after some fine-tuning on my game's GUI I am finally ready to begin with the gameplay. But that's a tall order. My game will be something like a 2D platformer with RPG elements like collecting armor, helmets, weapons etc. So with that in mind I begun thinking about a way to create my player. First, I thought a single Player class would do the job for me but since I want to equip the armor/helmet I've acquired, I quickly abandoned this concept.
Next I got another idea. I could have the player's Head, Arms and Legs to be different classes and each of them drawing its own texture, respectively. So I can swap between different armor/helmet sprites for each of the body parts. But that would seem pretty complex to implement... or not?
Could I have a code example on how you would do this? Which path you would take if you are in my stead? Single Player class or different body parts classes? If the latter, how would you hook them so that it all looks like a single sprite?
Armor/helmet should be part of the character status as it could be Health points. If you get hit your HP goes down and if your character collides with a helmet item then you should flag that status into your player object and render your character accordingly.
You may want to use the game component pattern (link is a very good read).
You probably want the player class still be the main base of the character, and have armor/clothing components that draw on top of the character.
The player class can then "have" the components and draw accordingly, add HP or other logic you like etc. A component could "break" and disappear etc.
Related
I am developing 2D Endless racer game, insted of constant background; i will use prefabs as background, i have 3 different prefabs as background: (Please Check Image)
Straight Road
Right Curved Road
Left Curved Road
I want to instantiate endless prefabs, according to instantiate point of each prefab,
I would appreciate for your support
Goal Image and Prefabs
One simple solution come straight from the example image you posted. Each road piece has its own "exit point", symbolized by that yellow circle. Since each road piece is its own prefab, you could give each of them an empty child object, acting like your yellow circle.
Each object would then have a reference to that object, and would use that to spawn the next object.
public class RoadPiece : Monobehaviour
{
public Transform nextInstantiatePoint;
To make the next road piece line up correctly, you could take advantage of the Sprite's Import Settings. Set the Pivot to "Bottom", or try the others for different effects.
The algorithm that you use to chose which piece to instantiate each time is up to you, but to start you could have an array of all the road pieces and pick one from there.
Ideally you want each object to wait some time before it instantiates the next, otherwise it will quickly cause the scene to be overcrowded. The easiest way to do it is like this:
void Start()
{
Invoke(nameof(SpawnNext), waitTime);
}
void SpawnNext()
{
Instantiate(roadPiece, nextInstantiatePoint.position, nextInstantiatePoint.rotation);
}
}
I am wanting to make a birds-eye view pixel-art game.
I currently have two sprite sheets set up, and split and whatnot
groundSheet and characterSheet these are split up into
ground_0_0_0 (A concrete floor)
ground_1_0_0 (grass)
character_0_0_0 (man idle animation frame 1)
character_0_0_1 (man idle animation frame 2)
character_0_1_0 (man run animation frame 1)
character_0_1_1 (man run animation frame 2)
character_1_0_0 (woman idle animation frame 1)
character_1_0_1 (woman idle animation frame 2)
character_1_1_0 (woman run animation frame 1)
character_1_1_1 (woman run animation frame 2)
The numbers after are a note as to:
first number - the main set of sprite animations (eg man)
second number - the animation set in use (eg run or idle)
third number - the frame of said animation.
(the ground has this as i plan to have animated grounds late on)
Now, I wish to make a script for the character (and ground alike) that has an editable value that is view able in the unity editor, for example how things like the sprite renderer has sprite, colour etc. Which dictates what first number to use (see above) what second number and the delay for the animation of the third number. This will then tell the sprite renderer what pictures to load and how quickly to load them. I also wish for the script to scan for the file starting with for example character_0_0_ and then count how many files after it, so it knows what to do when animating. I would like this script to be checking for a change in one of the variables viewable in the unity editor to change and as soon as it does it checks everything it needs for an animtion.
Something else could be done where there is only 1 box to edit in unity, which you put character_0_0_ or ground_1_0_ or something similar, and it checks everything that way (it also makes the script universal, and usable on the ground, character and walls (which I am adding later)).
