BluetoothAdapter ActionDiscoveryFinished - c#

I just started to take a look at xamarin and now I want to scan for bluetooth-devices. Therefor I use the following code:
BluetoothAdapter bluetoothAdapter = BluetoothAdapter.DefaultAdapter;
bluetoothAdapter.StartDiscovery();
And I have the following class for getting the result:
[BroadcastReceiver]
[IntentFilter(new [] {BluetoothAdapter.ActionDiscoveryFinished})]
public class BluetoothReceiver : BroadcastReceiver
{
public BluetoothReceiver()
{
}
public override void OnReceive(Context context, Intent intent)
{
if (BluetoothAdapter.ActionDiscoveryFinished.Equals(intent.Action))
{
}
}
}
I've also set the permissions for my app to BLUETOOTH and BLUETOOTH_ADMIN. Everything just works fine and the OnReceive-Method is called correctly. My problem now is: How do I get the found devices from the parameters of the OnReceive-Method?

ACTION_DISCOVERY_FINISHED doesn't tell you anything other than the discovery action has finished. https://developer.android.com/reference/android/bluetooth/BluetoothAdapter.html#ACTION_DISCOVERY_FINISHED
If you wanted to grab devices from the scan, you should read what startDiscovery() has to say regarding finding devices:
The discovery process usually involves an inquiry scan of about 12 seconds, followed by a page scan of each new device to retrieve its Bluetooth name.
This is an asynchronous call, it will return immediately. Register for ACTION_DISCOVERY_STARTED and ACTION_DISCOVERY_FINISHED intents to determine exactly when the discovery starts and completes. Register for ACTION_FOUND to be notified as remote Bluetooth devices are found.
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/bluetooth/BluetoothAdapter.html#startDiscovery()
Thus you should use ACTION_FOUND and parse the EXTRA_DEVICE for devices:
Broadcast Action: Remote device discovered.
Sent when a remote device is found during discovery.
Always contains the extra fields EXTRA_DEVICE and EXTRA_CLASS. Can contain the extra fields EXTRA_NAME and/or EXTRA_RSSI if they are available.
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/bluetooth/BluetoothDevice.html#ACTION_FOUND
In sequence of events, you would do the following:
ACTION_DISCOVERY_STARTED - Which will start discovery
ACTION_FOUND - Which will find a device
ACTION_DISCOVERY_FINISHED - Which will end discovery

As for beginner, I would recommend looking into cross-platform libraries, e.g. https://github.com/xabre/xamarin-bluetooth-le, https://github.com/aritchie/bluetoothle
This not only abstracts the platform-specific stuff, offers a simple interface to work with, but also give you multi-platform support out of the box.
I understand that this might be not the answer you're looking for, but in the end, this is what the main advantage of Xamarin is about - write once, run anywhere, etc.

Related

Does ReceiveAsync Method in 'Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Client' Consumes Internet?

I am using Azure SDKs on IoT devices. One of the methods I rely on is
public Task<Message> ReceiveAsync();
which appears in this namespace
namespace Microsoft.Azure.Devices.Client
Under this class
public sealed class DeviceClient : IDisposable
I am calling this method continuously within a while loop as follows
while (true)
{
var receivedMessage = await _deviceClient.ReceiveAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(3)).ConfigureAwait(false);
if (receivedMessage != null)
{
//Do staff
}
}
My question is: does this consume internet quotas even though the receivedMessage always shows null?
Digging through the source, you'll find three handlers:
HttpTransportHandler
MqttTransportHandler
AmqpTransportHandler
Which one is used, depends on your configuration. The HTTP one will issue a GET request per ReceiveAsync(), costing network traffic.
The MQTT handler operates on TCP or WebSockets, where keepalive traffic may be involved. But given this communication is bidirectional, most traffic that occurs involves actual messages being delivered. ReceiveAsync() simply gets the first message from the internal receive queue, if any, or waits for one to arrive, it doesn't poll.
The AMPQ handler also operates on a message queue, and I can't quite figure out whether a ReceiveAsync() will ultimately incur network traffic.

