This is the tutorial I'm following to learn Expression Tree.
I've more than 35 columns to display, but the user can chose to display 10 columns at once. So one the user type something in the search box, I want to search only the columns that are visible to the user.
SELECT FirstName, LastName, Address, ..., State
FROM Students
WHERE Id == #Id col1 AND (
FirstName LIKE '%#searchText%' OR
LastName LIKE '%#searchText%' OR
Address LIKE '%#searchText%' OR
...
State LIKE '%#searchText%')
Back to Linq, this is how I'm trying to accomplish it:
var result = db.Students
.Where(GetPredicate(id, listOfColumns))
.ToList();
This the private method:
private Expression<Func<Student, bool>> GetPredicate(int id, List<string> listOfColumns)
{
ParameterExpression pe = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Student), "s");
Expression left0 = Expression.Property(pe, "Id");
Expression right0 = Expression.Constant(id);
Expression e0 = Expression.Equal(left0, right0);
//Here ... omitted code because it's not working...
//
var expr = Expression.Lambda<Func<Student, bool>>(e0, new ParameterExpression[] { pe });
return expr;
}
As it is above, it's working just fine. However, the reason I even wrote this method was to be able to filter only by the user-selected columns.
I want to be able to compose based on the column that are visible in the UI.
if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchText))
{
foreach (string columnName in columnList)
{
Expression col = Expression.Property(pe, columnName);
Expression left = Expression.Call(pe, typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains"));
Expression right = Expression.Constant(searchText);
Expression e = Expression.IsTrue(left, right);
}
}
I'm completely lost. I know that I need to access the Contains method of the string class then I don't know what next. The Idea is to get something like this:
Where(d => d.Id == id && (d.FirstName.Contains(searchText)
|| d.LastName.Contains(searchText)
|| ...
|| d.State.Contains(searchText)))
Thanks for helping
You are pretty close, except constructing the call of Contains does not have a right side:
Expression col = Expression.Property(pe, columnName);
Expression contains = Expression.Call(
pe
, typeof(string).GetMethod(nameof(string.Contains), new Type[] { typeof(string)}) // Make a static field out of this
, Expression.Constant(searchText) // Prepare a shared object before the loop
);
Once you have your call expressions, combine them with OrElse to produce the body of your lambda. You can do it with loops, or you can use LINQ:
private static readonly MethodInfo Contains = typeof(string)
.GetMethod(nameof(string.Contains), new Type[] { typeof(string)});
public static Expression<Func<Student,bool>> SearchPredicate(IEnumerable<string> properties, string searchText) {
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Student));
var search = Expression.Constant(searchText);
var components = properties
.Select(propName => Expression.Call(Expression.Property(param, propName), Contains, search))
.Cast<Expression>()
.ToList();
// This is the part that you were missing
var body = components
.Skip(1)
.Aggregate(components[0], Expression.OrElse);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<Student, bool>>(body, param);
}
I like the PredicateBuilder class for stuff like this scenario:
using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public static class PredicateBuilder
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> True<T> () { return f => true; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> False<T> () { return f => false; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T> (this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var invokedExpr = Expression.Invoke (expr2, expr1.Parameters.Cast<Expression> ());
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.OrElse (expr1.Body, invokedExpr), expr1.Parameters);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T> (this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var invokedExpr = Expression.Invoke (expr2, expr1.Parameters.Cast<Expression> ());
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.AndAlso (expr1.Body, invokedExpr), expr1.Parameters);
}
}
Code using this would look like:
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.True<Student>().And(i=>i.Id==id);
if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(searchText))
{
if (firstNameColumnVisible) {
predicate = predicate.And(i=>i.FirstName.Contains(searchText));
}
if (lastNameColumnVisible) {
predicate = predicate.And(i=>i.LastName.Contains(searchText));
}
// more columns here.
}
At the end, use the PredicateBuilder instance as arguments to your Where operator in the Linq query.
