialized to this:
{ B: 1, c: 2 }
I came across this post about camel casing all properties unconditionally, which is done using:
var settings = new JsonSerializerSettings
{
ContractResolver = new CamelCasePropertyNamesContractResolver()
};
var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(a, settings);
But I couldn't find a counter-part question for camel casing a specific property. How is this done?
You can apply JsonPropertyAttribute's NamingStrategyType to the field that you want to camel case:
class A
{
[JsonProperty(NamingStrategyType = typeof(CamelCaseNamingStrategy))]
public object C { get; set; }
}
Or you can specify the name of the Property directly:
class A
{
[JsonProperty("c")]
public object C { get; set; }
}
Related
I'm storing data in a Firestore DB using .net. I'm using FirestoreData and FirestoreProperty attributes to control how objects are serialized to the DB. C# propeties, by default, are in PascalCase and I'd like them to be serialized in camelCase. I know I can set the name a property will be serialized in the FirestoreProperty attribute, but it's a really tedious and error proner task. Is there any way to configure Firestore .net client to by default serialize properties in camelCase?
Thanks
The FirestorePropertyAttribute defines two constructors. One allows to add a name by providing the parameter name:
The name to use within the Firestore document.
So you can simply set it for a property like
[FireStoreProperty("anyCase")]
public string AnyCase{ get; set; }
Doing this a silent way is not possible without modifying the underlying type. A possible approach is to implement a reflection based Document converter, changing the property names at runtime. You only need to define the converter once for each data class. Here is a possible approach:
//Sample data class
[FirestoreData(ConverterType = typeof(CamelCaseConverter<CustomCity>))]
public class CustomCity
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Country { get; set; }
public long Population { get; set; }
}
//Sample data class
[FirestoreData(ConverterType = typeof(CamelCaseConverter<CustomPerson>))]
public class CustomPerson
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public uint Age { get; set; }
}
//Conversion of camelCase and PascalCase
public class CamelCaseConverter<T> : IFirestoreConverter<T> where T : new()
{
public object ToFirestore(T value)
{
dynamic camelCased = new ExpandoObject();
foreach (PropertyInfo property in typeof(T).GetProperties())
{
string camelCaseName =
char.ToLowerInvariant(property.Name[0]) + property.Name.Substring(1);
((IDictionary<string, object>)camelCased)[camelCaseName] = property.GetValue(value);
}
return camelCased;
}
public T FromFirestore(object value)
{
if (value is IDictionary<string, object> map)
{
T pascalCased = new T();
foreach (PropertyInfo property in typeof(T).GetProperties())
{
string camelCaseName =
char.ToLowerInvariant(property.Name[0]) + property.Name.Substring(1);
property.SetValue(pascalCased, map[camelCaseName]);
}
return pascalCased;
}
throw new ArgumentException($"Unexpected data: {value.GetType()}");
}
I have a JSON value like this
{"$id":"649271776","$type":"outdoorgame","Overs":50,"Balls":6,"TeamName":"TestTeam"}
I wrote a C# code like this to change the value of Overs from 50 to 10
var jsonString = sSession.GameState; //this is the value {"$id":"649271776","$type":"outdoorgame","Overs":50,"Balls":6,"TeamName":"TestTeam"}
dynamic jsonObject =
Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(jsonString);
jsonObject.Overs = 10;
var modifiedJsonString = Newtonsoft.Json.JsonConvert.SerializeObject(jsonObject);
This code is changing the value of Overs from 50 to 10. The problem I am facing when I use the above code modifiedJsonString is missing these two values
"$id":"649271776","$type":"outdoorgame"
giving the output as {Overs":10,"Balls":6,"TeamName":"TestTeam"} I want $id and $type also in the modifiedJsonString.
I want modifiedJsonString like this {"$id":"649271776","$type":"outdoorgame","Overs":10,"Balls":6,"TeamName":"TestTeam"}
Can anyone tell me how to solve this problem
The problem is that $id and $type are not valid identifiers, and can't appear as members of the returned dynamic object built by the JSON serializer. As in gldraphael's answer, the solution is to create your own concrete class to hold the deserialized object; for the properties whose names start with $ you'll need to use JsonPropertyAttribute to remap the names:
public class GameState
{
[JsonProperty("$id")] public string ID { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("$type")] public string Type { get; set; }
int Overs { get; set; }
int Balls { get; set; }
public string TeamName { get; set; }
}
Further, Json.NET treats $type as a special property name and this interferes with proper deserialization of your object. To get around this, we must use the MetadataPropertyHandling.Ignore serializer setting.
