I have the following classes structure:
public class MyObj
{
public int Number;
}
public interface IService
{
int ProcessInt(MyObj obj);
}
public class Service : IService
{
public int ProcessInt(MyObj myObj)
{
return myObj.Number;
}
}
and then the consumer class
public class Class1
{
public void Run(IService s)
{
var obj = new MyObj {Number = 1};
Console.WriteLine(s.ProcessInt(obj));
}
}
and then the unit test
[TestFixture]
public class MyTest
{
private readonly Mock<IService> _service = new Mock<IService>(MockBehavior.Strict);
private readonly Class1 _sut = new Class1();
[SetUp]
public void SetUp()
{
var obj = new MyObj {Number = 1};
_service.Setup(x => x.ProcessInt(obj)).Returns(1);
}
[Test]
public void TestClass1()
{
_sut.Run(_service.Object);
}
}
The problem I have is that when I run the unit test, I get "Moq.MockException : IService.ProcessInt(MoqStuff.MyObj) invocation failed with mock behavior Strict.All invocations on the mock must have a corresponding setup." which is weird since I have the setup for that input.
Is this an expected behavior of Moq framework? Is there any way I can fix that?
Thank you
You have this code in your SetUp method:
var obj = new MyObj {Number = 1};
_service.Setup(x => x.ProcessInt(obj)).Returns(1);
Here you set up expectation, that ProcessInt is called with this specific object obj.
However, in your method Run you create another object:
var obj = new MyObj {Number = 1};
Though property value is the same, this object is totally different from the one you created in your SetUp method. This is the reason why you get exception about missing setup.
What you can do instead is set up your service for any input parameter using It.IsAny:
[SetUp]
public void SetUp()
{
_service.Setup(x => x.ProcessInt(It.IsAny<MyObj>())).Returns(1);
}
This setup will work for any parameter value.
Or if you want to match only based on some criteria, you can use It.Is:
[SetUp]
public void SetUp()
{
// setup only for cases where obj.Number == 1
_service
.Setup(x => x.ProcessInt(It.Is<MyObj>(o => o.Number == 1 )))
.Returns(1);
// setup only for cases where obj.Number == 2
_service
.Setup(x => x.ProcessInt(It.Is<MyObj>(o => o.Number == 2 )))
.Returns(2);
}
Related
I have such service as below. Let's say i want to test Create() method. I read that in unit testing i should test by comparing, counting and so on. How could i then test my Create() method. Is it ugly to change return type from void Create to bool Create just to be able to check method output for testing purpose or that's not ideal idea? Can you propose something?
public class CreateCarService : ICreateCarService
{
private readonly ICarQuery _carQuery;
private readonly ICarRepository _carRepository;
public CreateCarService(ICarQuery carQuery, ICarRepository carRepository)
{
_carQuery = carQuery;
_carRepository = carRepository;
}
public void Create(Car car)
{
if (car == null) throw new CusException(Error, "Car object cannot be null");
if (_carQuery.IsLoginExist(car.Login))
throw new CusException(Error, "Message1");
if (_carQuery.IsEmailExist(car.Email))
throw new CusException(Error, "Message1");
_carRepository.Add(car);
}
}
You might verify that for any valid Car instance Add method was called only once, by setting up the Moq behavior of IsLoginExist and IsEmailExist method an using a Verify method
[TestFixture]
public class Test
{
[Test]
public void CreateCarServiceTest()
{
var carQueryMock = new Mock<ICarQuery>();
var carRepositoryMock = new Mock<ICarRepository>();
var createCarService = new CreateCarService(carQueryMock.Object, carRepositoryMock.Object);
carQueryMock.Setup(c => c.IsLoginExist(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(false);
carQueryMock.Setup(c => c.IsEmailExist(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(false);
createCarService.Create(new Car());
carRepositoryMock.Verify(c => c.Add(It.IsAny<Car>()), Times.Once);
}
}
It also makes sense to check a negative cases, when Create method throws an exception
[Test]
public void CreateCarNegativeTest()
{
var carQueryMock = new Mock<ICarQuery>();
var carRepositoryMock = new Mock<ICarRepository>();
var createCarService = new CreateCarService(carQueryMock.Object, carRepositoryMock.Object);
Assert.Throws<CusException>(() => createCarService.Create(null));
carQueryMock.Setup(c => c.IsLoginExist(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(true);
Assert.Throws<CusException>(() => createCarService.Create(new Car()));
carQueryMock.Setup(c => c.IsLoginExist(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(false);
carQueryMock.Setup(c => c.IsEmailExist(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(true);
Assert.Throws<CusException>(() => createCarService.Create(new Car()));
}
You can split this method into different tests to have one Assert per test, or pass the parameters to it.
