I'm trying to convert the following SQL expression into a Lambda LINQ query and I seem to be going round in circles at the moment:
select m.MemberExternalPK FROM Member.Member AS m INNER JOIN Member.Account AS a ON m.MemberID = a.MemberID where m.MemberExternalPK in
(
SELECT m.MemberExternalPK
FROM Member.Member AS m INNER JOIN Member.Account AS a ON m.MemberID = a.MemberID
group by MemberExternalPK
having Count(AccountID) = 1
)
and AccountStatusID = 3
So far I have managed to get the following syntax that returns the correct number of rows I am after but all columns (except the MemberExternalPK one I want)!
Members.Join(Accounts, m => m.MemberID, a => a.MemberID, (m, a) => new { m, a })
.GroupBy(t => t.m.MemberExternalPK, t => t.a)
.Where(grp => grp.Count(p => p.AccountID != null) == 1)
.SelectMany(sublist => sublist).Where(x => x.AccountStatusID == 3)
I think this is fairly close:
var query =
from m in Member_Member
join a in Member_Account on m.MemberID equals a.MemberID
group a by m.MemberExternalPK into gas
where gas.Count(ga => ga.AccountID != null) == 1
from ga in gas
where ga.AccountStatusID == 3
select gas.Key;
The only concern is the ga.AccountID != null which means that the gas group may have more than one record so you might end up with more than one gas.Key at the end.
Something like this? Splitting it up could also improve performance.
var externalMembers =
Members.Join(Accounts, m => m.MemberID, a => a.MemberID, (m, a) => new { m, a })
.GroupBy(grp => grp.MemberExternalPK)
.Where(grp => grp.Count() > 1)
.Select(grp => grp.Key);
var result =
Members.Where(w => externalMembers.Contains(w.MemberExternalPK) && w.AccountStatusID == 3)
.Select(s => s.MemberExternalPK)
Related
Wondering why LINQ doesn't have a Left Join method. I've been trying to figure this out with myriad examples on SO, but no such luck. The other examples show simple examples with one join. If I group the joins then I only get references to the TradeCountries table in the select statement.
Being new to LINQ, I could've had this done 4 hours ago with a simple SELECT statement, but here I'm am trying to figure out why the LeftJoin method was left out of LINQ.
What does the line with "LeftJoin" need to be changed to make this work?
/*
* GetTop5Distributors
#param int array of series IDs
*/
public List<TopDistributors> Get5TopDistributors(IEnumerable<int> seriesIds)
{
_context = new MySQLDatabaseContext();
var result = _context.TradesTrades
.Join(_context.TradesSeries, tt => tt.SeriesId, ts => ts.Id, (tt, ts) => new { tt, ts })
.Join(_context.TradesTradeDistributors, tsd => tsd.tt.Id, ttd => ttd.TradeId,
(tsd, ttd) => new { tsd, ttd })
.Join(_context.TradesOrganisations, tsdto => tsdto.ttd.DistributorId, to => to.Id,
(tsdto, to) => new { tsdto, to })
.LeftJoin(_context.TradesCountries, tsdc => tsdc.to.CountryId, tc => tc.Id,
(tsdc, tc) => new {tsdc, tc})
.Where(x => seriesIds.Contains(x.tsdc.tsdto.tsd.tt.SeriesId))
.Where(x => x.tsdc.tsdto.tsd.tt.FirstPartyId == null)
.Where(x => x.tsdc.tsdto.tsd.tt.Status != "closed")
.Where(x => x.tsdc.tsdto.tsd.tt.Status != "cancelled")
.GroupBy(n => new { n.tsdc.tsdto.tsd.tt.SeriesId, n.tsdc.tsdto.ttd.DistributorId })
.Select(g =>
new TopDistributors
{
SeriesId = g.Key.SeriesId,
DistributorName = g.Select(i => i.tsdc.to.Name).Distinct().First(),
IsinNickname = g.Select(i => i.tsdc.tsdto.tsd.ts.Nickname).Distinct().First(),
CountryName = g.Select(i => i.tc.Name).Distinct().First(),
CommissionTotal = Math.Ceiling(g.Sum(i => i.tsdc.tsdto.ttd.Commission))
}
)
.OrderByDescending(x => x.CommissionTotal)
.Take(5)
.ToList();
return result;
}
Here's the rather simple select statement that is taking orders or magnitude too long to convert to LINQ.
