I'm working with an C# .Net application that uses Cplex DLL's for an optimization operation, and during that operation I want to write status progress to a statusbar on the that initiated the operation.
This is the general layout of the specific form;
namespace ActResMain
{
public class FormOptimize : System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
private callCplex()
{
//...
cplex.Use(new Cplex_ContinuousCallback());
cplex.Solve()
}
public void Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel(String strText)
{
statusBarPanel_1.Text = strText;
statusBar1.Refresh();
}
internal class Cplex_ContinuousCallback : Cplex.ContinuousCallback
{
FormOptimize formOpt = new FormOptimize();
public override void Main()
{
//From here I want to edit the statusbar at FormOptimize. I can write progress to console without any problems, but cannot reach function "Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel".
//If I include "FormOptimize formOpt = new FormOptimize" here, i get Visual studio exception on illegal window reference.
}
}
}
}
I have also tried invoking the Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel function like this:
internal class Cplex_ContinuousCallback : Cplex.ContinuousCallback
{
FormOptimize formOpt = new FormOptimize();
public override void Main()
{
FormCollection fc = Application.OpenForms;
var mpc = fc[1];
Type type = mpc.GetType();
MethodInfo dynMethod = type.GetMethod("Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel");
dynMethod.Invoke(mpc, new object[] { String.Format("Running Optimization: {0} iterations ", Niterations)});
}
}
But then I get an exception from visual studio stating that an object created by one thread cannot be modified from another thread.
Maybe this is something stupid that I have missed, but help is greatly appriciated
EDIT: I edited the code as per Mohammad Dehghans suggestion,
public class FormOptimize : System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
private callCplex()
{
cplex.Use(new Cplex_ContinuousCallback(this));
cplex.Solve()
}
internal class Cplex_ContinuousCallback : Cplex.ContinuousCallback
{
FormOptimize _formOptimize;
public Cplex_ContinuousCallback(FormOptimize formOptimize)
{
this._formOptimize = formOptimize;
}
public override void Main()
{
if (Niterations % 10 == 0)
{
_formOptimize.Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel(0, String.Format("Running Optimization: {0} iterations ", Niterations), 0);
}
}
}
public void Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel(short panelIndex, String strText, short severity)
{
if (statusBar1.InvokeRequired)
statusBar1.Invoke(new Action<short, string, short>(Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel), panelIndex, strText, severity);
else
{
if (panelIndex == 0)
{
//...
statusBarPanel_0.Text = strText;
}
else if (panelIndex == 1)
{
//...
statusBarPanel_1.Text = strText;
}
statusBar1.Refresh();
}
}
}
But by doing that I apparently broke something, as the application just ..stops after statusBar1.Invoke() is called the first time. If I pause the debugger it says that cplex.Solve() is executing, but then nothing more happens.
First of all, you need to pass the instance of your form to the implemented callback class, so when the Main method is called, you have access to the exact instance that is being shown on the screen.
Secondly, you need to use Invoke method to update the UI controls from anther thread (I've not worked with CPLEX so far, but I guess the callback is invoked from another thread. That's usual).
Read this for more information.
The complete code could be:
public class FormOptimize : System.Windows.Forms.Form
{
private callCplex()
{
//Misc code
cplex.Use(new Cplex_ContinuousCallback(this)); // <-- passing `this`
cplex.Solve()
//Misc code
}
public void Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel(String strText)
{
if (statusBarPanel_1.InvokeRequired)
statusBarPanel_1.Invoke(Action<string>(Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel), strText);
else
{
statusBarPanel_1.Text = strText;
statusBar1.Refresh();
}
}
internal class Cplex_ContinuousCallback : Cplex.ContinuousCallback
{
FormOptimize _formOptimize;
public Cplex_ContinuousCallback(FormOptimize formOptimize)
{
this._formOptimize = formOptimize;
}
public override void Main()
{
//...
_formOptimize.Update_OptimizeStatusbarPanel(String.Format("Running Optimization: {0} iterations ", Niterations));
}
}
}
Related
I have a form (MainPage) and I set a UserControl in it some times, So I write a method in that form like this to invoke:
delegate void containerPanelCallback(UIPart uiPart);
public void IncludeUIPart(UIPart uiPart)
{
if (this.containerPanel.InvokeRequired)
{
containerPanelCallback d = new containerPanelCallback(IncludeUIPart);
containerPanel.Invoke(d, new object[] { uiPart });
}
else
{
containerPanel.Controls.Clear();
containerPanel.Controls.Add(uiPart);
}
uiPart.Size = this.containerPanel.Size;
uiPart.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
}
UIPart class inherit from UserControl that my UserControls inherit from UIPart.
