Develop Reference

c# List with Arithmetic Operations

I want realize arithmetic operations with my list, in this case:
Column "width" * Column "height" should re-Write the Column "Partial".
I have tried do a loop but It is not working.
I put a breakPoint at the row:
_Area[i].Partial = _Area[i].width * _Area[i].height;
And the debug never stop them I can think this line is not been readed.
This is my Collection View Model:
public class CollectionVM_Area : BindableBase
{
private Values_Area _Area = new Values_Area();
public Values_Area Area
{
get { return _Area; }
set { SetProperty(ref _Area, value); }
}
public CollectionVM_Area()
{
_Area.Add(new Area()
{
width=10,
height=11,
});
_Area.Add(new Area()
{
width=5,
height=5,
Partial=1,
});
bool NeedPartial = false;
int i = 0;
while (NeedPartial = false && i < _Area.Count)
{
if (_Area[i].Partida == true)
{
NeedPartial = true;
}
else
{
i++;
}
}
if (NeedPartial==true)
{
_Area[i].Partial = _Area[i].width * _Area[i].height;
NeedPartial = false;
}
else
{
NeedPartial = true;
}
}
}
My Project is a UWP but I think is no different in with a windows forms in lists, any help is appreciated.

You have two mistalkes in your code. First your while-loop makes an assignement instead of a comparisson (= towards ==). Thus the first term within your while-condition allways evaluates to false. Secondly your calculation is located outside the loop causing the NeedPartial-value to be set but not never be read which I doubt is what you want.
Write this therefor:
bool NeedPartial = false;
int i = 0;
while (NeedPartial == false && i < _Area.Count) // or even simpler: while (!NeedPartial ...)
{
if (_Area[i].Partida == true) // or simply: if (_Area[i].Partida) { ... }
{
NeedPartial = true;
}
else
{
i++;
}
if (NeedPartial==true) // if (NeedPartial) ...
{
_Area[i].Partial = _Area[i].width * _Area[i].height;
NeedPartial = false;
}
else
{
NeedPartial = true;
}
}

Edit: Answered.
The Correct Loop is:
bool NeedPartial = false;
int i = 0;
while (!NeedPartial && i < _Area.Count)
{
if (_Area[i].Partida)
{
NeedPartial = true;
}
else
{
i++;
}
if (NeedPartial)
{
_Area[i].Partial = _Area[i].width * _Area[i].height;
NeedPartial = false;
i++;
}
else
{
NeedPartial = true;
}
}
Thanks to HimBromBeere for your help.

How to disable more than one NumericUpDown controls using one method?

i have a form with more than one NumericUpDown as controls to input answer. i want every input is true for an operation (multiplication, sum etc), NumericUpDown for that operation will be disable. i have used the code below (just for sum operation), but i think its not efficient because i have to make a method to check every operation.
private void IsSumTrue() {
if (add1 + add2 == sum.Value)
{
sum.Enabled = false;
}
}
private void IsDifferenceTrue()
{
if (add1 - add2 == difference.Value)
{
difference.Enabled = false;
}
}
private void IsProductTrue()
{
if (add1 * add2 == product.Value)
{
product.Enabled = false;
}
}
private void IsQuotientTrue()
{
if (add1 / add2 == quotient.Value)
{
quotient.Enabled = false;
}
}
anyone have idea how to make it more efficient with just a method for all operation?
below is my idea, but to check the value is true for every NumericUpDown i don't know how.
private void DisableIfValueIsTrue()
{
foreach(Control control in this.Controls)
{
NumericUpDown value = control as NumericUpDown;
// if(value [NEED HELP]
}
}

Considering your situtaion, you can set a tag for each NumericUpDown in design mode like this:
sum.Tag=1;
square.Tag=2;
etc
Then define some int variables:
int iSum=add1+add2;
int iSquare= //Whatever you want
etc
And finally loop through your controls this way:
foreach (NumericUpDown control in this.Controls.OfType<NumericUpDown>())
{
int intCondition = Convert.ToInt32(control.Tag) == 1
? iSum
: Convert.ToInt32(control.Tag) == 2
? iSquare
: Convert.ToInt32(control.Tag) == 3
? i3
: i4; //You should extend this for your 8 controls
control.Enabled = intCondition == control.Value;
}
OK! Second way I offer
Since you will have to always check 8 different conditions, you could simply forget about looping through the controls and just change your method like this:
private void DisableIfValueIsTrue()
{
sum.Enabled = add1 + add2 != sum.Value;
difference.Enabled= add1 - add2 != difference.Value;
product.Enabled= add1 * add2 != product.Value;
quotient.Enabled= (add2 !=0) && (add1 / add2 != quotient.Value);
//etc
}

