I'm trying to call a minimal C function from C# on Windows 10. I use mingw/g++ to compile the C code into a .dll
It turns out that I have to define opterator new[] or compile the .dll using Visual Studio. Otherwise my C# program crashes with the following error:
The program '[14740] Test.exe' has exited with code -1073741819 (0xc0000005) 'Access violation'.
I'd really love to understand what exactly is happening here and how I can resolve this issue without overriding all the new/delete operators but still using mingw.
Here's the minimal example reproducing the error including a workaround (if AddNewOperator is defined operator new[] will be defined and the resulting .dll will work fine):
Test.cs (compiled/run with Visual Studio 2017):
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
class Program
{
[DllImport("libTest", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.StdCall, ExactSpelling = true)]
public static extern int TestFunction();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("!!" + TestFunction());
}
}
Test.cpp compiled with mingw (see below):
#include <new>
#include <cstdlib>
#ifdef AddNewOperator // This will fix the issue
void* operator new[](std::size_t sz){
return std::malloc(sz);
}
#end
extern "C" {
int __stdcall __declspec(dllexport) TestFunction() {
int* test = new int[3]; // removing this line will make everything work when building
return test[2];
}
And here's the build script:
# Remove the following # and the compiled dll will work just fine
g++ -g -s -Wall -c -fmessage-length=0 Test.cpp #-DAddNewOperator
g++ -g -shared -o libTest.dll *.o -Wl,--subsystem,windows
Edit: compiling everything for x86 instead of 64 bit also fixes the issue (which is again no option for me)
TL;DR
You must not mix allocation / deallocation between compilers!
The problem you are facing is quite tricky and actually your program should crash every time, with or without the void* operator new[](size_t){...} definition.
If you debug your program, it actually should crash while deleting your test variable. This variable is created using mingw's new operator, but deleted using MSVC delete operator, and they are not interoperable. So you have to use mingw's delete function.
for a simple test you can just do:
c++ code:
int* test = nullptr;
int __stdcall __declspec(dllexport) TestFunction() {
test = new int[3]; // note test is global
return test[2];
}
void __stdcall _declspec(dllexport) CleanUp() {
delete[] test;
}
c# code:
public static extern int TestFunction();
public static extern int CleanUp();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("!!" + TestFunction());
CleanUp();
}
Why is your program not crashing if you redefine the new operator?!
I actually don't know for sure, but i think, the malloc implementation of mingw uses legacy C runtime which uses HeapAlloc for allocating and HeapFree for deleting your test variable. In short, you are simply lucky/unlucky it is not crashing when you custom defined your operator new and used malloc inside...
However, if you compile it using Visual Studio, both (dll and exe) are using the same runtime, so allocation/deallocation is done within the same memory space organizer. BUT still it is UB and you will run into problems! E.g.: If you create your libary with msvc10 and want to use this library with msvc14 same can happen here! I can remember some issues with code coming from a bug where the memory also was managed wrong; We used a library created with msvc11 but our code was compiled with msvc12...
Related
I have created a dll in C++ (windows 10, 64 bit dll, release configuration)
I have only one function in it.
extern "C"
{
__declspec(dllexport) void ConnectX()
{
std::cout << "yes" << std::endl;
}
}
When I create a new c# project, and call a function from this using:
[DllImport("XsensGrab.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl)]
public static extern void ConnectX();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Thread threadConnect = new Thread(ConnectX);
threadConnect.Start();
}
it works as expected.
When i add this same code to the existing project that i created it for, and run it, nothing happens. no error, but no connection either.
Both C# projects are release/ANY_CPU.
I cannot see a difference. Why would this work in one project, but not another? What setting in the C# application can I check to find the cause?
What I needed was to change the build settings / Platform target from ANY CPU, to x86, and the dll to win32.
In my c# code I need to call a c++ function (myWrapper) that is exported by a dll that I've created.
When myWrapper returns I get the following runtime error:
Run-Time Check Failure #0 - The value of ESP was not properly saved across a function call. This is usually a result of calling a function declared with one calling convention with a function pointer declared with a different calling convention.
As I will show below, I already specified the calling conventions a __cdecl.