Related
I want a function Expression> AnyColumnContains(string[] value)
that iterates through all Columns of a table and checks an array of values against the columns and returns true only if every value is contained in any column.
i already have a function that matches every column against one value but i have problems extending it to check the columns against every value
This is what i've got:
Expression<Func<T, bool>> AnyColumnContains<T>(string value){
var p = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "entity");
var fieldAccessors = typeof(T)
.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public)
.Where(f => f.PropertyType == typeof(string))
.Select(f => Expression.Property(p, f))
.ToArray();
var fieldArray = Expression.NewArrayInit(typeof(string), fieldAccessors);
var concatCall = Expression.Call(typeof(string).GetMethod(
"Concat", new[] { typeof(string[]) }), fieldArray);
var contains = Expression.Call(
concatCall,
typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] { typeof(string) }),
Expression.Constant(value));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(contains, p);
}
I tried to use a own extension method and replaced Contains with it but the problem is that i use sqlite and the expression cannot be converted since the Provider doesn't know the methods
This is what i want:
Expression<Func<T, bool>> AnyColumnContains<T>(string[] values){
// ... //
var contains = // build Expression Tree that matches all values against concatCall and only returns true if all values are contained.
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(contains, p);
}
Rather than making an entirely new method from scratch, you can simply compose the method that you already have that's working.
We can use the following method to combine predicates together:
public static class PredicateBuilder
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> True<T>() { return f => true; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> False<T>() { return f => false; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var secondBody = expr2.Body.Replace(expr2.Parameters[0], expr1.Parameters[0]);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.OrElse(expr1.Body, secondBody), expr1.Parameters);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var secondBody = expr2.Body.Replace(expr2.Parameters[0], expr1.Parameters[0]);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.AndAlso(expr1.Body, secondBody), expr1.Parameters);
}
}
It relies on the following method to replace all instance of one expression with another:
public static Expression Replace(this Expression expression,
Expression searchEx, Expression replaceEx)
{
return new ReplaceVisitor(searchEx, replaceEx).Visit(expression);
}
internal class ReplaceVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Expression from, to;
public ReplaceVisitor(Expression from, Expression to)
{
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node)
{
return node == from ? to : base.Visit(node);
}
}
Now all we have to do is call the single value version of AnyColumnContains for each value and Or all of the results together:
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> AnyColumnContains<T>(IEnumerable<string> values)
{
return values.Select(value => AnyColumnContains<T>(value))
.Aggregate((a, b) => a.Or(b));
}
I've looked into many generic linq filtering questions and their answers here in SO but none of them satisfy my needs so I thought I should create a question.
I've created many of what I call "filter provider" classes, one for each entity class in my model, to provide a simplistic search for my application. I didn't want to go into more advanced solutions like Lucene.Net because a basic filtering with matching score would suffice.
Inside each one of these provider classes there are multiple methods that will receive the filtering terms and query specific properties, returning a score for each match based on the relevance of the property. Most methods will filter multiple properties at once, but not all.
Here are two of these methods:
private IQueryable<Retailer> MatchHighRelevanceFields(string searchTerm, IQueryable<Retailer> retailers)
{
var results = retailers.Where(r =>
(r.CompanyName != null && r.CompanyName.ToUpper().Contains(searchTerm))
|| (r.TradingName != null && r.TradingName.ToUpper().Contains(searchTerm))
);
return results;
}
private IQueryable<Retailer> MatchMediumRelevanceFields(string searchTerm, IQueryable<Retailer> retailers)
{
var results = retailers.Where(r =>
(r.Address.Street != null && r.Address.Street.ToUpper().Contains(searchTerm))
|| (r.Address.Complement != null && r.Address.Complement.ToUpper().Contains(searchTerm))
);
return results;
}
These methods are replicated ad nauseum throughout each provider class and I hope I could replace them for a single method that would receive the properties to be included in the query.
Something like:
public static IQueryable<T> Match<T>(string searchTerm, IQueryable<T> data, Expression<Func<T, string>> filterProperties)
{
var results = **build the query for each property in filterProperties**
return results;
}
But I really can't figure it out. I tried using reflection but it only worked with Linq to Objects and I need a solution for Linq to Entities.