This method and invoke launched like this:
public class myClass
{
...
private static MainPage _frmMain;
private static myUIPart6 UIP6;
...
public static void aMethod(/* Some arguments */)
{
UIP6 = new myUIPart6 { /* Some settings of properties */ };
_frmMain.IncludeUIPart(UIP6);
_frmMain.Show(); /*Throws an error*/
}
...
}
The error is:
Cross-thread operation not valid: Control 'MainPage' accessed from a thread other than the thread it was created on.
I found many questions and many answers here about this error, But I can't figure it out why it is throwing at _frmMain.Show();?, Should I invoke something else? Or Am I in a wrong way? Is it related to creation of Handle of my UserControl?
Try adding the following code:
public static void aMethodCaller(){
if (_frmMain.InvokeRequired)
_frmMain.Invoke(new Action(aMethod));
else
aMethod();
}
and replace all references to aMethod() in your code to aMethodCaller()
Below is the sample code:
class Foo
{
static Form _frmMain;
public static void aMethod()
{
_frmMain.Show();
}
public static void aMethodCaller()
{
if (_frmMain.InvokeRequired)
_frmMain.Invoke(new Action(aMethod));
else
aMethod();
}
}
The _frmMain.Show() isn't guarded by any invocation requirement check. So you're probably calling it in a background thread.
I was given a generic API class, that contains a custom event which always needs to be invoked by the main UI thread.
My job is to banish these invocation call from the custom class, to make it "painless".
It should be synchronized like the default events in WinForms (eg the Timer "Elapsed" event, which also needs no invocation when it published values to a text box)
Is it possible to solve this, since the custom class needs to know where to invoke?
Here's the (important part of the) code:
public class ContactSensorHelper
{
public event OnReleaseStateChanged ReleaseStateChanged;
public delegate void OnReleaseStateChanged(ContactSensorEventArgs e);
private ContactSensorEventArgs.ReleaseState recentReleaseState;
public void ReportStateChanged()
{
if (ReleaseStateChanged != null)
ReleaseStateChanged(new ContactSensorEventArgs()
{
State = recentReleaseState
});
}
public class ContactSensorEventArgs : EventArgs
{
//......
public ReleaseState State { get; set; }
//......
public enum ReleaseState
{
FullReleased,
PartlyReleased,
NotReleased
}
}
}
The call from main UI:
public void SensorInit()
{
//....
sensorHelper.ReleaseStateChanged += releaseStateChanged;
//....
}
private void releaseStateChanged(ContactSensorEventArgs e)
{
//example
textBox1.Text = e.State.ToString(); // Thread exception (obviously)
}
Does anybody have me a hint to start?
You could do this by using your own event calling, and storing a reference to the thread, when the event is attached.
With the event add/remove syntax, you can have the caller attach to the event like before, but internally you store a list, with a reference to the thread (using an AsyncOperation) and the delegate to be called (used a Tuple containing both in the example)
Below is an example. I tested it, and it worked as expected when testing, but you might have to add some locking of the list to make it thread safe in case events are added/removed simultaneously.
public class ContactSensorHelper:IDisposable
{
public delegate void OnReleaseStateChanged(ContactSensorEventArgs e);
private ContactSensorEventArgs.ReleaseState recentReleaseState;
public void ReportStateChanged()
{
if (statechangedList.Count > 0)
{
var e = new ContactSensorEventArgs()
{
State = recentReleaseState
};
statechangedList.ForEach(t =>
t.Item1.Post(o => t.Item2((ContactSensorEventArgs)o), e));
}
}
List<Tuple<AsyncOperation, OnReleaseStateChanged>> statechangedList = new List<Tuple<AsyncOperation,OnReleaseStateChanged>>();
public event OnReleaseStateChanged ReleaseStateChanged
{
add
{
var op = AsyncOperationManager.CreateOperation(null);
statechangedList.Add(Tuple.Create(op, value));
}
remove
{
var toremove = statechangedList.Where(t => t.Item2 == value).ToArray();
foreach (var t in toremove)
{
t.Item1.OperationCompleted();
statechangedList.Remove(t);
}
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
statechangedList.ForEach(t => t.Item1.OperationCompleted());
statechangedList.Clear();
}
public class ContactSensorEventArgs : EventArgs
{
//......
public ReleaseState State { get; set; }
//......
public enum ReleaseState
{
FullReleased,
PartlyReleased,
NotReleased
}
}
}
The code below throws an exception because the abstract constructor is called before the child constructor.
