C# async/await write to textbox - c#

Needless to say I'm new to C# and doing some basic things to learn along the way. I'm trying to understand async/await feature. I have a form with 2 textboxes and a button. When I click the button, it checks a remote computer's service status (in this case remote registry. While it checks, it writes that it is checking the registry and tells the user to wait. Then starts if the state is stopped and gets some values I look for and writes those to the second textbox.
My code works, and I'm able to get my values. But the GUI freezes during this time. I tried to implement backgroundworker, thread and Async/Wait with no success. I tried doing Task and couldn't get that to work.
All the examples shown here or on other sites simply return int while I'm trying to return a string that writes the status and the values I want to textboxes. I tried to convert it to string with no success.
Long story short, for this type of processes, what would be a better approach? Can someone show me how and comment what does what along the way just so I understand better? I want to learn how to do it but at the same time learn why and learn to write cleaner code.
Thank you everyone for taking their time in advance.
string ComputerName = "Lab01";
public frmRegChecker()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Check_Status();
}
private void Check_Status()
{
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText("Checking Remote Registry service status on computer : " + ComputerName);
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText("Please wait... ");
ServiceController sc = new ServiceController("RemoteRegistry", ComputerName);
try
{
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText("The Remote Registry service status is currently set to : " + sc.Status.ToString());
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
if (sc.Status == ServiceControllerStatus.Stopped)
{
// Start the service if the current status is stopped.
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText("Starting Remote Registry service...");
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
try
{
// Start the service, and wait until its status is "Running".
sc.Start();
sc.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus.Running, new TimeSpan(0, 0, 3));
sc.Refresh();
sc.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus.Running);
// Display the current service status.
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText("The Remote Registry status is now set to:" + sc.Status.ToString());
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
try
{
var reg = RegistryKey.OpenRemoteBaseKey(RegistryHive.LocalMachine, ComputerName);
var key = reg.OpenSubKey(#"Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\");
string _OSVersion = (key.GetValue("CurrentVersion")).ToString();
richTextBox1.AppendText("OS version is : " + _OSVersion);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException)
{
richTextBox1.AppendText("Error getting registry value from" + ComputerName);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
}
catch (InvalidOperationException)
{
richTextBox1.AppendText("Could not start the Remote Registry service.");
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
}
else if (sc.Status == ServiceControllerStatus.Running)
{
try
{
var reg = RegistryKey.OpenRemoteBaseKey(RegistryHive.LocalMachine, ComputerName);
var key = reg.OpenSubKey(#"Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\");
string _OSVersion = (key.GetValue("CurrentVersion")).ToString();
richTextBox1.AppendText("OS version is : " + _OSVersion);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException)
{
richTextBox1.AppendText("Error getting registry value from" + ComputerName);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
}
}
}
catch
{
richTextBox1.AppendText("Error getting registry value from " + ComputerName);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
}

