If I have enum:
public enum ImportState : byte
{
None = 0,
ImportedWithChanges = 44,
AwaitingApproval = 45,
Removing = 66,
Revalidating = 99,
};
How to get enum order?
For example:
GetOrder(ImportState.None)
Should return 1(first in order)
GetOrder(ImportState.AwaitingApproval )
Should return 3 (third in order)
here is the missing method GetOrder
public static int GetOrder(ImportState State)
{
return Enum.GetValues(typeof(ImportState)).Cast<ImportState>().Select((x, i) => new { item = x, index = i }).Single(x => x.item == State).index;
}
As other noticed, Enum.GetValues() returns the values of an enum sorted by value. Perhaps this isn't what you wanted... So, using a little reflection:
public class EnumOrder<TEnum> where TEnum : struct
{
private static readonly TEnum[] Values;
static EnumOrder()
{
var fields = typeof(Values).GetFields(BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Public);
Values = Array.ConvertAll(fields, x => (TEnum)x.GetValue(null));
}
public static int IndexOf(TEnum value)
{
return Array.IndexOf(Values, value);
}
}
Example of use:
public enum Values
{
Foo = 10,
Bar = 1
}
int ix = EnumOrder<Values>.IndexOf(Values.Bar); // 1
Note that the C# specifications aren't clear if the "source code" ordering of an enum is maintained in the compiled program... At this time the C# compiler seems to maintain it, but there is no guarantee in the future...
The only two references I've found are:
Forward declarations are never needed in C# because, with very few exceptions, declaration order is insignificant
and
Declaration order for enum member declarations (§14.3) is significant when constant-expression values are omitted.
So as written, for the example I gave, the ordering is undefined and depends on the C# compiler!
Enumerating the enum values, casting to an IEnumerable, converting to a List. This it is a simple matter of using IndexOf().
Note that for this to work, the enum must be declared in increasing order.
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
using System;
using System.Linq;
class Program
{
public enum ImportState : byte
{
None = 0,
ImportedWithChanges = 44,
AwaitingApproval = 45,
Removing = 66,
Revalidating = 99,
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine(GetOrder(ImportState.None));
Console.WriteLine(GetOrder(ImportState.AwaitingApproval));
}
public static int GetOrder(ImportState state)
{
var enumValues = Enum.GetValues(typeof(ImportState)).Cast<ImportState>().ToList();
return enumValues.IndexOf(state) + 1; // +1 as the IndexOf() is zero-based
}
}
}
1
3
Press any key to continue . . .
Sth. like this?
int i = 0;
foreach (ImportState state in Enum.GetValues(typeof(ImportState)))
{
i++;
if (state == myState) return i;
}
However there is no real use for this, as enums do not provide an indexed enumeration in themselfes. They represent a value which is more what you´re probably after.
You can use this LINQ query:
int position = Enum.GetValues(typeof(ImportState)).Cast<ImportState>()
//.OrderBy(impState => (int)impState)
.TakeWhile(impState => impState != ImportState.None)
.Count() + 1;
It orders by the int-value of the enum-value, then it takes all until the searched value and counts them. I have omitted the OrderBy since Enum.GetValues automatically returns the order according to their int-value.
MSDN:
The elements of the array are sorted by the binary values of the
enumeration constants
Instead of using the order, you would be better to make better use of the flags. Consider the following
public enum ImportState : byte
{
None = 0,
ImportedWithChanges = 2,
AwaitingApproval = 4,
Removing = 6,
Revalidating = 8,
};
(double)state / Enum.GetValues(typeof(ImportState)).Cast<byte>().Max()
Example
Enums don't really have any sense of ordering, using the above probably still isn't perfect but it doesn't involve a made up order.