Thus you can deserialize, modify and re-serialize like this:
string jsonString = "{\"$id\":\"649271776\",\"$type\":\"outdoorgame\",\"Overs\":50,\"Balls\":6,\"TeamName\":\"TestTeam\"}";
JsonSerializerSettings settings = new JsonSerializerSettings() { MetadataPropertyHandling = MetadataPropertyHandling.Ignore };
GameState jsonObject = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<GameState>(jsonString, settings);
jsonObject.Overs = 10;
var modifiedJsonString = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(jsonObject);
See it in action.
You can use JToken to handle this.
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using Newtonsoft.Json.Linq;
var jsonString = "{\"$id\":\"649271776\",\"$type\":\"outdoorgame\",\"Overs\":50,\"Balls\":6,\"TeamName\":\"TestTeam\"}";
JToken jsonObject = JToken.Parse(jsonString);
jsonObject["Overs"] = 10;
var modifiedJsonString = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(jsonObject);
// In case one wanted to update the $type and $id fields
jsonObject["$type"] = "asdf";
jsonObject["$id"] = 123456;
var modifiedJsonString2 = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(jsonObject);
Will result in:
modifiedJsonString --> {"$id":"649271776","$type":"outdoorgame","Overs":10,"Balls":6,"TeamName":"TestTeam"}
And if you needed to update $id and $type, that is possible, too.
modifiedJsonString2 -->
{"$id":123456,"$type":"asdf","Overs":10,"Balls":6,"TeamName":"TestTeam"}
Demo on .NET Fiddle: https://dotnetfiddle.net/a370Mv
Use a concrete class. You'll need to annotate the fields with $ prefixes manually. Eg:
public class Example
{
public string Field { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("$type")]
public string Type { get; set; }
}
Here's a working example.
In your case the class will look something like:
public class ObjName
{
[JsonProperty("$id")]
public string Id { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("$type")]
public string Type { get; set; }
public int Overs { get; set; }
public int Balls { get; set; }
public string TeamName { get; set; }
}
(Just be mindful of the property case).
I am serializing an object of this format using Newtonsoft.JSON:
class Message
{
public HeaderType Header { get; set; }
public object Body { get; set; }
}
I want to turn the Header and Body properties into camel case, while presevering the case of the properties of the thing assigned to Body.
So if the message looks like:
var result = new Message() { Header = myHeader, Body = new SomeClass() { A = 1 }});
I want the output to look like:
{ header = myHeader, body = { A = 1 } } // I realize this isn't valid C#
Right now, I'm doing this to get the camel case conversion, but of course it's affecting everything.
string stringRepresentationOfObj = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj, new JsonSerializerSettings {
ContractResolver = new DefaultContractResolver {
NamingStrategy = new CamelCaseNamingStrategy()
}
});
Is there a way to ignore certain parts of the object? I see that the docs call out OverrideSpecifiedNames, ProcessDictionaryKeys, and ProcessExtensionDataNames, but it doesn't look like that's what I want.
Am I forced to use a some kind of custom naming strategy? How can I achieve this?
You can configure a CamelCaseNamingStrategy to not camel case properties that already have a name specified with an attribute, Check documentation here
Specify property name as below
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "Name")]
public string Name{ get; set; }
And in CamelCaseNamingStrategy set OverrideSpecifiedNames = false
string stringRepresentationOfObj = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj, new JsonSerializerSettings
{
ContractResolver = new DefaultContractResolver
{
NamingStrategy = new CamelCaseNamingStrategy()
{
OverrideSpecifiedNames = false
}
}
});
Another way is to modify your type only using JsonObject attribute as below,
this will force your type properties only to be in camelCase and any nested properties will not be affected.