Unfortunately, ServiceController is a rather outdated class and doesn't natively support async/await. That would be the cleanest solution if it were possible.
So, what you can do is use async/await with Task.Run. Task.Run executes code on a background thread, and you can use async/await from the UI to consume that background operation. This approach allows exceptions to be propagated and handled in a natural fashion, and it allows return values to also be handled naturally. Strip out the textbox updates for now for simplicity, and the first step looks like this:
private async void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
var osVersion = await Task.Run(() => CheckStatus());
richTextBox1.AppendText("OS version is : " + osVersion);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException ex)
{
richTextBox1.AppendText("Error getting registry value from" + ComputerName);
richTextBox1.AppendText(ex.ToString());
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
}
private string CheckStatus()
{
ServiceController sc = new ServiceController("RemoteRegistry", ComputerName);
if (sc.Status == ServiceControllerStatus.Stopped)
{
// Start the service if the current status is stopped.
// Start the service, and wait until its status is "Running".
sc.Start();
sc.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus.Running, new TimeSpan(0, 0, 3));
sc.Refresh();
sc.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus.Running);
}
var reg = RegistryKey.OpenRemoteBaseKey(RegistryHive.LocalMachine, ComputerName);
var key = reg.OpenSubKey(#"Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\");
return (key.GetValue("CurrentVersion")).ToString();
}
Next, add the progress updates. There's a built-in mechanism for that - IProgress<T>/Progress<T>, and it works like this:
private async void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
var progress = new Progress<string>(update =>
{
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText(update);
TxtBoxstatus.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
});
var osVersion = await Task.Run(() => CheckStatus(progress));
richTextBox1.AppendText("OS version is : " + osVersion);
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException ex)
{
richTextBox1.AppendText("Error getting registry value from" + ComputerName);
richTextBox1.AppendText(ex.ToString());
richTextBox1.AppendText(Environment.NewLine);
}
}
private string CheckStatus(IProgres<string> progress)
{
progress?.Report("Checking Remote Registry service status on computer : " + ComputerName);
progress?.Report("Please wait... ");
ServiceController sc = new ServiceController("RemoteRegistry", ComputerName);
progress?.Report("The Remote Registry service status is currently set to : " + sc.Status.ToString());
if (sc.Status == ServiceControllerStatus.Stopped)
{
// Start the service if the current status is stopped.
progress?.Report("Starting Remote Registry service...");
// Start the service, and wait until its status is "Running".
sc.Start();
sc.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus.Running, new TimeSpan(0, 0, 3));
sc.Refresh();
sc.WaitForStatus(ServiceControllerStatus.Running);
progress?.Report("The Remote Registry status is now set to:" + sc.Status.ToString());
}
var reg = RegistryKey.OpenRemoteBaseKey(RegistryHive.LocalMachine, ComputerName);
var key = reg.OpenSubKey(#"Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\");
return (key.GetValue("CurrentVersion")).ToString();
}
Note the separation of concerns: the only code that touches UI objects is a UI event handler. The CheckStatus method that contains the actual program logic is separated from the UI - all it knows is that it can report progress strings and return a string result.

This can easily be accomplished using async/await. An Example:
A simple WPF form:
<Window x:Class="WpfApp1.MainWindow"
...>
<Grid>
<Button Name="button" Content="Start" Click="Button_Click"/>
<TextBox Name="textButton" />
</Grid>
</Window>
and the associated code-behind:
public partial class MainWindow:Window
{
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private async void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
textButton.Text = "Running...";
string result = await DoIt();
textButton.Text = result;
}
private async Task<string> DoIt()
{
await Task.Delay(3000);
return "Finished...";
}
}
When clicking the button, the long-running 'calculation' in 'DoIt' is started'asynchrounously. While it is running, the UI remains responsive.
When DoIt returns returns its result (in this example after a dummy delay of 3 seconds) the 'click' eventhandler continues...
Remarks:
this example uses code behind for simplicity. The technique works as well using the MVVM-pattern (where the async operation is started from a command).
'async void' is an anti pattern, but is used to comply withe the auto generated eventhandler in code behind.
in a real world application the async 'DoIt' method would propably be situated in a backend 'model class'.
the example assumes you only want to update the UI once the long-running operation has finished. If you want intermediate updates, there are several options (unfortunately a bit more complex).

I think you can still use the backgroundworker to make your textboxes display messages without freezing the GUI. Take reference from this question Here on how to return an object from backgroundworker.

Related

What is the best way to check a url is valid every second (or less), with Task await or ContinueWith in a C# Window Forms Application (.NET)

