the program should translate numbers into letters. How to? - c#

My code should translate letters into numbers. How to translate numbers into letters?
string strs = Console.ReadLine();
Dictionary<char, int> dic = new Dictionary<char, int>
{
{'A', 1},
{'B', 2},
{'C', 3},
};
for (int i = 0; i < strs.Length; i++)
{
int val = 0;
if (dic.TryGetValue(strs[i], out val))
strs = strs.Replace(strs[i].ToString(), val.ToString());
}
Console.WriteLine(strs);

You actually do not need to use a dictionary for this. It can be done relatively easily just using the char type and the int type. Note that this assumes your example always uses upper-case characters from A-Z. If you need something more robust than this, you'll obviously need more complex logic.
public static class Converter
{
public static int? ConvertToInt(char value, char lowerLimit, char upperLimit)
{
// If the value provided is outside acceptable ranges, then just return
// null. Note the int? signature - nullable integer. You could also swap
// this with 0.
if (value < lowerLimit || value > upperLimit)
return null;
// 'A' is 65. Substracting 64 gives us 1.
return ((int)value) - 64;
}
public static char? ConvertToChar(int value, int lowerLimit, int upperLimit)
{
// Basically the same as above, but with char? instead of int?
if (value < lowerLimit || value > upperLimit)
return null;
// 'A' is 65. Substracting 64 gives us 1.
return ((char)value) + 64;
}
}
Usage would look something like this:
// = 1
int? a = Converter.ConvertToInt('A', 'A', 'F');
char? A = Converter.ConvertToChar(a, 1, (int)('F' - 'A'));
Note that you would need to do some level of string indexing, but this gives you a nice structure in that you don't need to store any state anywhere - you can just make it part of your method invocation.

All characters are in a computer mapped to a numeric value. So to get the numeric value of a character you can do the following:
int valueOfA= 'A';
Turns out that it is 65. So the following will work:
var text = "ABBA";
foreach (var character in text.ToCharArray())
{
int result=character;
Console.WriteLine(result-64);
}
for lowercase it is 33. So if you need to handle all a's as 1 then you can use:
var text = "aBBA".ToUpper();
foreach (var character in text.ToCharArray())
{
int result=character;
Console.WriteLine(result-64);
}
otherwise you need to do some checks.
Also notice that the character for 1 is not necessarily the value of 1. (in fact it is -15)

Related

How do I add integers to char[] array?

So I have to write a code that picks our random numbers from 1 to 100 and add them to a char[] array. But I'm having some difficulty doing so as I can only add the numbers to the array if I convert them to a char using (char) which changes the number. Can someone please help me?
Thanks,
public char[] CreationListe(int nmbrevaleurTirés)
{
char[] l = new char[nmbrevaleurTirés];
for (int i = 0; i < nmbrevaleurTirés; i++)
{
l[i] = (char)(new Random().Next(1, 101));
}
return l;
}
use ToChar() method of Convert class.
Convert.ToChar(new Random().Next(1, 101))
You cannot convert an integer larger then 9 into a char because it's considered as 2 chars, i.e. 10 will be considered as 1 and 0.
so I would recommend adding it to an array of strings
(except if your trying to get a random charcode which I dont think is the case, because why till 100?)
Personally, I'd use an int[] array instead
There shouldn't be any problem in storing ints up to 65535 in a char but you will have to cast it back to an int if you don't want it to be weird:
public static void Main()
{
var x = CreationListe(200);
foreach(var c in x)
Console.WriteLine((int)c); //need to cast to int!
}
public static char[] CreationListe(int nmbrevaleurTirés)
{
char[] l = new char[nmbrevaleurTirés];
for (int i = 0; i < nmbrevaleurTirés; i++)
{
l[i] = (char)(new Random().Next(1, 65536));
}
return l;
}
https://dotnetfiddle.net/z5yoBn
If you don't cast it back to int, then you'll get the char at that character index in the unicode table. If you've put 65 into a char, you'll get A when you print it, for example. This is because A is at position 65 in the table:
(ASCII table image posted for brevity's sake)

