I'm using gridcontrol of devexpres. I want to fill an object like textedit,datepicker,checkbox etc. from the gridcontrol, for that I had to make a function like DGSearch_CellClick; but there is a problem when I get the value, can't set it in objects like textedit,datepicker,checkbox.
Below is my code:
public void DGSearch_CellClick(GridView GView, object[] ConMast, int CurrRow)
{
try
{
for (int i = 0; i <= ConMast.Length - 1; i++)
{
ConMast[i] = GView.GetRowCellValue(CurrRow, GView.Columns[i]).ToString();
}
}
catch (Exception) { }
}
public void Search(int k)
{
try
{
// vbcls.DGSearch_CellClick(GViewSearch, new Control[] { TxtMstID, DtDate, TxtJno, DtSite, TxtPartyCode, TxtCompanyCode, TxtTypeCode, TxtArticalCode, TxtJanCharniCode, TxtProcessCode, TxtRgPer, TxtPoPer, TxtManufacturerSize, TxtLsWt, TxtMainCutno, TxtCutNo, TxtRemarks, ChkAutoCut, ChkAutoKno }, k);
vbcls.DGSearch_CellClick(GViewSearch, new object[] { TxtMstID.Text, DtDate.EditValue, TxtJno.Text, DtSite.EditValue, TxtPartyCode.Text, TxtCompanyCode.Text, TxtTypeCode.Text, TxtArticalCode.Text, TxtJanCharniCode.Text, TxtProcessCode.Text, TxtRgPer.Text, TxtPoPer.Text, TxtManufacturerSize.Text, TxtLsWt.Text, TxtMainCutno.Text, TxtCutNo.Text, TxtRemarks.Text, ChkAutoCut.Checked, ChkAutoKno.Checked }, k);
FillData();
GCSearch.Visible = false;
BtnEdit.Focus();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
}
}
While you certainly can edit values directly within a grid, I think your best bet is to make your grid databound, to a DataTable if you have to, but preferably to a collection of objects.
The addition of a BindingSource component will give you one more tool, and I recomment its use. For example, if you bind your collection to your binding source and bind your binding source to the grid, then any changes to the focused row in the grid will automatically update bindSource.Current.
Here is what that might look like:
gridDgSearch.DataSource = bindDgSearch;
List<DgSearch> dgSearchList = DgSearchCrud.GetAll();
bindDgSearch = dgSearchList;
Now, rather than trying to find items in the grid, simply iterate through your collection. Rather than updating items in the grid, update them in the collection and refresh the grid.
Also, e.RowHandle in many of the grid events will indicate the row in question, meaning this:
(DgSearch)gridDgSearchView.GetRow(e.RowHandle);
Will give you the entire object for that row (if the event arg doesn't already).
If you can elaborate more on where the contents of the grid come from, what you want to do with it, etc, it might help narrow down how you can handle it with this approach.
Related
I'm relatively new to XAML / Xamarin and I'm running into something I'm hoping someone can help me clarify.
I know the title is misleading, but I couldn't put it any different.
I have the following property in my ViewModel:
private ObservableCollection<Schedule> _scheduleList;
public ObservableCollection<Schedule> ScheduleList
{
get
{
return _scheduleList;
}
set
{
value = _scheduleList;
}
}
Somewhere down the line, I do something like this:
private void DayFilter(string week)
{
try
{
var list = _scheduleList.Where(x => x.ScheduleDate.DayOfWeek.ToString() == week);
ObservableCollection<Schedule> newlist = new ObservableCollection<Schedule>(list);
ScheduleList.Clear(); // <- this line clears out _scheduleList as well
foreach (var item in newlist)
{
ScheduleList.Add(item);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw ex;
}
}
Whenever ScheduleList.Clear() is called, it also clears out _scheduleList which is the private field.
I know this has something to do with the fact that this is ObservableCollection, but the requirement is that it should be, and I could not find a way to retain the value on _scheduleList, as I need this field populated throughout the lifetime of the application.