I need to provide an abstract class to capsule some logic from a different part of the program. However i also need to check if the abstract members are initialised correctly rigth after creation without the childclass having any influence over this.
the compiling example below should illustrate my question.
using System;
namespace Stackoverflow
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var x = new Thing(5);
var y = new Child(x);
}
}
class Child : AbstractParent
{
Thing childthing;
public Child(Thing provided) : base(){
childthing = provided;
}
public override void Initialise(){
//Exception is thrown here - childthing is still null
parentthing = childthing.Add(1);
}
}
abstract class AbstractParent
{
protected Thing parentthing;
public AbstractParent(){
Initialise();
AssertThingyNotNull();
}
private void AssertThingyNotNull(){
if (parentthing == null) throw new Exception("Waaa");
}
public abstract void Initialise();
}
class Thing
{
private int i;
public Thing(int i){
this.i = i;
}
public Thing Add(int b){
i += b;
return new Thing(i);
}
}
}
Edit #1:
Is there some way to do this by reflecting into the caller (should be the creator of child rigth?) and then reacting on the end of that call?
Edit #2:
Getting the .ctor that creates the child is easy. Manipulating the methods seems something between impossible and a bad idea.
foreach (StackFrame frame in new StackTrace().GetFrames())
{
Console.WriteLine(frame.GetMethod().Name);
}
You can't, basically. This is why you should avoid calling virtual (or abstract) members from a constructor as far as possible - you could end up with code which is running with an incomplete context. Any variable initializers are executed before the base class constructor is called, but none of the code within the constructor body is.
If you need to perform initialization and only want to do that when the derived class constructor is running, then just call Initialise from the derived class constructor to start with.
You can do something similar to what Microsoft did with InitializeComponent()
then let the children call it whenever it can.
Try this.
Edited = cleaner version.
using System;
namespace ConsoleApplication3
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var x = new Thing(5);
var y = new Child(x);
}
}
class Child : AbstractParent
{
public Child(Thing provided)
: base()
{
parentthing = provided;
base.Initialise();
}
}
abstract class AbstractParent
{
protected Thing parentthing;
public AbstractParent()
{
}
private void AssertThingyNotNull()
{
if (parentthing == null) throw new Exception("Waaa");
}
public void Initialise()
{
AssertThingyNotNull();
}
}
class Thing
{
private int i;
public Thing(int i)
{
this.i = i;
}
public Thing Add(int b)
{
i += b;
return new Thing(i);
}
}
}
I've searched Google all day and can't find the correct answer to my issue, hoping someone here can help me.
So, in the "Main" form I have the method to show a form that needs to be centered directly above the parent form (frmMain). Normally I would call ShowDialog(this) to see the parent, but for some reason I have to set the loadNewsFeedItem to static in order to see the method from the flpNewsFeedHeader : Label derrived class (below). The OnClick event triggers the method loadNewsFeedItem().
When I call this to set the parent, I'm getting the message "Keyword 'this' is not valid in a static property, static method, or static field initializer"
namespace NewsFeeds
{
public partial class FrmMain : Form
{
public static void loadNewsFeedItem()
{
frmNewsFeedView frmFeedView = new frmNewsFeedView(FrmFuncs.selFeedID);
frmFeedView.ShowDialog(this); // Error occurs on this line, when calling this via a static method
}
}
}
public class flpNewsFeedHeader : Label
{
private int FeedID = 0;
public int theFeedID
{
get { return FeedID; }
set { FeedID = value; }
}
protected override void OnClick(EventArgs e)
{
FrmFuncs.selFeedID = FeedID;
Thread thrShowFeed = new Thread(new ThreadStart(FrmMain.loadNewsFeedItem));
thrShowFeed.Start();
}
}
Can someone please give me a corrected code example or a hint as to how to get the loadNewsFeedItem() to be visible without setting the accessor to static, or how to work around this in a static accessor?