In detail, my C# code:
class myClass
{
[DllImport("MyWrapper.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl)]
public static extern void myWrapper();
public void myMethod()
{
myWrapper();
}
}
c++ code for myWrapper:
#include "IpIpoptApplication.hpp"
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void (__cdecl myWrapper)()
{
SmartPtr<IpoptApplication> solver = IpoptApplicationFactory();
ApplicationReturnStatus status = solver->Initialize();
}
The IpoptAppliationFactory function is imported from an external dll in IpOptApplication.hpp (which is part of an open source project and can be viewed from https://projects.coin-or.org/svn/Ipopt/stable/3.11/Ipopt/src/Interfaces/IpIpoptApplication.hpp) with this line:
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) class Ipopt::IpoptApplication * __cdecl IpoptApplicationFactory();
The strange thing is that the error happens only when "solver->Initialize()" in myWrapper is called. If I comment the call to this method myWrapper returns without errors.
The problem is not related to the definition of "Ipopt::IpoptApplication", nor in the implementation of IpoptApplicationFactory() or Initialize() because 1) they are from a well known open source project (http://www.coin-or.org/projects/Ipopt.xml) used by thousands of programmers, 2) myWrapper works correctly if used in a standalone executable written in c++ code.
I've already googled for hours and I believe that the problem is in the way I call myWrapper but I can't find a solution.
Can anyone give me some suggestion? Thanks a lot.
Roberto
Thanks to Hans Passant the problem has been solved. I must compile "myWrapper" in release mode.
IPOPT DLLS CAN BE COMPILED ONLY IN RELEASE MODE (see readme.txt distributed with IpOpt dlls)! I've set the configuration manager to compile this project always in release mode (even when the solution is in debug).
To debug my myWrapper function (which calls IpOpt dlls), it's necessary to set in the properties of my StartUp project, the check box "Enable unmanaged code debugging"
Since unmanaged code debugging does not allow code modifications during debug, I keep diabled this if I don't need to debug myWrapper.
I hope this will help
I am currently working on a project with really short deadline, so I don't have much time to understand everything. Also, I am not an expert in C++ development and memory management.
So, what I am trying to do is to create a DLL in with both C and C++ code. Then, I would like to call this DLL in a C# code. Currently, the communication between C++ and C# is OK. The problem comes up when I try to transfer a string from the DLL to the C# code. The error is this one :
System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
at Microsoft.Win32.Win32Native.CoTaskMemFree(IntPtr ptr)
at System.StubHelpers.CSTRMarshaler.ClearNative(IntPtr pNative)
at NMSPRecognitionWrapper.Program.GetResultsExt()
at NMSPRecognitionWrapper.Program.<Main>b__0() in <my dir>\Program.cs:line 54
at NMSPRecognitionWrapper.Program.StartRecognitionExt()
at NMSPRecognitionWrapper.Program.Main(String[] args) in <my dir>\Program.cs:line 60
Also, I can give you some piece of code below (really simplified !). Actually, the C++ expose two methods : StartRecognition() launch operations to get some data from microphone, then process them and store the results. GetResults() return an instance of the results previously stored. The WrapperCallback() allows the C# part to be called when a Result is able for processing. The C# part, when the Callback is called, will ask to get the results using the GetResults() method.
I know the architecture may seem really inappropriate in this presentation, but I don't want to explain the whole project to validate the model, please be sure everything is correct.
To finish, the problem is when the C# callback call the GetResults() method. Trying to access to the resultsForCS seems to be impossible from the C#.
C++ part - header
// NMSPRecognitionLib.h
#pragma once
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) char* GetResults();
extern "C" static void DoWork();
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void StartRecognition();
C++ part - sources
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "NMSPRecognitionLib.h"
static char * resultsForCS;
static SUCCESS ProcessResult(NMSPCONNECTION_OBJECTS *pNmspConnectionObjects, LH_OBJECT hResult)
{
[...]
char* szResult;
[...]
resultsForCS = szResult;
DoWork();
[...]
return Success;
error:
return Failure;
} /* End of ProcessResult */
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) char* GetResults()
{
return resultsForCS;
}
extern "C"
{
typedef void (*callback_function)();
callback_function gCBF;
__declspec(dllexport) void WrapperCallback(callback_function callback) {
gCBF = callback;
}
static void DoWork() {
gCBF();
}
}
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void StartRecognition()
{
char* argv[] = { "path", "params" };
entryPoint(2, argv);
}
C# part
class Program
{
[DllImport("NMSPRecognitionLib.dll", EntryPoint = "GetResults")]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPStr)]
public static extern string GetResultsExt();
public delegate void message_callback_delegate();
[DllImport("NMSPRecognitionLib.dll", EntryPoint = "WrapperCallback")]
public static extern void WrapperCallbackExt(message_callback_delegate callback);
[DllImport("NMSPRecognitionLib.dll", EntryPoint = "StartRecognition")]
public static extern void StartRecognitionExt();
static void Main(string[] args)
{
WrapperCallbackExt(
delegate()
{
Console.WriteLine(GetResultsExt());
}
);
StartRecognitionExt();
Console.WriteLine("\nPress any key to finish... ");
var nothing = Console.ReadLine();
}
}
I understand that the problem comes because I am using a pointer to store the results (char *), but I actually don't know how to do this in another way. The szResults type is char * too and I can't change this !
