Hello recently i have been profiling some mono application. Few weeks ago mono profiler outputted some simple reports. But then we make some major refactoring now during profiler run half of the file is filled with errors like :
unmatched leave at stack pos: 4 for method unknown method 0xb4b1d580
sometimes with actually method name when it finds symbols. My question is what does this mean? Can i somehow fix those errors? are profiling results affected?
Related
The problem
On our ASP .net website I keep getting wrong line numbers in stack traces of exceptions. I am talking about our live environment. There seems to be a pattern: The stack trace will always point to the line that contains the method's closing curly brackets.
For Example:
public class Foo
{
public void Bar()
{
object someObject = null;
someObject.ToString();
/*
arbitrarily more lines of code
*/
} // this line will be the one that the stack trace points to
}
More details
To be clear: This does not only happen for some method(s), it happens for every exception that we log. So I would rule out (JIT) optimizations here, that might lead to line numbers being seemingly randomly off. What bothers me is, that the wrong line numbers seem to consistently point to the closing curly brackets of the containing method.
Note that before .net 4.6 there actually was a bug in the framework, such that if you compiled targeting x64, exactly this would happen. However, Microsoft confirmed that this has been fixed. Also running a minimal example app for this, reaffirms their claim. But for some reason it still happens on the web servers.
It puzzles me even more that it does not happen in our test and development environments. The test and live systems are pretty similarly set up. The only real difference is that live we are running Windows Server 2012, while on the test system we are still using Windows Server 2008.
What I have checked
pdb files are valid (tested with chkmatch)
Compile time code optimizations are not the issue
The aforementioned bug in .net before 4.6 cannot be reproduced with a minimal example
.NET versions are exactly the same
Build comes from the same deploy script
Any clues towards solving this problem are highly appreciated. If you know anything that we could check, please let me know.
Compilation optimization as well as runtime optimization can change the actual execution, as well as the call stack information constructed. So you cannot treat the numbers that seriously.
More information can be found in posts such as Scott Hanselman's: Release IS NOT Debug: 64bit Optimizations and C# Method Inlining in Release Build Call Stacks.
It would be too difficult to troubleshoot a specific case without touching your bits. But if you know of WinDbg you might dive deeper, by live debugging the application when the exception occurs. Then you can dump the actual jitted machine code as well as other runtime information, so as to determine how the line number is constructed.
Thanks everyone for your help! We found out that the SCOM APM agent running on the machines in production caused our application to log wrong line numbers in the stack traces. As soon as we deactivated the agent, the line numbers were correct.
In latest .NET Core versions (aka .NET 6.0) if you have "Ready to run" JIT optimization enabled (PublishReadyToRun in publishing settings), this essentially renders line numbers inaccurate too.
Disabling it might help. But this comes as a performance trade obviously.
I recently released a Windows phone 8 app.
The app sometimes seem to crash randomly but the problem is it crash without breaking and the only info I get is a message on output that tells me there were an Access violation without giving any details.
So after releasing, from the crash reports I was able to obtain some more information, but they're kinda cryptical to me.
The info are:
Problem function: unknown //not very useful
Exception type: c0000005 //this is the code for Access violation exception
Stack trace:
Frame Image Function Offset
0 qcdx9um8960 0x00035426
1 qcdx9um8960 0x000227e2
I'm not used to work with memory pointer et similia and I'm not used to see a stack trace like that.
So I have those question:
How should I interpret/read those information, what's the meaning of every piece of information?
Is there a way to leverage those information to target my search for the problem?
Is there a way to get those information while debugging in VS2012
Notes:
I'm not asking what an Access Violation is
I tagged this as c# and c++ because my code is in c# but the exception is generated (I'm semi-guessing) by c++ implementation for the WebBrowser component
edit:
I tried setting the Debug type to Native only, this let me obtain the same info I had in the crash report on the dev center. This way the debugger break when the exception is thrown and let me see the disassebled code, unfortunately there's no qcdx9um8960 .pdb file (even on Microsoft Symbol Server), so I don't know the function name that caused the error.
