var a = new myTestClass();
var b = new myTestClass2();
list<string> instList = new list<string>();
instList.add("b");
public void simpleFunc()
{
foreach(string i in instList){
a.fieldName = **i.myFieldName;**
//HERE i is b which refers to the instance of myTestClass2
}
what I would like to accomplish here is: create a List of string whihc are the names of class instances then inside a for each loop use the instlist strings like an instance of the class and add something to that property of that class
is this possible?
If you really want to do that, you can create a dictionary with the name as key and the instance as value. I do wonder though why you are thinking the variable name is so important... A variable name can change easily and after all, it is just a pointer to the actual object. Shouldn't you create a class to save the 'metadata' of the variable?
Dictionary<string, string> d = new Dictionary<string, string>();
d.Add(nameof(a), a);
d.Add(nameof(b), b);
string valueAtB = d["b"];
Related
I have a class that is instantiated at the beginning of each iteration of a loop. Inside the loop, it's attributes need to be populated with the row values of a table returned by a stored procedure. As I have to iterate through each column of every row, in order to know which attribute of the class needs to be assigned a value and when, I have a dictionary that maps the column names to an index. This index refers to a position in a list that stores an attribute of an instance of the class:
while (reader.Read() && reader.HasRows)
{
Subscription subscription = new Subscription();
List<string> subscrData = new List<string>
{
subscription.attr1,
subscription.attr2,
subscription.attr3,
subscription.attr4
}
Dictionary<string, int> columnDict = new Dictionary<string, int>
{
{"attr1": 0},
{"attr2":1},
{"attr3":2},
{"attr4":3}
}
foreach (string colName in columnDict.Keys)
{
if (reader.GetSchemaTable().Columns[colName] == null)
subscrData[columnDict[colName]] = "null";
else
{
subscrData[columnDict[colName]] = reader[colName].ToString();
nullsReturned = false;
}
}
I'm probably coming at this from more of a C++ approach as with that you could store references to the class instance an modify its attributes, but this doesn't work with C# because lists store the values.
How can I restructure this code so that I can modify the actual attributes of the class instance while still being able to check if each column returned from the stored procedure is not null?
You don't need the list for this case. You either want to add a method like setAttribute(string attributeName) to your class (and within it build a switch/case to modify the given attribute); or, use reflection to change an instance field given its name.
I agree with Hasan. But just for your information: to implement your approach you could make use of Lambda expressions to keep track of the references to your properties (= the attributes).
Something like this would work:
Subscription subscription = new Subscription();
List<Expression<Func<Subscription, string>>> subscrData = new List<Expression<Func<Subscription, string>>>
{
a => a.attr1,
a => a.attr2,
a => a.attr3,
a => a.attr4,
};
//E.g. To update attribute 3 you can do this:
var prop = (PropertyInfo)((MemberExpression)subscrData[2].Body).Member;
prop.SetValue(subscription, "test string", null);
I have always initialized a collection as such:-
List<Type> name = new List<Type>();
But today I saw something like this:-
var variablename = new sMonth{
x = foo;
name = new List<Type>()
};
Is that even possible? and what is the difference between the two ways?
Yes, your second snippet is an example of object initialization.
Assuming your sMonth object contains a property of type List<Type>, you can initialize the object at the point you create the outer object:
var variablename = new sMonth{
x = foo,
name = new List<Type>()
};
Note the comma between items.
Additionally, since you're not assigning anything to name you could use the sMonth constructor to initialize the collection for you:
public sMonth()
{
name = new List<Type>();
}
I want to create a list of strings whose name should be the value of string variable.
Overall I want to assign a variable value to a (object) listname.
(Pseudo Code):
string s = "listname";
list<String>.Name = s;
Closest thing you can do is use a Dictionary to reference the variables.
Dictionary<string, List<string>> myLists = new Dictionary<string, List<string>>();
var s = "listname";
myLists.Add(s, new List<string>());
// To access
var list = myLists[s];
can some one explain to me how to break the chain with a NEW statement?
Let me clarify the chain I’m talking about. When I call to a class I use the NEW statement like so
Myclass x =new Myclass();
My understanding is this creates a new empty instance of Myclass. Now correct me if I’m wrong but having a new empty instance one should be able to add what ever data the class supports?
I use this lot and would think the above to be true until adding data in such a manner
Myclass x =new Myclass();
//oldMyclass being old data that needs to be changed then
//added back to the class as a new or duplicate entry
x = oldMyclass[1];
//we change the data
x.red= 0x54;
//we add it back
oldMyclass.add(x);
All is good until we edit the data after adding it say we need to change another value.
We access the oldMyclass and select the proper item say its index is 2 but we only want to change the values of index 2
Myclass x =new Myclass();
x = oldMyclass[2];
x.red=soemvalue;
oldMyclass[2] = x;
This will change the red value of both index 1 and index 2. How can I break the chain between index 1 and index 2?
I think I might have over simplified this question let me know.
Thanks for any information.
