I have two Models:
M1:
namespace wb01.Models
{
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public partial class M1
{
public M1()
{
this.M2 = new HashSet<M2>();
}
public int Id { get; set; }
public int N° { get; set; }
public string Commentaires { get; set; }
public int Id_qualité { get; set; }
public virtual Qualité Qualité { get; set; } //*(Qualité est autre table dans ma BDD)
public virtual ICollection<M2> M2 { get; set; }
}
}
And a second Model M2:
namespace wb01.Models
{
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public partial class M2
{
public int Id_M2 { get; set; }
public string N_wg { get; set; }
public double Poids { get; set; }
public int Id { get; set; }
public virtual M1 M1 { get; set; }
}
}
And a Controller:
namespace wb01.Controllers
{
using static wb01.Models.M2;
public class M1Controller : Controller
{
private M1Entities db = new M1Entities();
// GET: M1
public ActionResult Index()
{
var m1 = db.M1.Include(r => r.Qualité);
return View(m1.ToList());
}
}
}
I want in my View show the m1.ToList with a column contain the Poids of every Id in M1 (means for a m1_ID in M1 its Poids= sum(poids mi_ID in M2). Please if someone can help me ?
So maybe you can try to join your 2 tables:
public ActionResult Index()
{
var query = db.M1 // your starting point - table in the "from" statement
.Join(db.M2, // the source table of the inner join
t1 => t1.id, // Select the primary key (the first part of the "on" clause in an sql "join" statement)
t2 => t2.id, // Select the foreign key (the second part of the "on" clause)
(t1, t2) => new { t1 = t1, t2 = t2 }) // selection
.Where(M1AndM2 => M1AndM2.t1.id == 1); // where statement
return View(m1.ToList());
}
You can project on the columns you need like so
var m1 = db.M1.Include(r => r.M2).Include(r => r.Qualité).Select(r => new {
Poids = r.M2.Sum(x => x.Poids),
Col1 = r.Col1,
Col2 = r.Col2,
Col3 = r.Col3,
Col4 = r.Col4
});
return View(m1.ToList());
Related
I`m having simple method which builds IQueryable and returns it.
public IQueryable<ClassDTO> ReportByNestedProperty()
{
IQueryable<Class> query = this.dbSet;
IQueryable<ClassDTO> groupedQuery =
from opportunity in query
group new
{
ItemGroup = opportunity.OpportunityStage.Name,
EstimatedRevenue = opportunity.EstimatedRevenue,
CostOfLead = opportunity.CostOfLead
}
by new
{
opportunity.OpportunityStage.Name,
opportunity.OpportunityStage.Id
}
into item
select new ClassDTO()
{
ItemGroup = string.IsNullOrEmpty(item.Key.Name) ? "[Not Assigned]" : item.Key.Name,
Count = item.Select(z => z.ItemGroup.Name).Count(), // int
Commission = item.Sum(z => z.EstimatedRevenue), // decimal
Cost = item.Sum(z => z.CostOfLead), // decimal?
};
return groupedQuery;
}
This is fine. The thing i need is to create method with same return type, but groupby by different prperties dynamically. So from the above code I want to have 3 dynamic parts which will be passed as params:
ItemGroup = opportunity.OpportunityStage.Name
and
by new
{
opportunity.OpportunityStage.Name,
opportunity.OpportunityStage.Id
}
So the new method should be like this
public IQueryable<ClassDTO> ReportByNestedProperty(string firstNestedGroupByProperty, string secondNestedGroupByProperty)
{
// TODO: ExpressionTree
}
And call it like this:
ReportByNestedProperty("OpportunityStage.Name","OpportunityStage.Id")
ReportByNestedProperty("OtherNestedProperty.Name","OtherNestedProperty.Id")
ReportByNestedProperty("OpportunityStage.Name","OpportunityStage.Price")
So the main thing is to create expressions with these two selects:
opportunity.OpportunityStage.Name,
opportunity.OpportunityStage.Id
I have tried toe create the select expressions, groupby, the creation of Anonomoys classes and the DTO Class but I just cant get it right.