[JsonObject(NamingStrategyType = typeof(CamelCaseNamingStrategy))]
public class ApiMessage
{
public HeaderType Header { get; set; }
public object Body { get; set; }
}
Also, add JsonObject attribute to HeaderType class
[JsonObject(NamingStrategyType = typeof(CamelCaseNamingStrategy))]
public class HeaderType
{
public string MyPropertyA { get; set; }
public string MyPropertyB { get; set; }
}
Your result should be as below
{
"header": {
"myPropertyA": "AAA",
"myPropertyB": "BBB"
},
"body": {
"ObjectPropertyA": "Value A",
"ObjectPropertyB": "Value B",
"ObjectPropertyC": "Value C"
}
}
You can create your own resolver to behave this way.
You'd create one, possibly have it look for a new attribute (which you'd create), that you can then use to decorate the properties you don't want camelCased.
This question already has answers here:
Use different name for serializing and deserializing with Json.Net
(3 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I am trying to read a JSON file, rename the property names, and export a new JSON with the new names. As stated in this example, https://www.newtonsoft.com/json/help/html/JsonPropertyName.htm, we can use JsonProperty to specify a different name internally in the code. However, when you export the json, it returns the original name. So in the example it still returned "release_date" instead of "ReleaseDate" when it was logged in the console. Is there any way to do this without creating a brand new object?
To clear things up, here is example of what I am trying to do:
JSON Input:
{ "name": "Starcraft", "release_date": "1998-01-01T00:00:00" }
Object Used to deserialize the data:
public class Videogame
{
public string name{ get; set; }
[JsonProperty("release_date")]
public DateTime releaseDate { get; set; }
}
Code that is called:
var json = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Videogame>(File.ReadAllText(path))
Console.WriteLine(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(json));
Resulted Output:
{ "name": "Starcraft", "release_date": "1998-01-01T00:00:00" }
Desired Output:
{ "name": "Starcraft", "releaseDate": "1998-01-01T00:00:00" }
The only way that I currently know how to solve it is to create a new object and use it to serialize my output. Wasn't sure if there is any simpler way to do this.
The following will work:
public class Videogame
{
public string name{ get; set; }
[JsonProperty("release_date")]
public DateTime old
{
set { ReleaseDate = value; }
}
[JsonProperty("releaseDate")]
public DateTime ReleaseDate { get; set; }
}
When deserializing, the old property will redirect its value to the new property.
Since the old property is a setter only, it will not be serialized back.
I would not consider this approach for large amounts of renaming. It's then better to follow the advices given in the comments.
You could use custom resolve to create desired behaviour:
public class CustomContractResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
public bool UseJsonPropertyName { get; }
public CustomContractResolver(bool useJsonPropertyName)
{
UseJsonPropertyName = useJsonPropertyName;
}
protected override JsonProperty CreateProperty(MemberInfo member, MemberSerialization memberSerialization)
{
var property = base.CreateProperty(member, memberSerialization);
if (!UseJsonPropertyName)
property.PropertyName = property.UnderlyingName;
return property;
}
}
public class ErrorDetails
{
public int Id { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("error_message")]
public string ErrorMessage { get; set; }
}
var json = "{'Id': 1,'error_message': 'An error has occurred!'}";
var serializerSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings()
{
ContractResolver = new CustomContractResolver(false)
};
var dezerializerSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings
{
ContractResolver = new CustomContractResolver(true)
};
var obj = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<ErrorDetails>(json, dezerializerSettings);
var jsonNew = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(obj, serializerSettings);
Kudos to NtFreX and his answer. I'm providing mine so that you can indicate that your question is resolved.
I'm using an MVC 4 web API and asp.net web forms 4.0 to build a rest API. It's working great:
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage Me(string hash)
{
HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage;
List<Something> somethings = ...
httpResponseMessage = Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK,
new { result = true, somethings = somethings });
return httpResponseMessage;
}
Now I need to prevent some properties to be serialized. I know I can use some LINQ over the list and get only the properties I need, and generally it's a good approach, but in the present scenario the something object is too complex, and I need a different set of properties in different methods, so it's easier to mark, at runtime, each property to be ignored.
Is there a way to do that?
