I'm trying to select multiple columns not in a group by using linq - c#.
Using linq, I'm trying to group by ISNULL(fieldOne,''),ISNULL(fieldTo,'') and then select field_One, field_Two, field_Three for each group. So for each row that the group by would return, I want to see numerous rows.
So far I have the following, but can't seem to select all the needed columns.
var xy = tableQueryable.Where(
!string.IsNullOrEmpty(cust.field_One)
|| ! string.IsNullOrEmpty(ust.field_Two)
).GroupBy(cust=> new { field_One= cust.field_One ?? string.Empty, field_Tow = cust.field_Two ?? string.Empty}).Where(g=>g.Count()>1).AsQueryable();
Can somebody help pls?
You are pretty much there - all you are missing is a Select from the group:
var xy = tableQueryable
.Where(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(cust.first_name) || ! string.IsNullOrEmpty(ust.lastName))
.GroupBy(cust=> new { first_name = cust.first_name ?? string.Empty, last_name = cust.last_name ?? string.Empty})
.Where(g=>g.Count()>1)
.ToList() // Try to work around the cross-apply issue
.SelectMany(g => g.Select(cust => new {
Id = cust.Id
, cust.FirstName
, cust.LastName
, cust.RepId
}));
Select from each group does the projection of the fields that you want, while SelectMany dumps all the results into a flat list.
Would this work for you?
var groupsWithDuplicates = tableQueryable
.Where(c => !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(c.first_name) || !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(c.last_name))
.GroupBy(c => new { FirstName = c.first_name ?? "", LastName = c.last_name ?? "" })
.Where(group => group.Count() > 1) // Only keep groups with more than one item
.ToList();
var duplicates = groupsWithDuplicates
.SelectMany(g => g) // Flatten out groups into a single collection
.Select(c => new { c.first_name, c.last_name, c.customer_rep_id });
For me I have used following query to do the filter Customer and get the customer records group by the JobFunction. In my case the issue get resolved after adding the .AsEnumerable() after the where solve the problem.
var query = _context.Customer
.Where(x => x.JobTitle.ToUpper().Contains(searchText.ToUpper())).AsEnumerable()
.GroupBy(item => item.JobFunction,
(key, group) => new {
JobFunction = key,
CustomerRecords = group.ToList().Select(c => c).ToList()
})
.ToList();
Related
For the given data set, I want to return the unique rows for each OrderId that has the lowest number for Status, so the result would be:
I have a working query that does that:
var result = _dbContext.Orders
.GroupBy(s => s.OrderId)
.Select(group => group.OrderBy(x => x.Status).First()).ToList();
However, I would like to modify this query to only return three selected fields for each table row, rather than the dozens that exist. I know I need to add something like this:
.Select(group => new
{
OrderId = ???,
Status = ???,
Date = ???
}
But I am unable to add this to my existing query and have it still work. How can I do this?
You can try to do something like this:
var result = _dbContext.Orders
.GroupBy(s => s.OrderId)
.Select(group => group.OrderBy(x => x.Status).First())
.Select(order => new
{
OrderId = order.OrderId,
Status = order.Status,
Date = order.Date
})
.ToList();
In SQL you'd use:
SELECT OrderID,MIN(Status) as Status
FROM Orders
GROUP BY OrderID
A LINQ query is similar:
var query = context.Orders
.GroupBy(o=>o.OrderId)
.Select(g=> new {
OrderId=g.Key.OrderId,
Status=g.Min(o=>o.Status)
});
var results=query.ToList();
Am trying to refactor some data in order to display some charts.
I can't seem to figure out why using the following, it lists all the values at the top rather than being sequential like the source data.
var categories = VehicleSales.Select(v => v.name).Distinct().ToList();
var refactoredResults = new List<StackedColumnChart>();
foreach (var category in categories)
{
var subresult = VehicleSales.Where(x => x.vehicleType == category)
.GroupBy(x => x.vehicleType)
.Select(gcs => new StackedColumnChart
{
Category = category,
Values = gcs.Select(x => (int)x.data).DefaultIfEmpty(0).ToList()
}).ToList();
refactoredResults.AddRange(subresult);
}
Source Data:
Then the actual results and expected results:
Thanks in advance!