I came across this while doing some research and would like to give my solution I used for my situation and hope it helps people. I needed minimum and maximum numbers for a calculation, so mine are named appropriately and I correlated these with some CheckBoxes. I used null in beginning of minimum and end of maximum to account for empty. I also had to create an event handler SubscribeToEvents() shown below.
In my load event for my form:
SubscribeToEvents();
_checkBoxs = new[] { cbXLight, cbLight, cbMedium, cbHeavy, cbXHeavy, cbXXHeavy, cbXXXHeavy };
_minimumsNumericUpDowns = new[] { null, nLightMin, nMediumMin, nHeavyMin, nXHeavyMin, nXXHeavyMin, nXXXHeavyMin };
_maximumsNumericUpDowns = new[] { nXLightMax, nLightMax, nMediumMax, nHeavyMax, nXHeavyMax, nXXHeavyMax, null };
then I created a method:
private void DisableNumericUpDowns()
{
// disable everything:
foreach (var n in _minimumsNumericUpDowns)
{
if (n != null)
n.Enabled = false;
}
foreach (var n in _maximumsNumericUpDowns)
{
if (n != null)
n.Enabled = false;
}
}
The event handler:
private bool _eventsSubscribed;
private void SubscribeToEvents()
{
if (_eventsSubscribed)
return;
_eventsSubscribed = true;
cbXXHeavy.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
cbXHeavy.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
cbXLight.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
cbHeavy.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
cbLight.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
cbMedium.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
cbXXXHeavy.CheckedChanged += CheckBox_NumericState;
}
Now I can used this to check when they are enabled and if they are greater than or less than 0 if needed in the method CheckBox:
private void CheckBox_NumericState(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// disable everything
DisableNumericUpDowns();
// see if more than one checkbox is checked:
var numChecked = _checkBoxs.Count((cb) => cb.Checked);
// enable things if more than one item is checked:
if (numChecked <= 1) return;
// find the smallest and enable its max:
var smallest = -1;
for (var i = 0; i < _checkBoxs.Length; i++)
{
if (!_checkBoxs[i].Checked) continue;
if (_maximumsNumericUpDowns[i] != null)
{
_maximumsNumericUpDowns[i].Enabled = true;
}
smallest = i;
break;
}
// find the largest and enable its min:
var largest = -1;
for (var i = _checkBoxs.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
if (!_checkBoxs[i].Checked) continue;
if (_minimumsNumericUpDowns[i] != null)
{
_minimumsNumericUpDowns[i].Enabled = true;
}
largest = i;
break;
}
// enable both for everything between smallest and largest:
var tempVar = largest - 1;
for (var i = (smallest + 1); i <= tempVar; i++)
{
if (!_checkBoxs[i].Checked) continue;
if (_minimumsNumericUpDowns[i] != null)
{
_minimumsNumericUpDowns[i].Enabled = true;
}
if (_maximumsNumericUpDowns[i] != null)
{
_maximumsNumericUpDowns[i].Enabled = true;
}
}
}
So I can check each state as required:
I want to check if Extra Light is check:
// Extra Light
if (!cbXLight.Checked) return;
if (nXLightMax.Enabled == false)
{
_structCategoryType = XLight;
CheckStructureSheets();
}
else
{
if (nXLightMax.Value > 0)
{
_dMax = nXLightMax.Value;
_structCategoryType = XLight;
CheckStructureSheets();
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show(#"Extra Light Max cannot be zero (0)");
}
}
and next light checks both:
// Light
if (cbLight.Checked)
{
if (nLightMin.Enabled == false && nLightMax.Enabled == false)
{
_structCategoryType = Light;
CheckStructureSheets();
}
else
{
if (nLightMin.Enabled && nLightMin.Value > 0)
{
if (nXLightMax.Enabled && nLightMin.Enabled && nLightMax.Enabled == false)
{
_dMin = nLightMin.Value;
_structCategoryType = Light;
CheckStructureSheets();
}
else
{
if (nLightMax.Value > 0)
{
_dMin = nLightMin.Value;
_dMax = nLightMax.Value;
_structCategoryType = Light;
CheckStructureSheets();
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show(#"Light Max cannot be zero (0)");
return;
}
}
}
else if (nLightMin.Enabled == false && nLightMax.Enabled)
{
if (nLightMax.Value > 0)
{
_dMax = nLightMax.Value;
_structCategoryType = Light;
CheckStructureSheets();
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show(#"Light Max cannot be zero (0)");
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show(#"Light Min cannot be zero (0)");
return;
}
}
}
Hope this helps someone.
Tim