SELECT
trades_trades.series_id,
trades_organisations.`name`,
trades_series.nickname,
trades_countries.name as Country_Name,
SUM(trades_trade_distributors.commission) as Commission_Total
FROM
trades_trades
JOIN trades_series
ON trades_series.id = trades_trades.series_id
JOIN trades_trade_distributors
ON trades_trades.id = trades_trade_distributors.trade_id
JOIN trades_organisations
ON trades_trade_distributors.distributor_id = trades_organisations.id
LEFT JOIN trades_countries
ON trades_organisations.country_id = trades_countries.id
WHERE trades_trades.series_id IN (
17,
18)
AND trades_trades.first_party_id IS NULL
AND trades_trades.status <> 'closed'
AND trades_trades.status <> 'cancelled'
GROUP BY trades_trades.series_id, trades_trade_distributors.distributor_id
ORDER BY Commission_Total DESC
Following my recipe, here is a more or less straightforward translation of the SQL to LINQ. I moved the where to be near what it constrains, and used let to create a convenient name for the Sum, as LINQ doesn't allow you to forward reference anonymous object members.
var ans = from tt in trades_trades
where new[] { 17, 18 }.Contains(tt.series_id) && tt.first_party_id == null &&
tt.status != "closed" && tt.status != "cancelled"
join ts in trades_series on tt.series_id equals ts.id
join ttd in trades_trade_distributors on tt.id equals ttd.trade_id
join to in trades_orginizations on ttd.distributor_id equals to.id
join tc in trades_countries on to.country_id equals tc.id into tcj
from tc in tcj.DefaultIfEmpty() // GroupJoin -> left join
group new { tt, ts, ttd, to, tc } by new { tt.series_id, ttd.distributor_id } into tradeg
let Commission_Total = tradeg.Sum(trade => trade.ttd.commission)
orderby Commission_Total descending
select new {
tradeg.Key.series_id,
tradeg.First().to.name,
tradeg.First().ts.nickname,
Country_Name = tradeg.First().tc == null ? null : tradeg.First().tc.name,
Commission_Total
};
I have a task where I need to rank the search results based on which column the search term was found.
So for example, if the search term is found in column A of table 1, it ranks higher than if it was found in column A of table 2.
Right now, I have a linq query that joins multiple tables and searches for the search term in certain columns. I.E.
var results = db.People
.Join(db.Menu, p => p.ID, m => m.PersonID, (p, m) => new { p = p, m = m })
.Join(db.Domain, m => m.m.DomainID, d => d.ID, (m, d) => new { m = m, d = d })
.Where(d => searchTermArray.Any(x => d.m.p.p.Name.Contains(x)) || searchTermArray.Any(x => d.m.p.p.Biography.Contains(x)) || searchTermArray.Any(x => d.d.domain.Contains(x)))
.Select(p => p).Distinct();
So if the search term is found in db.People, column Name, that row/Person will rank higher than if found in db.People, column Biography, which will rank higher than if found in db.Domain, column domain.
This will order your result by the "rank". You can manipulate the query further if you also want to return the rank and not only the aggregate:
var results = db.People
.Join(db.Menu, p => p.ID, m => m.PersonID, (p, m) => new { p = p, m = m })
.Join(db.Domain, m => m.m.DomainID, d => d.ID, (m, d) => new { m = m, d = d })
.Select(d => new
{
rank = searchTermArray.Any(x => d.m.p.p.Name.Contains(x)) ? 3 : searchTermArray.Any(x => d.m.p.p.Biography.Contains(x)) ? 2 : searchTermArray.Any(x => d.d.domain.Contains(x)) ? 1 : 0,
m = d
})
.Where(a => a.rank > 0)
.OrderByDescending(a => a.rank)
.Select(a => a.m).Distinct();
Note: I take no responsibility for poor performance, that's LINQ after all.
I've been puzzling over this problem all morning and can't figure out how to do it in C#.
My SQL query as follows:
select a.CourseID,
a.UserID
from audit a
inner join results r on a.UserID = r.UserID
inner join Course c on a.CourseID = c.CourseID
where c.CourseType = 9 and a.Guid = 'A123F123D123AS123123'
and a.Result = 'Passed' and r.Class = 'Maths'
group by a.CourseID, a.UserID
order by a.UserID
returns exactly what I want, but I can't seem to translate it into linq format. (the format being used here is what is required in my job at the moment so please advise on this format)
So far I have the following:
var audits = auditRepository.Get(a => a.Course.CourseType == 9 && a.GUID == this.Company.GUID && a.Result == "Passed", null, null,
a => a.Course, a => a.User)
.Join(resultsRepository.Get(r => r.GUID == this.Company.GUID && r.Class == class),
a => a.UserID,
r => r.UserID,
(a, r) => new Audit
{
User = a.User,
Course = a.Course,
Result = a.Result,
Timestamp = a.Timestamp,
AuditID = a.AuditID,
UserID = a.UserID
}
)
.OrderByDescending(o => o.Timestamp)
.GroupBy(u => new { u.User, u.Course })
.Select(grp => grp.ToList())
.ToList();
However this returns duplicates.
