I am trying to run Unit TestCases through Nunit where i have two Unit TestCase classes,
1 class which deals with Product Console
2nd class which deals with other Windows processes and services, and both are under same project and they are set a sequence through Nunit Ordering which is very important aspect as all the testcases have to run sequentially.
When I am trying to run the testcases through command line, only the testcases specific to one class is running irrespective or ordering.
So, for example :
NoConsoleclass.cs
[Test , Order(1)]
public void Test1()
{}
[Test, Order(3)]
public void Test3()
{}
ConsoleTestCases.cs
[Test, Order(2)]
public void Test2()
{}
nunit3-console projectname.dll is running 1 and 3 first and then test 2.
Is there any way I could attain it the way I want as test 1, test 2 and then test 3??
I know, sequencing or pre-requisites is not adviceable, but it is required for this specific suite.
Kindly let me know
Thanks
Not currently, no.
There's an open feature request to allow the ordering of different TestFixtures - see the link below.
https://github.com/nunit/nunit/issues/345
This still wouldn't cover your case however, of wanting to interleave tests from different classes in a specific order. (Although would, if you were able to break this up into three classes.)
There's also an open feature request for a TestDependencyAttribute - which would allow you to specify one test as being dependent on the completion of others. This perhaps seems close to what you want to represent, than actual explicit ordering. Find that one at the link below.
https://github.com/nunit/nunit/issues/51
Related
I have a selenium project written with NUnit in C# .NET 6. I have a folder called 'Tests' where there are multiple sub folders and each folder has a lot of classes. Each class has only one Test method. The reason for this is for structuring the project and each class represents one process in the software I'm testing. However, some processes need to be run after some other processes have already ran.
My question is; is there any way to run the classes in a specific order I want? I have tried using
dotnet test --filter
However this did not work. I also tried using NUnit's
Order
attribute but this works only when a class has multiple test methods.
The Order attribute may be placed on a class or a method. From the NUnit docs:
The OrderAttribute may be placed on a test method or fixture to specify the order in which tests are run within the fixture or other suite in which they are contained.
The bold italics in the citation are mine. In your case, the "other suite" containing the fixture class is the namespace in which it is defined.
There is no "global" ordering facility, but if all your tests are in the same namespace, using the OrderAttribute on the fixtures will cause them to run in the order you specify. If it doesn't interfere with any other use of the namespaces you might consider putting them all in one namespace.
A couple of notes:
The OrderAttribute specifies the order in which the tests start. If you run tests in parallel, multiple tests may run at the same time.
It's not advisable to have the tests depend on one another in most cases.
There are lots of reasons not to control the order of tests, which are covered in the answers quoted by other folks. I'm just answering the specific "how-to" question you posed.
I have a bunch of integration tests that need to run sequentially because they interact with a database. The order in which the tests are executed does not matter, as long as at most one test is running at a given moment. According to the documentation, this can be achieved by grouping the tests in a collection. However, not all my tests share the same fixture, so I need at least two collections:
[CollectionDefinition("Collection A")]
public class CollectionA : ICollectionFixture<CollectionAFixture>
{
}
[CollectionDefinition("Collection B")]
public class CollectionB: ICollectionFixture<CollectionBFixture>
{
}
With this setup, tests from Collection A are run at the same time as tests from Collection B, which results in race conditions.
My question: is there a way to specify that the tests in both collections should be run sequentially, as if they were all part of a single collection?
I am aware that it is possible to disable parallelism using the xUnit console runner. However, I would prefer solving this in the source code, so other developers don't need to tweak their configuration.
I am working on a test library using NUnit, and am generating a custom report while the tests run.
In the TearDown of my tests I call a method that will report the result of the test. It works just fine if the test passes, but is never reached if the test fails, is ignored, or inconclusive.
To make things more difficult, the "//do stuff" in the TearDown can also cause the test to fail in which case it would still need to be logged. BUT Assert throws an exception which means it leaves the block and never reaches the reporting code.
[SetUp]
public void ExampleSetup()
{
//whatever
}
[Test]
public void ExampleTest()
{
//whatever
}
[TearDown]
public void ExampleTearDown()
{
//do stuff
someObject.ReportTestResult();
}
More Info
- Using NUnit 3.2.0
By looking up the NUnit documentation's Framework Extensibility chapter we can see that you need to use the Action Attribute.
The Action Attribute extension point is:
designed to better enable composability of test logic by creating
attributes that encapsulate specific actions to be taken before or
after a test is run.
Summary of a basic implementation of this extension point
You need to implement the ITestAction interface in your given say FooBarActionAttribute() class.
Given this you implement BeforeTest(), AfterTest() and Targets property.
For a basic scenario you need to perform your custom operations in the above two methods.
The final thing you need to do is to use this attribute, for example as:
[Test][FooBarActionAttribute()]
public void Should_Baz_a_FooBar() {
...
}
This will get executed right before and after the test method run.
For more advanced techniques please consult the linked documentation, it's pretty straightforward.
Frankly, this is just a bad idea. TearDown is part of your test. That's why it can fail. (But note that NUnit treats an assert failure in teardown as an error rather than a failure)
Since a test can do anything - good or bad, right or wrong - putting your logging into the test code is unreliable. You should be logging in the code that runs tests, not in the tests themselves. As stated above, the TearDown is a part of your test. So is any ActionAttribute you may define, as suggested in another answer. Don't do logging there.