So to solve this problem we need a few puzzle pieces first. The first puzzle piece is a method that can take an expression that computes a value, and then another expression that computes a new value taking the same type the first returns, and creates a new expression that represents the result of passing the result of the first function as the parameter to the second. This allows us to Compose expressions:
public static Expression<Func<TFirstParam, TResult>>
Compose<TFirstParam, TIntermediate, TResult>(
this Expression<Func<TFirstParam, TIntermediate>> first,
Expression<Func<TIntermediate, TResult>> second)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TFirstParam), "param");
var newFirst = first.Body.Replace(first.Parameters[0], param);
var newSecond = second.Body.Replace(second.Parameters[0], newFirst);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TFirstParam, TResult>>(newSecond, param);
}
This relies on the following tool to replace all instances of one expression with another:
public static Expression Replace(this Expression expression,
Expression searchEx, Expression replaceEx)
{
return new ReplaceVisitor(searchEx, replaceEx).Visit(expression);
}
internal class ReplaceVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Expression from, to;
public ReplaceVisitor(Expression from, Expression to)
{
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node)
{
return node == from ? to : base.Visit(node);
}
}
We'll also need a tool to help us OR two predicate expressions together:
public static class PredicateBuilder
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> True<T>() { return f => true; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> False<T>() { return f => false; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var secondBody = expr2.Body.Replace(
expr2.Parameters[0], expr1.Parameters[0]);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.OrElse(expr1.Body, secondBody), expr1.Parameters);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var secondBody = expr2.Body.Replace(
expr2.Parameters[0], expr1.Parameters[0]);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.AndAlso(expr1.Body, secondBody), expr1.Parameters);
}
}
Now that we have this we can use Compose on each property selector to map it from the property results to whether or not that property value is non-null and contains the search term. We can then OR all of those predicates together to get a filter for your query:
public static IQueryable<T> Match<T>(
IQueryable<T> data,
string searchTerm,
IEnumerable<Expression<Func<T, string>>> filterProperties)
{
var predicates = filterProperties.Select(selector =>
selector.Compose(value =>
value != null && value.Contains(searchTerm)));
var filter = predicates.Aggregate(
PredicateBuilder.False<T>(),
(aggregate, next) => aggregate.Or(next));
return data.Where(filter);
}
You can do it with expression trees but it's not as simple as you might think.
public static IQueryable<T> Match<T>(this IQueryable<T> data, string searchTerm,
params Expression<Func<T, string>>[] filterProperties)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof (T), "source");
Expression body = null;
foreach (var prop in filterProperties)
{
// need to replace all the expressions with the one parameter (gist taken from Colin Meek blog see link on top of class)
//prop.body should be the member expression
var propValue =
prop.Body.ReplaceParameters(new Dictionary<ParameterExpression, ParameterExpression>()
{
{prop.Parameters[0], parameter}
});
// is null check
var isNull = Expression.NotEqual(propValue, Expression.Constant(null, typeof(string)));
// create a tuple so EF will parameterize the sql call
var searchTuple = Tuple.Create(searchTerm);
var matchTerm = Expression.Property(Expression.Constant(searchTuple), "Item1");
// call ToUpper
var toUpper = Expression.Call(propValue, "ToUpper", null);
// Call contains on the ToUpper
var contains = Expression.Call(toUpper, "Contains", null, matchTerm);
// And not null and contains
var and = Expression.AndAlso(isNull, contains);
// or in any additional properties
body = body == null ? and : Expression.OrElse(body, and);
}
if (body != null)
{
var where = Expression.Call(typeof (Queryable), "Where", new[] {typeof (T)}, data.Expression,
Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(body, parameter));
return data.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(where);
}
return data;
}
public static Expression ReplaceParameters(this Expression exp, IDictionary<ParameterExpression, ParameterExpression> map)
{
return new ParameterRebinder(map).Visit(exp);
}
Now you need to have a expressionvisitor to make all the expressions use one parameter
//http://blogs.msdn.com/b/meek/archive/2008/05/02/linq-to-entities-combining-predicates.aspx
public class ParameterRebinder : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly IDictionary<ParameterExpression, ParameterExpression> _map;
public ParameterRebinder(IDictionary<ParameterExpression, ParameterExpression> map)
{
_map = map;
}
protected override Expression VisitParameter(ParameterExpression node)
{
if (_map.ContainsKey(node))
{
return _map[node];
}
return base.VisitParameter(node);
}
}
Would use it like
var matches = retailers.Match("7", r => r.Address.Street, x => x.Address.Complement).ToList();
Warning - I checked this with linq to objects using the AsQueryable but didn't run it against EF.
