Develop Reference

Is it possible to use a C# lambda expression to create an instance of System.Linq.Expressions.Expression at compile time?

A C# lambda expression (of type System.Linq.Expressions.Expression<TDelegate>) in code:
Expression<Func<Something, bool>> predicate = s => s.SomeProperty == 12;
To create a similar instance of System.Linq.Expressions.Expression:
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Something), "s");
var property = Expression.Property(parameter, typeof(Something).GetProperty("SomeProperty"));
var constant = Expression.Constant(12);
var expression = Expression.Equal(property, constant);
Is there a way to declare expression given only the predicate? So without building the expression tree step by step in code, but having the compiler infer it from a lambda expression.
var expression = Expression.FromLambda<Something>(s => s.SomeProperty == 12);

Sure, just grab the body of the lambda expression, like so:
Expression FromLambda(Expression<Func<Something, bool>> lambda)
{
return lambda.Body;
}
Then you can use it like so:
var expression = FromLambda(s => s.SomeProperty == 12);

Just return the expression
Expression<Func<T, bool>> FromLambda<T>(Expression<Func<T, bool>> lambda) {
return lambda;
}
And use as desired
var expression = FromLambda<Something>(s => s.SomeProperty == 12);
This however is not very flexible and targets just this scenario. You would need to create methods for any other delegate you want to use.

c# How to evaluate compareTo(..) in Expression which returns a string

I have similar Situation like here: How to declare a Linq Expression variable in order to have it processed as a dbParameter
But in my case, don't want to compare with 'equal' operator, I need to compare one string against another. How can I achieve this?
I tried something like this:
var comparsionString = "aaa";
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(ItemSearch), "s");
Expression prop = Expression.Property(param, "Id");
Expression<Func<string>> idLambda = () => comparsionString;
Expression searchExpr = Expression.GreaterThanOrEqual(prop, idLambda.Body);
Expression<Func<ItemSearch, bool>> myLambda =
Expression.Lambda<Func<ItemSearch, bool>>(searchExpr, param);
But unfortunately GreaterThanOrEqual is not supported for strings. So I would need the string.CompareTo(..) method which is supported at least by SQL to Entities.
Say:
Expression searchExpr = Expression.IsTrue(*prop*.CompareTo(*idLambda*) >= 0);
How to write this in a way, that compiler can understand?
Any help is apreciated.
Thank you!

If you investigate the compiler translation for
Expression<Func<string, bool>> f = s => s.CompareTo("aaaa") >= 0;
You will discover you need to use GreaterThanOrEqual(Call("s", "CompareTo", "aaaa")) so the code to create that is:
var comparsionString = "aaa";
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(ItemSearch), "s");
Expression prop = Expression.Property(param, "Id");
Expression<Func<string>> idLambda = () => comparsionString;
var CallMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("CompareTo", new[] { typeof(string) });
Expression callExpr = Expression.Call(prop, CallMethod, idLambda.Body);
Expression searchExpr = Expression.GreaterThanOrEqual(callExpr, Expression.Constant(0));
Expression<Func<ItemSearch, bool>> myLambda =
Expression.Lambda<Func<ItemSearch, bool>>(searchExpr, param);

Dynamic Linq where clause throws OutOfMemoryException

I am a novice at Linq and a true beginner with expression trees.
I have a generic expression routine that builds a simple Linq where clause that I found at:
https://www.simple-talk.com/dotnet/net-framework/dynamic-linq-queries-with-expression-trees/
public Func<TSource,bool> SimpleFilter<TSource> (string property, object value)
{
var type = typeof(TSource);
var pe = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyReference = Expression.Property(pe,property);
var constantReference = Expression.Constant(value);
var ret = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>
(Expression.Equal(propertyReference, constantReference), new[] { pe });
return ret.Compile();
}
When I call the function as SimpleFilter("JobCustomerID", 449152) it
yields (p => p.JobCustomerId == 449152) which is correct.
If I manually place that criteria in my Linq statement, I get the correct return.
var jj = db.VW_Job_List.Where((p => p.JobCustomerId == 449152));
However when called via the filter function, the Linq throws an OutOfMemoryException.
It is called in my application as:
var jj = db.VW_Job_List.Where(SimpleFilter<VW_Job_List>("JobCustomerID", 449152));
If I call the function with a text criterion, it returns properly:
var jj = db.VW_Job_List.Where(SimpleFilter<VW_Job_List>("CompanyCode", "LCS"));
Is there something specific about using an integer variable that needs to be accommodated? Do I have something coded incorrectly? Any thoughts or insights will be appreciated.

The two calls
var jj = db.VW_Job_List.Where((p => p.JobCustomerId == 449152));
and
var jj = db.VW_Job_List.Where(SimpleFilter<VW_Job_List>("JobCustomerID", 449152));
are not equivalent. The first resolves to Queryable.Where, hence the filter is applied inside the database, while the second - to Enumerable.Where, thus causing loading the whole table in memory and applying the filter there.
The problem is that the return type of your SimpleFilter is Func<TSource, bool>. In order to make them equivalent, it should be Expression<Func<TSource, bool>>. Note that although they look visually the same, there is a huge difference between lambda expression and lambda delegate due to the different overload resolution when applied to IQueryable<T>.
So, change the method like this and try again:
public Expression<Func<TSource,bool>> SimpleFilter<TSource> (string property, object value)
{
var type = typeof(TSource);
var pe = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyReference = Expression.Property(pe,property);
var constantReference = Expression.Constant(value);
var ret = Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>
(Expression.Equal(propertyReference, constantReference), new[] { pe });
return ret; // No .Compile()
}

Add second group by key field to existing Lambda Expression

I have a Group by expression that I am dynamically creating for use in a LINQ query. Currently, to construct the expression, I use the following code:
var arg = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), helper.getName());
var prop = Expression.Property(arg, "customerType");
var body = Expression.Convert(prop, typeof(object));
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Contact, object>>(body, arg);
var keySelector = lambda.Compile();
I then use the keySelector in the GroupBy for my LINQ query. My question is, if I wanted to add a second grouping criteria to this expression, say "salesStage", how would I add that to this existing expression?