What about this Solution?
var result = from r in Enum.GetValues<ImportState>()
let expression =
r == ImportState.Revalidating
? 0
: r == ImportState.AwaitingApproval
? 1
: r == ImportState.Removing
? 2
: r == ImportState.ImportedWithChanges
? 3
: 4
orderby expression ascending
select r.ToString();
Console.WriteLine(string.Join(", ", result));
Output: Revalidating, AwaitingApproval, Removing, ImportedWithChanges, None
Related
I want to sort a string using indexes, but it's not working after 10th index, 10th/later indexes added after 1st index in the list after using Sort() method.
I have tried below code, but it's not working.
List<string> stringList = new List<string>();
foreach (ManagementObject disk in objectSearcher.Get() )
{
stringList.Add(string.Format("{0, -15} {1,-35} {2, -20}",
disk.GetPropertyValue("Index"),
disk.GetPropertyValue("Model"),
diskSize));
}
stringList.Sort();
In the above scenario, the code is working fine for 0-9 indexes but for later indexes, this is not working as expected.
Put your object into a class structure and work with that strong type as long as possible:
public class DiskInfo
{
private int index = 0;
private string model = String.Empty;
private unsigned long size = 0;
public int getIndex() { return index; }
public string getModel() { return model; }
public unsigned long getSize() { return size; }
public DiskInfo(int index, string model, unsigned long size)
{
this.index = index;
this.model = model;
this.size = size;
}
public string ToString()
{
return string.Format("{0, -15} {1,-35} {2, -20}", index, model, size);
}
}
// ...
List<DiskInfo> lst = new List<DiskInfo>();
foreach (ManagementObject disk in objectSearcher.Get() )
{
lst.Add(new DiskInfo(
disk.GetPropertyValue("Index"),
disk.GetPropertyValue("Model"),
diskSize
));
}
Adjust types as needed.
Then you can use simple linq to sort.
lst = lst.OrderBy(x => x.getIndex());
On top of that you get IDE support and compiler errors instead of trying to figure out why you get format exceptions, etc when mucking around with strings.
If your input data is not of the correct data type, then cast it then and there.
For example, index gets passed as a string:
string strIdx = "15";
lst.Add(new DiskInfo(int.Parse(strIdx)), ...)
It's not working after 10th index.
That is because List().Sort invoke string's comparison function.In string comparison "0" is less than "1", "1" is less than "11" and "12" is less than "2" etc.So it is not working after 10.
You can definition a sample comparison function as below:
public static int Compare(string a, string b)
{
return int.Parse(a.Substring(0, 15)).CompareTo(int.Parse(b.Substring(0, 15)));
}
and then invoke it in sort method:
stringList.Sort(Compare);
The prerequisite is that your format is satisfied that its first 15 characters can convert to an integer.
You are probably looking for the "logical sort order" seen in Windows Explorer. Below I have replaced the default string comparer with a comparer using that API: StrCmpLogicalW
class Program
{
public sealed class NaturalStringComparer : IComparer<string>
{
[DllImport("shlwapi.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Unicode)]
public static extern int StrCmpLogicalW(string psz1, string psz2);
public int Compare(string a, string b) => StrCmpLogicalW(a, b);
}
static void Main()
{
var stringList = new List<string>();
var index = 0;
while (index < 12)
{
stringList.Add($"{index,-15} {"Model",-35} {"35GB",-20}");
index++;
}
stringList.Sort(new NaturalStringComparer());
foreach (var s in stringList)
{
Console.WriteLine(s);
}
}
}
You seem to be deliberately left aligning index your numbers, which will mean that the ascending string sorted sequence of 1 through 12 would would be 1, 11, 12, 2, 3, 4, ...
Since you have the index value during the creation of the string, it would be wasteful to again parse the number out of the string in order to sort it. It would be better to retain the index and the string separately in a suitable data structure, sort by the index, and then project out just the string.
Updated for OP's new Question
Creating a custom POCO class (with or without an IComparable implementation) seems overkill everytime you need to sort an enumerable of related data by one of its properties.
