If I have an entity:
class Post
{
[ Key ]
public int PostID { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Body { get; set; }
public string Comment { get; set; }
public virtual Project Project { get; set; }
...
public bool LikedByUser; // Append this property
}
public class PostLike
{
public int PostLikeID { get; set; }
public virtual Post Post { get; set; }
}
Is there a way I can do a join on a call to the database and just append this last property (mentioned in the code) as an extra... for example, this code is stupid (and probably doesn't work):
this.context.Posts
.Join(
this.context.PostLikes,
p => p.PostID,
pl => pl.Post.PostID,
// This is the bit that can't be right!
( p, pl ) => new Post()
{
PostID = p.PostID,
Title = p.Title,
Body = p.Body,
Comment = p.Comment
Project = p.Project,
LikedByUser = pl.Count > 0 ? true : false
}
);
I would like something like this:
this.context.Posts
.Join(
this.context.PostLikes,
p => p.PostID,
pl => pl.Post.PostID,
( p, pl ) => {
p.LikedByUser = pl.Count > 0 ? true : false;
}
);
So - one way you could do this, is via a sub-query:
var posts = this.context.Posts
.Select(p =>
new Post()
{
PostID = p.PostID,
Title = p.Title,
Body = p.Body,
Comment = p.Comment
Project = p.Project,
LikedByUser = this.context.PostLikes.Any(pl => pl.PostId = p.PostID)
});
If that property isn't part of the existing class - you could project into an anonymous type, for use:
var posts = this.context.Posts
.Select(p =>
new {
Post = p,
LikedByUser = this.context.PostLikes.Any(pl => pl.PostId = p.PostID)
});
Related
I have two database tables and I'm attempting to create a union query from them. They have different structures:
public partial class Notes
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public int VisitID { get; set; }
public string Note { get; set; }
public DateTime PostDate { get; set; }
public decimal AcctBalance {get; set; }
}
public partial class SystemNotes
{
public int ID {get; set;}
public int VisitID {get; set;}
public int FacilityID {get; set;}
public string Note {get; set;
public DateTime NoteDate {get ;set; }
}
What I want to do is end up with a list of all the data in Notes format sorted by PostDate. What I've tried so far is this:
List<Notes> requests = new List<Notes>();
requests = _context.Notes.Where(i => i.VisitID == VisitID && i.isActive == true).ToList();
List<SystemNotes> requests_s = new List<SystemNotes>();
requests_s = _context.SystemNotes.Where(i => i.VisitID == VisitID).ToList();
var unionA = from a in requests
select new
{
a.ID,
a.VisitID,
a.Note,
a.PostDate,
a.AcctBalance
};
var unionB = from b in requests_s
select new Notes()
{
ID = b.ID,
VisitID = (int)b.VisitID,
Note = b.Note,
PostDate = b.NoteDate,
AcctBalance = (decimal)0.00
};
List<Object> allS = (from x in unionA select (Object)x).ToList();
allS.AddRange((from x in unionB select (Object)x).ToList());
However, PostDate is no longer recognized as an element inside the Object so I can't sort on it. Also, it's in Object format not in Notes format which is what I want for where I'm sending my data. I'm stuck on this one point. Can you assist? Or am I doing this the wrong way in general?
If I correctly understand what you want:
List<Notes> myNotes = new List<Notes> {
new Notes () {
ID = 1,
VisitID = 2
}
};
List<SystemNotes> mySystemNotes = new List<SystemNotes> {
new SystemNotes () {
ID = 3,
VisitID = 4
}
};
var result = myNotes.Select (mn => new { mn.ID, mn.VisitID })
.Union(mySystemNotes.Select (msn => new { msn.ID, msn.VisitID }))
.OrderByDescending(a=>a.ID);
foreach (var currentItem in result)
{
Console.WriteLine ("ID={0}; VisitID={1}", currentItem.ID, currentItem.VisitID);
}
I'm indexing a type that has percolate query but Nest/elasticsearch choose to ignore the query property.
public class MyQueryModel
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string UserId { get; set;}
public string Email { get ; set;}
public string Name { get; set; }
public string State { get; set; }
public QueryContainer PercolatedQuery { get; set; }
}
public class DocModel
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string State { get; set; }
public string Category { get; set;}
public string Email { get; set; }
}
EDIT: some of property names between the 2 are same by coincidence. They totally mean different things on either of the 2 models and maybe mapped differently.