Is there away that the field _scheduleList does not get cleared out?
This is just how C# works
ScheduleList.Clear();
returns a reference to _scheduleList (that's what the public get does) and then calls Clear on it.
In your scenario, you probably need to maintain two completely separate copies of your data - the original, as well as one that you use for filtering/displaying the data.
I have a BindingList< KeyValuePair < string, string > > that is bound to a ComboBox control. Based on some conditions, the BindingList will be added a new KeyValuePair. Now, the Newly added item shows up at index 0 of the Combobox, instead of at the end.
While debugging, I found that the BindingList has got the right order. (i.e, the new KeyValuePair is appended)
Also, I check the SelectedValue of the ComboBox in it's SelectedIndexChanged handler and it seems to be not of the ListItem that got selected. Instead, it is that of the supposed ListItem, if the ComboBox had got the right order as in its DataSource, - the BindingList..
The code is a small part of a large project.. Plz let me know if the question is not clear. I can put the relevant parts of the code as per our context.
How could something like this happen? What can I do differently?
I have this class something like this.
public class DropdownEntity
{
//removed all except one members and properties
private string frontEndName
public string FrontEndName
{
get {return this.frontEndName; }
set {this.frontEndName= value; }
}
//One Constructor
public DropdownEntity(string _frontEndName)
{
this.FrontEndName = _frontEndName;
//Removed code which initializes several members...
}
//All methods removed..
public override string ToString()
{
return frontEndName;
}
}
In my windows form, I have a tab control with several tabs. In one of the tabs pages, I have a DataGridView. The user is supposed to edit the cells and click on a Next - button. Then, some processing will be done, and the TabControl will be navigated to the next tab page.
The next tab page has the combobox that has the problem I mentioned. This page also has a back button, which will take back.. the user can modify the gridview cells again.. and click on the next button. This is when the order gets messed up.
I am posting here the Click event handler of the Next Button.. Along with the class, with the rest of the code removed.
public partial class AddUpdateWizard : Form
{
//Removed all members..
BindingList<KeyValuePair<string, string>> DropdownsCollection;
Dictionary<string, DropdownEntity> DropdownsDict;
//Defined in a partial definition of the class..
DataGridView SPInsertGridView = new DataGridView();
ComboBox DropdownsCmbBox = new ComboBox();
Button NextBtn2 = new Button();
Button BackBtn3 = new Button();
//Of course these controls are added to one of the panels
public AddUpdateWizard(MainForm mainForm)
{
InitializeComponent();
DropdownsDict = new Dictionary<string, DropdownEntity>();
}
private void NextBtn2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string sqlArgName;
string frontEndName;
string fieldType;
for (int i = 0; i < SPInsertGridView.Rows.Count; i++)
{
sqlArgName = "";
frontEndName = "";
fieldType = "";
sqlArgName = SPInsertGridView.Rows[i].Cells["InsertArgName"].Value.ToString().Trim();
if (SPInsertGridView.Rows[i].Cells["InsertArgFrontEndName"].Value != null)
{
frontEndName = SPInsertGridView.Rows[i].Cells["InsertArgFrontEndName"].Value.ToString().Trim();
}
if (SPInsertGridView.Rows[i].Cells["InsertArgFieldType"].Value != null)
{
fieldType = SPInsertGridView.Rows[i].Cells["InsertArgFieldType"].Value.ToString().Trim();
}
//I could have used an enum here, but this is better.. for many reasons.
if (fieldType == "DROPDOWN")
{
if (!DropdownsDict.ContainsKey(sqlArgName))
DropdownsDict.Add(sqlArgName, new DropdownEntity(frontEndName));
else
DropdownsDict[sqlArgName].FrontEndName = frontEndName;
}
else
{
if (fieldType == "NONE")
nonFieldCount++;
if (DropdownsDict.ContainsKey(sqlArgName))
{
DropdownsDict.Remove(sqlArgName);
}
}
}
//DropdownsCollection is a BindingList<KeyValuePair<string, string>>.