Unfortunately, there is a history of doing logging within the tests because NUnit either didn't supply an alternative - at least not one that was easy to use. For NUnit V2, you could create a test event listener addin for exactly this purpose. You still can if that's the version of NUnit you are using.
For NUnit 3.0 and higher, you should create a listener extension that works with the TestEngine. The TestEngine and its extensions are completely separate from your tests. Once you have a well-tested extension, you will be able to use it with all your tests and the tests won't be cluttered with logging code.
my question is how can I run a single test on a single TestFixture at a time(for debugging for example).
I have several TestFixtures in each Test Category, and whenever I click on the R# icon on a single test, it says 'Run'/'Debug', however, even when selecting the exact test and the fixture, R# and NUnit runs all Fixtures one after the other.
[Category("LoginTestSuite")]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.AsiaPacific)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.Australia)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.Canada)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.CanadaFrench)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.France)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.Germany)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.HongKong)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.Japan)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.Spain)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.UnitedKingdom)]
[TestFixture(SiteEditionsEnum.UnitedStates)]
public class LoginTestSuite : FrontEndTestSuitesCommon
{
[...]
[Test]
public void RunLoginFunctionalTest()
{
Logger.Log(MessageType.None, "This test case is using the email address: " + ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["DefaultLoginEmail"], LogLevel.Info);
Actions.Login.GetToLoginPage();
Actions.Login.SetLoginCredentials();
After the click all Fixtures start running(i.e. all siteEditions)
The menu seems to say it will run or debug only that test with UK TestFixtures, but it doesn't, it runs all fixtures instead.
I use VS2008 SP1, ReSharper 7.0.97.60 with the built-in NUnit 2.6
First off I think there is a fundamental flaw in your test set up, your trying to make your one test do too much. One of the primary concepts of unit testing is "single responsibility", having verbose tests isn't a bad thing, and having a lot of tests isn't a bad thing.
My suggestion would be to break up your tests into a class for each TestFixture or could you create a test for each TestFixture Item? it's not about Resharper not running your tests wrong, it's how you have written your tests isn't matching how resharper was designed to work.
I've created a test suite in NUnit that references several distinct unit test fixtures in various assemblies.
I've pretty much used the example code from NUnit's docs:
namespace NUnit.Tests
{
using System;
using NUnit.Framework;
using System.Collections;
public class AllTests
{
[Suite]
public static IEnumerable Suite
{
get
{
ArrayList suite = new ArrayList();
suite.Add(new VisionMap.DotNet.Tests.ManagedInteropTest.DotNetUtilsTest());
return suite;
}
}
}
}
My goal is to add several tests to the list above so I can run them all in a batch.
But when I try to load the DLL in NUnit's GUI I get this:
What am I doing wrong?
I'm aware that the docs say the GUI won't run suites, but I've tried the console as well. Can somebody please tell me what Suites are good for and how I can use them to achieve my goal?
I'm using nunit 2.5.0.9122.
Edit
Well, no answers are forthcoming. I found an alternative solution in the end: Categories. I group test fixtures by giving them appropriate categories and then I can run a subset of them in batch, while still ignoring another subset.
Still, very odd that this Suite feature seems to be completely broken.
Suites aren't really needed for anything much at all these days. If you only wanted to use them to specify which tests do and don't get run this is much better achieved with Category attributes. This is what you ended up doing, and sounds like the best solution to your problem.
However, for others' and future reference, you can still use Suites in Nunit. You have to run them from the console, and only using the /fixture option. For example, to run the suite you specified above, you'd run (assuming your class was compiled into an assembly AllTests.dll):
nunit-console /fixture:AllTests.Suite AllTests.dll
You won't see any evidence of or way to run suites in the GUI - this is noted in the documentation. You can however run them from the console that is built into the GUI using commands like the above.
I use suites in some of my testing because I have some odd use cases that require me to sometimes need to pass an argument to my test methods. I do this by creating a suite such as the below. So there are some uses for them, just none needed in your case.
[Suite]
public static IEnumerable MySuite
{
get
{
var suite = new ArrayList{new TestClass1(arg1), TestClass2(arg2)};
return suite;
}
}
Is there any reason why you are returning "IEnumerable" instead of "TestSuite"?
[Suite]
public static TestSuite Suite
Update
Reading the small-print at the bottom of the page at NUnit site, it looks like Suite type tests will not show in in the Gui runner, so I guess that's the issue :)
Suites are currently not displayed in the Gui or run automatically by either runner when they are encountered. The historical purpose of the Suite mechanism was to provide a way of aggregating tests at the top level of each run. Hence, they are only supported when used with the /fixture option on the console or gui command line.
Update 2
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve with the "Suite" feature, but if you are trying to find a way of configuring a set of test assemblies to be run together, I have used "NUnit Test Projects" to do this in the past (it's just an xml config file listing test dlls). This allows a fixed set of test assembly references to be configured and then loaded into the GUI or run by the console runner:
http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=multiAssembly&r=2.5.5