I'm currently trying to use a WPF component that makes use of Application.Current from a WPF application, however due to several reasons I never call Application.Run (nor is that an option). The result is a NullReferenceException.
I'm basically trying to display multiple instances of the same WPF window from what would be a console application.
Any advice (and code samples in C#/F#) would be welcome!
Thanks in advance
Just to offer an alternative solution.
It is possible to keep an application running without any windows open. To me this feels less 'hackish'. :) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.application.shutdownmode.aspx
public class AppCode : Application
{
// Entry point method
[STAThread]
public static void Main()
{
AppCode app = new AppCode();
app.ShutdownMode = ShutdownMode.OnExplicitShutdown;
app.Run();
...
app.Shutdown();
}
}
EDIT:
Ok this got a bit cumbersome. Application.Run will block, so it needs to run in its own thread.
When it does run in its own thread, any interaction between your main thread and your ui thread had best be done by Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke. Here is some working code, that assumes you have a class that inherits from Application. I'm using a modified App.xaml/App.xaml.cs that a WPF project template creates for you, to get nice handling of ResourceDictionaries for free.
public class Program
{
// Entry point method
[STAThread]
public static void Main()
{
var thread = new System.Threading.Thread(CreateApp);
thread.SetApartmentState(System.Threading.ApartmentState.STA);
thread.Start();
// This is kinda shoddy, but the thread needs some time
// before we can invoke anything on the dispatcher
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100);
// In order to get input from the user, display a
// dialog and return the result on the dispatcher
var result = (int)Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(new Func<int>(() =>
{
var win = new MainWindow();
win.ShowDialog();
return 10;
}), null);
// Show something to the user without waiting for a result
Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(new Action(() =>
{
var win = new MainWindow();
win.ShowDialog();
}), null);
System.Console.WriteLine("result" + result);
System.Console.ReadLine();
// This doesn't really seem necessary
Application.Current.Dispatcher.InvokeShutdown();
}
private static void CreateApp()
{
App app = new App();
app.ShutdownMode = ShutdownMode.OnExplicitShutdown;
app.Run();
}
}
The following is the intended behavior of Application class:
The first open window is the MainWindow.
The only window in the list becomes the MainWindow (if others are to
be removed).
Application Class is designed to exit if no windows are present in
windows list.
Check this link.
So basically you cannot run an Application, without any window open. Keep a window open but hidden.
If I have misunderstood your problem, then perhaps the following similar cases might help:
Managing Application Resources when WPF is Hosted.
When running unit tests in Visual Studio 2008
Related
I have an unmanaged application which uses a WPF assembly for some of its user interface. Because of this arrangement Application.Current is not created automatically. So when the first WPF window is loaded, my code does this:
if (System.Windows.Application.Current == null)
{
new System.Windows.Application();
}
This works the first time and is the approach I've seen recommended.
But if the user closes the (only) WPF window, and later loads it again, even though Current == null again an exception is thrown when the Application ctor is called.
It is clear in the documentation that you can only have one Application per AppDomain - but why then is Current null and yet I can't create it?
The exception that is thrown is of type InvalidOperationException and has the message:
Cannot create more than one System.Windows.Application instance in the
same AppDomain.
Its InnerException is null.
To work around this I have tried to:
Construct Application using ShutdownMode = ShutdownMode.OnLastWindowClose
Explicitly call Current.Shutdown() when the WPF window is closed
but neither has made any difference.
Is there some other way to manually manage the lifetime of the Current object? Or should I instead attempt to create it when the unmanaged application starts, and then rely on it always being set for the lifetime of the process?
The documentation you linked states the following in its remarks section:
Only one instance of the Application class can be created per
AppDomain, to ensure shared access to a single set of
application-scope window, property, and resource data. Consequently,
the parameterless constructor of the Application class detects whether the instance being initialized is the first instance in an
AppDomain; if it is not, an InvalidOperationException is thrown.
The part I highlighted implies that it is not checking if it is the only / single application currently running, but rather that it checks if any another Application instance has been initialized before (regardless of whether or not it has been closed yet).
Taking a look at the source code of the Application class confirms this: The Application class internally uses a static flag (_appCreatedInThisAppDomain) that is set only once when initializing the first Application instance. But apparently this flag is never reset, which prevents you from creating any more Application instances within the same AppDomain.
This is easy in WinForms, not so much in WPF.
