Develop Reference

How do I handle database-first when the database doesn't have any links (and I can't add any)?

I have been asked to write a web site that will use an existing SQL Server database. The database was designed to work with another application, and so I can't make any potentially breaking changes to it.
Unfortunately, the database does not contain a single relational link, each table is standalone.
I know you can use EF commands to scaffold a database and create entity classes, but I would like the code to know the relationships that should exist between the tables.
I thought about scaffolding the database, then modifying the created classes to include the links, but I'm not sure if that would allow EF to load related entities. Also, as I will need to add some new tables to the database, I'm worried that EF will try and create those links when I do the migration.
Is there any way to do this?

Migrating data from 2 different SQL Server databases using console app

I have 2 web applications which are let's say Legacy1 and New1. I have separate DbContext for both applications and separate databases.
Now I want to migrate data from the Legacy1 database to the New1 database. I cannot simply use copy database or export database options in SQL Server. Entities are different and I need to incorporate some logic while migrating data.
I have decided to use .Net Core Console (.Net Framework) project to do this. Do I have to add both DbContexts to this project? Also all the entities which I want to map and do the migration or is there any other way to achieve this.

Finally i found a simple approach to achieve that. I used EF DB First approach to generate edmx files for source and target databases. Which gives me access to corresponding Entities as well.
I Queried source database using source dbcontext and manipulated data as per the requirements and inserted into target database using target dbcontext. I used AutoMapper to map source entities to Target entities.
It was much simpler than i thought earlier. Hope it helps others having similar scenario.

Entity framework code first for the subset of DB tables

I would like to add new module (project) to my solution and to use entity framework code first only for subest of my database tables. I'm using ADO.NET with stored procedures in other modules. I plan to split tables from db in the future, but for now it is not possible (tables have no relations to other tables but are used by old modules) I'm not sure if it is good practise to do it in this way and I would like to ask for help.
is it possible to use EF code first for subset of the tables of my DB?
how to initialize these tables with code first? I found only solutions to drop whole
db if model doesn't match and recreate new DB. I need drop and recreate only
tables that are used in my project
is it good practise to use more approaches of the db access to one db?
do you see some problems in this approach? Now I see problem with concurency and data consistency ( if old module will operate with this tables in another approach )
Thank you.

1) Yes, it is. On one of our projects, we had database with store procedures which we migrated to use EF. But not at once. It had taken some time so we used Store procedures whit ADO.NET as well as EF together.
2) I must say I'm not sure about this. We had database already created with only few changes. But you could created tables by yourself.
3) I think better would be to call stored procedures from EF and use it on whole projects if you need them. But using both, ADO.NET and EF is ok, if you have reasons.
4) Why it would be problem if you will use transactions?

Entity framework move/archive data from one database to another

I have the following scenario:
I have a production database which is highly transactional. In order to keep queries efficient I would like to archive data from some of the tables to another database with exactly the same schema.
The relationships between tables are not very complex but any dependent objects would have to go with the archived data in order to uphold foreign key constraints.
Is there a simple way to do this using Entity Framework? I have tried to create two different contexts and add to one and delete from the other, but this is a bit of a tedious route.
If Entity Framework is not the best tool for this what is?

There is no simple way in EF5 to do this.
If your database is MSSQL you can make use of partitioning for archive tables (see http://blogs.msdn.com/b/felixmar/archive/2011/02/14/partitioning-amp-archiving-tables-in-sql-server-part-1-the-basics.aspx for more information).

Entity Framework 4 DDL

I have been using the model-first approach for about two weeks now and it works great. I also used the "Generate Database from Model" option, which results in a DDL being generated, which in turn is an SQL script that I run to create the database. If I add entities to my model and update the DDL it does not add an alter statement to entities that already exist, so if I were to run the script again it deletes previous tables and recreates them and deletes any data. Is there any way I can prevent this? Or do it differently? Or change my approach?

Try Entity Designer Database Generation Power Pack. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2010/02/08/entity-designer-database-generation-power-pack.aspx

Not really the DDL approach has two problems, and one is not really fixable:
As you found out it creates / recreates a database. No maintenance.
More important: It is stupid. As in: not smart. It can only use a very small but most common subset of what one can do in SQL Server, so it basically is only feasible for the most simplistic databases.
If you do not beliee the second point, read up the complete DDL for SQL Server in the documentation and be surprised how many things one can do for not so common settings. All are transparent to the SQL UQuery side. And the vast majority of advanced features are not usable in EF4 DDL.