//key in the BindingList KeyValuePair will be that of the dictionary.
//The value will be from the ToString() function of the object in the Dictionary.
DropdownsCollection = new BindingList<KeyValuePair<string,string>>(DropdownsDict.Select(kvp => new KeyValuePair<string, string>(kvp.Key, kvp.Value.ToString())).ToList());
DropdownsCmbBox.DataSource = DropdownsCollection;
DropdownsCmbBox.DisplayMember = "Value";
DropdownsCmbBox.ValueMember = "Key";
//Go to the next tab
hiddenVirtualTabs1.SelectedIndex++;
}
private void BackBtn3_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
hiddenVirtualTabs1.SelectedIndex--;
}
//On Selected Index Changed of the mentioned Combobox..
private void DropdownsCmbBox_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (DropdownsCmbBox.SelectedValue != null)
{
if (DropdownsDict.ContainsKey((DropdownsCmbBox.SelectedValue.ToString())))
{
var dropdownEntity = DropdownsDict[DropdownsCmbBox.SelectedValue.ToString()];
DropdownEntityGB.Text = "Populate Dropdowns - " + dropdownEntity.ToString();
//Rest of the code here..
//I see that the Datasource of this ComboBox has got the items in the right order.
// The Combobox's SelectedValue is not that of the selected item. Very Strange behavior!!
}
}
}
}
The very first time the user clicks the Next Button, it's fine. But if he clicks the Back Button again and changes the Data Grid View cells.. The order will be gone.
I know, it can be frustrating to look at. It's a huge thing to ask for help. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Please let me know if you need elaboration at any part.
Thanks a lot :)
I think you have two problems here.
First, if you want to retain the order of the items you should use an OrderedDictionary instead of a regular one. A normal collection will not retain the order of the items when you use Remove method. You can see more info about this related to List here.
You could use such dictionary like this:
DropDownDict = new OrderedDictionary();
// Add method will work as expected (as you have it now)
// Below you have to cast it before using Select
DropDownCollection = new BindingList<KeyValuePair<string, string>>(DropDownDict.Cast<DictionaryEntry>().Select(kvp => new KeyValuePair<string, string>(kvp.Key.ToString(), kvp.Value.ToString())).ToList());
The second problem could be that you change the display name (FrontEndName) of already existing items, but the key is preserved. When you add a new item, try to remove the old one that you're not using anymore and add a new item.
The Sorted Property of the Combobox is set to True! I didn't check that until now. I messed up. Terribly sorry for wasting your time Adrian. Thanks a lot for putting up with my mess here.. :)
Using WPF C#.NET4.5 using visual studio 2012 ulti.
Old winforms code:
foreach (DataGridViewRow paretoRow in ParetoGrid.Rows)
{
if ((Convert.ToInt32(paretoRow.Cells["CurrentPareto"].Value) < (Convert.ToInt32(paretoRow.Cells["NewPareto"].Value))))
{
paretoRow.Cells["pNew"].Value = downArrow
}
}
As you can see each row I cycle through I check a specific cell, if true I then populate another cell. This was good old winforms code I used many times before...however.
Switching over to WPF was alot more different than i previously assumed.
DataGrid does not contain the Row property. Instead, I think you need to use:
DataGridRow paretoRow in paretogrid.Items
But im still at a loss on who to now get the cell.
So my question is, is there syntax changes to perform, if so where? Or as I'm beginning to believe datagrids in WPF operate with Objects more so than winforms thus not needing to use a propertie called "row", if this is the case what logic/syntax should i know use in this example?
Thanks for your patience guys, think when I go home for the bank holiday I'll do a bit of WPF digging to see how different it actually is.