C# how to detect which keyboard is pressed? [duplicate]

I have a barcode scanner (which acts like a keyboard) and of course I have a keyboard too hooked up to a computer. The software is accepting input from both the scanner and the keyboard. I need to accept only the scanner's input. The code is written in C#. Is there a way to "disable" input from the keyboard and only accept input from the scanner?
Note:
Keyboard is part of a laptop...so it cannot be unplugged. Also, I tried putting the following code
protected override Boolean ProcessDialogKey(System.Windows.Forms.Keys keyData)
{
return true;
}
But then along with ignoring the keystrokes from the keyboard, the barcode scanner input is also ignored.
I cannot have the scanner send sentinal characters as, the scanner is being used by other applications and adding a sentinal character stream would mean modifying other code.
Also, I cannot use the timing method of determining if the input came from a barcode scanner (if its a bunch of characters followed by a pause) since the barcodes scanned could potentially be single character barcodes.
Yes, I am reading data from a stream.
I am trying to follow along with the article: Distinguishing Barcode Scanners from the Keyboard in WinForms. However I have the following questions:
I get an error NativeMethods is inaccessible due to its protection level. It seems as though I need to import a dll; is this correct? If so, how do I do it?
Which protected override void WndProc(ref Message m) definition should I use, there are two implementations in the article?
Am getting an error related to [SecurityPermission( SecurityAction.LinkDemand, Flags = SecurityPermissionFlag.UnmanagedCode)] error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'SecurityPermission' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?). How do I resolve this error?
There is also an error on the line containing: if ((from hardwareId in hardwareIds where deviceName.Contains(hardwareId) select hardwareId).Count() > 0) Error is error CS1026: ) expected.
Should I be placing all the code in the article in one .cs file called BarcodeScannerListener.cs?
Followup questions about C# solution source code posted by Nicholas Piasecki on http://nicholas.piasecki.name/blog/2009/02/distinguishing-barcode-scanners-from-the-keyboard-in-winforms/:
I was not able to open the solution in VS 2005, so I downloaded Visual C# 2008 Express Edition, and the code ran. However, after hooking up my barcode scanner and scanning a barcode, the program did not recognize the scan. I put a break point in OnBarcodeScanned method but it never got hit. I did change the App.config with the id of my Barcode scanner obtained using Device Manager. There seems to be 2 deviceNames with HID#Vid_0536&Pid_01c1 (which is obtained from Device Manager when the scanner is hooked up). I don't know if this is causing the scanning not to work. When iterating over the deviceNames, here is the list of devices I found (using the debugger):
"\??\HID#Vid_0536&Pid_01c1&MI_01#9&25ca5370&0&0000#{4d1e55b2-f16f-11cf-88cb-001111000030}"
"\??\HID#Vid_0536&Pid_01c1&MI_00#9&38e10b9&0&0000#{884b96c3-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
"\??\HID#Vid_413c&Pid_2101&MI_00#8&1966e83d&0&0000#{884b96c3-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
"\??\HID#Vid_413c&Pid_3012#7&960fae0&0&0000#{378de44c-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
"\??\Root#RDP_KBD#0000#{884b96c3-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
"\??\ACPI#PNP0303#4&2f94427b&0#{884b96c3-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
"\??\Root#RDP_MOU#0000#{378de44c-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
"\??\ACPI#PNP0F13#4&2f94427b&0#{378de44c-56ef-11d1-bc8c-00a0c91405dd}"
So there are 2 entries for HID#Vid_0536&Pid_01c1; could that be causing the scanning not to work?
OK so it seems that I had to figure out a way to not depend on the ASCII 0x04 character being sent by the scanner...since my scanner does not send that character. After that, the barcode scanned event is fired and the popup with the barcode is shown. So thanks Nicholas for your help.
You could use the Raw Input API to distinguish between the keyboard and the scanner like I did recently. It doesn't matter how many keyboard or keyboard-like devices you have hooked up; you will see a WM_INPUT before the keystroke is mapped to a device-independent virtual key that you typically see in a KeyDown event.
Far easier is to do what others have recommended and configure the scanner to send sentinel characters before and after the barcode. (You usually do this by scanning special barcodes in the back of the scanner's user manual.) Then, your main form's KeyPreview event can watch those roll end and swallow the key events for any child control if it's in the middle of a barcode read. Or, if you wanted to be fancier, you could use a low-level keyboard hook with SetWindowsHookEx() to watch for those sentinels and swallow them there (advantage of this is you could still get the event even if your app didn't have focus).
I couldn't change the sentinel values on our barcode scanners among other things so I had to go the complicated route. Was definitely painful. Keep it simple if you can!
--