Obviously, we don't have an Application problem, we have an AppDomain problem.
I put a reasonable amount of effort into this, but couldn't get it to behave as I wanted it to, that is to destroy the old then recreate an AppDomain on a new Thread when the spacebar is pressed, I suppose that makes sense though given the scope.
It's a work around at best, and may not even be an option in your situation.
Is there some other way to manually manage the lifetime of the Current
object?
As best I can tell, the simple answer is to just maintain a WPF message loop Thread for the life of the program (via ShutdownMode.OnExplicitShutdown), and use the Application.Current.Dispatcher to display WPF objects as needed.
Here's an example of what I mean, as implemented in a managed console application:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Thread t = CreateThread();
t.Start();
bool quit = false;
while (!quit)
{
switch(Console.ReadKey().Key)
{
case ConsoleKey.Escape:
Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => Application.Current.Shutdown());
quit = true;
break;
case ConsoleKey.W:
Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() =>
{
var w = new Window() { Width = 500, Height = 500, Title = "WPF Window" };
w.Show();
});
break;
case ConsoleKey.D:
Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() =>
{
var d = new Window() { Width = 500, Height = 500, Title = "WPF Dialog" };
d.ShowDialog();
});
break;
case ConsoleKey.Spacebar:
//// Nope!
//Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => Application.Current.Shutdown());
//t = CreateThread();
//t.Start();
break;
}
};
}
static Thread CreateThread()
{
var t = new Thread(() =>
{
if (System.Windows.Application.Current == null)
{
new System.Windows.Application();
Application.Current.ShutdownMode = ShutdownMode.OnExplicitShutdown;
}
Application.Current.Run();
});
t.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA);
return t;
}
}
You'll need references to PresentationCore, PresentationFramework and WindowsBase to build this example.
I hope it at least inspires someone.
EDIT: FYI, this may not work anymore... It worked when I posted it, now two days later it does not. There was a cumulative update for .NET Framework (kb4538122) installed yesterday, but I'm not sure if this was the breaking change or not.
EDIT: I updated the code, it now works again.
I have an Console Application started as [STAThread].
That application should open a seperate Wpf UI for entering some settings.
The functions for that:
private static void openUI()
{
var application = new System.Windows.Application();
//referenced project in the same solution
var ui = new ManagerUI.MainWindow();
//blocks execution
application.Run(ui);
application.Shutdown();
}
Opening the UI for the first time works as expected.
The problem occurs when opening the UI for the second time.
I get an System.InvalidOperationException, saying that I cannot run more than one Application-Instance in the same AppDomain.
For saving ram, it must be closed between the operations.
I also tried to create the System.Windows.Application in the constructor.
But as soon as I run the application the second time, I get a very similiar exception.
The InitializeComponents() method of the UI throws an System.InvalidOperationException, saying that the Object is going to be terminated.
The StackTraces shows that the error appears when the xaml is parsed, so I conclude it cannot open it, because it is still opened by the first execution.
Neither calling ui.Close() nor calling application.Shutdown() solves the problem (Environment.Exit() closes everything, including my Console Application).
The ram profiler indicates, not everything was closed correctly because it shows an higher use after the Window was closed, than before it was opened in the firts place.
How do I properly close the Application instance, or how do I re-use it to run an Wpf Application multiple times?
Having looked at the source code for the Application class, it doesn't look like you will be able to work around this, as various static fields are initialized by the class constructor:
public Application()
{
...
lock(_globalLock)
{
if (_appCreatedInThisAppDomain == false)
{
...
_appInstance = this;
...
_appCreatedInThisAppDomain = true;
}
else
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(...);
}
}
}
...
static private object _globalLock;
static private bool _appCreatedInThisAppDomain;
static private Application _appInstance;
...
Basically the constructor sets _appCreatedInThisAppDomain to true, and as that field is private you have no way of setting it back*.
I think the only way of achieving something similar to what you want is to write a separate WPF application, then use the Process class to launch that from your console application. Alternatively, you could theoretically create a separate AppDomain to host your WPF stuff but that would be a lot more complicated.
[*] other than using Reflection, but let's not go there!