I'm new to C# .Net and Visual Studio 2022 - What I'm trying to achieve is to have a timer running every second to check that a website url is valid/is up. If the url IS reachable and the current WebView2 is not showing that website, then it should navigate to it. If it's already showing that website, it should do nothing else. If it was showing that website, but now it's no longer valid, the WebView should navigate to my custom error page. If whilst on the custom error page the website becomes available again, it should (re)load the website.
In my particular scenario I'm making a webView load localhost (127.0.0.1) for now. I want to continuously check the website is ip, and if it goes down, show custom error, if it comes back, show the website.
Not sure I'm explaining that very well. From the research I have done, I believe I need Task and also await using async method.
Here's my current timer and checkurl code as well as navigtionstarted and navigationcompeted:
private void webView_NavigationStarting(object sender, CoreWebView2NavigationStartingEventArgs e)
{
timerCheckRSLCDURL.Enabled = false;
}
private void webView_NavigationCompleted(object sender, Microsoft.Web.WebView2.Core.CoreWebView2NavigationCompletedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.IsSuccess)
{
Debug.WriteLine("JT:IsSuccess");
((Microsoft.Web.WebView2.WinForms.WebView2) sender).ExecuteScriptAsync("document.querySelector('body').style.overflow='hidden'");
}
else if (!e.IsSuccess)
{
Debug.WriteLine("JT:IsNOTSuccess");
webView.DefaultBackgroundColor = Color.Blue;
//webView.CoreWebView2.NavigateToString(Program.htmlString);
}
timerCheckRSLCDURL.Enabled = true;
}
private void timerCheckRSLCDURL_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Timer Fired! Timer.Enabled = " + timerCheckRSLCDURL.Enabled);
CheckURL(Properties.Settings.Default.URL, Properties.Settings.Default.Port);
}
private async void CheckURL(string url, decimal port)
{
timerCheckRSLCDURL = false;
Program.isWebSiteUp = false;
string webViewURL = BuildURL();
Debug.WriteLine("Checking URL: " + webViewURL);
try
{
var request = WebRequest.Create(webViewURL);
request.Method = "HEAD";
var response = (HttpWebResponse) await Task.Factory.FromAsync < WebResponse > (request.BeginGetResponse, request.EndGetResponse, null);
if (response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
Program.isWebSiteUp = true;
}
}
catch (System.Net.WebException exception)
{
Debug.WriteLine("WebException: " + exception.Message);
if (exception.Message.Contains("(401) Unauthorized"))
{
Program.isWebSiteUp = false;
}
else
{
Program.isWebSiteUp = false;
} // This little block is unfinished atm as it doesn't really affect me right now
}
catch (Exception exception)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Exception: " + exception.Message);
Program.isWebSiteUp = false;
}
if (Program.isWebSiteUp == true && webView.Source.ToString().Equals("about:blank"))
{
Debug.WriteLine("JT:1");
Debug.WriteLine("isWebSiteUp = true, webView.Source = about:blank");
webView.CoreWebView2.Navigate(webViewURL);
}
else if (Program.isWebSiteUp == true && !webView.Source.ToString().Equals(webViewURL))
{
Debug.WriteLine("JT:2");
Debug.WriteLine("isWebSiteUp = true\nwebView.Source = " + webView.Source.ToString() + "\nwebViewURL = " + webViewURL + "\nWebView Source == webViewURL: " + webView.Source.ToString().Equals(webViewURL) + "\n");
webView.CoreWebView2.Navigate(webViewURL);
}
else if (Program.isWebSiteUp == false && !webView.Source.ToString().Equals("about:blank"))
{
Debug.WriteLine("JT:3");
Debug.WriteLine("This SHOULD be reloading the BSOD page!");
webView.CoreWebView2.NavigateToString(Program.htmlString);
}
}
private string BuildURL()
{
string webViewURL;
string stringURL = Properties.Settings.Default.URL;
string stringPort = Properties.Settings.Default.Port.ToString();
string stringURLPORT = $ "{stringURL}:{stringPort}";
if (stringPort.Equals("80"))
{
webViewURL = stringURL;
}
else
{
webViewURL = stringURLPORT;
}
if (!webViewURL.EndsWith("/"))
{
webViewURL += "/";
}
//For now, the URL will always be at root, so don't need to worry about accidentally
//making an invalid url like http://example.com/subfolder/:port
//although potentially will need to address this at a later stage
Debug.WriteLine("BuildURL returns: " + webViewURL);
return webViewURL;
}
So the timer is fired every 1000ms (1 second) because I need to actively check the URL is still alive. I think the way I'm controlling the timer is wrong - and I imagine there's a better way of doing it, but what I want to do is this...
Check website URL every 1 second
To avoid repeating the same async task, I'm trying to disable the timer so it does not fire a second time whilst the async checkurl is running