Yes, the return type is the problem. The pinvoke marshaller must do something to release the memory that was allocated for the string. The contract is that memory allocations that need to be released by the caller must be allocated from the COM heap. CoTaskMemAlloc() in native code, also exposed in .NET as Marshal.AllocCoTaskMem().
This rarely comes to a good end, most native code allocates with malloc() or ::operator new, allocating from a heap that's created by the C runtime library. The wrong heap. So inevitably the CoTaskMemFree() call will fail. Ignored silently in Windows XP and earlier, a kaboom on Vista and up.
You must stop the pinvoke marshaller from trying to release the memory. Do so by declaring the return value as IntPtr. And use Marshal.PtrToStringAnsi() to recover the string.
You still have a Big Problem, the kind of problem that bedevils any native code that tries to use this function as well. You still have a string buffer that needs to be released. You cannot do that from C#, you can't pinvoke the correct version of free() or ::operator delete. A memory leak is inevitable. The only thing you can hope for is that the native code takes care of it, somehow. If it doesn't then you must use C++/CLI to interop with it. With the additional requirement that the native code needs to be rebuilt with the same compiler so that it uses the same shared CRT. Code that's difficult to use correctly from native code is also hard to pinvoke. That's a design flaw, always allow the caller to pass a buffer to be filled in so there's never a question who owns the memory.
Looking at:
at Microsoft.Win32.Win32Native.CoTaskMemFree(IntPtr ptr)
at System.StubHelpers.CSTRMarshaler.ClearNative(IntPtr pNative)
at NMSPRecognitionWrapper.Program.GetResultsExt()
I can see that your callback is called, but the runtime tries to free some memory. I think it assumes your pointer would be to com memory. Try converting the string yourself, it is easy!
[DllImport("NMSPRecognitionLib.dll", EntryPoint = "GetResults")]
public static extern IntPtr GetResultsExt();
[...]
string result = Marshal.PtrToStringAnsi(GetResultsExt())
No 100% guarantee, but worth a try.
I have found that it is usually easier to write a wrapper in C++/CLI around the C++ native code. A C++/CLI class can directly call and use native C++, but is accessible from C# (and any .Net language). In my experience, using DLLImport as you do leads to hard to debug and find errors.
I am working on a project that puts C# interacting with a previously created DLL in C++.
The code below shows how am I exporting the function I need:
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) int iterateAndTest(int testSize, char* testHash){
CUDADLL dll;
int ret = dll.iterateAndTest(testSize, testHash);
return ret;
}
The code below shows how I declare the function in C#:
[DllImport("C:\\Users\\BrunoBraga\\Documents\\Visual Studio 2012\\Projects\\CUDADLL\\Debug\\CUDADLL.dll")]
public static extern int iterateAndTest(int testSize, string testHash);
The problem is: the dll function is not returning anything. In fact, the dll once called, never returns to C# and the program simply ends.
I am not sure if I am giving the right code, but i suppose there is something about the dlls I am missing.
Sorry for the delay on response. THere were two problems:
1-When i created the object, i should have used new insted of just CUDADLL dll. I thought i could do this since without the new i was still able to access the inner fields.;
2-The program should run in admin, otherwise, some crashes would ocur;
Thanks again guys.
In Your c++ code insert __stdcall
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) __stdcall int iterateAndTest(int testSize, char* testHash);
in C#
[DllImport("yourdll.dll", EntryPoint="iterateAndTest", CallingConvention=CallingConvention.StdCall)]
public static extern int iterateAndTest(int testSize, string testHash);
use cout in your C++ function, if the function is called output will be displayed in output window if you are using Visual Studio.
try placing your c++ dll in your output directory
Possible Errors: dll not found or entry point exception will be thrown.
I have been tasked with maintaining a legacy unmanaged c++ system. I do not have access to the source of the entire system but I do have the source to a number of extension dlls that, when included in the same directory as the core system, will be loaded instead of the built in defaults.
I have used the extensions in the past for small changes without problems. My issue now, however, is that I'm being asked to overhaul one of the extension dlls with a substantial amount of extra functionality. Creating this extra functionality in C# is going to be significantly faster (time-to-develop) and more maintainable (our team is primarily composed of C# devs).