You may create a class that derives from MarshalByRefObject:
public class AppDomainWrapper : MarshalByRefObject
{
public void openUI()
{
var application = new System.Windows.Application();
var ui = new Window();
application.Run(ui);
application.Shutdown();
}
}
...and execute its openUI() method in its own application domain:
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
const int n = 2;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
{
AppDomain appDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("AppDomain");
AppDomainWrapper application = appDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap(typeof(AppDomainWrapper).Assembly.FullName, typeof(AppDomainWrapper).FullName) as AppDomainWrapper;
application.openUI();
AppDomain.Unload(appDomain);
}
}
Have a look at this question:Does a WPF Application Actually Need Application.Run?.
Basically it says, that you can open windows using window.ShowDialog() method without Application instance
The think is that Application.Run does not do anything important but run Dispatcher loop. ShowDialog have its own Dispatcher. You can create Application singleton instance however, since it contains some shared resources.
Hack(run it after application.Shutdown()). I use this in tests:
var field = typeof(Application).GetField(
"_appCreatedInThisAppDomain",
BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic) ??
throw new InvalidOperationException(
"Field is not found: _appCreatedInThisAppDomain.");
field.SetValue(null, false);
Steven Rands shows the problem.
I have the same problem in an external add-in. But I need an application object for xaml resources and a valid Application.Current.
In my eyes this is a bug. If you call Shutdown() this member should also be reset to false.
This is a tray-icon-only Windows Forms application. I'm trying to use argument to control something and change the text on the form for showing the status information.
But I found when I use argument to call it during it's running, the things I want to change are null (NotifyIcon() and MenuItem()), seems it ran a different application when I using arguments. I also tried Invoke() but there is no this definition in NotifyIcon().
Here is the code I wrote:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
if (args.Length > 0)
{
Arg_Call(args[0]);
}
if (new Mutex(true, "{XXX}").WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true))
{
Init_Tray();
Application.Run();
}
}
private static NotifyIcon trayicon;
private static void Init_Tray()
{
trayicon = new NotifyIcon() { Icon = new Icon(#"D:\projects\Icon.ico"), Text = "Waiting", Visible = true };
trayicon.Visible = true;
Application.Run();
}
private static void Arg_Call(string args)
{
trayicon.Invoke((MethodInvoker)delegate {
trayicon.Text = "OK";
}); //from: https://stackoverflow.com/a/661662/8199423
}
Where am I wrong? How to and what is the best way to change the NotifyIcon.Text property in the running form via command-line-arguments?
I am sorry I was unable to adequately explain why your question is a duplicate of the existing "single-instance-application" questions. I will try to reiterate the train of thought here:
You wrote "How to and what is the best way to change the texts in the running form via command-line-arguments?"
Your requirement involves a currently-running process, which is presenting the NotifyIcon in the task tray, and the desire to use the command-line to modify that currently-running process's state.
It is a simple fact that when you type anything on the command line, it starts a whole new process. That process is necessarily different from the process that is already running, and which is presenting the NotifyIcon in the task tray.
Putting all of the above together, we have the conclusion that you want a new process that you start on the command line to interact with an existing process. And the simplest way to achieve that goal is to use the built-in single-instance-application support found in .NET. This is because the support for single-instance-applications includes automatic passing of the new command line arguments to the previous running program. Hence, the duplicate.
As I mentioned earlier, you should try to develop the skill to generalize and see how seemingly new problems are really just old problems in disguise and which you or someone else already knows how to solve.
In the same way that all problem solving can be summarized as "break the large problem down into smaller problems, repeat as necessary until all of the smaller problems are problems you already know how to solve", programming is very often not a matter of solving new problems, but rather of recognizing how your current problem is really a problem you already know how to solve.
All that said, I have the impression that you're still having difficulty figuring out how to apply that information to your specific scenario. So, perhaps this is an opportunity to illustrate the validity of the philosophy I espouse, by showing you how your seemingly different problem really is the problem I claim it is. :)
So, let's start with your original scenario. I am not using the code you posted, because it's mostly code that isn't needed. It seemed simpler to me to start from scratch. To do that, I wrote a little TrayManager class that encapsulates the actual NotifyIcon part of the functionality:
class TrayManager : IDisposable
{
private readonly NotifyIcon _notifyIcon;
public TrayManager()
{
_notifyIcon = new NotifyIcon
{
ContextMenu = new ContextMenu(new[]
{
new MenuItem("Exit", ContextMenu_Exit)
}),
Icon = Resources.TrayIcon,
Text = "Initial value",
Visible = true
};
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
}
public void SetToolTipText(string text)
{
_notifyIcon.Text = text;
}
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
_notifyIcon.Visible = false;
}
private void ContextMenu_Exit(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Application.ExitThread();
}
~TrayManager()
{
Dispose(false);
}
}
The above hard-codes the context menu for the icon. Of course, it a real-world program, you'd probably want to decouple the menu from the above class, for greater flexibility.