Instead, you can easily build up a sortable anon class, struct or tuple containing the sortable integer and the concatenated string, then sort, then project out just the string. Either way, OP's GetPropertyValue method appears to return (reflect) a weak type such as object or string - accepted answer wouldn't compile as it needs to cast index to an int.
Here's value tuple solution:
var tuples = new List<(int index, string str)>();
foreach (ManagementObject disk in objectSearcher.Get() )
{
var indexValue = int.Parse(disk.GetPropertyValue("Index"));
tuples.Add((indexValue, string.Format("{0, -15} {1,-35} {2, -20}",
indexValue,
disk.GetPropertyValue("Model"),
diskSize)));
}
// Sort by index, and project out the assembled string.
var myList = tuples
.OrderBy(t => t.index)
.Select(t => t.str)
.ToList();
Original Answer, OP had a simple loop
What I've done below is to keep a Value tuple of the original string, and the parsed integer value of the first 15 digits.
Note that this will break if there are non-numeric characters in the first 15 characters of your string.
// Test Data
var strings = Enumerable.Range(0, 12)
.Select(i => (string.Format("{0, -15} {1,-35} {2, -20}", i, "Model", "35GB")));
// Project out a tuple of (index, string)
var indexedTuples = strings.Select(s => (idx: int.Parse(s.Substring(0, 15)), str: s));
var sorted = indexedTuples.OrderBy(t => t.idx)
.Select(t => t.str);
Let us say, I have an enum BasicType, which is defined as follows:
public enum ObjectType{
A = 1,
B = 2,
C = 3,
}
The BasicType identifies performs a ternary classification of any Object. Subsequently, I realized that the objects A and B need to be treated in a similar way as compared to C, so I defined another enum ObjectGroupType as follows :
public enum ObjectGroupType
{
AB = 1,
C = 2,
}
With the new enum, I am able to bucket objects of several known types as one. So, when I receive a stream of objects in various types, I actually identify whether they belong to AB or C type. Is there an elegant workaround for this? For instance, will I be able to assign the same enum values for A and B in the ObjectGroupType?:
Edit 1 : I am unable to find the resemblance to the question here
Edit 2 : Thank you Maurice for your constructive inputs -- taking cues from your answer, I came up with this redefined ObjectGroupType.
public enum ObjectGroupType
{
AB = ObjectType.A | ObjectType.B
C = 2,
}
Is this valid?
Essentially, when I process a stream of objects of type AB, I want to ascertain Type A or Type B objects. This is quite similar to a hierarchical two-level decision tree:
object
/ \
AB C
/\
A B
I apologize in advance if I misread your intent, but it almost sounds like you want to allow multiple different enum types to be acted on in your code based on the enum value. The good thing is that you can do that already with bitwise operations and enums.
Given an enum that looks like this:
[Flags]
enum ObjectType
{
A = 1,
B = 2,
C = 4,
D = 8
}
You can set a comparison value that is the bitwise OR of several values:
var allowedValues = ObjectType.A | ObjectType.C;
This works because the values in the enum act like bit fields under the covers.
When you run your code, you do a bitwise AND on the allowedValues variable and the test variable and see if it matches your test variable. If it does, then it is one of the values you want:
if ((test & allowed) == test) ...
Below is a working example using the enum above that shows you how it works.
void Main()
{
var allowed = ObjectType.A | ObjectType.C;
var values = new int [] { 1, 2, 4, 8 };
foreach (var i in values)
{
var test = (ObjectType)i;
if ((test & allowed) == test)
{
Console.WriteLine("Found a match: {0}", test);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("No match: {0}", test);
}
}
}
Best of luck!
Edit:
I found the answer of Maurice Reeves very good, I only want to bring some more info:
[Flags]
public enum ObjectType
{
None=0,
A = 1,
B = 2,
C = 4,
D = 8,
E = 16,
AorB=A|B,
BorCorD=B|C|D,
}
By using [Flags] attribute, you can create sets of enum items, which can help you establishing different business rules for each set.
