Develop Reference

How can I take an int from script1 and use it in script2 on c# unity2D

I'm kind of new to c# and unity so you may find me stupid.
I tried using all the ways mentioned in this video and I got error after error. Here is Script2 and Script1
For errors I got this:
Assets\ItemCollector2.cs(6,14): error CS0101: The namespace '<global namespace>' already contains a definition for 'ItemCollector'
And this:
Assets\ItemCollector2.cs(19,17): error CS0111: Type 'ItemCollector' already defines a member called 'OnCollisionEnter2D' with the same parameter types
What I am trying to do here is to make a game where you get points for sorting garbage into specific trash cans (for school project). I got it working with only one trashcan where if you put trash with a tag(biolagunev) in it you get a point for it but if I make another trashcan which takes trash with different tag, it overwrites the points you got from the first trashcan which is why I want to get the number of points from trashcan1 so that I can add any amount of points to it from trashcan2.

It might be that you have 2 classes with the same name and the compiler doesn't know which to refer

Unity C# getting a variable from another script on the same GameObject

So I got the default FPSController as my GameObject.
I added a script called Controller with a bool called holding which allows me to pick up an object.
Now I want to add an if statement to the FirstPersonController script in which I can't run if hold is true. Therefore I need the bool hold in my FPScontroller script.
I tried diffrent ways to do it but every time I use
.GetComponent<Controller>
I get an error saying that Controller can not be found.
The clas from Controller is public as well as the bool hold.
They are both on the same Object.

Seems like everything seems to be fine.
What happens when in your FPSController you write
Controller controller = transform.GetComponent<Controller>();
Is controller null? Or do you get a null reference exception?

your trying to get the "controller" as a child of the script your in. try :
this.GameObject.GetComponent<Controller>
it might be:
this.gameObject.GetComponent<Controller>
but one of those will fix your problem

Any way to use object code in a User Control as a template for a new Object in a Sharepoint 2010 web part?

I'm trying to do something my teacher says can't be done; I would like to prove him wrong.
In the CreateChildControls method of my SharePoint 2010 webpart, I am referencing a User Control file called "ChartUserControl.ascx" in my project that contains the ASP.NET code for a WebChartControl object configured just the way I want it. WebChartControl has an ID of "OrderQtyChart".
What I want to do is take the code from that UserControl and use it create a new WebChartControl, called "chart", with matching configuration. I'm trying to do this because there are callbacks etc. that need to be performed on the chart after it's created to actually populate it with chart-stuff.
So, my code:
WebChartControl chart;
protected override void CreateChildControls()
{
ChartUserControl userControl = new ChartUserControl();
// referencing file ChartUserControl.ascx as an object
chart = userControl.FindControl("OrderQtyChart") as WebChartControl;
// or
chart = (WebChartControl)userControl.FindControl("OrderQtyChart");
// Trying to tell the code to create 'chart' using the code defined in object
"OrderQtyChart" located in ChartUserControl.ascx
}
Or something like that. In either instance above, 'chart' will return null.
I'm trying to use the front end code of OrderQtyChart as a template for 'chart'; they're both the same type of object and I don't get any errors until I try to create 'chart' on my page, at which point I'm told it's null.
Is there a way to do this? It would save me a ton of time not to have to configure 'chart' completely at creation time. Even if I have to reference my front-end code for OrderQtyChart a different way.
Thanks.
[Edited 7/9 for clarity]

What you are trying to do seems very well possible and I assume your teacher did not understand your question correctly. Here are a few tips on how this is done:
Object A could be one of these:
A visual control such as label or textbox. In this case your will have to traverse the visual controls from parent to child by doing direct parent.FindControl("ObjectA");
It is an instance of a class. This might be a MyClass or a new textbox that is created by code. In this case you'll have to create a public property that has a getter which returns ObjectA. although you can use FindControl in case ObjectA is a UI component that is created and added dynamically at run-time. Otherwise, you'll have to stick with property.
FindControl will not traverse the parent to child hierarchy, so you'll have to do a recursive method in order to successfully find the ObjectA or if you have access to its direct parent, call FindControl on that. More info here: http://geekswithblogs.net/QuandaryPhase/archive/2009/05/06/asp.net-recursive-findcontrol-amp-extension-methods.aspx
Page life cycle plays an important role here, so make sure that you keep it in mind or you'll end up with a null reference that is not really caused by FindControl