You can do that without loop and selecting a distinct values, just use GroupBy method and map each group to StackedColumnChart using Select
var refactoredResults = VehicleSales
.GroupBy(s => s.Category)
.Select(g => new StackedColumnChart
{
Category = g.Key,
Values = g.Select(s => s.Value).ToList()
})
.ToList();
If the original data is not sorted and you'll need to sort the values by week number, you can use OrderBy clause before selecting a values Values = g.OrderBy(s => s.WeekNumber).Select(s => s.Value).ToList()
I have a line like so:
var lstOfIds = db.TBL_AssocIncidentSpecialCat
.Where(x => x.IncidentId == incidentVm.ID)
.Select(t => t.SpecialCategoriesId)
.ToList();
This line gathers me a list of of the SpecialCategoriesIds. Then I have to do this:
incidentVm.LstSpecialCategories = db.TBL_SpecialCategories
.Where(x => lstOfIds.Contains(x.Id))
.Select(t => t.SpecialCategory)
.ToList();
Is there a way to combine these two lines into one? Even though it's only two lines of code.. I feel as though having to grab the Ids first then having to grab the associated property based on the Id is just an extra step and could be shortened to just one line. But I may be wrong.
Any help is appreciated.
UPDATE
incidentVm.LstSpecialCategories = db.TBL_AssocIncidentSpecialCat
.Where(x => x.IncidentId == incidentVm.ID)
.Join(
db.TBL_SpecialCategories,
x => new{Id = x.SpecialCategoriesId},
t => new{Id = t.Id},
(x,t) => {return t.SpecialCategory}
);
I am getting red squiggly under last part in Join:
A lambda expression with a statement body cannot be converted to an expression tree
You can combine the two lines using Join. Something like,
var result = db.TBL_AssocIncidentSpecialCat
.Join(
db.TBL_SpecialCategories,
ais => new { Id = ais.IncidentId },
sc => new { Id = sc.Id },
(ais, sc) => { return sc; }
)
.ToList();
C# Fiddle for this.
Update with Where Clause: You should use your Where condition after the Join.
var result = db.TBL_AssocIncidentSpecialCat
.Join(
db.TBL_SpecialCategories,
ais => new { Id = ais.IncidentId },
sc => new { Id = sc.Id },
(ais, sc) => new { ais = ais, sc = sc }
)
.Where(x => x.ais.IncidentId == 1)
.Select(y => y.sc)
.ToList();
You can try a LINQ query-style join:
incidentVm.LstSpecialCategories = (from aispc in db.TBL_AssocIncidentSpecialCat
join spc in db.TBL_SpecialCategories
on aispc.SpecialCategoriesId equals lspc.Id
where aispc.IncidentId == incidentVm.ID
select lspc.SpecialCategory).ToList();
I was able to figure this out with the help of some answers and me testing it on my own. Here is my solution:
incidentVm.LstSpecialCategories = db.TBL_AssocIncidentSpecialCat
.Where(t => t.IncidentId == incidentVm.ID)
.Join(db.TBL_SpecialCategories,
ik => ik.SpecialCategoriesId,
ok => ok.Id,
(ik, ok) => ok.SpecialCategory
)
.ToList();
Thank you for all of your help.
I am able to produce a set of results that are desirable, but I have the need to group and sum of these fields and am struggling to understand how to approach this.