People seem to be overcomplicating this, this worked for me:
foreach (System.Data.DataRowView dr in yourDataGrid.ItemsSource)
{
MessageBox.Show(dr[0].ToString());
}
I think first think you want to do is to get all rows of your DataGrid:
public IEnumerable<Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGridRow> GetDataGridRows(Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGrid grid)
{
var itemsSource = grid.ItemsSource as IEnumerable;
if (null == itemsSource) yield return null;
foreach (var item in itemsSource)
{
var row = grid.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromItem(item) as Microsoft.Windows.Controls.DataGridRow;
if (null != row) yield return row;
}
}
and then iterate through your grid:
var rows = GetDataGridRows(nameofyordatagrid);
foreach (DataGridRow row in rows)
{
DataRowView rowView = (DataRowView)row.Item;
foreach (DataGridColumn column in nameofyordatagrid.Columns)
{
if (column.GetCellContent(row) is TextBlock)
{
TextBlock cellContent = column.GetCellContent(row) as TextBlock;
MessageBox.Show(cellContent.Text);
}
}
Yes, you are right. WPF DataGrid is built around better supporting the use of objects.
You could use a ViewModel similar to the following. Build them all into a collection and then set that collection as your ItemsSource. You would also need to use a ValueConverter if you want to display and image instead of a checkmark for pNew being true/false.
public class FooViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private int currentPareto;
public int CurrentPareto
{
get
{
return currentPareto;
}
set
{
if (currentPareto == value)
return;
currentPareto = value;
OnPropertyChanged("CurrentPareto");
OnPropertyChanged("pNew");
}
}
private int newPareto;
public int NewPareto
{
get
{
return newPareto;
}
set
{
if (newPareto == value)
return;
newPareto = value;
OnPropertyChanged("NewPareto");
OnPropertyChanged("pNew");
}
}
public bool pNew
{
get
{
return CurrentPareto < NewPareto;
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
}
Edit
To simplify it a little, you could use a base ViewModel class and use PropertyChanged weaving. The code would simplify to this:
public class FooViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public int CurrentPareto { get; set; }
public int NewPareto { get; set; }
public bool pNew { get { return CurrentPareto < NewPareto; } }
}
I don't even understand why is it just so complicated to get rows and their values in a datagrid. It feels like hell finding how. The api even give funny funny event names which is not so direct to the point also. Why can't just people concentrate on the baseline and give what exactly is needed and not all sorts of different options with no use and sense at all. I mean to eat all you need is a spoon and fork right. Never even changed since 100,000 years ago. This is my code thanks to the guy who mentioned some people just try to over-complicate things and waste your time.
private void dtaResultGrid_DataContextChanged(object sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
ActivateTestDatagridAccess();
}
public async void ActivateTestDatagridAccess()
{
try
{
await Task.Delay(500);
foreach (System.Data.DataRowView dr in dtaResultGrid.ItemsSource)
{
for (int j = 0; j < dtaResultGrid.Columns.Count; j++)
{
Console.WriteLine(dr[j].ToString());
}
Console.Write(Environment.NewLine);
}
}
catch (Exception exrr)
{
Console.WriteLine(exrr.ToString());
}
}
The 'simplest' answer, from Charles, did it for me. But I used Items instead of ItemsSource.
Now, for people getting this error:
System.InvalidCastException
Unable to cast object of type 'MS.Internal.NamedObject' to type 'System.Data.DataRowView'.
What did it for me was disabling the DataGrid's property CanUserAddRows. This removes the placeholder line for a new line, thus removing the placeholder object (which is NOT a DataRowView, but something else). If you already have this disabled, then I don't know.
Since I wanted to loop through each element of each row, I added another foreach:
foreach (System.Data.DataRowView dr in nameofyourgrid.Items)
{
foreach (var item in dr.Row.ItemArray)
{
MessageBox.Show(item.ToString());
}
}
In WPF you go about it a lot more dynamic and ObjectOrientated. You can bind the Column "pNew" on a Property of the element you put in the DataGrid, which returns downarrow.
If the value changes you can raise the Event PropertyChanged (Interface INotifyPropertyChanged) and the bound Property will get reevaluated.
Also interesting for beginning with WPF is DataTemplate, ControlTemplate, Converter.
Converter changes the Property Value to a usable Value for WPF (e.g. BoolToVisibility) when the Property gets called.