You can use Linq.Dynamic to build the query.
public static IQueryable<T> Match<T>(
string searchTerm,
IQueryable<T> data,
params Expression<Func<T, string>>[] filterProperties) where T : class
{
var predicates = new List<string>();
foreach (var prop in filterProperties)
{
var lambda = prop.ToString();
var columnName = lambda.Substring(lambda.IndexOf('.') + 1);
var predicate = string.Format(
"({0} != null && {0}.ToUpper().Contains(#0))", columnName);
predicates.Add(predicate);
}
var filter = string.Join("||", predicates);
var results = data.Where(filter, searchTerm);
return results;
}
Usage.
var retailers = Match(
"asd", db.Retailers, r => r.CompanyName, r => r.TradingName);
var retailers = Match(
"asd", db.Retailers, r => r.Address.Street, r => r.Address.Complement);
Limitation.
The filter can only accept basic expression.
r => r.Name
r => r.PropA.Name
r => r.PropA.PropB.Name
Try to use Expressions like those all
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/493917/Dynamic-Querying-with-LINQ-to-Entities-and-Express
Let's say that in my database I have the table
**Table Contact**
Id, FirstName, LastName, Phone, Email, DateCreated
1 Tom Williams 3052548623 tom#gmail.com 2013-12-21 14:51:08
etc...
I would like to enable users to search for a contact entering a string. Let's say the user enters:
tom -> TRUE
tom wil -> TRUE
wil tom -> TRUE
tom XX -> FALSE
t w 3 # -> TRUE
wil 305 -> TRUE
(True means search found customer Tom, False means it did not find it)
I will be performing this type of search among different tables in my database. It will be nice if I dont have to build the query for a specific table.
The approach I am thinking on taking is to split the search string every time I find one or more spaces. Then I will be creating n number of searches and then performing an intersect?
You could do something like that, assuming you want only search in the string properties (so your samples will work if we considere Phone as a string property).
It's of course doable with numeric properties (but gets more complicated).
A method like that in an helper static class
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> BuildPredicateForFilter<T>(string filterString)
{
//first, split search by space, removing white spaces, and putting this to upper case
var filters = filterString.Split(new []{" "}, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries).Select(m => m.ToUpper());
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof (T), "m");
//get string.Contains() method
var containsMethod = typeof (string).GetMethod("Contains");
//get string.ToUpper() method
var toUpperMethod = typeof (string).GetMethod("ToUpper", new Type[]{});
//find all the string properties of your class
var properties = typeof(T).GetProperties().Where(m => m.PropertyType == typeof(string));
//for all the string properties, build a "m.<PropertyName>.ToUpper() expression
var members = properties.Select(p => Expression.Call(Expression.Property(parameter, p), toUpperMethod));
Expression orExpression = null;
//build the expression
foreach (var filter in filters)
{
Expression innerExpression = null;
foreach (var member in members)
{
innerExpression = innerExpression == null
? (Expression)Expression.Call(member, containsMethod, Expression.Constant(filter))
: Expression.OrElse(innerExpression, Expression.Call(member, containsMethod, Expression.Constant(filter)));
}
orExpression = orExpression == null
? innerExpression
: Expression.AndAlso(orExpression, innerExpression);
}
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(orExpression, new[]{parameter});
}
usage :
var result = <yourSource>.Where(Helper.BuildPredicateForFilter<TableName>("tom XX"));
for example, with "tom XX", the orExpression will look like
((((m.FirstName.ToUpper().Contains("TOM") OrElse
m.LastName.ToUpper().Contains("TOM")) OrElse
m.Phone.ToUpper().Contains("TOM"))
OrElse m.Email.ToUpper().Contains("TOM"))
AndAlso
(((m.FirstName.ToUpper().Contains("XX") OrElse
m.LastName.ToUpper().Contains("XX")) OrElse
m.Phone.ToUpper().Contains("XX")) OrElse
m.Email.ToUpper().Contains("XX")))
EDIT
or you could change the method to
public static IQueryable<T> FilterFor(this IQueryable<T> queryable, string filterString) {
//same
var predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(orExpression, new[]{parameter});
return queryable.Where(predicate);
}
then usage would simply be
<yourSource>.FilterFor("tom XX");
So what we're looking to do here is search through all of the fields in a type for a given value, doing a Contains search. We can write a method to do this.
