Windows Phone 8.1 - Receive files with OBEX - c#

i have successfully implemented a library for sending files over Bluetooth via Obex Object Push Profile on Windows Phone 8.1 app (C#).
Anyway, I need to implement also the opposite direction (receive files via OPP) but I'm not able to find a way to override the already existing OPP system service.
The problem is that when a file is sent from a device to my windows phone application, the system service 'catch' it first (and the message "DeviceX is sharing a file with you, receive content?" is shown).
If i try to use RfcommConnectionTrigger and register a background task triggered by an incoming ObexObjectPush request, an exception raises: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070020)". I imagine that the other process is the system service.
Anyone knows out to solve this?
I report the code for the background task registration below:
string taskName = RfcommServiceId.ObexObjectPush.AsString();
if (BackgroundTaskRegistration.AllTasks.Values.SingleOrDefault(x => x.Name == taskName) == null)
{
RfcommConnectionTrigger trigger = new RfcommConnectionTrigger
{
};
trigger.InboundConnection.LocalServiceId = RfcommServiceId.ObexObjectPush;//OPPprovider.ServiceId;
BackgroundTaskBuilder builder = new BackgroundTaskBuilder
{
Name = taskName,
TaskEntryPoint = "WP_OPPServerBackgroundTask.OppTask",
};
builder.SetTrigger(trigger);
builder.Register();
}
Thanks in advance for any hint on this topic
Lorenzo

Related

How to find and list all UWP apps / packages?

My goal is to find and launch a UWP app by name (e.g. Twitter). I'm currently using an elevated desktop extension, following a guide by Stefan Wick.
In my full-trust Win32 console process, I'm currently using the PackageManager to find and list all the UWP apps, and it works on my machine. However, when I send my finalized app package to another user, nothing appears on his screen, even after running elevated.
Here's my current code:
var PkgMgr = new PackageManager();
var currUserPkgs = PkgMgr.FindPackagesForUser(string.Empty);
foreach (Package pkg in currUserPkgs)
{
string pkgName = pkg.DisplayName;
if (pkgName == "")
{
continue;
}
if (pkgName.Contains(appName) || appName.Contains(pkgName) ||
percentSimilarity(appName, pkgName) >= 0.50)
{
// we found it
appPkgName = pkg.Id.FamilyName;
break;
}
}
Why does this not bring up any packages on another user's machine? There's no error message that's called.
Also, is there another solution that can locate all UWP packages? Thank you!

USB device not valid in MonoLibUsb

I'm trying to open a USB device handle in MonoLibUsb (on Linux), but every time I open it I get IsInvalid == true on the device handle.
The USB device is definitely compatible with LibUsb as I've connected it to my Windows PC and can successfully use LibUsbDotNet to talk to it. If I try to use LibUsbDotNet in Mono the application hangs when trying to open it, so I figured LibUsbDotNet is for Windows and MonoLibUsb is for Mono (the name kind of gives it away). However, even MonoLibUsb fails to properly use the device.
So why is the device handle returned invalid?
Code
private void UsbInit() {
var sessionHandle = new MonoUsbSessionHandle();
var profileList = new MonoUsbProfileList();
profileList.Refresh(sessionHandle);
List<MonoUsbProfile> usbList = profileList.GetList().FindAll(MyVidPidPredicate);
foreach(MonoUsbProfile profile in usbList) {
var deviceHandle = profile.OpenDeviceHandle();
if (deviceHandle.IsInvalid) {
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("IsInvalid: {0} - {1}", MonoUsbSessionHandle.LastErrorCode, MonoUsbSessionHandle.LastErrorString));
}
}
}
private bool MyVidPidPredicate(MonoUsbProfile profile) {
if (profile.DeviceDescriptor.VendorID == 0xabcd && profile.DeviceDescriptor.ProductID == 0x1234)
return true;
return false;
}
Output
IsInvalid: Success -
This line in the documentation is very easy to overlook:
The user must have appropriate access permissions to the usb device before it can be used with linux.
If I'm starting the application as root (or through sudo) the device handle becomes valid.

How to write to a custom event log?