Curiously, a search on the web for the image name "qcdx9um8960" returns several results referencing Windows Phone 8 and the WebBrowser control. Gathering the answers and replies (some even by MSFT), here is what you should possibly look into:
If you upgraded your application from Windows Phone 6/7 to 8, make sure you are not still referencing any 6/7 DLLs. 1
Make sure you aren't testing or publishing your software in Debug mode. There is a "qcdx9um8960.pdb" file that might be missing, causing the access violation. 1
"...there is a possible race condition known issue if the app has multiple copies of WebBrowser open. See if your code perhaps inadvertently makes more than one instance." 1
That image, "qcdx9um8960" is referencing a Qualcomm DirectX driver DLL. Perhaps it's not the WebBrowser component's fault, but the DirectX driver it might be using to render the web pages. 2
The name of the image suggests that the crash is happening on devices powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus with model number MSM8960. 3
Assuming the processor above, and cross referencing Windows phones that use that chip, you're likely looking at the issue occurring on the Nokia Lumia 920T. 3 That's not to say that the driver doesn't work on several processor architectures or phones.
There are several other hits regarding crashes and issues debugging in the presence of that DLL, so unfortunately for you, I think you might be at the mercy of some third party software that has a few unresolved issues.
References
1 Access Violation since updated to WP8
2 [Toolkit][WP8] Performance issues with DepthStencilBuffer
3 Snapdragon (system on chip)
This kind of crash "should" never be caused by managed code, so you could go looking for a case where your app invokes some system or library API incorrectly. That's tedious. And the problem might have nothing to do with your app, it might be entirely internal to someone else's code. E.g, maybe WebBrowser crashes when user browses to some evil page. Or the failing code could be running on a thread that never even runs your code. From your observation that the debugger doesn't show any message before the access violation, and the fact that there are only 2 frames on the call stack, I suspect that's most likely.
So you should focus first on getting a (fairly) reliable repro scenario: the (minimal) set of steps that will (often or usually) produce the crash. This may involve interviewing the users who experienced the crash, or maybe some test automation on your part to try to accelerate the failure rate.
Once you have that, Microsoft (or another 3rd party) will accept responsibility -- managed code is never supposed to be able to cause an unhandled exception like access violation. And the scenario might give you a hint about how you can change your app's behavior to avoid the problem, because a real fix might take a long time to be released and distributed.
I have a Windows Forms application (.NET 4) that runs fine on my development machine but crashes on two other test machines. I can load the minidump that it creates in VS2010.
Choosing to "Debug with Mixed" leads to apparently endless (I killed devenv after about 20 minutes) abuse of the CPU by Visual Studio.
When I "Debug with Native Only", it can't find the source (even though I have mirrored the source in the same folder as on the test machine). It simply says:
Unhandled exception at 0x793f5b8c in
YourWinApp.exe.hdmp: 0xC0000409: 0xc0000409.
And then shows me
Call stack location: clr.dll!793f5b8c()
How would I find out what's causing the application to crash? Can I take a full crashdump whilst the "Notify Microsoft" dialog is being displayed, and would that help?
Minidump debugging was supposed to be majorly improved in VS2010. Haven't seen a lot of evidence for it myself yet, mixed-mode debugging looks as awkward as it was before when I did some quick tests. Don't take my word for it though. Native-only is however never going to show you a managed call stack.
Tackle this at the source. Write an event handler for AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException and register it in your Main() method. Let it display the value of e.ExceptionObject.ToString() in, say, a message box. That gets you the managed stack trace of the exception. While that message box is displayed you could also snap the minidump, ought to get you closer to the crash location.
The particular exception you are getting is however definitely pointing to native C/C++ code. A buffer overflow that is corrupting the stack. Make sure you have the .pdb files for any native code your app uses. And setup the Microsoft symbol server so you get a good native stack trace from the minidump.
Edit: the fact that you don't get UnhandledException raised definitely points to stack integrity checking in the CRT. It was designed to not raise an exception but terminate the program immediately. Necessary behavior because the stack is compromised, the code cannot assume that it can be unwound safely. Given the crash location, it is likely that this check is actually done in the CLR code. I know this wasn't done in previous CLR versions but that might be different in the CLR version included with .NET 4.0
This is going to make it quite difficult to get a managed stack trace. There's a lot you can reverse-engineer from the unmanaged stack trace, as long as you setup the symbol server so that you'll get identifier names from the CLR stack frames. Post that stack trace in your question if you want help interpreting it. A bug in the CLR code is not unlikely btw, you may want to consider calling Microsoft Support. They will however need a consistent repro. They may make do with that all important stack trace if the repro is hard to come by. Setup the symbol server to get a good unmanaged stack trace. Easy in VS2010: Tools + Options, Debugging, Symbols, tick "Microsoft Symbol Servers".