Gah, never mind. I realized I can just call the user control directly and I'm seriously overcomplicating this.
That's a whole new question, so I'll just start a different thread.

how to achieve calling a function dynamically, thats right the function to be called is decided from database values, using c#

the application is very large so giving a brief back ground and the problem
when the user logs in, a button is displayed having the text of the function he is allowed to call.
the function he is allowed is mapped in the database table
its made sure that the name of the actual function is same to the ones used in the db.
problem
the name is extracted, and stored as text field of button and also in a string variable.
now how am i supposed to call this function using the string variable which has the name stored in it!
like we type
name-of-function();
but here i dont know the name, the string at run time does so i cant write like
string()!!?

You will need to use reflection to do this. Here is a rough sketch of what you need to do:
// Get the Type on which your method resides:
Type t = typeof(SomeType);
// Get the method
MethodInfo m = t.GetMethod("methodNameFromDb");
// Invoke dynamically
m.Invoke(instance, null);
Depending on your actual needs you will have to modify this a little - lookup the used methods and types on MSDN: MethodInfo, Invoke

Well, no matter what you do, there is going to have to be some kind of mapping done between a database "function" and your "real" function. You can probably use Reflection using your Types and MethodInfo.
However, this sounds like a maintenance nightmare. It also sounds like you are reinventing user roles or the like. I would be very cautious about going down this path - I think it will be much more complex and problematic than you think.

C#: Attrbute for intellisense to show method only outside of assembly

Basically what I'm hoping for is something that would work like how the Obsolete attribute works with Intellisense and strikes the method text when typing out the name. What I'm looking for is an attribute that blocks the method from being seen with the assembly it's defined. Kind of like an reverse internal. Using 3.5 by the by.
Yeah sounds odd but if you need the reason why, here it is:
My current solution for lazy loading in entity framework involves having the generated many to one or one to one properties be internal and have a facade? property that is public and basically loads the internal property's value:
public ChatRoom ParentRoom
{
get
{
if(!ParentRoomInnerReference.IsLoaded)
{
ParentRoomInnerReference.Load();
}
return ParentRoomInner;
}
set
{
ParentRoomInner = value;
}
}
Problem with this is if someone tries to use the ParentRoom property in a query:
context.ChatItem.Where(item => item.ParentRoom.Id = someId)
This will blow up since it doesn't know what to do with the facade property when evaluating the expression. This isn't a huge problem since the ParentRoomInner property can be used and queries are only in the entity assembly. (IE no selects and such in the UI assembly) The only situation comes in the entity assembly since it can see both properties and it's possible that someone might forget and use the above query and blow up at runtime.
So it would be nice if there were an attribute or some way to stop the entity assembly from seeing (ie blocked by intellisense) the outward facing properties.
Basically inside the assembly see ParentRoomInner. Outside the assembly see ParentRoom. Going to guess this isn't possible but worth a try.
I do see that there is an attribute
for stopping methods from being
viewable
(System.ComponentModel.EditorBrowsable)
but it's choices are rather slim and
don't really help.

You can use the EditorBrowsableAttribute for this:
[System.ComponentModel.EditorBrowsable(System.ComponentModel.EditorBrowsableState.Never)]
public void MyMethod() {}
One thing to know, though: In c#, you will still get intellisense on the method if it is in the same assembly as the one you are working in. Someone referencing your assembly (or your project, for a project reference) will not see it though. You can also pass EditorBrowsableState.Advanced, and then you will only get intellisense if c# if you clear the HideAdvancedMembers option in Tools Options.

I haven't heard of a good way to do this in plain .NET. But, here are some ideas. Maybe one of them will work, or set you off in a direction that will be helpful.
Use FxCop, probably writing your own rule to make sure ParentRoom isn't called from the asslembly that defined it.
Look into the various post-processing projects for .NET (link design-by-contract).
Write some code inside your ParentRoom getter which will check the stack (using "new Stack()" or "new StackFrame(1)" to figure out whether the caller was from the same assembly. If so, either throw an exception or simply return ParentRoomInner.