Your update, seven years later: If your use case is reading from a USB barcode scanner, Windows 10 has a nice, friendly API for this built-in in Windows.Devices.PointOfService.BarcodeScanner. It's a UWP/WinRT API, but you can use it from a regular desktop app as well; that's what I'm doing now. Here's some example code for it, straight from my app, to give you the gist:
{
using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Windows;
using Windows.Devices.Enumeration;
using Windows.Devices.PointOfService;
using Windows.Storage.Streams;
using PosBarcodeScanner = Windows.Devices.PointOfService.BarcodeScanner;
public class BarcodeScanner : IBarcodeScanner, IDisposable
{
private ClaimedBarcodeScanner scanner;
public event EventHandler<BarcodeScannedEventArgs> BarcodeScanned;
~BarcodeScanner()
{
this.Dispose(false);
}
public bool Exists
{
get
{
return this.scanner != null;
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
this.Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
public async Task StartAsync()
{
if (this.scanner == null)
{
var collection = await DeviceInformation.FindAllAsync(PosBarcodeScanner.GetDeviceSelector());
if (collection != null && collection.Count > 0)
{
var identity = collection.First().Id;
var device = await PosBarcodeScanner.FromIdAsync(identity);
if (device != null)
{
this.scanner = await device.ClaimScannerAsync();
if (this.scanner != null)
{
this.scanner.IsDecodeDataEnabled = true;
this.scanner.ReleaseDeviceRequested += WhenScannerReleaseDeviceRequested;
this.scanner.DataReceived += WhenScannerDataReceived;
await this.scanner.EnableAsync();
}
}
}
}
}
private void WhenScannerDataReceived(object sender, BarcodeScannerDataReceivedEventArgs args)
{
var data = args.Report.ScanDataLabel;
using (var reader = DataReader.FromBuffer(data))
{
var text = reader.ReadString(data.Length);
var bsea = new BarcodeScannedEventArgs(text);
this.BarcodeScanned?.Invoke(this, bsea);
}
}
private void WhenScannerReleaseDeviceRequested(object sender, ClaimedBarcodeScanner args)
{
args.RetainDevice();
}
private void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (disposing)
{
this.scanner = null;
}
}
}
}
Granted, you'll need a barcode scanner that supports the USB HID POS and isn't just a keyboard wedge. If your scanner is just a keyboard wedge, I recommend picking up something like a used Honeywell 4600G off eBay for like $25. Trust me, your sanity will be worth it.
What I did in a similar situation is distinguish between a scan and a user typing by looking at the speed of the input.
Lots of characters very close together then a pause is a scan. Anything else is keyboard input.
I don't know exactly your requirements, so maybe that won't do for you, but it's the best I've got :)
It depends on the way you are interacting with the device. Anyway it wont be a C# solution, it will be some other library. Are you reading data from a stream? If you are just taking keystrokes, there may be nothing you can do about it.
I know this is an old thread, found it by searching barcode scanning in WIN10.
Just a few notes in case someone needs it.
These scanners from Honeywell have several USB interfaces.
One is a keyboard + Hid Point of sales (composite device).
Also there are CDC-ACM (ComPort emulation) and Hid Point of sales (alone) + more.
By default the scanners expose a serial number, so the host can distinguish between many devices (I had once +20 connected). There is a command to disable the serial number though!
The newer models behave the same in this regard.
If you want to see it live, try my terminal program yat3 (free on my site).
It can open all the interfaces mentioned above and is tailored for such devices.
A word to use keyboard interfaces:
Only use them as a last resort. They are slow, less reliable when it comes to exotic characters. The only good use is if you want to enter data into existing applications. If you code anyway, then reading from ComPort/HidPos-Device is easier.
look at this: http://nate.dynalias.net/dev/keyboardredirector.rails (NOT AVAILABLE ANYMORE) works great!
Specify the keyboard and the keys you want to block, and it works like a charm!
Also take a look at this: http://www.oblita.com/interception.html
You can create a C# wrapper for it - it also works like a charm..
I think you might be able to distinguish multiple keyboards through DirectX API, or if that doesn't work, through raw input API.
I have successfully accomplished what you folks are looking for here. I have an application that receives all barcode character data from a Honeywell/Metrologic barcode scanner. No other application on the system receives the data from the scanner, and the keyboard continues to function normally.
My application uses a combination of raw input and the dreaded low-level keyboard hook system. Contrary to what is written here, I found that the wm_input message is received before the keyboard hook function is called. My code to process the wm_input message basically sets a boolean variable to specify whether or not the received character is from the scanner. The keyboard hook function, called immediately after the wm_input is processed, swallows the scanner’s pseudo-keyboard data, preventing the data from being received by other applications.
The keyboard hook function has to be placed in an dll since you want to intercept all system keyboard messages. Also, a memory mapped file has to be used for the wm_input processing code to communicate with the dll.