You want to test the "expected behavior" of the member under test. Since the member under test does not return any verifiable output and has a dependency on external abstractions, you should be able to monitor the interaction of the member under test with that external abstractions and verify the expected behavior
One such example
public void CreateCarService_Create_Should_Add_Car() {
//Arrange
Car car = new Car {
Login = "Login",
Email = "Email"
};
ICarQuery carQuery = Mock.Of<ICarQuery>();
ICarRepository carRepository = Mock.Of<ICarRepository>();
ICreateCarService subject = new CreateCarService(carQuery, carRepository);
//Act
subject.Create(car);
//Assert
Mock.Get(carRepository).Verify(_ => _.Add(car), Times.Once);
}
The example above safely navigates through to the end of the member under test but lets say you wanted to test the exception is thrown for the null parameter case.
public void CreateCarService_Create_Should_Throw_CusException_For_Null_Car() {
//Arrange
ICreateCarService subject = new CreateCarService(null, null);
//Act
Action act = ()=> subject.Create(null);
//Assert
var ex = Assert.Throws<CusException>(act);
}
You want to create tests for all the possible paths through the member under test. So take some time and review the subject under test and work out the possible test cases. Arrange the subject to satisfy those cases and exercise those cases to verify the expected behavior.
Reference Moq Quickstart to get a better understanding of how to use the Moq mocking framework.
You don't need to change it to bool, just to test. A simple way you can do this is:
[TestFixture]
public class Test
{
CreateCarService createCarService;
ICarRepository carRepositoryMock;
[Setup]
public void InitializeTest()
{
var carQueryMock = new Mock<ICarQuery>();
carRepositoryMock = new Mock<ICarRepository>();
createCarService = new CreateCarService(carQueryMock.Object, carRepositoryMock.Object);
}
[Test]
public void CreateCarShouldThrowIfNull()
{
//arrange
Car car =null;
//act and assert
Assert.Throw<CustomException>(()=>
{
createCarService.CreateCar(car);
});
}
[Test]
public void CreateCarShouldThrowForInvalidLogin()
{
//arrange
var car = new Car()
{
Login=null,
Email="Email"
};
//act and assert
Assert.Throw<CustomException>(()=>
{
createCarService.CreateCar(car);
});
}
And So on.
You can use Assert.Throw for invalid car objects or Assert.DoesNotThrow for valid car objects. Finally, you can test if the car was added to the repository by:
[Test]
public void CreateCarShouldAddCarToRepo()
{
//arrange
var car = new Car()
{
Login="Login",
Email="Email"
};
//act
createCarService.CreateCar(car);
var carRetrieved =carRepositoryMock.GetCar(car.id);//depending on your implementation
//assert
Assert.AreSame(car,carRetrieved);
}
I have a class with a private method
public class MyClass
{
private void SomeMethod(PrimaryAllocationDP packet)
{
........................
some code
........................
packet.AllocatedAgency = AgencyAllocated;
}
}
Now by using MSUnit Testing framework, I have written so far
[TestMethod]
public void TestAllocatedAgency()
{
var packet = new Fixture().Create<PrimaryAllocationDP>(); //used AutoFixture here
PrivateObject accessor = new PrivateObject(new MyClass());
accessor.Invoke("SomeMethod", packet); //Act
// what will be the Assert? Since it is void
}
What will be the Assert? Since it is void, how can I write the assert?