EDIT:
Here are the classes involved:
public class ClassDTO
{
public ClassDTO() { }
[Key]
public string ItemGroup { get; set; }
public decimal Commission { get; set; }
public decimal? Cost { get; set; }
public int Count { get; set; }
}
Class obj is a pretty big one so i`m posting just part of it
public partial class Class
{
public Class() { }
[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public Guid? OpportunityStageId { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(nameof(OpportunityStageId))]
[InverseProperty(nameof(Entities.OpportunityStage.Class))]
public virtual OpportunityStage OpportunityStage { get; set; }
}
public partial class OpportunityStage
{
public OpportunityStage()
{
this.Classes = new HashSet<Class>();
}
[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
[InverseProperty(nameof(Class.OpportunityStage))]
public virtual ICollection<TruckingCompanyOpportunity> Classes{ get; set; }
}
I have simplified your Grouping query and introduced private class IdName which should replace anonymous class usage:
class IdName
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; } = null!;
}
static Expression MakePropPath(Expression objExpression, string path)
{
return path.Split('.').Aggregate(objExpression, Expression.PropertyOrField);
}
IQueryable<ClassDTO> ReportByNestedProperty(IQueryable<Class> query, string nameProperty, string idProperty)
{
// Let compiler to do half of the work
Expression<Func<Class, string, int, IdName>> keySelectorTemplate = (opportunity, name, id) =>
new IdName { Name = name, Id = id };
var param = keySelectorTemplate.Parameters[0];
// generating expressions from prop path
var nameExpr = MakePropPath(param, nameProperty);
var idExpr = MakePropPath(param, idProperty);
var body = keySelectorTemplate.Body;
// substitute parameters
body = ReplacingExpressionVisitor.Replace(keySelectorTemplate.Parameters[1], nameExpr, body);
body = ReplacingExpressionVisitor.Replace(keySelectorTemplate.Parameters[2], idExpr, body);
var keySelectorLambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Class, IdName>>(body, param);
// finalize query
IQueryable<ClassDTO> groupedQuery = query
.GroupBy(keySelectorLambda)
.Select(item => new ClassDTO()
{
ItemGroup = string.IsNullOrEmpty(item.Key.Name) ? "[Not Assigned]" : item.Key.Name,
Count = item.Count(x => x.Name), // int
Commission = item.Sum(x => x.EstimatedRevenue), // decimal
Cost = item.Sum(x => x.CostOfLead), // decimal?
});
return groupedQuery;
}
I am trying to convert the following SQL using LINQ in c#
enter code here
SELECT t2.AccountID, t1.Name, t1.ParentID, SUM(t2.Debit), SUM(t2.Credit)
FROM t2.INNER JOIN
t1.ON t2.AccountID = t1.ID
GROUP BY t2.AccountID, t2.Name, t1.ParentID
HAVING (t1.ParentID = 22)
Try following :
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace ConsoleApplication23
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Name[] names = null;
Amount[] amounts = null;
var results = (from t1 in names.Where(x => x.ParentID == 22)
join t2 in amounts on t1.ID equals t2.AccountID
select new { t1 = t1, t2 = t2 }
)
.GroupBy(x => new { accountId = x.t2.AccountID, name = x.t1.Name, parent = x.t1.ParentID })
.Select(x => new { accountID = x.Key.accountId, name = x.Key.name, parentID = x.Key.parent, debit = x.Sum(y => y.t2.Debit), credit = x.Sum(y => y.t2.Credit) })
.ToList();
}
}
public class Name
{
public int ParentID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public int ID { get; set; }
}
public class Amount
{
public int AccountID { get; set; }
public decimal Debit { get; set; }
public decimal Credit { get; set; }
}
}
I don´t know where is the mistake why it says that does not contain a defintion of ImporteSolicitado, interesesDemora and importeReintegro when they are colums of c and the last one of d
var importes = (from c in _context.ReintegroSolicitado
join d in _context.ReintegroRecibido on c.Expediente.ID equals d.Expediente.ID
group new {c,d} by new { c.Expediente.Codigo} into cd
select new { ImporteSolictadoFinal = cd.Sum(b => b.ImporteSolicitado + b.InteresesDemora), ImporteReintegroFinal = cd.Sum(e => e.ImporteReintegro) });
your group element contains two property c and d. So you need refer to
this property as
...
select new {
ImporteSolictadoFinal = cd.Sum(b => b.c.ImporteSolicitado + b.c.InteresesDemora),
ImporteReintegroFinal = cd.Sum(e => e.d.ImporteReintegro) }
...
This is very tough to get right with query posted. I did my best, but it is probably not exactly correct.
var importes = (from c in _context.reintegroSolicitado
join d in _context.reintegroRecibido on c.expediente.ID equals d.expediente.ID
select new { reintegroSolicitado = c, reintegroRecibido = c})
.GroupBy(x => new { c = x.reintegroSolicitado , d = x.reintegroRecibido})
.Select(cd => new { ImporteSolictadoFinal = cd.Sum(b => b.reintegroSolicitado.ImporteSolicitado + b.reintegroSolicitado.InteresesDemora), ImporteReintegroFinal = cd.Sum(e => e.reintegroRecibido.ImporteReintegro) });
}
}
public class Context
{
public List<ReintegroSolicitado> reintegroSolicitado { get; set; }
public List<ReintegroSolicitado> reintegroRecibido { get; set; }
public Expediente expediente { get; set; }
}
public class ReintegroSolicitado
{
public Expediente expediente { get; set; }
public int ImporteSolicitado { get; set; }
public int InteresesDemora { get; set; }
public int ImporteReintegro { get; set; }
}
public class Expediente
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public int Codigo { get; set; }
}
I hope it's more clear what I want to do from the code than the title. Basically I am grouping by 2 fields and want to reduce the results into a collection all the ProductKey's constructed in the Map phase.