This may seem confusing, but it make sense for me and many of you will probably mention a much easier way to do animations and such, but please only say these if it does what I want above.
For scripts and such my file layout:
/Assets
/scripts
ground.cs
character.cs
/sprites
characterSheet.png
character_0_0_0
character_0_0_1
character_0_1_0
character_0_1_1
character_1_0_0
character_1_0_1
character_1_1_0
character_1_1_1
groundSheet.png
ground_0_0_0
ground_1_0_0
(For some reason Stack overflow said the above was code, so i had to make it as that)
ground.cs and character.cs are the scripts in which I want to made as explained above.
In my object view thingy I have
Main Camera
ground
character
I am practically a newb to C# and JS I know bascially the grammar of C# (like where to use {} and put ; at the end of the lines). If you help me with this, i request that you explain the script, like use the // thing to simply explain what each command does, I know a few but not all of them. And I know someone is going to say it is really well documented in tutorial X and such, but most tutorials are not in unity 5 and while helping with the matter do not touch on it exactly.
Thank you for your help, if there is anything about this question/request that you do not understand (It is pretty complex) I will explain.
Maybe I am completely wrong, but it seems to me that you are trying to recreate an Animation system.
Is there a specific reason for which you wouldn't use Unity's animation system?
You can do everything that you describe here with it (change sprite, choose animation speed). And you would have almost no code to write. Just drag and drop you sprites in the editor for a start
EDIT - answer to first comment:
What you should do is create all the animations you need. Then in the animator, you choose which condition will trigger a transition to another animation (for instance, boolean jump is true will transition to animation jump). Then in your code you can call GetComponent().SetBool("Jump", true).
To have different character, you can create different gameObjects (one per character). They all have a different animator with animations specific to the character.
The other solutiojn if you really want one one gameObject and one animator is that you also add string condition to you animation (example, if character=="character1" and jump==true, transition to jump animation).
If I were you I would really focus on testing and learning all you can do with Unity animator. I can't think of a case were you would need to recreate the animation system yourself
Your question was long winded and hard to understand but ill try to help,
firstly if you want editable values in the unity editor I would Suggest using a serialized structure of information like this
[System.Serializable] // this makes it viewable in the inspector
public struct Sprite_Manager;
{
public Sprite[] Render_Sprites; // array of sprites to store sprites
public SpriteRenderer S_Renderer;
public float Anim_Delay;
}
public class Character : MonoBehavior {
Sprite_Manager SMG = new Sprite_Manager(); // instantiate a new instance of the struct
void Set_Sprite()
{
for(int i = 0; i < SMG.Render_Sprites.Length; i++)
{
SMG.S_Renderer.sprite = SMG.Render_Sprites[i];
}
}
void Update
{
Invoke("Set_Sprite", SMG.Anim_Delay);
}
}
Not sure if this is exactly what your looking for but this is one way you could setup a structure of sprite based information and use Invoke to setup some sort of delay when passing new sprites to the renderer.
I am thinking of building a game like the sims and was thinking of how I could make the characters interact with any object without having to systematically change the character's code and prefab whenever I decide to add new furniture and props to the library. I have had an idea that consists of having my animations attached to the furniture itself rather than having it attached to the character (which would require a lot of memory and extra code if we had a lot of furniture in the game library!). I was thinking about it and had in mind that I could add a rig skeleton in Blender that has the desired animation(s) but not rig any specific object - so that I only have the animation, the location, rotation and scale of the bones! and since the characters' rigs are the same as the skeleton's rig in the furniture's animation, they could be compatible!
I hope this makes sense...
The thing is that I realise at this stage that I do not know the Animation class very well, and I am not sure if / how I can use the animation attached to the furniture to make my character interact with it...
Can Animation.Play() take multiple arguments apart from the animation to play and the play mode? Is it possible to specify which object has to play the animation? I am talking about doing all of this from the script - I write in C# by the way... and I might attach the script to the camera so I hope the script does not have to be necessarily attached to the character prefab in order to play the animation... Though I don't mind creating a function in the character's script if necessary!
I am not new to Unity but I have mostly been using cars and character controllers, so I haven't dealt with much animation coding yet...