Well given that in the example the method under test is making a change to its argument/dependency you could assert that the desired result of calling the function is that the packet's AllocatedAgency property is in fact not null
[TestMethod]
public void TestAllocatedAgency() {
//Arrange
var packet = new Fixture().Create<PrimaryAllocationDP>(); //used AutoFixture here
var sut = new MyClass();
var accessor = new PrivateObject(sut);
//Act
accessor.Invoke("SomeMethod", packet);
//Assert
Assert.IsNotNull(packet.AllocatedAgency);
}
If it is possible for you to change PrimaryAllocationDP you can also add a new interface IPrimaryAllocationDP and test the property setting. In my test I am assuming AllocatedAgency is of type object and I am using Moq. But maybe you can also use AutoFixture for mocking? To make it more clear I set AgencyAllocated directly in MyClass
[TestFixture]
public class DependencyInjection
{
[TestMethod]
public void TestAllocatedAgency()
{
var packet = new Mock<IPrimaryAllocationDP>();
PrivateObject accessor = new PrivateObject(new MyClass());
accessor.Invoke("SomeMethod", packet.Object); //Act
packet.VerifySet(p => p.AllocatedAgency = 42);
}
}
public interface IPrimaryAllocationDP
{
//object or any other type
object AllocatedAgency { set; }
}
public class PrimaryAllocationDP : IPrimaryAllocationDP
{
public object AllocatedAgency { set; private get; }
}
public class MyClass
{
private readonly object AgencyAllocated = 42;
private void SomeMethod(IPrimaryAllocationDP packet)
{
//........................
//some code
//........................
packet.AllocatedAgency = AgencyAllocated;
}
}
I am testing my class
public class myclass
{
private IAwesome awesomeObject;
public myclass(IAwesome awesomeObject)
{
this.awesomeObject = awesomeObject;
}
public void MethodUnderTest()
{
this.awesomeObject.RunSomething(); //I want to verify that RunSomething was called
}
}
The way I am doing this is:
//Arrange
var mockAwesome = new Mock<IAwesome>();
mockAwesome.Setup(x=>x.RunSomething()).Returns ... Verify()...;
//Act
var sut = new myclass(mockAwesome.object);
sut.MethodUnderTest();
//Assert
mockAwesome.Verify();
The exception I am getting is:
System.NotSupportedException : Expression references a method that
does not belong to the mocked object: x => x.RunSomething
Is it not possible to test that a specific method was executed on a mocked object that I passed into a class, that is now part of a private member of that class?
Modify set up line to mockAwesome.Setup(x=>x.RunSomething()).Verifiable() and it should work for the example you provided.
[TestClass]
public class MoqVerificationTest {
[TestMethod]
public void Moq_Should_Verify_Setup() {
//Arrange
var mockAwesome = new Mock<IAwesome>();
mockAwesome.Setup(x => x.RunSomething()).Verifiable();
//Act
var sut = new myclass(mockAwesome.Object);
sut.MethodUnderTest();
//Assert
mockAwesome.Verify();
}
public interface IAwesome {
void RunSomething();
}
public class myclass {
private IAwesome awesomeObject;
public myclass(IAwesome awesomeObject) {
this.awesomeObject = awesomeObject;
}
public void MethodUnderTest() {
this.awesomeObject.RunSomething(); //I want to verify that RunSomething was called
}
}
}
To confirm, comment out this.awesomeObject.RunSomething() in your sample class and run the test again. It will fail because you setup the RunSomething as Verifiable() and it was not used.
When testing, works perfectly fine for me...