Thanks in advance!
Chris
Edit: used ActiveForm for owner.
public partial class FrmMain : Form
{
public static void loadNewsFeedItem(Form owner)
{
frmNewsFeedView frmFeedView = new frmNewsFeedView(FrmFuncs.selFeedID);
frmFeedView.ShowDialog(owner);
}
}
}
public class flpNewsFeedHeader : Label
{
private int FeedID = 0;
public int theFeedID
{
get { return FeedID; }
set { FeedID = value; }
}
protected override void OnClick(EventArgs e)
{
FrmFuncs.selFeedID = FeedID;
// Shouldn't need a new thread. Already on the GUI thread.
FrmMain.loadNewsFeedItem (System.Windows.Forms.Form.ActiveForm);
}
}
may be you mean this:
frmFeedView.Owner = System.Windows.Forms.Form.ActiveForm;
frmFeedView.ShowDialog();
In a static method, this is meaningless. One option is to skip the parameter
frmFeedView.ShowDialog();
The other option is to setup a static variable as shown below (but beware, it can have side effects if you try to open multiple instances of FrmMain)
public partial class FrmMain : Form
{
private static FrmMain staticInstance;
public FrmMain()
{
staticInstance = this;
InitializeComponent();
...
}
public static void loadNewsFeedItem()
{
frmNewsFeedView frmFeedView = new frmNewsFeedView(FrmFuncs.selFeedID);
frmFeedView.ShowDialog(staticInstance );
}
I would like to make a delegate available to an entire class. The point of this is to allow a called method from an external class' backgroundWorker to continually report back through all of it's methods (ExternalClass.Run(); calls ExternalClass.Method2(); ExternalClass.Method3(); etc and they all need to send several progress reports. It seems inefficient to have to continually pass the delegate.
I've tried initializing an instance of the delegate globally and setting it to equal the passed instance in Run(); for each method to then have available to it but I am given an error that a null object cannot be implicitly converted.
thanks!
I cannot show the code I am working with as I do not currently have it with me (it's on my laptop) but I will try to better explain now. PSEUDO-CODE:
class form1 : form {
backgroundWorker_doWork()
{
Class2.Run();
}
backgroundWorker_OnProgressChange()
{
// do this
}
}
class class2{
Run(){
OtherMethod();ThirdMethod();
}
OtherMethod(){ //need to call backgroundWorker.ReportProcess(int, string)}
ThirdMethod(){ //need to call backgroundWorker.ReportProcess(int, string)}
}
I really don't want to have to pass it every time is the point, i'd like to somehow pass it to class2
You should show your code that isn't working and the exact error message. It should be fine - here's an example:
using System;
class Demo
{
private readonly Action action;
public Demo(Action action)
{
this.action = action;
}
public void FirstMethod()
{
Console.WriteLine("In first method");
action();
}
public void SecondMethod()
{
Console.WriteLine("In second method");
action();
}
}
class Test
{
static void Main()
{
Demo demo = new Demo(() => Console.WriteLine("Action called"));
demo.FirstMethod();
demo.SecondMethod();
}
}
You can use the InvokeMethod function from a backgroundWorker to allow the worker to execute any delegate, example below (also waits for the invoke to finish, which you may not need):
BackgroundWorker Function (C++.net)
BackgroundWorkerFunction()
{
::IAsyncResult ^ThreadResult;
SetTileCount_Delegate ^SetCountDel = gcnew SetTileCount_Delegate(this, &PartDetail::SetTileCount_Function);
//RecordingContainer is the class I am invoking into
ThreadResult = this->RecordingContainer->BeginInvoke(
SetCountDel, ThisTest->RecordingsCache->Count);
WaitForInvokeTimeOutOrCompletion(ThreadResult);
}
System::Void WaitForInvokeTimeOutOrCompletion(IAsyncResult ^ThreadResult)
{
if(ThreadResult == nullptr) return;
long SleepTotal = 0;
long SleepInterval = 100;
while ((SleepTotal <= 2000) && !ThreadResult->IsCompleted)
{
ThreadResult->AsyncWaitHandle->WaitOne(SleepInterval, false);
SleepTotal += SleepInterval;
}
}