Collect the digits numbers in the decimal number C#

I want a method to remove the comma from the decimal number and then collect the digits. For example, if the user inputs 1,3 it will remove the comma and collect 1 and 3 together. I mean 1+3 =4. Can I use trim or replace?
public int AddSum(string x1)
{
string x = x1.Trim();
int n = Convert.ToInt32(x);
return n;
}
public int AddSum(string x1)
{
var digitFilter = new Regex(#"[^\d]");
return digitFilter.Replace(x1, "").Select(c => int.Parse(c)).Sum();
}
OR
public int AddSum(string x1)
{
return x1.Where(c => char.IsDigit(c)).Select(c => c - '0').Sum();
}
If you want to iterate over the characters in a string and compute the sum of digits contained therein, it's trivial:
public static int SumOfDigits( string s ) {
int n = 0;
foreach ( char c in s ) {
n += c >= '0' && c <= '9' // if the character is a decimal digit
? c - '0' // - convert to its numeric value
: 0 // - otherwise, default to zero
; // and add that to 'n'
}
return n;
}
It sounds like you want take a comma-separated string of numbers, add the numbers together, then return the result.
The first thing you have to do is use the Split() method on the input string. The Split() method takes an input string splits the string into an array of strings based on a character:
string[] numbers = x1.Split(',');
So now we have an array of strings called numbers that hold each number. The next thing you have to do is create an empty variable to hold the running total:
int total = 0;
The next thing is to create a loop that will iterate through the numbers array and each time, add the number to the running total. Remember that numbers is an array of strings and not numbers. so we must use the Parse() method of int to convert the string to a number:
foreach (string number in numbers)
{
total += int.Parse(number);
}
Finally, just return the result:
return total;
Put it all together and you got this:
private static int AddSum(string x1)
{
string[] numbers = x1.Split(',');
int total = 0;
foreach (string number in numbers)
{
total += int.Parse(number);
}
return total;
}
I hope this helps and clarifies things. Keep in mind that this method doesn't do any kind of error checking, so if your input is bad, you'll get an exception probably.

Getting the sum of all numbers in a character array

I have converted string to char[], but now when I try to get a total of all the numbers in the array, I get a wrong output. The goal is that if the user enters a number as a string e.g - 12, the output should be 3 i.e 1 + 2, another example - 123 should be 1+2+3 = 6.
I am new to coding. My apologies for any inconvienence.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int sum = 0;
String num = Console.ReadLine();
char[] sep = num.ToCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < sep.Length; i++)
{
sum += (sep[i]);
}
Console.WriteLine(sum);
Console.ReadLine();
}
You are currently adding ascii values. The ascii value of 1 is 49 and that of 2 Is 50... You need to use int.TryParse to convert from char to int.
int value;
for (int i = 0; i < sep.Length; i++)
{
if (int.TryParse (sep[i].ToString(),out value))
sum += value;
}
If you want to calculate sum of digits, you need to convert each char to int first. Char needs to be converted to string and then parsed into int. Your original code contains implicit conversion, which converts 1 and 2 into 49 and 50 (ASCII), thus the sum ends up being 99.
Try this code instead:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int sum = 0;
String num = Console.ReadLine();
char[] sep = num.ToCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < sep.Length; i++)
{
sum += int.Parse(sep[i].ToString());
}
Console.WriteLine(sum);
Console.ReadLine();
}
Just for fun here is a LINQ solution.
var sum = num.Select( c => int.Parse((string)c) ).Sum();
This solution takes advantage of the fact that a string is also an IEnumerable<char> and therefore can be treated as a list of characters.
The Select statement iterates over the characters and converts each one to an integer by supplying a lambda expression (that's the => stuff) that maps each character onto its integer equivalent. The symbol is typically prounced "goes to". You might pronounce the whole expression "C goes to whatever integer can be parsed from it."
Then we call Sum() to convert the resulting list of integers into a numeric sum.