public class BlockResult
{
public Client.Names ClientName;
public string Block;
public IEnumerable<ProductKey> ProductKeys;
}
public Block()
{
Map = products =>
from product in products
where product.Details.Block != null
select new
{
product.ClientName,
product.Details.Block,
ProductKeys = new List<ProductKey>(new ProductKey[]{
new ProductKey{
Id = product.Id,
Url = product.Url
}
})
};
Reduce = results =>
from result in results
group result by new {result.ClientName, result.Block} into g
select new BlockResult
{
ClientName = g.Key.ClientName,
Block = g.Key.Block,
ProductKeys = g.SelectMany(x=> x.ProductKeys)
};
}
I get some weird System.InvalidOperationException and a source code dump where basically it is trying to initialize the list with an int (?).
If I try replacing the ProductKey with just IEnumerable ProductIds (and make appropriate changes in the code). Then the code runs but I don't get any results in the reduce.
You probably don't want to do this. Are you really going to need to query in this manner? If you know the context, then you should probably just do this:
var q = session.Query<Product>()
.Where(x => x.ClientName == "Joe" && x.Details.Block == "A");
But, to answer your original question, the following index will work:
public class Products_GroupedByClientNameAndBlock : AbstractIndexCreationTask<Product, Products_GroupedByClientNameAndBlock.Result>
{
public class Result
{
public string ClientName { get; set; }
public string Block { get; set; }
public IList<ProductKey> ProductKeys { get; set; }
}
public class ProductKey
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
}
public Products_GroupedByClientNameAndBlock()
{
Map = products =>
from product in products
where product.Details.Block != null
select new {
product.ClientName,
product.Details.Block,
ProductKeys = new[] { new { product.Id, product.Url } }
};
Reduce = results =>
from result in results
group result by new { result.ClientName, result.Block }
into g
select new {
g.Key.ClientName,
g.Key.Block,
ProductKeys = g.SelectMany(x => x.ProductKeys)
};
}
}
When replicating I get the same InvalidOperationException, stating that it doesn't understand the index definition (stack trace omitted for brevity).
Url: "/indexes/Keys/ByNameAndBlock"
System.InvalidOperationException: Could not understand query:
I'm still not entirely sure what you're attempting here, so this may not be quite what you're after, but I managed to get the following working. In short, Map/Reduce deals in anonymous objects, so strongly typing to your custom types makes no sense to Raven.
public class Keys_ByNameAndBlock : AbstractIndexCreationTask<Product, BlockResult>
{
public Keys_ByNameAndBlock()
{
Map = products =>
from product in products
where product.Block != null
select new
{
product.Name,
product.Block,
ProductIds = product.ProductKeys.Select(x => x.Id)
};
Reduce = results =>
from result in results
group result by new {result.Name, result.Block}
into g
select new
{
g.Key.Name,
g.Key.Block,
ProductIds = g.SelectMany(x => x.ProductIds)
};
}
}
public class Product
{
public Product()
{
ProductKeys = new List<ProductKey>();
}
public int ProductId { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Block { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<ProductKey> ProductKeys { get; set; }
}
public class ProductKey
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
}
public class BlockResult
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Block { get; set; }
public int[] ProductIds { get; set; }
}
How to make this expression using the methods of exptension, but (!) not using anonymous types?
from p in posts
join u in context.oxite_Users on p.CreatorUserID equals u.UserID
join pa in context.oxite_PostAreaRelationships on p.PostID equals pa.PostID
join a in context.oxite_Areas on pa.AreaID equals a.AreaID
let c = getCommentsQuery(p.PostID)
let t = getTagsQuery(p.PostID)
let tb = getTrackbacksQuery(p.PostID)
let f = getFilesQuery(p.PostID)
where p.State != (byte)EntityState.Removed
orderby p.PublishedDate descending
select new Post
{ area = a, comments = c } e.t.c.
The key here is to introduce a tuple that encapsulates the combined state of the join operations and other lets. I can't repro your environment just from that, but here's a limited example that should make it clear(ish);
using System.Linq;
static class Program
{
static void Main()
{
var users = new User[0]; // intentionally 0; only exists to prove compiles
var orders = new Order[0];
var query = users.Join(orders, user => user.UserId, order => order.OrderId, (user,order) => new UserOrderTuple(user,order))
.Where(tuple => tuple.State != 42).OrderByDescending(tuple => tuple.Order.OrderId)
.Select(tuple => new ResultTuple { Comment = tuple.Comment });
}
}
class ResultTuple
{
public string Comment { get; set; }
}
class UserOrderTuple
{
public UserOrderTuple(User user, Order order)
{
User = user;
Order = order;
Comment = "some magic that gets your comment and other let";
State = 124;
}
public string Comment { get; private set; }
public int State { get; private set; }
public User User { get; private set; }
public Order Order { get; private set; }
}
class User
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
}
class Order
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int OrderId { get; set; }
}