First we'll need to use a PredicateBuilder, as we'll be dynamically generating a number of expressions that we want to OR together. Here is my definition of a PredicateBuilder capable of doing that:
public static class PredicateBuilder
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> True<T>() { return f => true; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> False<T>() { return f => false; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var secondBody = expr2.Body.Replace(expr2.Parameters[0], expr1.Parameters[0]);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.OrElse(expr1.Body, secondBody), expr1.Parameters);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T>(
this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var secondBody = expr2.Body.Replace(expr2.Parameters[0], expr1.Parameters[0]);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.AndAlso(expr1.Body, secondBody), expr1.Parameters);
}
}
This uses the following helper method/class to replace all instances of one Expression with another:
internal class ReplaceVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Expression from, to;
public ReplaceVisitor(Expression from, Expression to)
{
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node)
{
return node == from ? to : base.Visit(node);
}
}
public static Expression Replace(this Expression expression,
Expression searchEx, Expression replaceEx)
{
return new ReplaceVisitor(searchEx, replaceEx).Visit(expression);
}
Another tool that we'll use to solve this problem is a Compose method. It will take one expression, then another expression that takes as input the output of another, and produces a new expression that takes the input of the first and produces the output of the last.
public static Expression<Func<TFirstParam, TResult>>
Compose<TFirstParam, TIntermediate, TResult>(
this Expression<Func<TFirstParam, TIntermediate>> first,
Expression<Func<TIntermediate, TResult>> second)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TFirstParam), "param");
var newFirst = first.Body.Replace(first.Parameters[0], param);
var newSecond = second.Body.Replace(second.Parameters[0], newFirst);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TFirstParam, TResult>>(newSecond, param);
}
Thanks to all of these tools, what's left is actually quite straightforward. We'll accept a query, a string to search for, and a series of selectors, each selecting out a field to search through. Then we initialize a filter, go through every single selector, use Compose to turn each selector into a predicate that performs a Contains check on the relevant search text, and then ORs that to the existing filter.
public static IQueryable<T> AnyFieldContains<T>(
this IQueryable<T> query,
string searchText,
params Expression<Func<T, string>>[] fieldSelectors)
{
var filter = PredicateBuilder.False<T>();
foreach (var selector in fieldSelectors)
{
filter = filter.Or(selector.Compose(
value => value.Contains(searchText)));
}
return query.Where(filter);
}
Now that we have all of this we can split the input that you have, and for each of those expressions we can call this method. Then you simply need to supply selectors for the fields that need to be searched through:
IQueryable<Foo> query = db.Foo;
string searchText = "wil tom";
var searchExpressions = searchText.Split(' ');
foreach (var expression in searchExpressions)
{
query = query.AnyFieldContains(expression,
foo => foo.FirstName,
foo => foo.LastName,
foo => foo.Phone);
}
var result = query.Any();
If you're really sure that you want to search every field (and I'm not sure if you are, it's likely many tables will have fields that shouldn't be searched, or have fields that will need some sort of work on your end to transform them into an appropriate string worth searching), then you can use reflection to generate all of the selectors, rather than typing out explicitly what you want to have searched. We can simply create an additional overload such that if no selectors are provided it will use "everything":
public static IQueryable<T> AnyFieldContains<T>(
this IQueryable<T> query,
string searchText)
{
return AnyFieldContains(query, searchText,
typeof(T).GetProperties()
.Select(prop => CreateSelector<T>(prop))
.ToArray());
}
private static Expression<Func<T, string>> CreateSelector<T>(PropertyInfo prop)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T));
Expression body = Expression.Property(param, prop);
if (prop.PropertyType == typeof(decimal?))
body = Expression.Call(body, typeof(SqlFunctions)
.GetMethod("StringConvert", new[] { typeof(decimal?) }));
else if (prop.PropertyType == typeof(double?))
body = Expression.Call(body, typeof(SqlFunctions)
.GetMethod("StringConvert", new[] { typeof(double?) }));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, string>>(body, param);
}
I have a dbml context query that looks something like this:
var SQLQueryResult = (from activeTable in context.activeTabless
where (
activeTable .AssignedTo == "Person1" ||
activeTable .AssignedTo == "Person2" ||
activeTable .AssignedTo == "Person3")
select new { ... });
My question is, how can I update the where field so that it can have any number of or (not just three as above) based on a user selection?