Once the async/await task of checking the url has finished, the timer should be re-enabled to continue monitoring is the website url is still up
If the website is down, it should show my custom error page (referred to as BSOD) which is some super basic html loaded from resources and 'stored' in Program.htmlString
if the the website is down, and the webview is already showing the BSOD, the webview should do nothing. The timer should continue to monitor the URL.
if the website is up and the webview is showing the BSOD, then it should navigate to the checked url that is up. If the website is up, and the webview is already showing the website, then the webview should do nothing. The timer should continue to monitor the URL.
From other research, I'm aware I shouldn't be using private async void - eg shouldn't be using it as a void. But I've not yet figured out / understood the correct way to do this
In the Immediate Window, it appears that webView_NavigationCompleted is being fired twice (or sometimes even a few times) instantly as the immediate window output will show JT:IsSuccess or JT:IsNOTSuccess a few times repeated in quick succession. Is that normal? I'm assuming something isn't correct there.
The main problem appears to be due to the timer being only 1 second. If I change the timer to fire every 30 seconds for example, it seems to work ok, but when it's every second (I may even need it less than that at some point) it's not really working as expected. Sometimes the BSOD doesn't load at all for example, as well as the webView_NavigationCompleted being fire multiple times in quick succession etc.
Could someone pretty please help me make this code better and correct.
I've searched countless websites etc and whilst there is some good info, some of it seems overwhelming / too technical so to speak. I had to lookup what "antecedent" meant earlier as it's a completely new word to me! :facepalm:
Many thanks inadvance
This answer will focus on the Task timer loop to answer the specific part of your question "check a url is valid every second". There are lots of answers about how to perform the actual Ping (like How do you check if a website is online in C#) and here's the Microsoft documentation for Ping if you choose to go that route.
Since it's not uncommon to set a timeout value of 120 seconds for a ping request, it calls into question whether it would have any value to do this on a steady tick of one second. My suggestion is that it would make more sense to:
Make a background thread
Perform a synchronous ping (wait for the result) on the background thread.
Marshal the ping result onto the UI thread to perform the other tasks you have laid out.
Synchronously wait a Task.Delay on the background thread before performing the next ping.
Here is how I personally go about doing that in my own production code:
void execPing()
{
Task.Run(() =>
{
while (!DisposePing.IsCancellationRequested)
{
var pingSender = new Ping();
var pingOptions = new PingOptions
{
DontFragment = true,
};
// https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.net.networkinformation.ping?view=net-6.0#examples
// Create a buffer of 32 bytes of data to be transmitted.
string data = "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
byte[] buffer = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(data);
int timeout = 120;
try
{
// https://stackoverflow.com/a/25654227/5438626
if (Uri.TryCreate(textBoxUri.Text, UriKind.Absolute, out Uri? uri)
&& (uri.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttp ||
uri.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttps))
{
PingReply reply = pingSender.Send(
uri.Host,
timeout, buffer,
pingOptions);
switch (reply.Status)
{
case IPStatus.Success:
Invoke(() => onPingSuccess());
break;
default:
Invoke(() => onPingFailed(reply.Status));
break;
}
}
else
{
Invoke(() => labelStatus.Text =
$"{DateTime.Now}: Invalid URI: try 'http://");
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// https://stackoverflow.com/a/60827505/5438626
if (ex.InnerException == null)
{
Invoke(() => labelStatus.Text = ex.Message);
}
else
{
Invoke(() => labelStatus.Text = ex.InnerException.Message);
}
}
Task.Delay(1000).Wait();
}
});
}
What works for me is initializing it when the main window handle is created:
protected override void OnHandleCreated(EventArgs e)
{
base.OnHandleCreated(e);
if (!(DesignMode || _isHandleInitialized))
{
_isHandleInitialized = true;
execPing();
}
}
bool _isHandleInitialized = false;
Where:
private void onPingSuccess()
{
labelStatus.Text = $"{DateTime.Now}: {IPStatus.Success}";
// Up to you what you do here
}
private void onPingFailed(IPStatus status)
{
labelStatus.Text = $"{DateTime.Now}: {status}";
// Up to you what you do here
}
public CancellationTokenSource DisposePing { get; } = new CancellationTokenSource();
Example 404:

