Some time ago, I designed an application to an exisitng system. The application allows updating some app in PDA's. It is a kind of a remote updater. It uses web service.
Before I designed the application I had read some articles about WCF - technology. Then, I found a piece of information about comparision between SOAP protocol and REST architecture. Then I understood that REST is more useful for devices such as mobile or PDA's. Because of REST requires less data than SOAP. Obviously, I read more about REST that it uses HTTP methods and I know a lot about it.
As a result, I decided to use the REST architecture and everything was good. The application is still using.
Recently, I have changed my job. There is an application which uses a web service to sending data to PDA's. The web service uses SOAP protocol. I was very surprised when I have seen it first time. In my job, nobody can't tell me about it with some reasons.
Summarizing my story, I need to know that I am right that REST is a better option for a web service when we need to connect with PDA's or both option are correct. I don't need some description between SOAP vs. REST. I would like to receive a precision answer.
Related
I have this Windows Service that communicates with TCP/IP.
What I want to know is a method for a Windows Form Application to able to modify the setting of this service, such as remote host address and port to connect, timeout length, and log settings.
I have researched about NamedPipe, WCF Service, and IPC, but I can't decide what matches my scenario the best.
Will be nice to able to change the service settings by doing something like this from the client side.
[Service].SetTimeout(3000);
Any suggestions?
If you want that kind of programmatic control, then WCF is your best bet. With WCF, you get to define the API yourself, e.g., what methods to call, what messages to pass, etc. The WCF framework takes care of exchanging the data for you. And with the WCF config files, changing the back-end data exchange mechanism is trivial. For example, you could replace a NetNamedPipeBinding used for same-machine communication with a NetTcpBinding for cross-machine communication simply by modifying the config file(s). Full disclosure, though, if you haven't done WCF before, my experience was that the barrier to entry was pretty high. Of course, I took my lumps with Visual Studio 2008. It might be much easier in a more recent version. Here's an answer I gave a while back with some tutorials that helped me.
For me personally, I've replaced the early WCF implementation with a TCP-based version over localhost in the project I work on. The front-end application receives constant information from the Windows service when things are "running," and at the time of our decision, WCF streaming was not documented very well. We also saw evidence of problems, although that might simply be because we did it wrong. In any case, I'm very pleased with the solution we've come up with.
I can't speak to named pipes directly, but from what I've read, they're easy to use.
HTH.
currently my WCF Service is using net.pipes to talk on local machine.
Now I want to consume the web service in java on the same machine.
Here I have some questions:
Which binding I have to use to talk on local machine with Java client?
I don't want to go over network and the client must be able to consume the web service.
Do you may have any articles or tipps how to start here? May some hints what I have to take care about?
BasicHttpBinding exposes a SOAP 1.1 wsdl which is probably the most interoperable between JAVA and .NET. If your calls are local then you won't go out to the network.
EDIT
WsHttpBinding supports SOAP 1.2 which is a larger, more complex specification and therefore more open to interpretation by different vendors. So while it may work fine, it will generally be less interoperable.
Specifically there may be differences in the way security is handled on either side (see here for a good explanation).
I need multiple clients that talk to a WCF service. The WCF service also must be able to connect to any one of the clients also.
So - it sounds like the server and the clients need to have both a WCF server and client built into each one.
Is this correct or is there some way to do this?
I was looking at NetPeerTcpBinding, but that is obsolete. To be fair I'm not sure if that is a valid solution either.
Background:
I plan to have a Windows service installed on hundreds of machines in our network with a WCF service and a WCF client built in.
I will have one Windows service installed on a server with a WCF service and a client built in.
I will have a Windows Forms application
I will have a database
The clients on the network will connect to the service running on the server in order to insert some information on the database.
The user will use the Windows Forms application to connect to the Windows service on the server and this Windows service will connect to the relevant client on the factory floor (to allow remote browsing of files and folders).
Hence I believe the machines on the floor and the server both require a WCF cleint and service built in.
The reason people are recommending wsHttpDualBinding is because it is in itself a secure and interoperable binding that is designed for use with duplex service contracts that allows both services and clients to send and receive messages.
The type of communication mentioned 'duplex' has several variations. Half and Full are the simplest.
Half Duplex: Works like a walkie-talkie, one person may speak at any given time.
Full Duplex: Like a phone, any person may speak at any given time.
Each will introduce a benefit and a problem, they also provide ways to build this communication more effectively based upon your needs.
I'm slightly confused, but I'll attempt to clarify.
You have an assortment of approaches that may occur here, a Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) Service requires the following:
Address
Binding
Contract
Those are essentially the "ABC's" for WCF. The creation of those depicts a picture like this:
As you can see the Service will contain:
Host
Service
Client
The host houses the service which the client will consume so those service methods perform a desired task. An example representation:
As you see Client-1 is going through the Internet (HTTP, HTTPS, etc.) then will hit the Host, which will have the service perform those tasks.
Now Client-n is consuming the service locally, so it is talking over (TCP, etc.) as an example.
The easiest way to remember: One service can be consumed by however many clients require those methods to perform a task. You can create very complex models using a service-oriented architecture (SOA).