In order to check if and item exist in a set you can do as follow:
public static bool IsAorB(this ObjectType item)
{
return ObjectType.AorB.HasFlag(item);
}
if you want to creat on the fly new set of items, you can do:
var newGroup=ObjectType.A | ObjectType.BorCorD;
if you want to apply some business rule to a set, except an item, you can do:
var newGroupExceptC =newGroup^=ObjectType.C;
Now if you check if element C exist in the set you will get false:
bool exist=newGroupExceptC.HasFlag(ObjectType.C) // =false
more info you can find here
You might use a int instead of an enum, use values that don't overlap when combined (i.e. values whose binary representation has only one bit on) and then perform a mask operation on the ObjectType of a parameter to determine if it is AB:
class SomeClass
{
public static class ObjectType
{
public const int A = 1;
public const int B = 2;
public const int C = 4;
public const int D = 8;
}
public int MyType;
public string Title;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<SomeClass> list = new List<SomeClass>()
{
new SomeClass() {Title ="I am of type A", MyType = ObjectType.A }
,new SomeClass() {Title ="I am of type B", MyType = ObjectType.B }
,new SomeClass() {Title ="I am of type AB", MyType = ObjectType.A | ObjectType.B }
};
list.ForEach(p => { if (p.MyType == (ObjectType.A | ObjectType.B)) Console.WriteLine(p.Title); });
}
}
The downside of this approach is losing strong-typing of Object Type, i.e. you can assign any value not just those you define in the ObjectType.
I need to get the numeric position of an enum in its definition.
Consider the following enum - it is used for bit fields but the status names
would be useful if they had the values on the right that I have commented.
[Flags]
public enum StatusFlags
{
None = 0, // 0 -- these commented indexes are the numbers I also would like
Untested = 1, // 1 to associate with the enum names.
Passed_Programming = 2, // 2
Failed_Programming = 4, // 3
// ... many more
}
I have created a static method as follows, which works for what I want.
public static int GetStatusID(this StatusFlags flag)
{
int i = 0;
foreach (StatusFlags val in Enum.GetValues(typeof(StatusFlags)))
{
if (flag == val) break;
i++;
}
return i;
}
It is used like this:
StatusFlags f = StatusFlags.Failed_Programming;
// I want the position i.e value of 3 not the value the enum is associated with i.e 4
int Index = f.GetStatusID();
Is there is a better way to do this?
How about using attributes on your enum? Something like this:
[Flags]
public enum StatusFlags
{
[Index=0]
None = 0,
[Index=1]
Untested = 1,
[Index=2]
Passed_Programming = 2,
[Index=3]
Failed_Programming = 4,
// ... many more
}
Then you can the index value of your enum like this:
var type = typeof(StatusFlags);
var statusFlag = type.GetMember(StatusFlags.Untested.ToString());
var attributes = statusFlag [0].GetCustomAttributes(typeof(IndexAttribute),false);
var index = int.Parse(((IndexAttribute)attributes[0]).Index); //if you need an int value
A deleted answer here suggested something that resembled
public static int GetStatusID(this StatusFlags flag)
{
return Array.IndexOf(Enum.GetValues(typeof(StatusFlags)), flag);
}
and was just missing the syntactical point that IndexOf is a static function in the Array class, not an extension method. I like it though for brevity.