DataTemplate and ControlTemplate can be used to alter the appearance of the Control.
There are several good Tutorials for WPF out there. I would also recommend to look into the MVVM-Pattern to use as a between layer of your Businessobject and your WPF-Control, especially to handle things like what you try to do here.
if you fill your datagridview rows using an instance of a class (like struct_class)
this would be the fastest way to have a foreach loop
foreach (struct_class row in dgv.Items)
{
MessageBox.Show(row.name);
}
Why can't you just use this property to get the number of rows and then use a For loop to iterate through?
dataGridView1.Rows.Count
I have a method that adds items to my listbox called refreshInterface which is called as soon as the programe starts, adding names of homeforms in the listbox using the FormItems class, here is the rereshInterface method below
public void refreshInterface()
{
//int number = 0;
foreach (DataSet1.xspGetAnalysisUsageTypesRow homeForms in myDataSet.xspGetAnalysisUsageTypes)
{
var forms = new FormItems(homeForms);
listBox1.Items.Add(forms);
}
}
The FormItems class is this below
public class FormItems
{
public DataSet1.xspGetAnalysisUsageTypesRow types { get; set; }
public FormItems(DataSet1.xspGetAnalysisUsageTypesRow usageTypes)
{
types = usageTypes;
}
public override string ToString()
{
// returns the rows that are relating to types.xlib_ID
var libtyps = types.GetxAnalysisUsageRows();
var cnt = 0;
foreach (DataSet1.xAnalysisUsageRow ty in libtyps)
{
//returns true if ty is null
bool typeNull = ty.Isxanu_DefaultNull();
// if its false, if xanu_Default is set
if (!typeNull)
{
cnt += 1;
}
}
var ret = String.Format("set {0} [Set: {1}]", types.xlib_Desc, cnt);
//return this.types.xlib_Desc;
return ret;
}
}
Each listbox (the listbox is on the left of the homeform) item has a number of reports that can be added to it, so for instance, i select an homeform from my listbox, there are 12 textboxes on the right hand side and each textbox has a pair of buttons which are Browse and Clear. If I click on the browse button a new form appears, and i select a report from that form and add it to a particular textbox, the count for that homeform should update, and i clear a textbox for a particular homeform, the count should also update.
At the moment when i debug the application, it shows me the count of each Homeform depending on the amount of reports added to the homeform, but while the programe is running, if i add a new report to a homeform, the count does not update until i restart the debug session. I was told about using a Databinding method but not sure of how i could use it here
How do i ge my listbox item to update ?
You should probably look into binding. Here is a good place to start:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/140621/WPF-Tutorial-Concept-Binding
If you want a GUI to respond to data changes then binding is your best friend.
You should bind List Box component source to Observable Collection, every update you do to Observable Collection will update List Box data.
Might not be exact but should give you an idea.
public void refreshInterface()
{
Dictionary<int,string> items = new Dictionary<int,string>();
//int number = 0;
foreach (DataSet1.xspGetAnalysisUsageTypesRow homeForms in myDataSet.xspGetAnalysisUsageTypes)
{
var formitem = new FormItems(homeForms);
items.Add(formitem.someprop, formitem.toString());
}
listbox.DataSource = items;
listbox.DisplayMember = "Value";
listbox.ValueMember = "Key";
}
I have a datagridview which we will call dataGridViewExample.
My object (the uncommon datatypes is because my database is SQLite):
class MyObject
{
public Int64 Vnr { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public Single Price { get; set; }
public int Amount { get; set; }
}
Here is the relevant code:
//This form gets called with a .ShowDialog(); in my form1.
private List<MyObjecte> ExampleList = new List<MyObject>();
public MyForm()
{
dataGridViewExample.DataSource = OrdreInkøbsListe;
}
private void AddtoDataGridViewExample()
{
//Add a new MyObject to the list
ExampleList.Add(new myObject()
{
Vnr = newVnr,
Amount = newAmount,
Price = newPrice,
Name = newName
});
//refresh datasource
dataGridViewExample.DataSource = null;
dataGridViewExample.Refresh();
dataGridViewExample.DataSource = OrdreInkøbsListe;
ddataGridViewExample.Refresh();
}
When MyForm gets called with a .ShowDialog, it shows up fine and displays my DataGridView example just fine. As you can read from the code, the ExampleListis initially empty, so it just shows an empty datagridview with 4 columns: Vnr, Name, Price & Amount. If I click inside it etc. nothing happens - so everything is working as planned, so far.