thanks for #AlexJoliq and #BrettCaswell. just want to inform that before Alex edited his answer from using "==" to "!=", i (thought) already solved the problem. but i don't know where is the more effective and efficient way, alex's or mine.
below is my code for DisableIfValueIsTrue():
if (add1 + add2 == sum.Value) sum.Enabled = false;
if (add1 - add2 == difference.Value) difference.Enabled = false;
if (add1 * add2 == product.Value) product.Enabled = false;
if (add1 / add2 == quotient.Value) quotient.Enabled = false;

Simplifying IF statement logic - inner logic overlap

Can the below logical if conditions be simplified ?
I have wrote this code but some parts are overlapping so I thought to seek for some help to see whether it can be simplified...
I have actually three different fields but following the same patterns.
EDIT :
if (Row.ReceivableAmount_IsNull == true && Row.CustomerID == LastCustomerID)
{
if (LastReceivableAmount == null)
{
Row.PreviousReceivableAmount_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousReceivableAmount = LastReceivableAmount.GetValueOrDefault();
}
}
else
{
Row.PreviousReceivableAmount = LastReceivableAmount.GetValueOrDefault();
LastReceivableAmount = Row.ReceivableAmount;
}
if (Row.SaleAmount_IsNull == true && Row.CustomerID == LastCustomerID)
{
if (LastSaleDate == null)
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate = LastSaleDate.GetValueOrDefault();
}
}
else
{
if (LastSaleDate == null)
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate = LastSaleDate.GetValueOrDefault();
}
LastSaleDate = Row.Date;
}
if (Row.PaymentAmount_IsNull == true && Row.CustomerID == LastCustomerID)
{
if (LastPaymentDate == null)
{
Row.PreviousPaymentDate_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousPaymentDate = LastPaymentDate.GetValueOrDefault();
}
}
else
{
Row.PreviousPaymentDate = LastPaymentDate.GetValueOrDefault();
LastPaymentDate = Row.Date;
}

Yes, you only care about LastSaleDate in your outer if condition, so move everything else out.
Once you've moved it out, you can invert your original condition, reducing your if/else to just an if.
if (LastReceivableAmount == null)
{
Row.PreviousReceivableAmount_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousReceivableAmount = LastReceivableAmount.GetValueOrDefault();
}
if (!Row.ReceivableAmount_IsNull || Row.CustomerID != LastCustomerID)
{
Row.PreviousReceivableAmount = LastReceivableAmount.GetValueOrDefault();
LastReceivableAmount = Row.ReceivableAmount;
}
if (LastSaleDate == null)
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate = LastSaleDate.GetValueOrDefault();
}
if (!Row.SaleAmount_IsNull || Row.CustomerID != LastCustomerID)
{
LastSaleDate = Row.Date;
}
if (LastPaymentDate == null)
{
Row.PreviousPaymentDate_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousPaymentDate = LastPaymentDate.GetValueOrDefault();
}
if (!Row.PaymentAmount_IsNull == true || Row.CustomerID != LastCustomerID)
{
Row.PreviousPaymentDate = LastPaymentDate.GetValueOrDefault();
LastPaymentDate = Row.Date;
}