Try this approach see if anything different results...
void Main()
{
IAwesome awesome = Mock.Of<IAwesome>();
Mock<IAwesome> mock = Mock.Get(awesome);
mock.Setup(m => m.RunSomething());
MyClass myClass = new MyClass(awesome);
myClass.MethodUnderTest();
mock.Verify(m => m.RunSomething(), Times.Once);
}
public interface IAwesome
{
void RunSomething();
}
public class MyClass
{
private IAwesome awesomeObject;
public myclass(IAwesome awesomeObject)
{
this.awesomeObject = awesomeObject;
}
public void MethodUnderTest()
{
this.awesomeObject.RunSomething();
}
}
I am using Moq library for unit testing. Now what i want is that when I access my object for the first time it should return null, and when i access this on second time it should return something else.
here is my code
var mock = new Mock<IMyClass>();
mock.Setup(?????);
mock.Setup(?????);
var actual = target.Method(mock.object);
in my method i am first checking that whether mock object is null or not, if it is null then do initialize it and then do some calls on it.
bool Method(IMyClass myObj)
{
if (myObj != null)
return true;
else
{
myObj = new MyClass();
bool result = myObj.SomeFunctionReturningBool();
return result;
}
}
what to do setup for mock object,
Also i need to know how to mock this line
bool result = myObj.SomeFunctionReturningBool();
It sounds like you are trying to run two tests with one test method - maybe it would be better to split the tests into two?
You also want to initialise a new object if the method is passed null. To test this, I suggest creating a factory object responsible for creating instances of MyClass. The new code would look like:
interface IMyClassFactory
{
IMyClass CreateMyClass();
}
bool Method(IMyClass myObj, IMyClassFactory myClassFactory)
{
if (myObj != null)
{
return true;
}
myObj = myClassFactory.CreateMyClass();
return myObj.SomeFunctionReturningBool();
}
Then the tests would look like:
[Test]
public void Method_ShouldReturnTrueIfNotPassedNull()
{
Assert.That(target.Method(new MyClass()), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void Method_ShouldCreateObjectAndReturnResultOfSomeFunctionIfPassedNull()
{
// Arrange
bool expectedResult = false;
var mockMyClass = new Mock<IMyClass>();
mockMyClass.Setup(x => x.SomeFunctionReturningBool()).Returns(expectedResult);
var mockMyFactory = new Mock<IMyClassFactory>();
mockMyFactory.Setup(x => x.CreateMyClass()).Returns(mockMyClass.Object);
// Act
var result = target.Method(null, mockMyFactory.Object);
// Assert
mockMyClass.Verify(x => x.SomeFunctionReturningBool(), Times.Once());
mockMyFactory.Verify(x => x.CreateMyClass(), Times.Once());
Assert.That(result, Is.EqualTo(expectedResult));
}
Here the factory pattern has been used to pass in an object which can create objects of IMyClass type, and then the factory itself has been mocked.
If you do not want to change your method's signature, then create the factory in the class's constructor, and make it accessible via a public property of the class. It can then be overwritten in the test by the mock factory. This is called dependency injection.
Moq - Return null - This working example simply illustrates how to return null using Moq. While the line of code is required is the commented line below, a full working example is provided below.