Async Web Service call not consistently asynchronous

I'm having issues creating an asynchronous web service using the Task Parallel Library with ASP.NET Web API 2. I make an asynchronous call to a method StartAsyncTest and create a cancellation token to abort the method. I store the token globally and then retrieve it and call it from a second method CancelAsyncTest. Here is the code:
// Private Global Dictionary to hold text search tokens
private static Dictionary<string, CancellationTokenSource> TextSearchLookup
= new Dictionary<string, CancellationTokenSource>();
/// <summary>
/// Performs an asynchronous test using a Cancellation Token
/// </summary>
[Route("StartAsyncTest")]
[HttpGet]
public async Task<WsResult<long>> StartAsyncTest(string sSearchId)
{
Log.Debug("Method: StartAsyncTest; ID: " + sSearchId + "; Message: Entering...");
WsResult<long> rWsResult = new WsResult<long>
{
Records = -1
};
try
{
var rCancellationTokenSource = new CancellationTokenSource();
{
var rCancellationToken = rCancellationTokenSource.Token;
// Set token right away in TextSearchLookup
TextSearchLookup.Add("SyncTest-" + sSearchId, rCancellationTokenSource);
HttpContext.Current.Session["SyncTest-" + sSearchId] =
rCancellationTokenSource;
try
{
// Start a New Task which has the ability to be cancelled
var rHttpContext = (HttpContext)HttpContext.Current;
await Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
HttpContext.Current = rHttpContext;
int? nCurrentId = Task.CurrentId;
StartSyncTest(sSearchId, rCancellationToken);
}, TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning);
}
catch (OperationCanceledException e)
{
Log.Debug("Method: StartAsyncText; ID: " + sSearchId
+ "; Message: Cancelled!");
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
rWsResult.Result = "ERROR";
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(ex.Message) == false)
{
rWsResult.Message = ex.Message;
}
}
// Remove token from Dictionary
TextSearchLookup.Remove(sSearchId);
HttpContext.Current.Session[sSearchId] = null;
return rWsResult;
}
private void StartSyncTest(string sSearchId, CancellationToken rCancellationToken)
{
// Spin for 1100 seconds
for (var i = 0; i < 1100; i++)
{
if (rCancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested)
{
rCancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
}
Log.Debug("Method: StartSyncTest; ID: " + sSearchId
+ "; Message: Wait Pass #" + i + ";");
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
TextSearchLookup.Remove("SyncTest-" + sSearchId);
HttpContext.Current.Session.Remove("SyncTest-" + sSearchId);
}
[Route("CancelAsyncTest")]
[HttpGet]
public WsResult<bool> CancelAsyncTest(string sSearchId)
{
Log.Debug("Method: CancelAsyncTest; ID: " + sSearchId
+ "; Message: Cancelling...");
WsResult<bool> rWsResult = new WsResult<bool>
{
Records = false
};
CancellationTokenSource rCancellationTokenSource =
(CancellationTokenSource)HttpContext.Current.Session["SyncTest-" + sSearchId];
// Session doesn't always persist values. Use TextSearchLookup as backup
if (rCancellationTokenSource == null)
{
rCancellationTokenSource = TextSearchLookup["SyncTest-" + sSearchId];
}
if (rCancellationTokenSource != null)
{
rCancellationTokenSource.Cancel();
TextSearchLookup.Remove("SyncTest-" + sSearchId);
HttpContext.Current.Session.Remove("SyncTest-" + sSearchId);
rWsResult.Result = "OK";
rWsResult.Message = "Cancel delivered successfully!";
}
else
{
rWsResult.Result = "ERROR";
rWsResult.Message = "Reference unavailable to cancel task"
+ " (if it is still running)";
}
return rWsResult;
}
After I deploy this to IIS, the first time I call StartAsyncTest and then CancelAsyncTest (via the REST endpoints), both requests go through and it cancels as expected. However, the second time, the CancelAsyncTest request just hangs and the method is only called after StartAsyncTest completes (after 1100 seconds). I don't know why this occurs. StartAsyncTest seems to highjack all threads after it's called once. I appreciate any help anyone can provide!
I store the token globally and then retrieve it and call it from a second method CancelAsyncTest.
This is probably not a great idea. You can store these tokens "globally", but that's only "global" to a single server. This approach would break as soon as a second server enters the picture.
That said, HttpContext.Current shouldn't be assigned to, ever. This is most likely the cause of the odd behavior you're seeing. Also, if your real code is more complex than ThrowIfCancellationRequested - i.e., if it's actually listening to the CancellationToken - then the call to Cancel can execute the remainder of StartSyncTest from within the call to Cancel, which would cause considerable confusion over the value of HttpContext.Current.
To summarize:
I recommend doing away with this approach completely; it won't work at all on web farms. Instead, keep your "task state" in an external storage system like a database.
Don't pass HttpContext across threads.
A colleague offered a alternative call to Task.Factory.StartNew (within StartAsyncTest):
await Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
StartSyncTest(sSearchId, rCancellationToken);
},
rCancellationToken,
TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning,
TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext());
This implementation seemed to solve the asynchronous issue. Now future calls to CancelAsyncTest succeed and cancel the task as intended.