Since both branches of the if are similar, except one statement, you could use the following approach:
if (LastSaleDate == null)
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate_IsNull = true;
}
else
{
Row.PreviousSaleDate = LastSaleDate.GetValueOrDefault();
}
if (!Row.SaleAmount_IsNull || Row.CustomerID != LastCustomerID)
{
LastSaleDate = Row.Date;
}

Nullable Property throwing NullReferenceException on .HasValue

This line of (C#) code
if (!currentLap.S1.HasValue)
is giving me
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
provided I'm sure that currentLap variable is instantiated (because it's being used a few lines before and it is a local variable) and it has following property:
private double? _s1;
[DefaultValue(null)]
[JsonConverter(typeof(ShortDoubleConverter))]
public double? S1
{
get { return _s1; }
set { _s1 = value; }
}
how can it possibly throw NullReferenceException? Can it be something to do with optimization on Release mode?
Thanks,
Stevo
EDIT:
here is full method code.
public void Update(DriverData driverData)
{
LapInfo currentLap = this.CurrentLap;
if (currentLap != null &&
this.LastDriverData != null &&
driverData.TotalLaps != this.LastDriverData.TotalLaps &&
driverData.InPits &&
driverData.Speed < 10 &&
!this.LastDriverData.InPits)
{
currentLap.Escaped = true;
}
this.LastDriverData = driverData;
if ((currentLap == null || currentLap.Lap != driverData.LapNumber) &&
!this.Laps.TryGetValue(driverData.LapNumber, out currentLap))
{
currentLap = new LapInfo() { Lap = driverData.LapNumber, Parent = this, Class = driverData.Class };
this.Laps.Add(driverData.LapNumber, currentLap);
int lapsCount = 0, completedDriverLaps = 0, cleanLaps = 0;
this.TotalLaps = driverData.TotalLaps;
//if it's not the first lap
if (driverData.TotalLaps > 0)
{
//previous lap
if (this.CurrentLap == null || !this.CurrentLap.Escaped)
{
this.CompletedLaps++;
if (this.CurrentLap == null || !this.CurrentLap.MaxIncident.HasValue)
this.CleanLaps++;
}
}
foreach (DriverLapsInfo laps in this.Parent.LapsByVehicle.Values)
{
lapsCount += laps.TotalLaps;
completedDriverLaps += laps.CompletedLaps;
cleanLaps += laps.CleanLaps;
}
this.Parent.Parent.SetLapsCount(driverData, lapsCount, driverData.Class, completedDriverLaps, cleanLaps);
}
this.CurrentLap = currentLap;
//add incidents
if (driverData.Incidents != null)
{
foreach (IncidentScore incident in driverData.Incidents)
{
this.CurrentLap.MaxIncident = Math.Max(this.CurrentLap.MaxIncident ?? 0, incident.Strength);
this.CurrentLap.Incidents++;
this.Incidents++;
}
}
LapInfo previousLap = null;
if ((this.PreviousLap == null || this.PreviousLap.Lap != driverData.TotalLaps) &&
this.Laps.TryGetValue(driverData.TotalLaps, out previousLap))
{
this.PreviousLap = previousLap;
if (!this.PreviousLap.Date.HasValue)
{
this.PreviousLap.Date = DateTime.UtcNow;
}
}
if (currentLap.Position == 0)
currentLap.Position = driverData.Position;
if (driverData.CurrentS1 > 0)
{
**if (!currentLap.S1.HasValue)**
{
this.UpdateBestS1(driverData.BestS1);
this.Parent.Parent.UpdateBestS1(driverData.BestS1, driverData.UniqueName);
currentLap.UpdateS1(driverData.CurrentS1, driverData);
//reset the best split set at the finish line
if (this.PreviousLap != null && this.PreviousLap.SplitBest < 0)
this.PreviousLap.SplitBest = 0;
}
if (driverData.CurrentS2.HasValue && driverData.CurrentS1.HasValue && !currentLap.S2.HasValue)
{
double s2 = driverData.CurrentS2.Value - driverData.CurrentS1.Value;
this.UpdateBestS2(s2);
this.Parent.Parent.UpdateBestS2(s2, driverData.UniqueName);
currentLap.UpdateS2(s2, driverData);
}
}
if (this.PreviousLap != null)
{
if (driverData.LastLap > 0)
{
if (!this.PreviousLap.S3.HasValue && driverData.LastS2.HasValue)
{
double s3 = driverData.LastLap.Value - driverData.LastS2.Value;
this.UpdateBestS3(s3);
this.Parent.Parent.UpdateBestS3(s3, driverData.UniqueName);
this.PreviousLap.UpdateS3(s3, driverData);
}
if (!this.PreviousLap.LapTime.HasValue)
{
double? bestLap = this.Parent.Parent.BestLap;
this.PreviousLap.UpdateLapTime(driverData, 0);
this.Parent.Parent.UpdateBestLap(this.PreviousLap, driverData.BestLap, driverData);
this.UpdateBestLap(driverData.BestLap, this.PreviousLap);
this.PreviousLap.UpdateLapTime(driverData, bestLap);
}
}
else
{
if (this.PreviousLap.SplitBest.HasValue)
this.PreviousLap.UpdateBestSplit();
if (this.PreviousLap.SplitSelf.HasValue)
this.PreviousLap.UpdateSelfSplit();
}
}
if (driverData.InPits)
{
switch (driverData.Sector)
{
case Sectors.Sector1:
if (previousLap != null)
previousLap.InPits = true;
break;
case Sectors.Sector3:
currentLap.InPits = true;
break;
}
}
//lap to speed
if (currentLap.TopSpeed < driverData.Speed)
{
driverData.TopSpeedLap = driverData.Speed;
currentLap.UpdateTopSpeed(driverData.Speed);
}
else
driverData.TopSpeedLap = currentLap.TopSpeed;
//overall top speed
if (this.TopSpeed < driverData.Speed)
{
driverData.TopSpeed = driverData.Speed;
this.TopSpeed = driverData.Speed;
this.Parent.Parent.UpdateTopSpeed(this.TopSpeed, driverData);
}
else
driverData.TopSpeed = this.TopSpeed;
}
There is no way on earth the code can make it to that line and currentLap beeing null.
Or am I going crazy? :)