Edit: Here is the copy method that I tried
public static Items.SavedItem Copy(Items.SavedItem old)
{
Items.SavedItem x = new Items.SavedItem();
x.generator = old.generator;
x.hireling_class = old.hireling_class;
x.id = old.id;
x.item_slot = old.item_slot;
x.owner_entity_id = old.owner_entity_id;
x.socket_id = old.socket_id;
x.square_index = old.square_index;
x.used_socket_count = old.used_socket_count;
return x;
}
So let's say, for arguments sake, you have a class like this:
public MyClass
{
public string Foo { get; set; }
}
And you have a collection
List<MyClass> myList = new List<MyClass>();
Now you create an instance of MyClass
MyClass obj1 = new MyClass() { Foo = "bar" };
Now if you do this:
myList.Add(obj1);
myList.Add(obj1);
You now have a list with TWO members, but they happen to be the same object. Whats stored in the list is a reference to the object you added, not the object itself. So myList[0] == myList[1]
Now if you did this:
MyClass item = myList[1];
And then:
item.Foo = "something else";
Both the item at index 1 and the item at index 0 will have 'Foo == "something else"' because they are the same item.
Another point that seems to be confusing you is this: myList has two items. If I do this:
MyClass item = myList[0];
myList still has two items. Indexing a collection doesn't remove it and because of that, there is no need to add the item back to the list. It's already there. All I've done is copy the reference from myList to a variable named item.
There are collections (Stack and Queue for example) that do work on the principle that you will remove items and (potentially) add them back, but List doesn't work that way.
So if you wanted to add multiple objects to myList you need to create multiple objects with the new keyword. For example:
List<MyClass> myList = new List<MyClass>();
MyClass obj1 = new MyClass() { Foo = "bar" };
myList.Add(obj1);
obj1 = new MyClass() { Foo = "something else" }; // Note: I've reused the variable, but this is a *new* object
myList.Add(obj1);
Or, if you don't need the new object assigned to a variable, you can simply if to:
List<MyClass> myList = new List<MyClass>();
myList.Add(new MyClass() { Foo = "a" });
myList.Add(new MyClass() { Foo = "b" });
Or even more compactly, you can exploit the collection initialization syntax and simply:
List<MyClass> myList = new List<MyClass>()
{
new MyClass() { Foo = "a" },
new MyClass() { Foo = "b" }
}
If you want to copy an object from your list, then you need to copy each property (and if it contains other objects, you may need to copy them too). There are various ways to do this, IClonable or a copy constructor are examples, but it basically comes down to, at some point, doing something like this:
myCopy.Foo = myOriginal.Foo;
myCopy.Bar = myOriginal.Bar;
// repeat for all properties that you want to copy.
Now assuming that Foo and Bar aren't also reference types, you have a copy. If they are reference types, you have a copy, but myCopy.Foo and myOriginal.Foo are still pointing at the same object.
How do I make a generated Object name? For example:
ObjectEx "name" = new ObjectEx();
Edit:
The object will be named by a user input.
The code will be:
Console.Write("Input new user's name: ");
string newUsersName = Console.ReadLine();
(Create ObjectEx)
Edit2:
I have a Dictionary for ObjectEx(Person) which handles all ObjectExs.
Person is the real class name, sorry about making the example object ObjectEx.
public static List<Person> persons = new List<Person>();
Objects don't have names - variables do, and they're always determined at compile-time.
If you want a map from string to object, just use a Dictionary<string, ObjectEx> - then come with random strings using Random. (There are plenty of examples of generating random strings on Stack Overflow.)
If you just want a collection of objects and you were using "random name" as a way of expressing that, use List<ObjectEx> - you don't need a name at all in that case.
If you need something else, please be more specific.
You can use array and store object in to that.
ObjectEx []arrObjectEx = new ObjectEx[10];
arrObjectEx[0] = new ObjectEx();
I would use list<T> (generic list) instead of array if the number of random elements are unknown.
List<ObjectEx> lstObjectEx = new List<ObjectEx>();
lstObjectEx.Add(new ObjectEx());
If randomly generated object need to be accessed uniquely then you can use dictionary. e.g
Dictionary<int, ObjectEx> dicObjectEx = new Dictionary<int, ObjectEx>();
dicObjectEx.Add(someUniqueNumber, new ObjectEx());
That is not possible but how about using a Dictionary. You can use a string value Add and Get hold of an Object you stored.
// somewhere near the start in your code initialize the dictionary
var dict = new Dictionary<string, Person>();
// later on you can dynamically add an Object to the Dictionary
// newUsersName is the so called Index
string newUsersName = Console.ReadLine();
dict.Add(newUsersName, new Person());
// if you need to get hold of that object again use the Index
// myObj is a Person type
var myObj = dict[newUsersName];
// assume Person has an Age property
myObj.Age = 20;
// show all Persons now in the dictionary
foreach(var username in dict.Keys)
{
Console.WriteLine(username);
var pers = dict[username];
Console.WriteLine("{0} is {1} years old", username, pers.Age );
}
You could use a dictionary to store objects, where the Key is the object name