I'm trying to get my .Net Windows Service to right to a custom event log. I'm using EventLogInstaller to create the event log and source when the application is installed. I read here that it takes a while for Windows to register the source so they reccomend you restart the application before trying to write to the log.
As this is a Windows Service I didn't want to have to force a computer restart or get the user to manually start the service up, so I use this code to wait for the log to exist and then start the service automatically.
while (!(EventLog.Exists("ManageIT") || EventLog.SourceExists("ManageIT Client Service")))
{
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
System.ServiceProcess.ServiceController controller = new System.ServiceProcess.ServiceController("ManageIT.Client.Service");
controller.Start();
My problem is that events from the service are still written to the Application Log and although I can see my custom log in the Registry Editor it does not show up in the Windows 7 Event Viewer.
Any help will be much appreciated.
By default when a service is installed, the source gets associated with the Application Log.
If we change this association at a later point, the system needs a restart.
We can however prevent the association of the service with the application log, by setting autolog property to false in the service class (class which inherits from servicebase) constructor.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.serviceprocess.servicebase.autolog.aspx
Try this snippet:
edit - caveat: if the user running the code does not have administrator rights, this will throw an exception. Since this is the case (and if the user will not have these rights) best practices should be to assume the log exists, and simply write to it. see: The source was not found, but some or all event logs could not be searched
if (!EventLog.SourceExists("MyApplicationEventLog"))
{
EventSourceCreationData eventSourceData = new EventSourceCreationData("MyApplicationEventLog", "MyApplicationEventLog");
EventLog.CreateEventSource(eventSourceData);
}
using (EventLog myLogger = new EventLog("MyApplicationEventLog", ".", "MyApplicationEventLog"))
{
myLogger.WriteEntry("Error message", EventLogEntryType.Error);
myLogger.WriteEntry("Info message", EventLogEntryType.Information);
}
It sounds like you are writing to the event log like this:
EventLog.WriteEntry("Source", "Message");
This will write to the application log.
If you use the code in simons post with the creation of myLogger, you can specify the name of the Log.
I did something like this:
var logName = EventLog.LogNameFromSourceName("MyApp", Environment.MachineName);
//delete the source if it associated with the wrong Log
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(logName) & logName != "MyLog")
{
EventLog.DeleteEventSource("MyApp", Environment.MachineName);
}
if (!EventLog.SourceExists("MyApp"))
{
EventLog.CreateEventSource("MyApp", "MyLog");
}

WMEncoder Throws COMException (0x80004005) Unspecified Error

So I'm running this code
public static void ConvertToWma(string inFile, string outFile, string profileName)
{
// Create a WMEncoder object.
WMEncoder encoder = new WMEncoder();
ManualResetEvent stopped = new ManualResetEvent(false);
encoder.OnStateChange += delegate(WMENC_ENCODER_STATE enumState)
{
if (enumState == WMENC_ENCODER_STATE.WMENC_ENCODER_STOPPED)
stopped.Set();
};
// Retrieve the source group collection.
IWMEncSourceGroupCollection srcGrpColl = encoder.SourceGroupCollection;
// Add a source group to the collection.
IWMEncSourceGroup srcGrp = srcGrpColl.Add("SG_1");
// Add an audio source to the source group.
IWMEncSource srcAud = srcGrp.AddSource(WMENC_SOURCE_TYPE.WMENC_AUDIO);
srcAud.SetInput(inFile, "", "");
// Specify a file object in which to save encoded content.
IWMEncFile file = encoder.File;
file.LocalFileName = outFile;
// Choose a profile from the collection.
IWMEncProfileCollection proColl = encoder.ProfileCollection;
proColl.ProfileDirectory = AssemblyInformation.GetExecutingAssemblyDirectory();
proColl.Refresh();
IWMEncProfile pro;
for (int i = 0; i < proColl.Count; i++)
{
pro = proColl.Item(i);
if (pro.Name == profileName)
{
srcGrp.set_Profile(pro);
break;
}
}
// Start the encoding process.
// Wait until the encoding process stops before exiting the application.
encoder.SynchronizeOperation = false;
encoder.PrepareToEncode(true);
encoder.Start();
stopped.WaitOne();
}
And I get a COMException (0x80004005) when encoder.PrepareToEncode gets executed.
Some notes:
1) The process is spawned by an ASP.NET web service so it runs as NETWORK SERVICE
2) inFile and outFile are absolute local paths and their extensions are correct, in addition inFile definitely exists (this has been a source of problems in the past)
3) The program works when I run it as myself but doesn't work in the ASP.NET context.
This says to me its a security permission issue so in addition I've granted Full Control to the directory containing the program AND the directories containing the audio files to NETWORK SERVICE. So I really don't have any idea what more I can do on the security front. Any help?
Running WM Encoder SDK based app in windows service is not supported. It uses hidden windows for various reasons, and there isn't a desktop window in service. DRM would certainly fail with no user profile. Besides, even when you make your service talk to WME instance on a user's desktop, Microsoft only supports 4 concurrent requests per machine because the global lock in WME (I know, not pretty programming, but WME is old). For more scalable solutions, consider Windows Media Format SDK.
You may want to move your WM Encoder based app to Expression Encoder SDK as WM Encoder's support is ending.

What is the Fastest way to read event log on remote machine?