BLE advert -- get the device display name

It's pretty straightforward to listen for BLE advertisements and get the BluetoothAddress, signal strength etc from the advert. This page says
Once you have the address, you can call BluetoothLEDevice.FromBluetoothAddressAsync to get a reference to the device.
so I did and this gave me a BluetoothLEDevice object with a Name property. Unfortunately the name is frequently - but not always - an empty string.
When I interactively scan for Bluetooth devices, Windows shows me a list of names for devices it can see (excluding already paired devices). It does this very quickly and it shows a number of devices that don't ever show up in the names accumulated from advertising.
Is there a reliable strategy for quickly obtaining the name normally shown when computers and phones list unpaired devices?
I tried the suggestion from Emil, and while this simplifies my code by eliminating the need to obtain a BluetoothLEDevice object, the fundamental problem remains: advertisements cannot be relied upon to supply a name. They don't even contain meaningful manufacturer data.
The code currently looks like this
BluetoothLEAdvertisementWatcher watcher = new BluetoothLEAdvertisementWatcher();
...
watcher.Received += OnAdvertisementReceived;
watcher.Start();
...
private void BleAdvertHandlerAsync(BluetoothLEAdvertisementReceivedEventArgs args)
{
var localName = args.Advertisement.LocalName;
...
}
Fishing the local name into a variable sidesteps the fact that resolving the value entails a COM call which is not allowed in a breakpoint expression.
Playing with the switches on my mouse and keyboard, which can be paired with three different hosts and switched between them, I notice that when I tell them to connect to another host I immediately get advertisements containing names. If the host isn't present there is a steady stream of them that ceases when I switch back to my computer and a session is established.
This suggests that advertisements are not the way Windows populates its list of unpaired hosts.
If you use the advertisement watcher you can check the BluetoothLEAdvertisement.LocalName property.
For your second question, maybe your phone is discovered through Bluetooth Classic?