ASP.NET Web API uses Json.Net as default formatter, so if your application just only uses JSON as data format, you can use [JsonIgnore] to ignore property for serialization:
public class Foo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonIgnore]
public List<Something> Somethings { get; set; }
}
But, this way does not support XML format. So, in case your application has to support XML format more (or only support XML), instead of using Json.Net, you should use [DataContract] which supports both JSON and XML:
[DataContract]
public class Foo
{
[DataMember]
public int Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; }
//Ignore by default
public List<Something> Somethings { get; set; }
}
For more understanding, you can read the official article.
According to the Web API documentation page JSON and XML Serialization in ASP.NET Web API to explicitly prevent serialization on a property you can either use [JsonIgnore] for the Json serializer or [IgnoreDataMember] for the default XML serializer.
However in testing I have noticed that [IgnoreDataMember] prevents serialization for both XML and Json requests, so I would recommend using that rather than decorating a property with multiple attributes.
Instead of letting everything get serialized by default, you can take the "opt-in" approach. In this scenario, only the properties you specify are allowed to be serialized. You do this with the DataContractAttribute and DataMemberAttribute, found in the System.Runtime.Serialization namespace.
The DataContactAttribute is applied to the class, and the DataMemberAttribute is applied to each member you want to be serialized:
[DataContract]
public class MyClass {
[DataMember]
public int Id { get; set;} // Serialized
[DataMember]
public string Name { get; set; } // Serialized
public string DontExposeMe { get; set; } // Will not be serialized
}
Dare I say this is a better approach because it forces you to make explicit decisions about what will or will not make it through serialization. It also allows your model classes to live in a project by themselves, without taking a dependency on JSON.net just because somewhere else you happen to be serializing them with JSON.net.
This worked for me: Create a custom contract resolver which has a public property called AllowList of string array type. In your action, modify that property depending on what the action needs to return.
1. create a custom contract resolver:
public class PublicDomainJsonContractResolverOptIn : DefaultContractResolver
{
public string[] AllowList { get; set; }
protected override IList<JsonProperty> CreateProperties(Type type, MemberSerialization memberSerialization)
{
IList<JsonProperty> properties = base.CreateProperties(type, memberSerialization);
properties = properties.Where(p => AllowList.Contains(p.PropertyName)).ToList();
return properties;
}
}
2. use custom contract resolver in action
[HttpGet]
public BinaryImage Single(int key)
{
//limit properties that are sent on wire for this request specifically
var contractResolver = Configuration.Formatters.JsonFormatter.SerializerSettings.ContractResolver as PublicDomainJsonContractResolverOptIn;
if (contractResolver != null)
contractResolver.AllowList = new string[] { "Id", "Bytes", "MimeType", "Width", "Height" };
BinaryImage image = new BinaryImage { Id = 1 };
//etc. etc.
return image;
}
This approach allowed me to allow/disallow for specific request instead of modifying the class definition. And if you don't need XML serialization, don't forget to turn it off in your App_Start\WebApiConfig.cs or your API will return blocked properties if the client requests xml instead of json.
//remove xml serialization
var appXmlType = config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.FirstOrDefault(t => t.MediaType == "application/xml");
config.Formatters.XmlFormatter.SupportedMediaTypes.Remove(appXmlType);
I will show you 2 ways to accomplish what you want:
First way: Decorate your field with JsonProperty attribute in order to skip the serialization of that field if it is null.
public class Foo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore)]
public List<Something> Somethings { get; set; }
}
Second way: If you are negotiation with some complex scenarios then you could use the Web Api convention ("ShouldSerialize") in order to skip serialization of that field depending of some specific logic.
public class Foo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public List<Something> Somethings { get; set; }
public bool ShouldSerializeSomethings() {
var resultOfSomeLogic = false;
return resultOfSomeLogic;
}
}
WebApi uses JSON.Net and it use reflection to serialization so when it has detected (for instance) the ShouldSerializeFieldX() method the field with name FieldX will not be serialized.