Pusher for Windows Phone failing to disconnect

I have encountered a problem with pusherClient.wp8 package I installed from Nuget. Every time the app is sent to the background, I disconnect from pusher and unsubscribe from the channel. when I resume the app, the code hang when connection is re-established with pusher.
I have tried to reset the pusher object, reset the channel, create a new instance of pusher, and still nothing works, it seems there is a problem with the package, or rather the websocket disconnect method is failing to disconnect from pusher, however, when I close the app, everything get reseted. but this does not help me in instances when a user open a photopicker from my app.
Does anyone has a suggestion or know of another pusherclient I can use for windows phone 8. I have been struggling with this problem for weeks now.
Here is the github link of the package I used: https://github.com/bszypelow/PusherClient.WP8/blob/master/PusherClient.WP8
Thank you
public ConnectionState Connect()
{
var task = Task.Run(async () => await pusher.ConnectAsync()); ;
try
{
task.Wait();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Exception " + ex.Message + " at " + ex.Source + "Inner exception " + ex.InnerException + " additional data " + ex.Data);
}
return task.Result;
}
From looking at the source code I have a guess:
All the async methods never use .ConfigureAwait(false) which could be a reason for the dead lock.
Especially if you call it from the UI thread using the .Wait() or .Result. From event for example.
I suggest you to update the code (it's MIT license, you can do that):
public Task<Channel> Subscribe(string channelName)
{
if (_connection.State != ConnectionState.Connected)
throw new PusherException("You must wait for Pusher to connect before you can subscribe to a channel", ErrorCodes.NotConnected);
if (Channels.ContainsKey(channelName))
{
return Task.FromResult(Channels[channelName]);
}
// If private or presence channel, check that auth endpoint has been set
var chanType = ChannelTypes.Public;
if (channelName.ToLower().StartsWith("private-"))
chanType = ChannelTypes.Private;
else if (channelName.ToLower().StartsWith("presence-"))
chanType = ChannelTypes.Presence;
return SubscribeToChannel(chanType, channelName); //await is not needed here
}
private async Task<Channel> SubscribeToChannel(ChannelTypes type, string channelName)
{
switch (type)
{
case ChannelTypes.Public:
Channels.Add(channelName, new Channel(channelName, this));
break;
case ChannelTypes.Private:
AuthEndpointCheck();
Channels.Add(channelName, new PrivateChannel(channelName, this));
break;
case ChannelTypes.Presence:
AuthEndpointCheck();
Channels.Add(channelName, new PresenceChannel(channelName, this));
break;
}
if (type == ChannelTypes.Presence || type == ChannelTypes.Private)
{
string jsonAuth = await _options.Authorizer.Authorize(channelName, _connection.SocketID)
.ConfigureAwait(false); //do not capture the context!!
var template = new { auth = String.Empty, channel_data = String.Empty };
var message = JsonConvert.DeserializeAnonymousType(jsonAuth, template);
_connection.Send(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(new { #event = Constants.CHANNEL_SUBSCRIBE, data = new { channel = channelName, auth = message.auth, channel_data = message.channel_data } }));
}
else
{
// No need for auth details. Just send subscribe event
_connection.Send(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(new { #event = Constants.CHANNEL_SUBSCRIBE, data = new { channel = channelName } }));
}
return Channels[channelName];
}
You can checkout the source code, than if you don't use it now you can install trial version of ReSharper and this plug-in. They will help you to find all the lines where .ConfigureAwait is missing.