c# switch all letters in a string for a different pre-chosen letter

Whilst working on a simple project I was trying to come up with a very basic cryptographic system which will allow me to switch letters in a message to another pre-chosen letter. So far I have tried a few ways but have so far been unsuccessful in my attempts. (*NOTE: This is not for anything other then learning the basics of c# so randomness and security is not important in this case, I simply want to turn one letter into another for the sake of learning how to do it)
so first I started by defining some strings such as this
string a = "a";
string b = "b";
string c = "d";
..... //continues to string z = "z"
next I tried to create a new string based on the values that have been input in to a textbox called PlainTextBox and place them inside a separate textbox called ChangedTextBox. this code is triggered with a button click event.
string str = PlainTextBox.Text;
char[] array = str.ToCharArray();
array[int.Parse(a)] = 'x';
array[int.Parse(b)] = 'y';
array[int.Parse(c)] = 'z';
.......// continues to (z)
str = new string(array);
ChangedTextBox.Text = str;
but this code throws an exception because the input is not a valid integer. the basic Idea is that if the user types "abc" in the PlainTextBox and pushes a button, the ChangedTextBox should show "xyz" but should be inclusive of the whole text in PlainTextBox, switching every letter in the message to its chosen counterpart.
Besides the error I receive, this code seems very cumbersome and inefficient.
Is there a faster way to achieve this result?
Just for completeness I will also include information, that what you are doing is called Caesar cipher
You could define yourself a proper Dictionary
var mapping = new Dictionary<char, char>()
{
{ 'a', 'x' },
{ 'b', 'y' },
{ 'c', 'z' }
// other letters
}
in which you would assign every original letter the letter it should be converted to. Then you could use this dictionary
ChangedTextBox.Text = new string(PlainTextBox.Text.Select(letter => mapping[letter].ToArray());
You've chosen wrong collection type (array) for mapping; dictionary is much more convenient
private static Dictionary<char, char> m_Mapping = new Dictionary<char, char>() {
{'a', 'x'}, // a -> x
{'b', 'y'}, // b -> y
...
};
Then implement the encoding
// I'd rather used Linq
private static String Encode(String value) {
// Simplest: we don't check if the actual character can be mapped
return String.Concat(value.Select(c => m_Mapping[c]));
}
But your (amended) implementation is good enough:
private static String Encode(string str) {
char[] array = str.ToCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; ++i) {
// Simplest: we don't check if the actual character can be mapped
array[i] = m_Mapping[array[i]];
}
return new string(array);
}
Finally, add up UI:
ChangedTextBox.Text = Encode(PlainTextBox.Text);
Edit: in general case, when m_Mapping doesn't contain records for some characters (e.g. for new line \n) and so we want to preserve these characters intact we can't use direct m_Mapping[...] but should implement, say, EncodeChar.
private static char EncodeChar(char value) {
char result;
if (m_Mapping.TryGetValue(value, out result))
return result;
else
return value;
}
And put EncodeChar(...) instead of m_Mapping[...]
private static String Encode(String value) {
return String.Concat(value.Select(EncodeChar(c)));
}
Your version
private static String Encode(string str) {
char[] array = str.ToCharArray();
for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; ++i) {
array[i] = EncodeChar(array[i]);
return new string(array);
}
Probably the best solution is using a Dictionary, as other answers had said. But if I understand what you want, you want to just change one letter by that letter plus an offset in a kind of "circular" way. This solution would do something like that (with "abcd" as input it would return "xyza"):
string input = "abcd";
char startChar = 'x';
char lastChar = 'z';
char firstChar = 'a';
byte[] asciiBytes=Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(input);
byte[] encriptedByteArray = new byte[asciiBytes.Length];
int val = (int)startChar-(int)firstChar;
int i = 0;
foreach(byte b in asciiBytes)
{
var a=b + val;
if (a>(int)lastChar)
{
a = firstChar+(a-lastChar)-1;
}
encriptedByteArray[i] = (byte)a;
i++;
}
string encriptedArray = System.Text.Encoding.UTF8.GetString(encriptedByteArray);
With this solution you can change the offsety easily (changing startChar). It has room for improvement though, for example it only works on lower letters from a-z, it could be changed to be more extensive.
int.Parse(a)
will of course throw InvalidCastException because a is a string as you've defined it
string a = "a";