All WCF is, is a mean to connect your application to a host or
centralized location you may not have access to.
As you can see in the above image, the Client communicates through a Service to the Host. Which performs a series of task. WCF will talk over an array of protocols. Hopefully this will provide a better understanding of how WCF is structured.
There are a lot of tutorials and even post to get you started. Some excellent books such as "WCF Step by Step".
Essentially your looking for an asynchronous full duplex connection, or a synchronous full duplex service. As mentioned above, your task in essence is the point of a Service.
The question: How does this work best?
It will boil down to your design. There are limitations and structures that you will need to adhere to to truly optimize it for your goal.
Such obstacles may be:
Server Load
Communication Path
Security
Multiple Clients Altering UI / Same Data
Etc.
The list continues and continues. I'd really look up tutorials or a few books on WCF. Here are a few:
WCF Step by Step
WCF Multi-Tier Development
WCF Service Development
They will help you work with the service structure to adhere to your desired goal.
Remember the "ABCs" for the most success with WCF.
Use wsDualHttpBinding if you want your service communicate with your clients.
Read WS Dual HTTP.
You might want to try out creating a WCF service using netTcpBinding. It will work for your requirements. You can use the article How to: Use netTcpBinding with Windows Authentication and Transport Security in WCF Calling from Windows Forms as a start:
Also, there are many examples included within the WCF Samples package which you can use.
I would like to have a client application and web application (or service, no UI) and I would like to connect to said web service from within my desktop application and to have two simultaneous network stream, one of them for uploading data and reading them on server and the other one for sending stuff to the client application.
I am not looking for a solution that uses anything more than that like WCF or anything, I just want a way to create connection between web server and my client application and exchange pure binary data. I would implement the protocol myself, I am not looking for any entities or encapsulation like WCF provides.
I don't even know what project type is the best choice here. I thought about empty ASP.NET application maybe that I'd upload on FTP but I have no idea what I should do next to make the application connectible to. I am not asking for complete solution of course, rather some articles that focus on how to make a plain and simple connection between server and client. I want server to be able to immediately update client and vice versa, that's why I am looking for a way to have stream.
Edit: I may as well say that the service is meant to be placed on ASP.NET hosting and I don't know how ports work on these, if there are any restrictions or anything.
"Web service" and "Network stream" are incompatible concepts. Web-services are (ideally) stateless and disconnected - so they work regardless of how the underlying network works. Messages are exchanged only from client-to-server and are encapsulated in HTTP request/response pairs. Hence "web service".
If you want to exchange "pure binary data" (as you put it) then you just need to work with sockets (or use .NET's TcpClient, which wraps up sockets in an easier-to-use API). ASP.NET would be inappropriate for this.
You can technically have an application that uses sockets that runs within an ASP.NET host process but this might not work depending on how security is set-up and it's also bound by the ASP.NET process lifecycle (so it is activated by IIS and can be shut-down or recycled at any time without warning).
You do not want to use ASP.NET Web Services for this (ASMX). That is a legacy technology, and should not be used for new development.
Why do you not want to use WCF? Do you believe it's too complicated? The thing about WCF is that it removes the complication of creating your own protocols.
Also, which version of .NET are you using? WCF get a lot easier to configure with .NET 4.0.
Here is simple duplex example using WCF.
Try it, check if performance you've got is enough, try to use alternative bindings ( like net.tcp). WCF is really neat tool to use. Once become more familiar with it you will love it.
Also check chapter on bindings in WCF from Learning WCF
Have a look at the MVC4 APIController. It works much like stock MVC except that methods return XML or JSON (or anything else you like).
Eg
/api/Users/Get
would could return something like
{
{"Username":"Bob", "Id":3},
{"Username":"Steve", "Id":4}
}
You can also return files and other streams by using special return types. You even get strongly typed, validated input through the use of models.
There's an example here which shows a full CRUD controller and sample AJAX calls from JS which you can replicate in your desktop app
We have a number of Windows services running in our system (built in C#). We use WCF to communicate with them and control them, since WCF offers very convenient communication with these processes.
Right now in our Windows GUI for managing, monitoring and troubleshooting the services, we simply register callbacks and receive notifications when a message is available from the service. Obviously this application is stateful and WCF provides the ability for the local delegate to be called when the maintained connection to the service indicates.
In our web application which users actually use, we'd like to use long-polling to have a status area on the web page (iframe, AJAX, whatever) which shows any issues which the services are reporting. We'd like to use a long-polling or other technique which minimizes actual polling on the network.
The problem we are running up against is that we need something to make the long-polling HTTP request against which will somehow always be running in IIS and which itself can be WCF-connected to our services and which can convert the event/delegate-based WCF response into a blocking-style long-poll response. It feels like a chicken-and-egg situation that some component in our system is always going to be in a loop, polling - and that's exactly what we are trying to avoid.
Does anyone have an example of doing this?
Well, if your services present with WCF, why not simply consume the WCF services with javsacript? Then you remove your IIS servers from the equation completely. if a user wants to see what the services are doing then they can retrieve the information directly from the service.
Here's a blog with someone showing how to do this:Call wcf service from Json