my mappings:
on queries index:
client.CreateIndex("on_my_queries", c => c
.Mappings(m => m
.Map<MyQueryModel>(mq => mq
.AutoMap()
.Properties(props => props
.Percolator(perc => perc
.Name(m => m.PercolatedQuery)
)
)
)
)
)
on doc index
client.CreateIndex("on_my_docs", c => c
.Mappings(m => m
.Map<MyDocModel>(md => md
.AutoMap()
)
)
)
Indexing my query model:
var queryModel = new MyQueryModel
{
Id = "some-id",
UserId = "some-user-id",
Email = "some-valid-email",
State = "some-valid-state",
PercolatedQuery = new TermQuery
{
Field = "category",
Value = "some-valid-cat-on-my-doc-models"
}
}
var request = new IndexRequest<QueryModel>(DocumentPath<MyQueryModel>.Id(queryModel));
var result = client.Index(request);
Everything gets indexed except the PercolatedQuery field. After scratching a lot of my head, I find out that client is not even serializing it. I ran the following only to see that PercolatedQuery was not serialized:
var jsonString = client.Serializer.SerializeToString(request);
jsonString:
{
"id" : "some-id",
"userId" : "some-user-id",
"email: : "some-valid-email",
"state" : "some-valid-state"
}
What client see as percolated query:
var queryString = client.Serializer.SerializeToString(queryModel.PercolatedQuery);
queryString:
{
"term": {
"category": {
"value": "some-valid-cat-on-my-doc-models"
}
}
}
I don´t know where is the mistake why it says that does not contain a defintion of ImporteSolicitado, interesesDemora and importeReintegro when they are colums of c and the last one of d
var importes = (from c in _context.ReintegroSolicitado
join d in _context.ReintegroRecibido on c.Expediente.ID equals d.Expediente.ID
group new {c,d} by new { c.Expediente.Codigo} into cd
select new { ImporteSolictadoFinal = cd.Sum(b => b.ImporteSolicitado + b.InteresesDemora), ImporteReintegroFinal = cd.Sum(e => e.ImporteReintegro) });
your group element contains two property c and d. So you need refer to
this property as
...
select new {
ImporteSolictadoFinal = cd.Sum(b => b.c.ImporteSolicitado + b.c.InteresesDemora),
ImporteReintegroFinal = cd.Sum(e => e.d.ImporteReintegro) }
...
This is very tough to get right with query posted. I did my best, but it is probably not exactly correct.
var importes = (from c in _context.reintegroSolicitado
join d in _context.reintegroRecibido on c.expediente.ID equals d.expediente.ID
select new { reintegroSolicitado = c, reintegroRecibido = c})
.GroupBy(x => new { c = x.reintegroSolicitado , d = x.reintegroRecibido})
.Select(cd => new { ImporteSolictadoFinal = cd.Sum(b => b.reintegroSolicitado.ImporteSolicitado + b.reintegroSolicitado.InteresesDemora), ImporteReintegroFinal = cd.Sum(e => e.reintegroRecibido.ImporteReintegro) });
}
}
public class Context
{
public List<ReintegroSolicitado> reintegroSolicitado { get; set; }
public List<ReintegroSolicitado> reintegroRecibido { get; set; }
public Expediente expediente { get; set; }
}
public class ReintegroSolicitado
{
public Expediente expediente { get; set; }
public int ImporteSolicitado { get; set; }
public int InteresesDemora { get; set; }
public int ImporteReintegro { get; set; }
}
public class Expediente
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public int Codigo { get; set; }
}
I have to next 2 entities in my project
public class Product
{
public Product()
{
this.ProductImages = new HashSet<ProductImage>();
this.ProductParams = new HashSet<ProductParam>();
}
public int ID { get; set; }
public int BrandID { get; set; }
public int CodeProductTypeID { get; set; }
public string SeriaNumber { get; set; }
public string ModelNumber { get; set; }
public decimal Price { get; set; }
public bool AvailableInStock { get; set; }
public virtual Brand Brand { get; set; }
public virtual CodeProductType CodeProductType { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ProductImage> ProductImages { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ProductParam> ProductParams { get; set; }
}
public class ProductParam
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int ProductId { get; set; }
public int CodeProductParamId { get; set; }
public string Value { get; set; }
public virtual Product Product { get; set; }
public virtual CodeProductParam CodeProductParam { get; set; }
}
and I want to get list of Products which has list of specified parameters
var prodParamCritria = new List<ProductParam>()
{
new ProductParam(){CodeProductParamId =1, Value="Black" },
new ProductParam(){CodeProductParamId =2, Value="Steal"}
};
in sql I can do it by using EXISTS clause twise
SELECT *
FROM Products p
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM ProductParams pp
WHERE pp.ProductId = p.ID
AND (pp.CodeProductParamId = 1 AND pp.[Value] = N'Black')
)
AND EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM ProductParams pp
WHERE pp.ProductId = p.ID
AND pp.CodeProductParamId = 2
AND pp.[Value] = N'Steal'
)
How can i get same result by EF methods or linq
Try this:
var products= db.Products.Where(p=>p.ProductParams.Any(pp=>pp.CodeProductParamId == 1 && pp.Value == "Black") &&
p.ProductParams.Any(pp=>pp.CodeProductParamId == 2 && pp.Value == "Steal"));
Update
The problem in work with that list of ProductParam to use it as a filter is that EF doesn't know how to translate a PodructParam object to SQL, that's way if you execute a query like this:
var products2 = db.Products.Where(p => prodParamCritria.All(pp => p.ProductParams.Any(e => pp.CodeProductParamId == e.CodeProductParamId && pp.Value == e.Value)));
You will get an NotSupportedException as you comment in the answer of #BostjanKodre.