.HasValue will not throw if the nullable reference is null, but a.b.HasValue will if a is null.
I suspect that currentLap == null. I know you say you're sure that currentLap is not null, but I think that's the most likely explanation. Can you post more code?
Update:
Thanks for posting your code.
This doesn't throw:
void Main() {
var f = new Foo();
Console.WriteLine (f.S1);
Console.WriteLine (f.S1.HasValue);
}
class Foo {
private double? _s1 = null;
public double? S1 {
get { return _s1; }
set { _s1 = value; }
}
}
Could you try to create a minimal reproduction? (minimal code that exhibits the issue)

Maybe have a look at the previous line of code :) - debugger often highlights the next line after the one where the NullReferenceException was actually thrown.

Endpoint is not compatible with version 1 of windows immersive project

For some reason I have error generating code for a wcf service using "Add service reference" wizard.
Custom tool warning: No endpoints compatible with version 1 of windows immersive project were found. C:\work\test_projects\CirMetro\Service References\SvcProxy\Reference.svcmap 1 1 CirMetro
Do you guys know how to fix it ?
My sample WCF service is braindead simple. Here is source code:
static void Main()
{
UiWcfSession.OnInitialize += ClientInitialize;
var baseAddresses = new Uri("net.tcp://localhost:9000/");
var host = new ServiceHost(typeof(UiWcfSession), baseAddresses);
var reliableSession = new ReliableSessionBindingElement { Ordered = true, InactivityTimeout = new TimeSpan(24, 20, 31, 23) };
var binding =
new CustomBinding(reliableSession, new TcpTransportBindingElement()) { ReceiveTimeout = TimeSpan.MaxValue };
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IClientFulfillmentPipeService), binding, "svc");
var metadataBehavior = new ServiceMetadataBehavior();
host.Description.Behaviors.Add(metadataBehavior);
var mexBinding = MetadataExchangeBindings.CreateMexTcpBinding();
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IMetadataExchange), mexBinding, "mex");
host.Open();
Thread.CurrentThread.Join();
}
private static void ClientInitialize(int uiprocessid, string key)
{
Debug.WriteLine("ClientInitialize");
}