The extension dll only has two functions that get called by the core system. The two functions take a bool, int, uint, RECT, Point, CString and return void. Some of the parameters they accept are const.
I'm really keen to find a solid way to bridge these extension functions to C# (.NET 4). So far I've put considerable effort into researching COM Visible, Regasm, c++ mixed mode and interop wrapping libraries. I've also lost a considerable amount of time on proof of concept projects during this research and so far I do not have a working 'bridge'.
What is the most pain free method to get this up and running?
I'm under considerably more pressure on this project than normal - I'm literally starting the C# now and assuming I will get this working somehow.
Really appreciate help and feedback.
Here is the .h and .def files:
modeldll.h
#ifndef INC_MODELDLL_H
#define INC_MODELDLL_H
#ifdef MODELDLL_EXPORTS
#define MODELDLL_API __declspec(dllexport)
#else
#define MODELDLL_API __declspec(dllimport)
#endif
typedef int (*model_updatemodel_t)(const bool update_model, const HWND hwnd, const RECT rect, const POINT next_point, const CString title);
MODELDLL_API int UpdateModel(const bool update_model, const HWND hwnd, const RECT rect, const POINT next_point, const CString title);
typedef int (*model_updatemodelpoint_t)(const bool update_model, const HWND hwnd, const RECT rect, UINT update, const POINT next_point);
MODELDLL_API int UpdateModelPoint(const bool update_model, const HWND hwnd, const RECT rect, UINT update, const POINT next_point);
typedef void (*model_process_message_t)(const char *message, const void *param);
MODELDLL_API void ProcessMessage(const char *message, const void *param);
#endif // INC_MODELDLL_H
modeldll.def:
LIBRARY model.dll
EXPORTS
ProcessMessage #1
UpdateModel #2
UpdateModelPoint #3
I've investigated this topic couple of years ago: I want to use log4net and Npgsql libraries from native code that compiles even withour /clr key.
The main idea behind this technique described by Paul DiLascia in his two remarkable articles:
Managed Code in Visual Studio 2005
Use Our ManWrap Library to Get the Best of .NET in Native C++ Code
For example, here some code snippets that uses log4net library from native code (this code resides in simple non-managed dll, but you should compile this with /clr, but it's not nessary to compile with /clr key code that would use this dll from native code):
// Log4NetWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
//facade for log4net library (you may create something like this too)
ref class Log4NetWrapper
{
public:
//I intentionally remove additional methods, because
//I'm trying to show the main principle
static void ReportDebugMessage(char* msg);
private:
static property log4net::ILog^ Logger
{
log4net::ILog^ get();
}
static Object^ syncObject_ = gcnew Object();
static String^ loggerName_ = "";
};
//C-interface that could be accessed from native code
extern "C"
{
_declspec(dllexport) void ReportDebugMessage(char* msg)
{
Log4NetWrapper::ReportDebugMessage(msg);
}
}
// This is the main DLL file.
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "Log4NetWrapper.h"
void Log4NetWrapper::ReportDebugMessage(char* msg)
{
String^ data = gcnew String(msg);
Logger->Debug(data);
}
log4net::ILog^ Log4NetWrapper::Logger::get()
{
if ( loggerName_ == nullptr )
return log4net::LogManager::GetLogger("");
return log4net::LogManager::GetLogger(loggerName_);
}
Compile this code as native dll, than add this dll to your native project, add something like this to that project:
#pragma once
#pragma comment(lib, "Log4NetWrapper")
extern "C"
{
_declspec(dllimport) void ReportDebugMessage(char* msg);
}
And use ReportDebugMessage to access managed code from native code.
Without further information there's not much to go on but I would suggest that you have the following.
Extension Dll (unmanaged code) -> Managed C++ (wrapper) -> C# dll
The first jump is explained in this example:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/mcpp/cpptomancpp.aspx
You can then load the c# assembly from the managed c++ fairly easily using
using namespace YourNameSpace; // the namespace of the c# routines
In time you may be able to merge the first two.
As Preet suggested, this can be done using a Managed C++ wrapper that will do the bridging you need.
This article explains the entire process:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/mcpp/unmanaged_to_managed.aspx
I've actually done these sort of things quite a lot several years ago, and all direction work pretty well - C# calling C++ code, C++ code calling C# (via a Managed C++ proxy) and C# passing delegate to a C++ code treating them as function pointers and calling them. I've had some example projects for this, I'll try and find them.