You could do this:
public static int GetStatusID(this StatusFlags flag)
{
return
Enum
.GetValues(typeof(StatusFlags))
.Cast<StatusFlags>()
.Select((f, n) => new { f, n })
.Where(fn => fn.f == flag)
.Select(fn => fn.n)
.DefaultIfEmpty(0)
.First();
}
How about just using math? He says the flags go up in powers of 2
int GetStatusID(this StatusFlags flag)
{
if (((int)flag) == 0) return 0;
return (Math.Log((double)flag) / Math.Log(2D)) + 1;
}
If each flag has only 1 bit set like that then the index is just Math.Log2((int)flag) + 1. However Math.Log2 is a floating-point operation and is very slow so don't use it
If you're using .NET Core then there are BitOperations.Log2 and BitOperations.TrailingZeroCount which map directly to hardware instructions like TZCNT/BSF in x86 or CLZ in ARM, hence are much more efficient and the result is like this
public static int GetStatusID(this StatusFlags flag)
{
if ((int)flag == 0)
return 0;
return BitOperations.Log2((int)flag);
// or return BitOperations.TrailingZeroCount((int)flag) + 1;
}
If you're using an older .NET framework then calculate see the way to calculate integer log2 quickly in these questions
What's the quickest way to compute log2 of an integer in C#?
Fastest implementation of log2(int) and log2(float)
Fast way of finding most and least significant bit set in a 64-bit integer
The following code returns One, Two, Three, where I expect GetNames to do that and GetValues to return 2, 5, 10:
enum Nums
{
One = 2,
Two = 5,
Three = 10
}
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
var vals = Enum.GetValues(typeof(Nums));
}
}
What is up here? How do I get the values 2, 5, 10 from the type Nums?
cast it to an int like this:
int value = (int)Num;
You need to cast it to an int:
int val = (int)Nums.One;
Or to answer your question for getting all of the items in the enum:
IEnumerable<int> values = Enum.GetValues(typeof(Nums)).Cast<int>();
You can do it like this:
int[] vals = Enum
.GetValues(typeof(Nums)) // Thus far, this is your code
.Cast<int>() // Cast individual elements to int
.ToArray(); // Convert the result to array
Here is a demo on ideone.
I haven't fully wrapped my head around C# Enums yet, but the Enum.GetValues documentation has an example that shows that casting has some very interesting and powerful effects on them. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.enum.getvalues(v=vs.110).aspx
using System;
enum SignMagnitude { Negative = -1, Zero = 0, Positive = 1 };
public class Example
{
public static void Main()
{
foreach (var value in Enum.GetValues(typeof(SignMagnitude))) {
Console.WriteLine("{0,3} 0x{0:X8} {1}",
(int) value, ((SignMagnitude) value));
} }
}
// The example displays the following output:
// 0 0x00000000 Zero
// 1 0x00000001 Positive
// -1 0xFFFFFFFF Negative
In C, enums, internally equates to an integer. Therefore we can treat data types of enum as integer also.
How to achieve the same with C#?
Firstly, there could be two values that you're referring to:
Underlying Value
If you are asking about the underlying value, which could be any of these types: byte, sbyte, short, ushort, int, uint, long or ulong
Then you can simply cast it to it's underlying type. Assuming it's an int, you can do it like this:
int eValue = (int)enumValue;
However, also be aware of each items default value (first item is 0, second is 1 and so on) and the fact that each item could have been assigned a new value, which may not necessarily be in any order particular order! (Credit to #JohnStock for the poke to clarify).
This example assigns each a new value, and show the value returned:
public enum MyEnum
{
MyValue1 = 34,
MyValue2 = 27
}
(int)MyEnum.MyValue2 == 27; // True
Index Value
The above is generally the most commonly required value, and is what your question detail suggests you need, however each value also has an index value (which you refer to in the title). If you require this then please see other answers below for details.
Another way to convert an Enum-Type to an int:
enum E
{
A = 1, /* index 0 */
B = 2, /* index 1 */
C = 4, /* index 2 */
D = 4 /* index 3, duplicate use of 4 */
}
void Main()
{
E e = E.C;
int index = Array.IndexOf(Enum.GetValues(e.GetType()), e);
// index is 2
E f = (E)(Enum.GetValues(e.GetType())).GetValue(index);
// f is E.C
}
More complex but independent from the INT values assigned to the enum values.
By default the underlying type of each element in the enum is integer.
enum Values
{
A,
B,
C
}
You can also specify custom value for each item:
enum Values
{
A = 10,
B = 11,
C = 12
}
int x = (int)Values.A; // x will be 10;
Note: By default, the first enumerator has the value 0.