You configure procdump to get full memory dump if the application has unhandled exception ,which you can debug it in VS or Windbg
And the minidump has call-stack information as watson buckets, here is one from CLR team and I wrote about the same
A brief explanation on the watson bucket information that you see in event viewer for unhandled exception
ExeFileName
Exe Assembly Version
Exe Assembly Timestamp
Full Name
Faulting Assembly version
Faulting assembly timestamp
Faulting assembly method def
Faulting method IL instruction that caused the exception
Exception type
I'm attempting to debug a .NET Compact framework C# application on a Windows Mobile 6 device using Visual Studio 2005. If execution reaches a breakpoint I have previously set, 9 times out of 10 it crashes. If it doesn't crash first time, that breakpoint will continue working correctly, even through multiple executions of the application.
I get an exception code 0xC0000005
(STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at address
0x00000000015fab774.
That's a native exception. In a managed application this is typically caused by one of your P/Invokes or a flaw in a customised version of WindowsCE.
I had an identical issue with some printer code a while back. The native exception ONLY occured during attached debug and then not all the time but sometimes all of the time. :D. It never happened in production.
The actual issue was a bad bit of C++ that got a string (well a pointer to a string) and then gobbled the next 1024 bytes onwards. Problem was, sometimes it wasn't supposed to access some of those bytes! I think it happened during debug due to either more memory being used or some curious memory alignment scenario.
We fixed that issue by passing the length of the string to the C++ call too so it didn't have to take the next 1024 blindly.
It is worth noting that there are many more possibilities that result in a 0xC0000005. Some very helpful people haved added some of those possibilities here.
If you do not have access to any of the lower level code I recommend taking this issue up with the people who provided your OS image (typically the manufactuer) as well as any providers of low level components you use. This issue is HARD to fix so I wouldn't expect a fix myself, especially if the Manufacturer is Symbol, Intermec or Datalogic (formers have shit support and the latter just fired most of their devs).
This issue seems to have been resolved after a re-install of Service Pack 1 for Visual Studio 2005
Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm running a (mostly) single threaded program (there's a main thread that does everything, the others only read stuff). I can get the application to run fine in VS2008 after a minor change (I changed the text of a form, and tab order of another form), but I can no longer get it to work outside of the debugger. Does anyone know what would cause this?
Clarification: Release mode, launched with debugger (F5) works. Debug mode, lanuched with debugger (F5) works. Debug executable, or release executable launched outside of VS or with Ctrl+F5 fail.
It uses Microsoft's Virtual Earth 3D, and it seems to crash just when the 'ring of hope' (loading ring) is about to complete.
Event log says: ".NET Runtime version 2.0.50727.3053 - Fatal Execution Engine Error (000006427F44AA6E) (80131506)"
Culprit: this line:
this.loader = PlugInLoader.CreateLoader(this.globeControl.Host);
Causes it to fail. However, the form that was working uses the exact same line without an issue. This line is nesseccary for the program to function. I have no idea what it's doing.
Another Lead the error seems to be inside the .NET framework. Application worked on another machine, attempting reinstall. Update: didn't make a difference, although when I repaired VS it kept telling me Visual Studio was crashing even though I wasn't running it.
Error
When I launch the program after a couple minutes I get:
Application has generated an exception that could not be handled.
Proccess ID=0x9CC (2508), Thread ID =0xF0C(3852).
Click OK to terminate the application.
Click CANCEL to debug the application.
The disassembly is bizarre:
0000000077EF2A90 int 3
0000000077EF2A91 int 3
0000000077EF2A92 int 3
0000000077EF2A93 int 3
0000000077EF2A94 int 3
0000000077EF2A95 int 3
0000000077EF2A96 xchg ax,ax
0000000077EF2A9A xchg ax,ax
0000000077EF2A9E xchg ax,ax
0000000077EF2AA0 int 3 <-- Crashes here
0000000077EF2AA1 ret
It repeats that same code block several times (minus on ax exchanging with itself)
Besides my computer, it has worked on every machine I've tested it on, except for a VM on my machine which won't install the .NET framework because setup downloads 0 bytes out of 0 bytes for the framework)...lovely windows.