Let's say the number can come from a list or array.
That's simple with straight SQL but not sure how to do it via Linq to SQL.
var persons = new []{"Person1", "Person2", "Person3"};
var SQLQueryResult = (from activeTable in context.activeTabless
where ( persons.Contains(activeTable .AssignedTo))
select new { ... });
You can check if something exists in a collection using the .Contains() extension method of IEnumerable.
You can create your query dynamically by using Expressions for being able to build where predicates. More details and a sample you can find here: Linq dynamic queries
You can use predicate builder (utility class):
using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
public static class PredicateBuilder {
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Make<T>() {
return null;
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Make<T>(this Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate) {
return predicate;
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T>(this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr, Expression<Func<T, bool>> orExpression) {
if (expr == null) {
return orExpression;
}
var invokedExpr = Expression.Invoke(orExpression, expr.Parameters.Cast<Expression>());
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(Expression.Or(expr.Body, invokedExpr), expr.Parameters);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T>(this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr, Expression<Func<T, bool>> andExpression) {
if (expr == null) {
return andExpression;
}
var invokedExpr = Expression.Invoke(andExpression, expr.Parameters.Cast<Expression>());
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(Expression.And(expr.Body, invokedExpr), expr.Parameters);
}
}
Usage:
public IEnumerable<Squad> GetSquadsByIDs(IEnumerable<int> squadIDs) {
if (squadIDs == null || !squadIDs.Any()) {
throw new ArgumentNullException("squadIDs");
}
var condition = PredicateBuilder.Make<Squad>(s => false);
foreach (var squadID in squadIDs) {
int squadIDValue = squadID;
condition = PredicateBuilder.Or<Squad>(condition, s => s.SquadID == squadIDValue);
}
var db = m_DalContextProvider.GetContext();
return db.Squads.Where(condition);
}
I have an application and I'm trying to implement DDD concepts. I have my repository class with some method to list entities. I would like to know how can I do a query with QueryOver to filter separating with AND operator, when the parameter is filled, sample
public IEnumerable<Product> FindProducts(string name, decimal? price, DateTime? validDate, int? stock, int? idSupplier)
{
var query = Session.QueryOver<Product>().OrderBy(x => x.Name).Asc;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(name))
// add where condition for name parameter
if (price.HasValue)
// add 'AND' where condition for price parameter
if (validDate.HasValue)
// add 'AND' where condition for validDate parameter
if (idSupplier.HasValue)
// add 'AND' where condition for idSupplier parameter
// other possible conditions
return query.List();
}
Is there any way to do that before I use HQL string query? hehehe
Thank you!
Here, use PredicateBuilder:
How To:
IQueryable<Product> SearchProducts (params string[] keywords)
{
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.False<Product>();
foreach (string keyword in keywords)
{
string temp = keyword;
predicate = predicate.Or (p => p.Description.Contains (temp));
}
return dataContext.Products.Where (predicate);
}
PredicateBuilder Source:
using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public static class PredicateBuilder
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> True<T> () { return f => true; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> False<T> () { return f => false; }
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Or<T> (this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var invokedExpr = Expression.Invoke (expr2, expr1.Parameters.Cast<Expression> ());
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.OrElse (expr1.Body, invokedExpr), expr1.Parameters);
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> And<T> (this Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr1,
Expression<Func<T, bool>> expr2)
{
var invokedExpr = Expression.Invoke (expr2, expr1.Parameters.Cast<Expression> ());
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>
(Expression.AndAlso (expr1.Body, invokedExpr), expr1.Parameters);
}
}
For more information on PredicateBuilder and LinqKit go here: http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqkit.aspx