C# how cancel an executing method

I have a delegate method to run a heavy process in my app (I must use MS Framework 3.5):
private delegate void delRunJob(string strBox, string strJob);
Execution:
private void run()
{
string strBox = "G4P";
string strJob = "Test";
delRunJob delegateRunJob = new delRunJob(runJobThread);
delegateRunJob.Invoke(strBox, strJob);
}
In some part of the method runJobThread
I call to an external program (SAP - Remote Function Calls) to retrieve data. The execution of that line can take 1-30 mins.
private void runJobThread(string strBox, string strJob)
{
// CODE ...
sapLocFunction.Call(); // When this line is running I cannot cancel the process
// CODE ...
}
I want to allow the user cancel whole process.
How can achieve this? I tried some methods; but I fall in the same point; when this specific line is running I cannot stop the process.
Instead of using the delegate mechanism you have to study the async and await mechanism. When you understand this mechanism you can move to cancellationtoken.
An example doing both things can be found here :
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2012/06/06/async-in-4-5-enabling-progress-and-cancellation-in-async-apis.aspx
Well; I find out a complicated, but effective, way to solve my problem:
a.) I created a "Helper application" to show a notification icon when the process is running (To ensure to don't interfere with the normal execution of the main app):
private void callHelper(bool blnClose = false)
{
if (blnClose)
fw.processKill("SDM Helper");
else
Process.Start(fw.appGetPath + "SDM Helper.exe");
}
b.) I created a Thread that call only the heavy process line.
c.) While the Thread is alive I check for external file named "cancel" (The "Helper application" do that; when the user click an option to cancel the process the Helper create the file).
d.) If exists the file; dispose all objects and break the while cycle.
e.) The method sapLocFunction.Call() will raise an exception but I expect errors.
private void runJobThread(string strBox, string strJob)
{
// CODE ...
Thread thrSapCall = new Thread(() =>
{
try { sapLocFunction.Call(); }
catch { /* Do nothing */ }
});
thrSapCall.Start();
while (thrSapCall.IsAlive)
{
Thread.Sleep(1000);
try
{
if (fw.fileExists(fw.appGetPath + "\\cancel"))
{
sapLocFunction = null;
sapLocTable = null;
sapConn.Logoff();
sapConn = null;
canceled = true;
break;
}
}
finally { /* Do nothing */ }
}
thrSapCall = null;
// CODE ...
}
Works like a charm!
I think you would have to resort to the method described here. Read the post to see why this is a long way from ideal.
Perhaps this might work...
private void runJobThread(string strBox, string strJob, CancellationToken token)
{
Thread t = Thread.CurrentThread;
using (token.Register(t.Abort))
{
// CODE ...
sapLocFunction.Call(); // When this line is running I cannot cancel the process
// CODE ...
}
}
A bit of dnspy exposes a cancel method on nco3.0.
private readonly static Type RfcConnection = typeof(RfcSessionManager).Assembly.GetType("SAP.Middleware.Connector.RfcConnection");
private readonly static Func<RfcDestination, object> GetConnection = typeof(RfcSessionManager).GetMethod("GetConnection", BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic).CreateDelegate(typeof(Func<RfcDestination, object>)) as Func<RfcDestination, object>;
private readonly static MethodInfo Cancel = RfcConnection.GetMethod("Cancel", BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
object connection = null;
var completed = true;
using (var task = Task.Run(() => { connection = GetConnection(destination); rfcFunction.Invoke(destination); }))
{
try
{
completed = task.Wait(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(invokeTimeout));
if (!completed)
Cancel.Invoke(connection, null);
task.Wait();
}
catch(AggregateException e)
{
if (e.InnerException is RfcCommunicationCanceledException && !completed)
throw new TimeoutException($"SAP FM {functionName} on {destination} did not respond in {timeout} seconds.");
throw;
}
}