The simplest way to use the above would look something like this:
static class Program
{
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
using (TrayManager trayManager = new TrayManager())
{
Application.Run();
}
}
}
So, how do we modify the above so that when you run the program again, you can change the Text property of the NotifyIcon with the command-line arguments you type? That's where the single-instance application comes in. As seen in the duplicate I marked earlier, What is the correct way to create a single-instance application?, one of the simplest ways to accomplish this is to use the Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.WindowsFormsApplicationBase class, which has built right in support for single-instance applications and a mechanism for delivering new command line arguments to the existing process.
The one little draw-back is that this class was designed for Winforms programs, with the assumption that there will be a main form. To use it will require creating a Form instance. For a program without the need for an actual form, this means creating a Form instance that is never shown, and making sure that it's never shown does require a little bit of finagling. Specifically:
class TrayOnlyApplication : WindowsFormsApplicationBase
{
public TrayOnlyApplication()
{
IsSingleInstance = true;
MainForm = new Form { ShowInTaskbar = false, WindowState = FormWindowState.Minimized };
// Default behavior for single-instance is to activate main form
// of original instance when second instance is run, which will show
// the window (i.e. reset Visible to true) and restore the window
// (i.e. reset WindowState to Normal). For a tray-only program,
// we need to force the dummy window to stay invisible.
MainForm.VisibleChanged += (s, e) => MainForm.Visible = false;
MainForm.Resize += (s, e) => MainForm.WindowState = FormWindowState.Minimized;
}
}
The only thing in the above that gives us the single-instance application behavior we want is the setting of IsSingleInstance = true;. Everything else is there just to satisfy the requirement that some Form object is present as the MainForm, without actually showing that object on the screen.
Having added the above class to the project, we can now "connect the dots". The new Program class looks like this:
static class Program
{
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
using (TrayManager trayManager = new TrayManager())
{
TrayOnlyApplication app = new TrayOnlyApplication();
app.StartupNextInstance += (s, e) => trayManager
.SetToolTipText(e.CommandLine.Count > 0 ? e.CommandLine[0] : "<no value given>");
app.Run(args);
}
}
}
You'll note two changes:
In addition to the TrayManager, which handles the NotifyIcon, we now also create the TrayOnlyApplication object, subscribing to its StartupNextInstance event so that we can receive the command line arguments given to any new instance, and use that to set the Text property of the NotifyIcon object (by passing that to the method created specifically for that purpose).
Instead of using Application.Run() to run the require message-pump loop to handle window messages, we use the Run() method our TrayOnlyApplication class inherited from the WindowsFormsApplicationBase class. Either of these methods handle message pumping while the program is running, and return control to the caller when the Application.ExitThread() method is called, so both approaches to message pumping work with the code in the TrayManager.
Now, the above example is simply a slight modification of the original version that didn't enforce single-instance operation. You might notice that it has the arguable deficiency that it always creates the tray icon, whether or not it's the first instance to run. Subsequent instances will run, create the tray icon, then immediately dismiss the icon and exit.
The WindowsFormsApplicationBase provides a mechanism to avoid this, the Startup event. While the StartupNextInstance event is raised in any instance of the application that is run when an instance already is running, the Startup event is raised only when no other instance is already running. I.e. in the instance where you actually want to do things, like show the tray icon.
We can take advantage of that event to defer creation of the NotifyIcon until we know whether we actually need it or not:
static class Program
{
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
TrayManager trayManager = null;
TrayOnlyApplication app = new TrayOnlyApplication();
// Startup is raised only when no other instance of the
// program is already running.
app.Startup += (s, e) => trayManager = new TrayManager();
// StartNextInstance is run when the program if a
// previously -run instance is still running.
app.StartupNextInstance += (s, e) => trayManager
.SetToolTipText(e.CommandLine.Count > 0 ? e.CommandLine[0] : "<no value given>");
try
{
app.Run(args);
}
finally
{
trayManager?.Dispose();
}
}
}
Note that here, we need to write the try/finally explicitly instead of using the using statement, because the using statement requires initialization of the variable when it's declared, and we want to defer initialization until later, or never, depending on which instance is being run.