I am working on an application which reads eventlogs(Application) from remote machines. I am making use of EventLog class in .net and then iterating on the Log entries but this is very slow. In some cases, some machines have 40000+ log entries and it takes hours to iterate through the entries.
what is the best way to accomplish this task? Are there any other classes in .net which are faster or in any other technology?
Man, I feel your pain. We had the exact same issue in our app.
Your solution has a branch depending on what server version you're running on and what server version your "target" machine is running on.
If you're both on Vista or Windows Server 2008, you're in luck. You should look at System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventLogQuery and System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventLogReader. These are new in .net 3.5.
Basically, you can build a query in XML and ship it over to run on the remote computer. Maybe you're just searching for events of a specific type, or maybe just new events from a specific point in time. The search runs on the remote machine, and then you just get back the matching events. The new classes are much faster than the old .net 2.0 way, but again, they are only supported on Vista or Windows Server 2008.
For our app when the target is NOT on Vista/Win2008, we downloaded the raw .evt file from the remote system, and then parsed the file using its binary format. There are several sources of data about the event log format for .evt files (pre-Vista), including link text and an article I recall on codeproject.com that had some c# code.
Vista and Windows Server 2008 machines use a new .evtx format that is a new format, so you can't use the same binary parsing approach across all versions. But the new EventLogQuery and EventLogReader classes are so fast that you won't have to. It's now perfectly speedy to just use the built-in classes.
Event Log Reader is horribly slow... too slow. WTF Microsoft?
Use LogParser 2.2 - Search for C# and LogParser on the Internet (or you can use the log parser commands from the command line). I don't want to duplicate the work already contributed by others.
I pull the log from the remote system by having the log exported as an EVTX file. I then copy the file from the remote system. This process is really quick - even with a network that spans the planet (I had issues with having the log exported to a network resource). Once you have it local, you can do your searches and processing.
There are multiple reasons for having the EVTX - I won't get into the reasons why we do this.
The following is a working example of the code to save a copy of the log as an EVTX:
(Notes: "device" is the network host name or IP. "LogName" is the name of the log desired: "System", "Security", or "Application". outputPathOnRemoteSystem is the path on the remote computer, such as "c:\temp\%hostname%.%LogName%.%YYYYMMDD_HH.MM%.evtx".)
static public bool DumpLog(string device, string LogName, string outputPathOnRemoteSystem, out string errMessage)
{
bool wasExported = false;
string errorMessage = "";
try
{
System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventLogSession els = new System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventLogSession(device);
els.ExportLogAndMessages(LogName, PathType.LogName, "*", outputPathOnRemoteSystem);
wasExported = true;
}
catch (UnauthorizedAccessException e)
{
errorMessage = "Unauthorized - Access Denied: " + e.Message;
}
catch (EventLogNotFoundException e)
{
errorMessage = "Event Log Not Found: " + e.Message;
}
catch (EventLogException e)
{
errorMessage = "Export Failed: " + e.Message + ", Log: " + LogName + ", Device: " + device;
}
errMessage = errorMessage;
return wasExported;
}
A good Explanation/Example can be found on MSDN.
EventLogSession session = new EventLogSession(Environment.MachineName);
// [System/Level=2] filters out the errors
// Where "Log" is the log you want to get data from.
EventLogQuery query = new EventLogQuery("Log", PathType.LogName, "*[System/Level=2]");
EventLogReader reader = new EventLogReader(query);
for (EventRecord eventInstance = reader.ReadEvent();
null != eventInstance;
eventInstance = reader.ReadEvent())
{
// Output or save your event data here.
}
When waiting 5-20 minutes with the old code this one does it in less than 10 seconds.
Maybe WMI can help you:
WMI with C#
Have you tried using the remoting features in powershell 2.0? They allow you to execute cmdlets (like ones to read event logs) on remote machines and return the results (as objects, of course) to the calling session.
You could place a Program at those machines that save the log to file and sends it to your webapplication i think that would be alot faster as you can do the looping local but im not sure how to do it so i cant ive you any code :(
I recently did such thing via WCF callback interface however my clients interacted with the server through WCF and adding a WCF Callback was easy in my project, full code with examples is available here
Just had the same issue and want to share my solution. It makes a search through application, system and security eventlogs from 260 seconds (using EventLog) about a 100 times faster (using EventLogQuery).
And this in a way where it is possible to check if the event message contains a pattern or any other check without the requirement of FormatDescription().
My trick is to use the same mechanism as PowerShells Get-WinEvent does and then pass it through the result check.
Here is my code to find all events within last 4 days where the event message contains a filter pattern.
string[] eventLogSources = {"Application", "System", "Security"};
var messagePattern = "*Your Message Search Pattern*";
var timeStamp = DateTime.Now.AddDays(-4);
var matchingEvents = new List<EventRecord>();
foreach (var eventLogSource in eventLogSources)
{
var i = 0;
var query = string.Format("*[System[TimeCreated[#SystemTime >= '{0}']]]",
timeStamp.ToUniversalTime().ToString("o"));
var elq = new EventLogQuery(eventLogSource, PathType.LogName, query);
var elr = new EventLogReader(elq);
EventRecord entryEventRecord;
while ((entryEventRecord = elr.ReadEvent()) != null)
{
if ((entryEventRecord.Properties)
.FirstOrDefault(x => (x.Value.ToString()).Contains(messagePattern)) != null)
{
matchingEvents.Add(entryEventRecord);
i++;
}
}
}
Maybe that the remote computers could do a little bit of computing. So this way your server would only deal with relevant information. It would be a kind of cluster using the remote computer to do some light filtering and the server would the the analysis part.

Categories

Resources