WinRT C#: Cannot save UnhandledException to Storage

I'm working on WinRT. If an unhandled exception is thrown I want to write the message text to the storage.
I added an Event handler in 'App.xaml.cs', see the code.
The exception is caught but the last line, where the file is written, crashes again -> 'exception'!
Why? Any idea?
public App()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
this.Suspending += OnSuspending;
this.UnhandledException += App_UnhandledException;
}
async void App_UnhandledException(object sender, UnhandledExceptionEventArgs e)
{
StorageFolder folder = Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.Current.LocalFolder;
StorageFile file= await folder.CreateFileAsync("crash.log",CreationCollisionOption.OpenIfExists);
await FileIO.AppendTextAsync(file, e.Message); // <----- crash again -----
}
Thanks
Sunny
I've been wondering the same thing and stumbled across this quite early on in my search. I've figured out a way, hopefully this will prove useful to someone else too.
The problem is that await is returning control of the UI thread and the app's crashing. You need a deferral but there's no real way to get one.
My solution is to use the settings storage, instead. I'm assuming most people wanting to do this want to do something LittleWatson style, so here's some code modified from http://blogs.msdn.com/b/andypennell/archive/2010/11/01/error-reporting-on-windows-phone-7.aspx for your convenience:
namespace YourApp
{
using Windows.Storage;
using Windows.UI.Popups;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
public class LittleWatson
{
private const string settingname = "LittleWatsonDetails";
private const string email = "mailto:?to=you#example.com&subject=YourApp auto-generated problem report&body=";
private const string extra = "extra", message = "message", stacktrace = "stacktrace";
internal static void ReportException(Exception ex, string extraData)
{
ApplicationData.Current.LocalSettings.CreateContainer(settingname, Windows.Storage.ApplicationDataCreateDisposition.Always);
var exceptionValues = ApplicationData.Current.LocalSettings.Containers[settingname].Values;
exceptionValues[extra] = extraData;
exceptionValues[message] = ex.Message;
exceptionValues[stacktrace] = ex.StackTrace;
}
internal async static Task CheckForPreviousException()
{
var container = ApplicationData.Current.LocalSettings.Containers;
try
{
var exceptionValues = container[settingname].Values;
string extraData = exceptionValues[extra] as string;
string messageData = exceptionValues[message] as string;
string stacktraceData = exceptionValues[stacktrace] as string;
var sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.AppendLine(extraData);
sb.AppendLine(messageData);
sb.AppendLine(stacktraceData);
string contents = sb.ToString();
SafeDeleteLog();
if (stacktraceData != null && stacktraceData.Length > 0)
{
var dialog = new MessageDialog("A problem occured the last time you ran this application. Would you like to report it so that we can fix the error?", "Error Report")
{
CancelCommandIndex = 1,
DefaultCommandIndex = 0
};
dialog.Commands.Add(new UICommand("Send", async delegate
{
var mailToSend = email.ToString();
mailToSend += contents;
var mailto = new Uri(mailToSend);
await Windows.System.Launcher.LaunchUriAsync(mailto);
}));
dialog.Commands.Add(new UICommand("Cancel"));
await dialog.ShowAsync();
}
}
catch (KeyNotFoundException)
{
// KeyNotFoundException will fire if we've not ever had crash data. No worries!
}
}
private static void SafeDeleteLog()
{
ApplicationData.Current.LocalSettings.CreateContainer(settingname, Windows.Storage.ApplicationDataCreateDisposition.Always);
var exceptionValues = ApplicationData.Current.LocalSettings.Containers[settingname].Values;
exceptionValues[extra] = string.Empty;
exceptionValues[message] = string.Empty;
exceptionValues[stacktrace] = string.Empty;
}
}
}
To implement it, you need to do the same as the link above says, but to ensure the data's here in case the url ever goes down:
App.xaml.cs Constructor (BEFORE the call to this.InitializeComponent()):
this.UnhandledException += (s, e) => LittleWatson.ReportException(e.Exception, "extra message goes here");
Obviously if you already have an UnhandledException method you can throw the call to LittleWatson in there.
If you're on Windows 8.1, you can add a NavigationFailed call too. This needs to be in an actual page (typically MainPage.xaml.cs or whatever page is first opened):
xx.xaml.cs Constructor (any given page):
rootFrame.NavigationFailed += (s, e) => LittleWatson.ReportException(e.Exception, "extra message goes here");
Lastly, you need to ask the user if they want to send the e-mail when the app re-opens. In your app's default Page's constructor (default: the page App.xaml.cs initializes):
this.Loaded += async (s, e) => await LittleWatson.CheckForPreviousException();
Or add the call to your OnLoad method if you already use it.
In this situation, await could be loosely translated to "do this job on another thread, and continue what you were doing while you wait for it to finish". Given that what your app was doing was crashing, you probably don't want it to continue doing that until you're done logging the problem. I'd suggest running your file IO synchronously in this case.
This may come a bit too late for the original question but...
as #Hans Passant suggested, avoiding await (i.e., running the FileIO.AppendTextAsync() synchronously), also seconded by #Jon, I would opt for this rather than the relatively too heavy code for LittleWatson. As the app is in some error handing state anyway (this should be a rare occurrence) I wouldn't put any blocking arising from synchronous (due to removing await) as a major downside.
Leaving the synchronous option to one side, the following await implementation worked for me:
Change await FileIO.AppendTextAsync(file, e.Message); to:
Task task = LogErrorMessage(file, e.Message)
task.Wait(2000); // adjust the ms value as appropriate
...
private async Task LogErrorMessage(StorageFile file, string errorMessage)
{
await FileIO.AppendTextAsync(file, errorMessage); // this shouldn't crash in App_UnhandledException as it did before
}

Categories

Resources