(Unfortunately, there's no way to defer creation of the dummy window in the TrayOnlyApplication class, since it's required just to call the Run() method, which requires a valid Form object be already set, and the determination as to which instance is being run happens in that call, not before.)
And that's all there is to it. The above shows, clearly I hope, exactly how the single-instance application techniques available to you directly solve the problem you are asking for help with. By providing a mechanism for a newly-run instance of your program to communicate the command line arguments passed to it, to the already-running instance of the same program, that newly-run instance can cause the already-running instance to perform whatever work it needs to (such as changing the tool-tip text for the tray icon, for example).
Naturally, any similar mechanism will achieve the same result. The only important thing is to have the newly-run instance detect an existing instance, and communicate with it. It just happens that the WindowsFormsApplicationBase class provides that functionality pre-made. There are lots of other ways to do the same thing, each with their own pros and cons.
So I have a huge program and decided I should make one of the methods run in a separate thread. So I put the method in a separate class, an activated it on my form. It seemed to worked just how I wanted it to until it got to part where it gave me this error:
SendKeys cannot run inside this application because the application
is not handling Windows messages. Either change the application to
handle messages, or use the SendKeys.SendWait method.
I tried looking for the answer online. I think I saw something about how SendKeys only works in a Form or something.
Can anyone tell me a way to simulate a keystroke without using SendKeys, OR a way to get SendKeys to work in a different, non-form thread?
Your console application needs a message loop. This is done through the Application class. You will need to call Application.Run(ApplicationContext).
class MyApplicationContext : ApplicationContext
{
[STAThread]
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Create the MyApplicationContext, that derives from ApplicationContext,
// that manages when the application should exit.
MyApplicationContext context = new MyApplicationContext();
// Run the application with the specific context. It will exit when
// the task completes and calls Exit().
Application.Run(context);
}
Task backgroundTask;
// This is the constructor of the ApplicationContext, we do not want to
// block here.
private MyApplicationContext()
{
backgroundTask = Task.Factory.StartNew(BackgroundTask);
backgroundTask.ContinueWith(TaskComplete);
}
// This will allow the Application.Run(context) in the main function to
// unblock.
private void TaskComplete(Task src)
{
this.ExitThread();
}
//Perform your actual work here.
private void BackgroundTask()
{
//Stuff
SendKeys.Send("{RIGHT}");
//More stuff here
}
}
I Know this not an answer, but this how i used to do using ActiveX and Script
Set ws = CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
str = "Hi there... ~ Dont click your mouse while i am typing." & _
" ~~This is a send key example, using which you can send your keystrokes"
ws.Run("notepad.exe")
WScript.Sleep(1000)
For c=1 To Len(str)
WScript.Sleep(100) 'Increase the value for longer delay
ws.SendKeys Mid(str,c,1)
Next
Save this code as file.vbs and double click to execute in windows machine.
a web service is running with IIS.
When calling the initialize service, some libraries are dynamically loaded in order to start a wpf application.
The code compiles, runs... but the window never shows up. No exception is thrown whatsoever.
Below is the code that is executed to create the WPF application:
public void Start()
{
ThreadStart ts = Run;
Thread t = new Thread(ts);
t.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA);
t.Start();
}
[STAThread]
public void Run()
{
try
{
App app = new App();
MainWindow w = new MainWindow();
w.Show();
app.Run(w);
} catch (Exception e)
{
LogManager.GetLogger("general").Debug(e.StackTrace);
}
}
If I run that in a console application, it works perfectly:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
MyApplication app = new MyApplication();
app.Start();
Console.ReadKey();
}
But if I run it from the web service, code is correctly executed (as I can debug it, and no exceptions) but the window never shows up:
public void initialize() {
IMyApplication application = assembly.CreateInstance(namespaceValue + ".MyApplication") as IMyApplication;
application.Start();
}
I can see in the process manager that the WPF process is running... Any idea why the window does not show up ?
Regards,
Francois
Is there something special to do to grant all access/rigths to the web service ?
Check your application pool and tell me what user it uses - or if you use impersonation.
My first guess would be that this runs as a service user (with no rights to mess with a desktop and especially not with your desktop). In general I think this is a strange thing to do..
Why don't you use a Silverlight out of browser application? Why no ClickOnce?