I thank you in advance for your help and apologise for my weird english - I live in France! ^^
Mecanim performs retargeting of humanoid animations, so for what concern that specific case, you should be able to use the same rig and set of animation clip on different models.
For what concern grabbing furniture, you don't need the object to be rigged. You can use IK to precise move your character's hand toward the target object and then parent it to the relative joint in the hierarchy.
I had an idea in my game of having 3 layers to the map, the first being the ground, the second being the roads/grass/etc, and the third being impassable objects such as walls/buildings/lakes/rivers/trees. I have it so the player is centered at the middle of the screen and the layers of the map move in the inverse direction that the player wants to go. I was thinking I would have the different layers that way if the playerModel overlaps whereever something is drawn on the impassableLayer, then the playerModel would shift back. However, as I am new to xna, I don't know how to get the game to recognize that the playerModel is overlapping the impassable objects on the impassableLayer. The impassableLayer obviously only has objects drawn on it, and is empty anywhere there isn't an object. Therefore I can't just say:
if (playerModel.X > impassableLayer.X)
{
impassableLayer.X++;
}
As this would always be true.
Is there a way to tell if an object is overlapping a layer?
What you are looking for is collision detection I belive. You want to keep objects from passing through each other. It isnt as simple as the idea you had. True collision detection will take alot of work, but their are tons of tutorials for it.
Youtube tutorial on per pixel collision
Per-pixel collision on MSDN
Bounding Box Collision
You can always to a search here on the site or google, there are lots of resources for this out there.
I'm designing a 3D game with a camera not entirely unlike that in The Sims and I want to prevent the player character from being hidden behind objects, including walls, pillars and other objects.
One easy way to handle the walls case is to have them face inwards and not have an other side, but that won't cover the other cases at all.
What I had planned is to somehow check for objects that are "in front" of the player, relative to the camera, and hide them - be it by alpha blending or not rendering at all.
One probably not so good idea I had in mind is to scan from the camera to the player in a straight line and see if you hit a non-hidden object, continuing until you reach the player. Unfortunately, I am an almost complete newbie on 3D programming.
Demonstration SVG illustration < that wall panel obscures the player, so it must be hidden. Another unrelated and pretty much already solved problem is removing all three wall panels on that side, which is irrelevant to this question and only caused by the mapping system I came up with.
What I had planned is to somehow check for objects that are "in front" of the player, relative to the camera, and hide them - be it by alpha blending or not rendering at all.
This is a good plan. You'll want to incorporate some kind of bounding volume onto the player, so the entire player (plus a little extra) is visible at all times. Then, simply run the intersection algorithm for each corner of the bounding volume.
Finding which object is at a given point on screen is called picking. Here's an XNA link for you which should direct you to an example. The idea is that you retrieve the 3D point in the game from the 2D point, and then can use standard collision detection methods to work out which object is occupying that space. Then you can elect to render that object differently.
One hack which might suffice if you have trouble with the picking approach is to render the character once as part of the scene, and then render it again at the end at half-alpha on top of everything. That way you can see the whole character and the wall, though you won't see through the wall as such.
One easy way, at least for prototyping, would be to always draw the player after you draw the rest of the scene. This would ensure that the player is rendered on top of anything else in the scene. Crude but effective.
Create a bounding volume from the camera to the extents of the player, determine what objects intersect that volume, and then render them in whatever alternate style you want?
There might be some ultra-clever way to do this, but this seems like the pretty straightforward version, and shouldn't be too much of a perf hit (you're probably doing collision every frame anyway....)
The simplest thing I can think of that should work relatively well is to model all obstacles by a plane perpendicular to your ground (assuming you have a ground.) Roughly assuming everything that is an obstacle is a wall with some height.
Model your player as a point somewhere, and model your camera as another point. The line in 3d that connects these two points lies in a plane that is particularly interesting to you, because if this plane intersects an "obstacle plane" below the height of the obstacle, that means that that obstacle is blocking your view of the player point.
I hope thats somewhat clear. To make this into an algorithm you'd have to implement a general method for determining where two planes intersect (to determine if the obstacle is tall enough to block view.)