In my scenario, what would be the best way to get results that will:
Have a distinct [KeyCode] (right now I get many records, same KeyCode
but different occupation details)
SUM wage and projection fields (in same query)
Here is my LINQ code:
private IQueryable<MyAbstractCustomOccupationInfoClass> GetMyAbstractCustomOccupationInfoClass(string[] regionNumbers)
{
//Get a list of wage data
var wages = _db.ProjectionAndWages
.Join(
_db.HWOLInformation,
wages => wages.KeyCode,
hwol => hwol.KeyCode,
(wages, hwol) => new { wages, hwol }
)
.Where(o => regionNumbers.Contains(o.hwol.LocationID))
.Where(o => o.wages.areaID.Equals("48"))
.Where(o => regionNumbers.Contains(o.wages.RegionNumber.Substring(4))); //regions filter, remove first 4 characters (0000)
//Join OccupationInfo table to wage data, for "full" output results
var occupations = wages.Join(
_db.OccupationInfo,
o => o.wages.KeyCode,
p => p.KeyCode,
(p, o) => new MyAbstractCustomOccupationInfoClass
{
KeyCode = o.KeyCode,
KeyTitle = o.KeyTitle,
CareerField = o.CareerField,
AverageAnnualOpeningsGrowth = p.wages.AverageAnnualOpeningsGrowth,
AverageAnnualOpeningsReplacement = p.wages.AverageAnnualOpeningsReplacement,
AverageAnnualOpeningsTotal = p.wages.AverageAnnualOpeningsTotal,
});
//TO-DO: How to Aggregate and Sum "occupations" list here & make the [KeyCode] Distinct ?
return occupations;
}
I am unsure if I should perform the Grouping mechanism on the 2nd join? Or perform a .GroupJoin()? Or have a third query?
var occupations = _db.OccupationInfo.GroupJoin(
wages,
o => o.KeyCode,
p => p.wages.KeyCode,
(o, pg) => new MyAbstractCustomOccupationInfoClass {
KeyCode = o.KeyCode,
KeyTitle = o.KeyTitle,
CareerField = o.CareerField,
AverageAnnualOpeningsGrowth = pg.Sum(p => p.wages.AverageAnnualOpeningsGrowth),
AverageAnnualOpeningsReplacement = pg.Sum(p => p.wages.AverageAnnualOpeningsReplacement),
AverageAnnualOpeningsTotal = pg.Sum(p => p.wages.AverageAnnualOpeningsTotal),
});
I wrote some entity framework select:
var query = context.MyTable
.Select(a => new
{
count = a.OtherTable.Where(b => b.id == id).Sum(c => c.value),
total = a.OtherTable2.Where(d => d.id == id) * count ...
});
I have always select total:
var query = context.MyTable
.Select(a => new
{
count = a.OtherTable.Where(b => b.id == id).Sum(c => c.value),
total = a.OtherTable2.Where(d => d.id == id) * a.OtherTable.Where(b => b.id == id).Sum(c => c.value)
});
Is it possible to select it like in my first example, because I have already retrieved the value (and how to do that) or should I select it again?
One possible approach is to use two successive selects:
var query = context.MyTable
.Select(a => new
{
count = a.OtherTable.Where(b => b.id == id).Sum(c => c.value),
total = a.OtherTable2.Where(d => d.id == id)
})
.Select(x => new
{
count = x.count,
total = x.total * x.count
};
You would simple do
var listFromDatabase = context.MyTable;
var query1 = listFromDatabase.Select(a => // do something );
var query2 = listFromDatabase.Select(a => // do something );
Although to be fair, Select requires you to return some information, and you aren't, you're somewhere getting count & total and setting their values. If you want to do that, i would advise:
var listFromDatabase = context.MyTable.ToList();
listFromDatabase.ForEach(x =>
{
count = do_some_counting;
total = do_some_totalling;
});
Note, the ToList() function stops it from being IQueryable and transforms it to a solid list, also the List object allows the Linq ForEach.
If you're going to do complex stuff inside the Select I would always do:
context.MyTable.AsEnumerable()
Because that way you're not trying to still Query from the database.
So to recap: for the top part, my point is get all the table contents into variables, use ToList() to get actual results (do a workload). Second if trying to do it from a straight Query use AsEnumerable to allow more complex functions to be used inside the Select