I've had similar issues where timing conflicts were causing the failure, and my debugging (breakpoints and stepping through the code) forced the code to run in the correct order.
Try take off optimizations from the Release build (in the project settings) and see if that helps.
I fixed it, the .NET 2.0 Framework was corrupt and when I reinstalled it, everything magically started working again.
I cannot tell you what exactly the problem is, but here's what you could do to get a clue what's really happening. I assume you're using VS2008 or 2005.
Switch to release mode
Go to Debug\Exceptions, and mark all "Thrown" exceptions, like illustrated here: http://vvcap.net/db/JbWS_tzy2IpBoI7R7amm.htp
Run executable in debugger, ignore the warnings from VS that there's no debug info
It does seem that there's a win32 exception thrown some time during execution, but this way or another, you will get one or more messages from debugger explaining what kind of exception happened and where. In most cases those messages make it pretty clear what exactly went wrong
EDIT: One thing I forgot to mention is that unmanaged debugging must also be turned on, such like here (when you start program directly from IDE) or here (when you attach to running process)
Here is a support article with that error. Does that apply?
Perhaps the debugger is eating an excaption the VE3D API is throwing. In VS, do a ctrl+alt+e and change it to break whenever any exception is thrown. This can be tedius b/c it will break on all your try catch blocks, but it might give you some information.
Here is some info. about that PlugInLoader. It seems to imply it must be called from the FirstFrameRendered eventhandler. Perhaps one of your forms is doing that and one not?
Search for #if(DEBUG) directives?
Search for Debug.Assert(?
Have you googled the error? I found this thread (admittedly not horribly helpful)
I once had a similar problem with exactly the same behaviour using a plug-in-system. When loading a plug-in from a MarshalByRef-object (see example code below), it seems as if .NET creates a new AppDomain or Context for the loaded assembly. (Can anyone confirm this? I've not found any source regarding this.)
public class ProxyAssemblyLoader : MarshalByRefObject {
public Assembly GetAssembly(string path) {
return Assembly.LoadFrom(path);
}
}
Furthermore in my case the plug-in loads a different version of the mscorlib. (My app is CLR2 and the loaded is CLR4) Afterwards I used the plug-in by reflection and tried to access a value of the new mscorlib, which was loaded from the other application domain. Usually both should be usable because the mscorlib is a commonly used assembly and only loaded once (see Global Assembly Cache). But it seems as if this is not the case. But in general Microsoft advises to avoid that.
I've not exactly figured out what the problem was, but I figured out the call that causes the application to crash without any hint. Why without any hint? It crashed without any hint, because the thrown exception was only available in "the other" appdomain and not available for the main/default app domain.
The taken action was just implicit copying the value of another appdomains assembly to a local untyped value (object) in the default appdomain. This was enough to get a type identity mismatch error due different versions of the assembly. It seems as if Visual Studio could handle it, but if the application runs standalone it crashes.
This may also explains why you needed to reinstall your .NET. Maybe your installed .NET-Framework was a beta or something like that, which contained a minor difference.
In conclusion some general solutions for the problem could be:
Avoid using different versions of assemblies with different versions of the same type.
In other cases may try to load both assemblies inside the same appdomain. (As far as possible regarding the probing context.)
A solution for cross appdomain communication could be serialization of the values.
(Make sure that the correct .NET-Framework Non-Beta Version is installed.)
we found and fixed this issue with MSFT, we faced this problem with VSTO development.
Apply the following patch from MSFT.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/975954
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/974372
One thing left I think is to use WinDbg to try and debug it. Here are some links on how to use it:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/debug/windbg_part1.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/johan/archive/2007/11/13/getting-started-with-windbg-part-i.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/tess/ (good blog about debugging in general in windbg)
Thinking about it, it could also be some service or something that's clashing. Try stopping all unneeded services and closing unneeded programs (including startup ones) and see what happens then.
I had the exact same issue with one of my console applications. I determined that it was my antivirus (Avast) that was causing the issue.
Add the BIN folder to the exclusion list and disable "DeepScreen".
Then rebuild the project and try again!