You have a problem, because what the compiler does on a regular GroupBy call is generate a new anonymous type with the properties you define. If the type doesn't exist, we cannot create an expression creating an object of the type.
However, given that you are using this for LINQ-to-Objects, we can use the Tuple<> type to generate the grouping key. Hopefully you do not need to group on more than 8 parameters.
Here is a generic function to generate the grouping function:
static Func<T, object> BuildGrouper<T>(IEnumerable<string> properties) {
var arg = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), helper.getName());
// This is the list of property accesses we will be using
var parameters = properties.Select(propName => Expression.Property(arg, propName)).ToList();
// Find the correct overload of Tuple.Create.
// This will throw if the number of parameters is more than 8!
var method = typeof(Tuple).GetMethods().Where(m => m.Name == "Create" && m.GetParameters().Length == parameters.Count).Single();
// But it is a generic method, we need to specify the types of each of the arguments
var paramTypes = parameters.Select(p => p.Type).ToArray();
method = method.MakeGenericMethod(paramTypes);
// Invoke the Tuple.Create method and return the Func
var call = Expression.Call(null, method, parameters);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, object>>(call, arg);
return lambda.Compile();
}

From BinaryExpression to Expression<Func<T, bool>>

Suppose I have something like
Expression<Func<SomeType, DateTime>> left = x => x.SomeDateProperty;
Expression<Func<SomeType, DateTime>> right = x => dateTimeConstant;
var binaryExpression = Expression.GreaterThan(left, right);
Expression<Func<SomeType, bool>> predicate =
x => x.SomeDateProperty> dateTimeConstant;
1) How can I replace the right hand of the assignment of the last line with something that uses the binaryExpression instead? var predicate = x => binaryExpression; doesn't work.
2) The right is always a constant, not necessarily DateTime.Now. Could it be of some simpler Expression type? For instance, it doesn't depend on SomeType, it is just a constant.
3) If I have the GreaterThan as a string, is there a way to get from this string to the method with the same name in Expression? In general, if the name of the comparison method is given as a string, how can I go from the string to actually calling the method with the same name on the Expression class?
It has to work with LINQ to Entities, if it matters.

1 and 2: You need to build the expression tree manually to do this, the compiler cannot help because it only constructs ready-made expressions that represent functions in their entirety. That's not useful when you want to build functions piece by piece.
Here's one straightforward way to build the expression you want:
var argument = Expression.Parameter(typeof(SomeType));
var left = Expression.Property(argument, "SomeDateProperty");
var right = Expression.Constant(DateTime.Now);
var predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<SomeType, bool>>(
Expression.GreaterThan(left, right),
new[] { argument }
);
You can take this for a test drive with
var param = new SomeType {
SomeDateProperty = DateTime.Now.Add(TimeSpan.FromHours(-1))
};
Console.WriteLine(predicate.Compile()(param)); // "False"
3: Since in all likelihood the number of possible choices for your binary predicate will be quite small, you could do this with a dictionary:
var wordToExpression =
new Dictionary<string, Func<Expression, Expression, BinaryExpression>>
{
{ "GreaterThan", Expression.GreaterThan },
// etc
};
Then, instead of hardcoding Expression.GreaterThan in the first snippet you would do something like wordToExpression["GreaterThan"](left, right).
Of course this can also be done the standard way with reflection.

When you use GreaterThan, you need to specify the expression bodies, not the lambda itself. Unfortunately, there is a complication: the x in the two expressions is not the same.
In this particular case, you could just about get away with this, because the second expression does not use x
So; your "1" and "2" should be answered by:
var binaryExpression = Expression.GreaterThan(left.Body, right.Body);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<SomeType, bool>>(binaryExpression,
left.Parameters);
However, to handle this in the general case, you must rewrite on of the expressions, to fix-up the parameters:
var binaryExpression = Expression.GreaterThan(left.Body,
new SwapVisitor(right.Parameters[0], left.Parameters[0]).Visit(right.Body));
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<SomeType, bool>>(binaryExpression,
left.Parameters);
with:
public class SwapVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Expression from, to;
public SwapVisitor(Expression from, Expression to)
{
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node)
{
return node == from ? to : base.Visit(node);
}
}
For your "3"; there is nothing inbuilt for that; you could use reflection, though:
string method = "GreaterThan";
var op = typeof(Expression).GetMethod(method,
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static,
null, new[] { typeof(Expression), typeof(Expression) }, null);
var rightBody = new SwapVisitor(right.Parameters[0],
left.Parameters[0]).Visit(right.Body);
var exp = (Expression)op.Invoke(null, new object[] { left.Body, rightBody });
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<SomeType, bool>>(exp, left.Parameters);