Everytime I call AddtoDataGridViewExample() it adds the new object to the Datagridview, and the datagridview does update, listing all the objects added so far (they show themself as rows, again according to plan).
Now, remember that I just said that nothing happened if you clicked inside DataGridViewExample before I have called AddtoDataGridViewExample()?
Well, after having called AddtoDataGridViewExample() once or more, the program will crash if I click inside DataGridViewExample (for example: the users wants to select a row). It throws an IndexOutOfRangeException and talks about an -1 index.
It also throws the exception in the other form, on the line where I call MyForm with .ShowDialog();
I really am stuck on this, do you guys have any idea what is wrong??
My only clue is that I do believe the refresh of DataGridViewExample's datasource might be the cause of the problem.
Another important note: I have yet bound any events to my DataGridViewExample. So you can rule that idea out.
Here is all DataGridViewExample's properties:
this.dataGridViewExample.AllowUserToAddRows = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.AllowUserToDeleteRows = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.AllowUserToResizeColumns = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.AllowUserToResizeRows = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.AutoSizeColumnsMode = System.Windows.Forms.DataGridViewAutoSizeColumnsMode.Fill;
this.dataGridViewExample.ColumnHeadersHeightSizeMode = System.Windows.Forms.DataGridViewColumnHeadersHeightSizeMode.AutoSize;
this.dataGridViewExample.Location = new System.Drawing.Point(591, 53);
this.dataGridViewExample.MultiSelect = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.Name = "dataGridViewExample";
this.dataGridViewExample.ReadOnly = true;
this.dataGridViewExample.RowHeadersVisible = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.SelectionMode = System.Windows.Forms.DataGridViewSelectionMode.FullRowSelect;
this.dataGridViewExample.ShowEditingIcon = false;
this.dataGridViewExample.Size = new System.Drawing.Size(240, 150);
this.dataGridViewExample.TabIndex = 31;
I guess the click event tries to get the currently selected row and do something with it, while dataGridViewExample.DataSource = null; clears the datasource, and the currently selected row becomes null.
If you set the DataGridView.DataSource to the list, you don't need to reset it to null, refresh, and reset it to the list again (and refresh again) to see the changes. It will be enough to just refresh the DataGridView.
You can also just try using an BindingList<T> object instead of a List<T>, which will automatically notify your grid of its internal changes (Adding and removing elements), and there's also an INotifyPropertyChanged interface you can implement on your MyObject class, that will make every property change in an object show on the grid (For any changes made to the object in the code, and not through the grid itself).
Have you tried running the debugger and break when InedxOutOfRangeException is thrown to see where the exception is thrown?
Select Debug > Exceptions then there's a Find button on the dialog so you don't have to browse through all of the possibilities.
I had similar situation. I assigned generic list of certain object to DataGridView. Then I was setting null to DataSource and after that refresh. After that I assign list of objects to DataSource. While clicked on grid while runtime error occured IndexOutOfRange. My solution was to assign new empty list of my object to that grid and refresh and after changes on my working list I do assign to DataSource and call Refresh. Now, it is working without any crashes. Please look on my code before:
grid.DataSource = null;
grid.Refresh();
if(cases.Count() > 0)
{
grid.DataSource = cases;
grid.Refresh();
}
And now on my code after:
grid.DataSource = new List<MyCase>();
grid.Refresh();
//do something with cases
if(cases.Count() > 0)
{
grid.DataSource = cases;
grid.Refresh();
}