Any advice is appreciated, thanks
H
Instead of
.Select(grp => grp.ToList())
Select only the first element from each group to exclude duplicates:
.Select(grp => grp.First())
If you need a count also:
.Select(t => new{grp = t.First(),cnt = t.Count()} )
Fix:
.Select(t => new { grp = t.First(), cnt = t.Select(s => s.AuditID).Distinct().Count() })
I would like to add a condition to the below query based on another property
eg"and a.City=b.City" .How would I do it .
Currenty query
var result = firstCollection.Join(secondCollection,
a => a.CustomerId,
b => b.CustomerId, //TO ADD "and a.City=b.City"
GetDifferences)
.SelectMany(x => x)
.Where(x => x != null).ToList();
In sql I would do:
Select * from firstCollection a
INNER JOIN secondCollection B on a.CustomerId=b.CustomerId and a.city=b.city
many thanks for your suggestions
Use anonymous types:
var result = firstCollection.Join(secondCollection,
a => new { a.CustomerId, a.City }
b => new { b.CustomerId, b.City },
GetDifferences)
.SelectMany(x => x)
.Where(x => x != null).ToList();
How can I transform this SQL query to LINQ?
SELECT eg.Name Name, sum(bi.PlannedAmount) Amount
FROM BudgetItem bi, Expense e, ExpenseGroup eg
WHERE Discriminator = 'ExpenseItem' AND
bi.ExpenseId = e.Id AND
e.ExpenseGroupId = eg.id AND
bi.MonthlyBudgetId = 1
GROUP BY eg.Name
So far I've come up with this line:
var result = context
.ExpenseGroups
.GroupBy(eg => eg.Id, (s) => new { Name = s.Name, Amount = s.Expenses.SelectMany(e => e.Items).Sum(i => i.PlannedAmount) })
.ToList();
But I still cannot figure out what expression to use to add 'bi.MonthlyBudgetItem = 1'.
Does anybody have an Idea?
Edit #1:
I forgot to mention the relationships between the entities. Every ExpenseGroup has many Expenses, and every Expense has many BudgetItems.
So, ExpenseGroup => Expenses => BudgetItems
Edit #2:
I'm using Entity Framework and every ExpenseGroup has a Collection of Expense objects (every Expense has a ExpenseGroup object), as well as every Expense has a Collection of BudgetItem objects (every BudgetItem object has a Expense object).
I suppose something like this should do it:
var result = context
.ExpenseGroups
.Where(x => x.Discriminator == 'ExpenseItem' &&
x.bi.ExpenseId == e.Id &&
x.e.ExpenseGroupId == eg.id &&
x.bi.MonthlyBudgetId == 1)
.GroupBy(eg => eg.Id, (s) => new { Name = s.Name, Amount = s.Expenses.SelectMany(e => e.Items).Sum(i => i.PlannedAmount) })
.ToList();
Something similar to this...
var result = (from g in context.ExpenseGroups
where g.Expense.BudgetItem.MonthlyBudgetId == 1
select g)
.GroupBy(eg => eg.Id, (s) => new { Name = s.Name, Amount = s.Expenses.SelectMany(e => e.Items).Sum(i => i.PlannedAmount) })
.ToList();
or
var result = context.ExpenseGroups
.Where(g => g.Expense.BudgetItem.MonthlyBudgetId == 1)
.GroupBy(eg => eg.Id, (s) => new { Name = s.Name, Amount = s.Expenses.SelectMany(e => e.Items).Sum(i => i.PlannedAmount) })
.ToList();
You are actually doing an inner join in your SQL query, so do similarly in your linq query as well. This should work:-
var result = from bi in context.BudgetItem
join e in context.Expense
on bi.ExpenseId equals e.Id
where bi.MonthlyBudgetId == 1
join eg in ExpenseGroup
on e.ExpenseGroupId equals eg.id
group new { bi, eg } by eg.Name into g
select new
{
Name = g.Key,
Amount = g.Sum(x => x.bi.PlannedAmount)
};