Starting application from service running as SYSTEM that can interact with the user

I currently have a single application that needs to be started from a windows service that i am coding in .net 3.5. This application is currently running as the user who ran the service, in my case the SYSTEM user. If running as the SYSTEM user it does not show the application to the users desktop. Thoughts? advice?
//constructor
private Process ETCHNotify = new Process();
//StartService()
ETCHNotify.StartInfo.FileName = baseDir + "\\EtchNotify.exe";
ETCHNotify.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
//BackgroundWorkerThread_DoWork()
if (!systemData.GetUserName().Equals(""))
{
// start ETCHNotify
try {
ETCHNotify.Start();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
systemData.Run("ERR: Notify can't start: " + ex.Message);
}
}
I only execute the try/catch if the function i have written GetUserName() (which determines the username of the user running explorer.exe) is not null
again to reiterate: desired functionality is that this starts ETCHNotify in a state that allows it to interact with the currently logged in user as determined by GetUserName()
Collage of some post found around (this and this)
Note that as of Windows Vista, services are strictly forbidden from interacting directly with a user:
Important: Services cannot directly interact with a user as of Windows
Vista. Therefore, the techniques mentioned in the section titled Using
an Interactive Service should not be used in new code.
This "feature" is broken, and conventional wisdom dictates that you shouldn't have been relying on it anyway. Services are not meant to provide a UI or allow any type of direct user interaction. Microsoft has been cautioning that this feature be avoided since the early days of Windows NT because of the possible security risks.
There are some possible workarounds, however, if you absolutely must have this functionality. But I strongly urge you to consider its necessity carefully and explore alternative designs for your service.
Use WTSEnumerateSessions to find the right desktop, then CreateProcessAsUser to start the application on that desktop (you pass it the handle of the desktop as part of the STARTUPINFO structure) is correct.
However, I would strongly recommend against doing this. In some environments, such as Terminal Server hosts with many active users, determining which desktop is the 'active' one isn't easy, and may not even be possible.
A more conventional approach would be to put a shortcut to a small client app for your service in the global startup group. This app will then launch along with every user session, and can be used start other apps (if so desired) without any juggling of user credentials, sessions and/or desktops.
Ultimately in order to solve this i took the advice of #marco and the posts he mentioned. I have created the service to be entirely independent of the tray application that interacts with the user. I did however install the Tray application via registry 'start up' methods with the service. The Service installer will now install the application which interacts with the user as well... This was the safest and most complete method.
thanks for your help everyone.
I wasn't going to answer this since you already answered it, (and it's oh, what? going on 2.5 years OLD now!?) But there are ALWAYS those people who are searching for this same topic, and reading the answers...
In order to get my service to Interact with the Desktop, no matter WHAT desktop, nor, how MANY desktops, nor if the service was even running on the SAME COMPUTER as the desktop app!! None of that matters with what I got here... I won't bore you with the details, I'll just give you the meat and potatoes, and you and let me know if you want to see more...
Ok. First thing I did was create an Advertisement Service. This is a thread that the service runs, opens up a UDP socket to listen for broadcasts on the network. Then, using the same piece of code, I shared it with the client app, but it calls up Advertise.CLIENT, rather than Advertise.SERVER... The CLIENT opens the port I expect the service to be on, and broadcasts a message, "Hello... Is there anybody out there??", asking if they're there ANY servers listening, and if so, reply back to THIS IP address with your computer name, IP Address and port # where I can find the .NET remoting Services..." Then it waits a small amount of time-out time, gathers up the responses it gets, and if it's more than one, it presents the user with a dialog box and a list of services that responded... The Client then selects one, or, if only ONE responded, it will call Connect((TServerResponse) res); on that, to get connected up. At this point, the server is using Remoting Services with the WellKnownClientType, and WellKnownServerType to put itself out there...
I don't think you are too interested in my "Auto-Service locater", because a lot of people frown on UDP, even more so when your app start broadcasting on large networks. So, I'm assuming you'd be more interested in my RemotingHelper, that gets the client connected up to the server. It looks like this:
public static Object GetObject(Type type)
{
try {
if(_wellKnownTypes == null) {
InitTypeCache();
}
WellKnownClientTypeEntry entr = (WellKnownClientTypeEntry)_wellKnownTypes[type];
if(entr == null) {
throw new RemotingException("Type not found!");
}
return System.Activator.GetObject(entr.ObjectType, entr.ObjectUrl);
} catch(System.Net.Sockets.SocketException sex) {