You can directly cast it:
enum MyMonthEnum { January = 1, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December };
public static string GetMyMonthName(int MonthIndex)
{
MyMonthEnum MonthName = (MyMonthEnum)MonthIndex;
return MonthName.ToString();
}
For Example:
string MySelectedMonthName=GetMyMonthName(8);
//then MySelectedMonthName value will be August.
Use simple casting:
int value = (int) enum.item;
Refer to enum (C# Reference)
Use a cast:
public enum MyEnum : int {
A = 0,
B = 1,
AB = 2,
}
int val = (int)MyEnum.A;
using System;
public class EnumTest
{
enum Days {Sat=1, Sun, Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri};
static void Main()
{
int x = (int)Days.Sun;
int y = (int)Days.Fri;
Console.WriteLine("Sun = {0}", x);
Console.WriteLine("Fri = {0}", y);
}
}
One reason that the designers c# might have chosen to NOT have enums auto convert was to prevent accidentally mixing different enum types...
e.g. this is bad code followed by a good version
enum ParkingLevel { GroundLevel, FirstFloor};
enum ParkingFacing { North, East, South, West }
void Test()
{
var parking = ParkingFacing.North; // NOT A LEVEL
// WHOOPS at least warning in editor/compile on calls
WhichLevel(parking);
// BAD wrong type of index, no warning
var info = ParkinglevelArray[ (int)parking ];
}
// however you can write this, looks complicated
// but avoids using casts every time AND stops miss-use
void Test()
{
ParkingLevelManager levels = new ParkingLevelManager();
// assign info to each level
var parking = ParkingFacing.North;
// Next line wrong mixing type
// but great you get warning in editor or at compile time
var info=levels[parking];
// and.... no cast needed for correct use
var pl = ParkingLevel.GroundLevel;
var infoCorrect=levels[pl];
}
class ParkingLevelInfo { /*...*/ }
class ParkingLevelManager
{
List<ParkingLevelInfo> m_list;
public ParkingLevelInfo this[ParkingLevel x]
{ get{ return m_list[(int)x]; } }}
In answering this question I define 'value' as the value of the enum item, and index as is positional location in the Enum definition (which is sorted by value). The OP's question asks for 'index' and various answer have interpreted this as either 'index' or 'value' (by my definitions). Sometimes the index is equal to numerical value.
No answer has specifically addressed the case of finding the index (not value) where the Enum is an Enum flag.
Enum Flag
{
none = 0 // not a flag, thus index =-1
A = 1 << 0, // index should be 0
B = 1 << 1, // index should be 1
C = 1 << 2, // index should be 2
D = 1 << 3, // index should be 3,
AandB = A | B // index is composite, thus index = -1 indicating undefined
All = -1 //index is composite, thus index = -1 indicating undefined
}
In the case of Flag Enums, the index is simply given by
var index = (int)(Math.Log2((int)flag)); //Shows the maths, but is inefficient
However, the above solution is
(a) Inefficient as pointed out by #phuclv (Math.Log2() is floating point and costly) and
(b) Does not address the Flag.none case, nor any composite flags - flags that are composed of other flags (eg the 'AandB' flag as in my example).
DotNetCore
If using dot net core we can address both a) and b) above as follows:
int setbits = BitOperations.PopCount((uint)flag); //get number of set bits
if (setbits != 1) //Finds ECalFlags.none, and all composite flags
return -1; //undefined index
int index = BitOperations.TrailingZeroCount((uint)flag); //Efficient bit operation
Not DotNetCore
The BitOperations only work in dot net core. See #phuclv answer here for some efficient suggestions https://stackoverflow.com/a/63582586/6630192
#user1027167 answer will not work if composite flags are used, as per my comment on his answer
Thankyou to #phuclv for suggestions on improving efficiency