I have a solution for you but probably you will not like it. To resolve that issue you could call the ToList method before call the Where. This way you will bring all products to memory and you would work with Linq to Object instead Linq to Entities, but this is extremely inefficient because you are filtering in memory and not in DB.
var products3 = db.Products.ToList().Where(p => prodParamCritria.All(pp => p.ProductParams.Any(e => pp.CodeProductParamId == e.CodeProductParamId && pp.Value == e.Value)));
If you want filter by one criteria then this could be more simple and you are going to be able filtering using a list of a particular primitive type. If you, for example, want to filter the products only by CodeProductParamId, then you could do this:
var ids = new List<int> {1, 2};
var products = db.Products.Where(p => ids.All(i=>p.ProductParams.Any(pp=>pp.CodeProductParamId==i))).ToList();
This is because you are working with a primitive type and not with a custom object.
I suppose something like that should work
db.Product.Where(x => x.ProductParams.FirstOrDefault(y => y.CodeProductParamId == 1) != null && x.ProductParams.FirstOrDefault(y => y.CodeProductParamId == 2) != null).ToList();
or better
db.Product.Where(x => x.ProductParams.Any(y => y.CodeProductParamId == 1) && x.ProductParams.Any(y => y.CodeProductParamId == 2)).ToList();
Ok, if you need to make query on parameters in list prodParamCriteria it will look like this:
db.Product.Where(x => prodParamCritria.All(c=> x.ProductParams.Any(p=>p.CodeProductParamId == c.CodeProductParamId && p.Value== c.Value))).ToList();
I forgot that complex types cannot be used in query database, so i propose you to convert your prodParamCriteria to dictionary and use it in query
Dictionary<int, string> dctParams = prodParamCritria.ToDictionary(x => x.CodeProductParamId , y=>y.Value);
db.Product.Where(x => dctParams.All(c => x.ProductParams.Any(p=> p.CodeProductParamId == c.Key && p.Value== c.Value))).ToList();
another variation:
IEnumerable<Int32> lis = prodParamCritria.Select(x => x.CodeProductParamId).ToList();
var q = Products.Select(
x => new {
p = x,
cs = x.ProductParams.Where(y => lis.Contains(y.Id))
}
).Where(y => y.cs.Count() == lis.Count()).
ToList();
with a named class like (or maybe without, but not in linqpad)
public class daoClass {
public Product p {get; set;}
public Int32 cs {get; set;}
}
IEnumerable<Int32> lis = prodParamCritria.Select(x => x.CodeProductParamId).ToList();
var q = Products.Select(
x => new daoClass {
p = x,
cs = x.ProductParams.Where(y => lis.Contains(y.Id))
}
).Where(y => y.cs.Count() == lis.Count()).
SelectMany(y => y.p).
ToList();
I have two tables in Database:
PostCalculationLine
PostCaluclationLineProduct
PostCalculationLineProduct(table2) contains Foriegn key of PostCalucationLineId(table1)
In C# code I have two different Models for these two tables as follows:
public class PostCalculationLine : BaseModel
{
public long Id{ get; set; }
public string Position { get; set; }
public virtual Order Order { get; set; }
public virtual Task Task { get; set; }
//some other properties go here
public virtual IList<PostCalculationLineProduct> PostCalculationLineProducts { get; set; }
}
and
public class PostCalculationLineProduct : BaseModel
{
public long Id {get;set;}
public string Description { get; set; }
//some other properties go here
}
Now in Entityframework code, I fetch data from PostCalculationLineProduct as follows:
PostCalculationLineRepository pclr = new PostCalculationLineRepository();
DataSourceResult dsrResult = pclr.Get()
.SelectMany(p => p.PostCalculationLineProducts)
.Where(c => c.Product.ProductType.Id == 1 && c.DeletedOn == null)
.Select(c => new HourGridViewModel()
{
Id = c.Id,
Date = c.From,
EmployeeName = c.Employee != null ?c.Employee.Name:string.Empty,
Description= c.Description,
ProductName = c.Product != null?c.Product.Name :string.Empty,
From = c.From,
To = c.Till,
Quantity = c.Amount,
LinkedTo = "OrderName",
Customer ="Customer"
PostCalculationLineId = ____________
})
.ToDataSourceResult(request);
In the above query I want to get PostCalculationLineId(from Table1) marked with underLine. How can I achieve this?
Thanks
You can use this overload of SelectMany to achieve this:-
DataSourceResult dsrResult = pclr.Get()
.SelectMany(p => p.PostCalculationLineProducts,
(PostCalculationLineProductObj,PostCalculationLineObj) =>
new { PostCalculationLineProductObj,PostCalculationLineObj })
.Where(c => c.PostCalculationLineProductObj.Product.ProductType.Id == 1
&& c.PostCalculationLineProductObj.DeletedOn == null)
.Select(c => new HourGridViewModel()
{
Id = c.PostCalculationLineProductObj.Id,
Date = c.PostCalculationLineProductObj.From,
//Other Columns here
PostCalculationLineId = c.PostCalculationLineObj.Id
};
This will flatten the PostCalculationLineProducts list and returns the flattened list combined with each PostCalculationLine element.