DebugHelper.Debug.OutputDebugString("SocketException occured in RemotingHelper::GetObject(). Error: {0}.", sex.Message);
Disconnect();
if(Connect()) {
return GetObject(type);
}
}
return null;
}
private static void InitTypeCache()
{
if(m_AdvertiseServer == null) {
throw new RemotingException("AdvertisementServer cannot be null when connecting to a server.");
}
_wellKnownTypes = new Dictionary<Type, WellKnownClientTypeEntry>();
Dictionary<string, object> channelProperties = new Dictionary<string, object>();
channelProperties["port"] = 0;
channelProperties["name"] = m_AdvertiseServer.ChannelName;
Dictionary<string, object> binFormatterProperties = new Dictionary<string, object>();
binFormatterProperties["typeFilterLevel"] = "Full";
if(Environment.UserInteractive) {
BinaryServerFormatterSinkProvider binFormatterProvider = new BinaryServerFormatterSinkProvider(binFormatterProperties, null);
_serverChannel = new TcpServerChannel(channelProperties, binFormatterProvider);
// LEF: Only if we are coming form OUTSIDE the SERVICE do we want to register the channel, since the SERVICE already has this
// channel registered in this AppDomain.
ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(_serverChannel, false);
}
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Write(string.Format("Registering: {0}...\n", typeof(IPawnStatServiceStatus)));
RegisterType(typeof(IPawnStatServiceStatus),m_AdvertiseServer.RunningStatusURL.ToString());
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Write(string.Format("Registering: {0}...\n", typeof(IPawnStatService)));
RegisterType(typeof(IPawnStatService), m_AdvertiseServer.RunningServerURL.ToString());
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Write(string.Format("Registering: {0}...\n", typeof(IServiceConfiguration)));
RegisterType(typeof(IServiceConfiguration), m_AdvertiseServer.RunningConfigURL.ToString());
}
[SecurityPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Flags=SecurityPermissionFlag.RemotingConfiguration, RemotingConfiguration=true)]
public static void RegisterType(Type type, string serviceUrl)
{
WellKnownClientTypeEntry clientType = new WellKnownClientTypeEntry(type, serviceUrl);
if(clientType != RemotingConfiguration.IsWellKnownClientType(type)) {
RemotingConfiguration.RegisterWellKnownClientType(clientType);
}
_wellKnownTypes[type] = clientType;
}
public static bool Connect()
{
// Init the Advertisement Service, and Locate any listening services out there...
m_AdvertiseServer.InitClient();
if(m_AdvertiseServer.LocateServices(iTimeout)) {
if(!Connected) {
bConnected = true;
}
} else {
bConnected = false;
}
return Connected;
}
public static void Disconnect()
{
if(_wellKnownTypes != null) {
_wellKnownTypes.Clear();
}
_wellKnownTypes = null;
if(_serverChannel != null) {
if(Environment.UserInteractive) {
// LEF: Don't unregister the channel, because we are running from the service, and we don't want to unregister the channel...
ChannelServices.UnregisterChannel(_serverChannel);
// LEF: If we are coming from the SERVICE, we do *NOT* want to unregister the channel, since it is already registered!
_serverChannel = null;
}
}
bConnected = false;
}
}
So, THAT is meat of my remoting code, and allowed me to write a client that didn't have to be aware of where the services was installed, or how many services were running on the network. This allowed me to communicate with it over the network, or on the local machine. And it wasn't a problem to have two or more people running the app, however, yours might. Now, I have some complicated callback code in mine, where I register events to go across the remoting channel, so I have to have code that checks to see if the client is even still connected before I send the notification to the client that something happened. Plus, if you are running for more than one user, you might not want to use Singleton objects. It was fine for me, because the server OWNS the objects, and they are whatever the server SAYS they are. So, my STATS object, for example, is a Singleton. No reason to create an instance of it for EVERY connection, when everyone is going to see the same data, right?
I can provide more chunks of code if necessary. This is, of course, one TINY bit of the overall picture of what makes this work... Not to mention the subscription providers, and all that.
For the sake of completeness, I'm including the code chunk to keep your service connected for the life of the process.
public override object InitializeLifetimeService()
{
ILease lease = (ILease)base.InitializeLifetimeService();
if(lease.CurrentState == LeaseState.Initial) {
lease.InitialLeaseTime = TimeSpan.FromHours(24);
lease.SponsorshipTimeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30);
lease.RenewOnCallTime = TimeSpan.FromHours(1);
}
return lease;
}
#region ISponsor Members
[SecurityPermissionAttribute(SecurityAction.LinkDemand, Flags=SecurityPermissionFlag.Infrastructure)]
public TimeSpan Renewal(ILease lease)
{
return TimeSpan.FromHours(12);
}
#endregion
If you include the ISponsor interface as part of your server object, you can implement the above code.
Hope SOME of this is useful.
When you register your service, you can tell it to allow interactions with the desktop. You can read this oldie link http://www.codeproject.com/KB/install/cswindowsservicedesktop.aspx
Also, don't forget that you can have multiple users logged in at the same time.
Apparently on Windows Vista and newer interacting with the desktop has been made more difficult. Read this for a potential solution: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/ServiceDesktopInteraction.aspx