// _mockShopService.Setup(x => x.GetProduct(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(() => null);
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
using Moq;
public class Product
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public interface IShopService
{
Product GetProduct(string productId);
}
public class ShopService : IShopService
{
public Product GetProduct(string productId)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(productId))
{
return new Product();
}
return new Product { Id = "8160807887984", Name = "How to return null in Moq" };
}
}
public class Shop
{
private static IShopService _shopService;
public Shop(IShopService shopService)
{
_shopService = shopService;
}
public Product GetProduct(string productId)
{
Product product = _shopService.GetProduct(productId);
return product;
}
}
[TestClass]
public class ShopTests
{
Mock<IShopService> _mockShopService;
[TestInitialize]
public void Setup()
{
_mockShopService = new Mock<IShopService>();
}
[TestMethod]
public void ShopService_GetProduct_Returns_null()
{
//Arrange
Shop shop = new Shop(_mockShopService.Object);
//This is how we return null --- all other code above is to bring this line of code home
_mockShopService.Setup(x => x.GetProduct(It.IsAny<string>())).Returns(() => null);
//Act
var actual = shop.GetProduct(It.IsAny<string>());
//Assert
Assert.IsNull(actual);
}
}
To mock a result value you can do simply:
mock.Setup(foo => foo.SomeFunctionReturningBool()).Returns(true); // or false :)
for the other question, just pass null in the unit test instead of passing mock.object and your unit test cover that too. So you basically create two unit test one with:
var actual = target.Method(mock.object);
and the other one with:
var actual = target.Method(null);
Currently your SUT is tight-coupled with MyClass implementation. You can't mock objects which are instantiated with new keyword inside your SUT. Thus you cannot test your SUT in isolation, and your test is not unit test anymore. When implementation of MyClass.SomeFunctionReturningBool will change (it will return true instead of false), tests of your SUT will fail. This shouldn't happen. Thus, delegate creation to some dependency (factory) and inject that dependency to your SUT:
[Test]
public void ShouldReturnTrueWhenMyClassIsNotNull()
{
Mock<IMyClassFactory> factory = new Mock<IMyClassFactory>();
Mock<IMyClass> myClass = new Mock<IMyClass>();
var foo = new Foo(factory.Object);
Assert.True(foo.Method(myClass.Object));
}
[Test]
public void ShouldCreateNewMyClassAndReturnSomeFunctionValue()
{
bool expected = true;
Mock<IMyClass> myClass = new Mock<IMyClass>();
myClass.Setup(mc => mc.SomeFunctionReturningBool()).Returns(expected);
Mock<IMyClassFactory> factory = new Mock<IMyClassFactory>();
factory.Setup(f => f.CreateMyClass()).Returns(myClass.Object);
var foo = new Foo(factory.Object);
Assert.That(foo.Method(null), Is.EqualTo(expected));
factory.VerifyAll();
myClass.VerifyAll();
}
BTW assignment new value to method parameter does not affect reference which you passed to method.
Implementation:
public class Foo
{
private IMyClassFactory _factory;
public Foo(IMyClassFactory factory)
{
_factory = factory;
}
public bool Method(IMyClass myObj)
{
if (myObj != null)
return true;
return _factory.CreateMyClass().SomeFunctionReturningBool();
}
}
You can use TestFixture with parameter. this test will run two times and different type value.
using NUnit.Framework;
namespace Project.Tests
{
[TestFixture(1)]
[TestFixture(2)]
public class MyTest
{
private int _intType;
public MyTest(int type)
{
_intType = type;
}
[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
if (_intType==1)
{
//Mock Return false
}
else
{
//Mock Return Value
}
}
}
}
I encountered a class during my work that looks like this:
public class MyObject
{
public int? A {get; set;}
public int? B {get; set;}
public int? C {get; set;}
public virtual int? GetSomeValue()
{
//simplified behavior:
return A ?? B ?? C;
}
}
The issue is that I have some code that accesses A, B and C and calls the GetSomeValue() method (now, I'd say this is not a good design, but sometimes my hands are tied ;-)). I want to create a mock of this object, which, at the same time, has A, B and C set to some values. So, when I use moq as such:
var m = new Mock<MyObject>() { DefaultValue = DefaultValue.Mock };
lets me setup a result on GetSomeValue() method, but all the properties are set to null (and setting up all of them using Setup() is quite cumbersome, since the real object is a nasty data object and has more properties than in above simplified example).
So on the other hand, using AutoFixture like this:
var fixture = new Fixture();
var anyMyObject = fixture.CreateAnonymous<MyObject>();
Leaves me without the ability to stup a call to GetSomeValue() method.
Is there any way to combine the two, to have anonymous values and the ability to setup call results?