Compare numeric values as string

I have a method which gets two string. These strings can contain numbers, ASCII chars or both at the same time.
The algorithm works like this:
Split both strings into char Arrays A and B.
Try to parse element Ai and Bi to an int
Compare element Ai with element Bi, in case of integers use direct comparison, in case of chars use ordinal string comparison.
Do work based on the result
Now, I'm wondering: Do I really need to parse the elements to int? I simply could compare each element in an ordinal string comparison and would get the same result, right?
What are the performance implications here? Is parsing and normal comparison faster than ordinal string comparison? Is it slower?
Is my assumption (using ordinal string comparison instead of parsing and comparing) correct?
Here is the method in question:
internal static int CompareComponentString(this string componentString, string other)
{
bool componentEmpty = string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(componentString);
bool otherEmtpy = string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(other);
if (componentEmpty && otherEmtpy)
{
return 0;
}
if (componentEmpty)
{
return -1;
}
if (otherEmtpy)
{
return 1;
}
string[] componentParts = componentString.Split(new[] { '.' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
string[] otherParts = other.Split(new[] { '.' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
for (int i = 0; i < Math.Min(componentParts.Length, otherParts.Length); i++)
{
string componentChar = componentParts[i];
string otherChar = otherParts[i];
int componentNumVal, otherNumVal;
bool componentIsNum = int.TryParse(componentChar, out componentNumVal);
bool otherIsNum = int.TryParse(otherChar, out otherNumVal);
if (componentIsNum && otherIsNum)
{
if (componentNumVal.CompareTo(otherNumVal) == 0)
{
continue;
}
return componentNumVal.CompareTo(otherNumVal);
}
else
{
if (componentIsNum)
{
return -1;
}
if (otherIsNum)
{
return 1;
}
int comp = string.Compare(componentChar, otherChar, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
if (comp != 0)
{
return comp;
}
}
}
return componentParts.Length.CompareTo(otherParts.Length);
}
This are strings that might be used. I might add only the part after the minus sign is used.
1.0.0-alpha
1.0.0-alpha.1
1.0.0-alpha.beta
1.0.0-beta.2
With this method you can create a compare string for each of your string. These strings are comparable by simple alphanumeric comparison.
Assumptions:
There is a minus in the string separating the common part and the indiv part
before the minus is always a substring of three integer values divided by a dot
These integer values are not higher than 999 (look at variable "MaxWidth1")
behind the minus is another substring consisting of several parts, also divided by a dot
The second substring's parts may be numeric or alphanumeric with a max. width of 7 (look at "MaxWidth2")
The second substring consists of max. 5 parts (MaxIndivParts)
Put this method wherever you want:
public string VersionNumberCompareString(string versionNumber, int MaxWidth1=3, int MaxWidth2=7,int MaxIndivParts=5){
string result = null;
int posMinus = versionNumber.IndexOf('-');
string part1 = versionNumber.Substring(0, posMinus);
string part2 = versionNumber.Substring(posMinus+1);
var integerValues=part1.Split('.');
result = integerValues[0].PadLeft(MaxWidth1, '0');
result += integerValues[1].PadLeft(MaxWidth1, '0');
result += integerValues[2].PadLeft(MaxWidth1, '0');
var alphaValues = part2.Split('.');
for (int i = 0; i < MaxIndivParts;i++ ) {
if (i <= alphaValues.GetUpperBound(0)) {
var s = alphaValues[i];
int casted;
if (int.TryParse(s, out casted)) //if int: treat as number
result += casted.ToString().PadLeft(MaxWidth2, '0');
else //treat as string
result += s.PadRight(MaxWidth2, ' ');
}
else
result += new string(' ', MaxWidth2);
}
return result; }
You call it like this:
var s1 = VersionNumberCompareString("1.3.0-alpha.1.12");
//"001003000alpha 00000010000012 "
var s2 = VersionNumberCompareString("0.11.4-beta");
//"000011004beta "
var s3 = VersionNumberCompareString("2.10.11-beta.2");
//"002010011beta 0000002 "
Be aware of the final " sign. All strings are of the same length!
Hope this helps...
that's .net comparison logic for ascii strings -
private unsafe static int CompareOrdinalIgnoreCaseHelper(String strA, String strB)
{
Contract.Requires(strA != null);
Contract.Requires(strB != null);
Contract.EndContractBlock();
int length = Math.Min(strA.Length, strB.Length);
fixed (char* ap = &strA.m_firstChar) fixed (char* bp = &strB.m_firstChar)
{
char* a = ap;
char* b = bp;
while (length != 0)
{
int charA = *a;
int charB = *b;
Contract.Assert((charA | charB) <= 0x7F, "strings have to be ASCII");
// uppercase both chars - notice that we need just one compare per char
if ((uint)(charA - 'a') <= (uint)('z' - 'a')) charA -= 0x20;
if ((uint)(charB - 'a') <= (uint)('z' - 'a')) charB -= 0x20;
//Return the (case-insensitive) difference between them.
if (charA != charB)
return charA - charB;
// Next char
a++; b++;
length--;
}
return strA.Length - strB.Length;
}
}
having said that, Unless you have a strict performance constaint, i would say if you get the same result from an already implemented & tested function, its better to reuse it and not to reinvent the wheel.
It saves so much time in implementation, unit testing, debugging & bug fixing time. & helps keep the software simple.

Categories

Resources