I figured it out.
It's unfortunate that we have to decompile sources of Visual Studio to find out what works in Metro instead of referring to non-existent documentation :-)
In short I can't use ReliableSession.
If you want more details C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\Common7\IDE\PrivateAssemblies\Microsoft.VisualStudio.ServiceReference.Platforms.dll contains function which check what is supported.
private static bool IsBindingSupported(Binding binding)
{
if ((!(binding is BasicHttpBinding) && !(binding is CustomBinding)) && (!(binding is WSHttpBinding) && !(binding is NetTcpBinding)))
{
return false;
}
if (binding is WSHttpBinding)
{
if (((WSHttpBinding) binding).ReliableSession.Enabled)
{
return false;
}
if (((WSHttpBinding) binding).TransactionFlow)
{
return false;
}
if (((WSHttpBinding) binding).MessageEncoding != WSMessageEncoding.Text)
{
return false;
}
}
if (binding is NetTcpBinding)
{
if (((NetTcpBinding) binding).ReliableSession.Enabled)
{
return false;
}
if (((NetTcpBinding) binding).TransactionFlow)
{
return false;
}
}
foreach (BindingElement element in binding.CreateBindingElements())
{
if (element is TransportBindingElement)
{
if ((!(element is HttpTransportBindingElement) && (!(element is HttpsTransportBindingElement) || (element as HttpsTransportBindingElement).RequireClientCertificate)) && !(element is TcpTransportBindingElement))
{
return false;
}
}
else if (element is MessageEncodingBindingElement)
{
if (!(element is BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement) || (((BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement) element).MessageVersion != MessageVersion.Soap12WSAddressing10))
{
if (element is TextMessageEncodingBindingElement)
{
if ((((TextMessageEncodingBindingElement) element).MessageVersion != MessageVersion.Soap11) && (((TextMessageEncodingBindingElement) element).MessageVersion != MessageVersion.Soap12WSAddressing10))
{
return false;
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
}
else if (element is SecurityBindingElement)
{
if (!(element is TransportSecurityBindingElement))
{
return false;
}
TransportSecurityBindingElement element2 = (TransportSecurityBindingElement) element;
if (!ValidateUserNamePasswordSecurityBindingElement(element2))
{
if (((((element2.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.Endorsing.Count == 1) && (element2.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.Signed.Count == 0)) && ((element2.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.SignedEncrypted.Count == 0) && (element2.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.SignedEndorsing.Count == 0))) && ((element2.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.Endorsing[0] is SecureConversationSecurityTokenParameters) && ((element2.MessageSecurityVersion == MessageSecurityVersion.WSSecurity10WSTrustFebruary2005WSSecureConversationFebruary2005WSSecurityPolicy11BasicSecurityProfile10) || (element2.MessageSecurityVersion == MessageSecurityVersion.WSSecurity11WSTrustFebruary2005WSSecureConversationFebruary2005WSSecurityPolicy11BasicSecurityProfile10)))) && ((element2.IncludeTimestamp && (element2.DefaultAlgorithmSuite == SecurityAlgorithmSuite.Default)) && (element2.SecurityHeaderLayout == SecurityHeaderLayout.Strict)))
{
SecureConversationSecurityTokenParameters parameters = (SecureConversationSecurityTokenParameters) element2.EndpointSupportingTokenParameters.Endorsing[0];
if (parameters.RequireDerivedKeys || !(parameters.BootstrapSecurityBindingElement is TransportSecurityBindingElement))
{
return false;
}
TransportSecurityBindingElement bootstrapSecurityBindingElement = (TransportSecurityBindingElement) parameters.BootstrapSecurityBindingElement;
if (!ValidateUserNamePasswordSecurityBindingElement(bootstrapSecurityBindingElement))
{
return false;
}
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
}
else if ((!(element is SslStreamSecurityBindingElement) || (element as SslStreamSecurityBindingElement).RequireClientCertificate) && !(element is WindowsStreamSecurityBindingElement))
{
if (!(element is TransactionFlowBindingElement))
{
return false;
}
if ((!(binding is WSHttpBinding) || ((WSHttpBinding) binding).TransactionFlow) && (!(binding is NetTcpBinding) || ((NetTcpBinding) binding).TransactionFlow))
{
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
}