Edit
Based on nemesv's answer, I derived the following utility method (hope I got it right):
public static Mock<T> AnonymousMock<T>() where T : class
{
var mock = new Mock<T>();
fixture.Customize<T>(c => c.FromFactory(() => mock.Object));
fixture.CreateAnonymous<T>();
fixture.Customizations.RemoveAt(0);
return mock;
}
This is actually possible to do with AutoFixture, but it does require a bit of tweaking. The extensibility points are all there, but I admit that in this case, the solution isn't particularly discoverable.
It becomes even harder if you want it to work with nested/complex types.
Given the MyObject class above, as well as this MyParent class:
public class MyParent
{
public MyObject Object { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
}
these unit tests all pass:
public class Scenario
{
[Fact]
public void CreateMyObject()
{
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new MockHybridCustomization());
var actual = fixture.CreateAnonymous<MyObject>();
Assert.NotNull(actual.A);
Assert.NotNull(actual.B);
Assert.NotNull(actual.C);
}
[Fact]
public void MyObjectIsMock()
{
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new MockHybridCustomization());
var actual = fixture.CreateAnonymous<MyObject>();
Assert.NotNull(Mock.Get(actual));
}
[Fact]
public void CreateMyParent()
{
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new MockHybridCustomization());
var actual = fixture.CreateAnonymous<MyParent>();
Assert.NotNull(actual.Object);
Assert.NotNull(actual.Text);
Assert.NotNull(Mock.Get(actual.Object));
}
[Fact]
public void MyParentIsMock()
{
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new MockHybridCustomization());
var actual = fixture.CreateAnonymous<MyParent>();
Assert.NotNull(Mock.Get(actual));
}
}
What's in MockHybridCustomization? This:
public class MockHybridCustomization : ICustomization
{
public void Customize(IFixture fixture)
{
fixture.Customizations.Add(
new MockPostprocessor(
new MethodInvoker(
new MockConstructorQuery())));
fixture.Customizations.Add(
new Postprocessor(
new MockRelay(t =>
t == typeof(MyObject) || t == typeof(MyParent)),
new AutoExceptMoqPropertiesCommand().Execute,
new AnyTypeSpecification()));
}
}
The MockPostprocessor, MockConstructorQuery and MockRelay classes are defined in the AutoMoq extension to AutoFixture, so you'll need to add a reference to this library. However, note that it's not required to add the AutoMoqCustomization.
The AutoExceptMoqPropertiesCommand class is also custom-built for the occasion:
public class AutoExceptMoqPropertiesCommand : AutoPropertiesCommand<object>
{
public AutoExceptMoqPropertiesCommand()
: base(new NoInterceptorsSpecification())
{
}
protected override Type GetSpecimenType(object specimen)
{
return specimen.GetType();
}
private class NoInterceptorsSpecification : IRequestSpecification
{
public bool IsSatisfiedBy(object request)
{
var fi = request as FieldInfo;
if (fi != null)
{
if (fi.Name == "__interceptors")
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
}
This solution provides a general solution to the question. However, it hasn't been extensively tested, so I'd love to get feedback on it.
Probably there is a better why, but this works:
var fixture = new Fixture();
var moq = new Mock<MyObject>() { DefaultValue = DefaultValue.Mock };
moq.Setup(m => m.GetSomeValue()).Returns(3);
fixture.Customize<MyObject>(c => c.FromFactory(() => moq.Object));
var anyMyObject = fixture.CreateAnonymous<MyObject>();
Assert.AreEqual(3, anyMyObject.GetSomeValue());
Assert.IsNotNull(anyMyObject.A);
//...
Initially I tried to use fixture.Register(() => moq.Object); instead of fixture.Customize but it registers the creator function with OmitAutoProperties() so it wouldn't work for you case.
As of 3.20.0, you can use AutoConfiguredMoqCustomization. This will automatically configure all mocks so that their members' return values are generated by AutoFixture.
var fixture = new Fixture().Customize(new AutoConfiguredMoqCustomization());
var mock = fixture.Create<Mock<MyObject>>();
Assert.NotNull(mock.Object.A);
Assert.NotNull(mock.Object.B);
Assert.NotNull(mock.Object.C);