I'm late to the game, but an anonymous objects would do the trick:
[HttpGet]
public HttpResponseMessage Me(string hash)
{
HttpResponseMessage httpResponseMessage;
List<Something> somethings = ...
var returnObjects = somethings.Select(x => new {
Id = x.Id,
OtherField = x.OtherField
});
httpResponseMessage = Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK,
new { result = true, somethings = returnObjects });
return httpResponseMessage;
}
Try using IgnoreDataMember property
public class Foo
{
[IgnoreDataMember]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Works fine by just adding the:
[IgnoreDataMember]
On top of the propertyp, like:
public class UserSettingsModel
{
public string UserName { get; set; }
[IgnoreDataMember]
public DateTime Created { get; set; }
}
This works with ApiController. The code:
[Route("api/Context/UserSettings")]
[HttpGet, HttpPost]
public UserSettingsModel UserSettings()
{
return _contextService.GetUserSettings();
}
Almost same as greatbear302's answer, but i create ContractResolver per request.
1) Create a custom ContractResolver
public class MyJsonContractResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
public List<Tuple<string, string>> ExcludeProperties { get; set; }
protected override JsonProperty CreateProperty(MemberInfo member, MemberSerialization memberSerialization)
{
JsonProperty property = base.CreateProperty(member, memberSerialization);
if (ExcludeProperties?.FirstOrDefault(
s => s.Item2 == member.Name && s.Item1 == member.DeclaringType.Name) != null)
{
property.ShouldSerialize = instance => { return false; };
}
return property;
}
}
2) Use custom contract resolver in action
public async Task<IActionResult> Sites()
{
var items = await db.Sites.GetManyAsync();
return Json(items.ToList(), new JsonSerializerSettings
{
ContractResolver = new MyJsonContractResolver()
{
ExcludeProperties = new List<Tuple<string, string>>
{
Tuple.Create("Site", "Name"),
Tuple.Create("<TypeName>", "<MemberName>"),
}
}
});
}
Edit:
It didn't work as expected(isolate resolver per request). I'll use anonymous objects.
public async Task<IActionResult> Sites()
{
var items = await db.Sites.GetManyAsync();
return Json(items.Select(s => new
{
s.ID,
s.DisplayName,
s.Url,
UrlAlias = s.Url,
NestedItems = s.NestedItems.Select(ni => new
{
ni.Name,
ni.OrdeIndex,
ni.Enabled,
}),
}));
}
You might be able to use AutoMapper and use the .Ignore() mapping and then send the mapped object
CreateMap<Foo, Foo>().ForMember(x => x.Bar, opt => opt.Ignore());
For .NET Core 3.0 and above:
The default JSON serializer for ASP.NET Core is now System.Text.Json, which is new in .NET Core 3.0. Consider using System.Text.Json when possible. It's high-performance and doesn't require an additional library dependency.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/migration/22-to-30?view=aspnetcore-3.1&tabs=visual-studio#newtonsoftjson-jsonnet-support
Sample (Thanks cuongle)
using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
public class Foo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonIgnore]
public List<Something> Somethings { get; set; }
}
If you already have Newtonsoft.Json intalled and chose to use it instead, by default, [JsonIgnore] won't work as expected.
For some reason [IgnoreDataMember] does not always work for me, and I sometimes get StackOverflowException (or similar). So instead (or in addition) i've started using a pattern looking something like this when POSTing in Objects to my API:
[Route("api/myroute")]
[AcceptVerbs("POST")]
public IHttpActionResult PostMyObject(JObject myObject)
{
MyObject myObjectConverted = myObject.ToObject<MyObject>();
//Do some stuff with the object
return Ok(myObjectConverted);
}
So basically i pass in an JObject and convert it after it has been recieved to aviod problems caused by the built-in serializer that sometimes cause an infinite loop while parsing the objects.
If someone know a reason that this is in any way a bad idea, please let me know.
It may be worth noting that it is the following code for an EntityFramework Class-property that causes the problem (If two classes refer to each-other):
[Serializable]
public partial class MyObject
{
[IgnoreDataMember]
public MyOtherObject MyOtherObject => MyOtherObject.GetById(MyOtherObjectId);
}
[Serializable]
public partial class MyOtherObject
{
[IgnoreDataMember]
public List<MyObject> MyObjects => MyObject.GetByMyOtherObjectId(Id);
}