network sessions and sending files

Background
Hi.
I write a program that analyzes the packets for specific words contained therein. I need to analyze outgoing email, jabber, ICQ. If the words are found, the packet is blocked.I did it, but I have a problem with the files and sending email through the web.
Problems
Simple code:
while (Ndisapi.ReadPacket(hNdisapi, ref Request))
{
// some work
switch (protocol)
{
//....
case "HTTP":
// parse packet(byte[])
HTTP.HttpField field = HTTP.ParseHttp(ret);
if (field != null && field.Method == HTTP.HttpMethod.POST)
{
// analyze packet and drop if needed
DoWork();
}
}
The problem is the following. For example, I attach to email the file of 500 KB. The file will be split approximately in 340 packets. In the code above, DoWork() only for first packet will be executed.
Ok, then I need to restore session completely and pass whole session to DoWork(). I did it. But I can't wait while session is finished, because other packet( http, arp, all packets) will be suspended (And after a couple of minutes the Internet is disconnected).
Therefore, the first question:
How to solve this problem (may be advice for design program)?
Now the email, suppose this code:
switch (protocol)
{
//....
case "HTTP":
// parse packet(byte[])
var httpMimeMessage = Mime.Parse(ret);
// analyze packet and drop if needed
DoSomeWork();
break;
}
For example, we are looking for word "Finance". Then, if we open any website and there will be a word finance then packet is blocked.
Second question: How do I determine that this is the e-mail?
Thanks and sorry for my English.
To be able to analyze more than one packet/stream at the same time, you'll need to refactor your solution to use threading or some other form of multitasking and since your task appears to be both compute and io-intensive, you'll probably want to take a hard look at how to leverage event-handling at the operating system level (select, epoll, or the equivalent for your target platform).
And to answer your second question regarding email, you'll need to be able to identify and track the tcp session used to deliver email messages from client to server, assuming the session hasn't been encrypted.
As I'm sure you already know, the problem you're trying to solve is a very complicated one, requiring very specialized skills like realtime programming, deep knowledge of networking protocols, etc.
Of course, there are several "deep packet inspection" solutions out there already that do all of this for you, (typically used by public companies to fulfill regulatory requirements like Sarbanes-Oxley), but they are quite expensive.

Categories

Resources