Ok, I'm stuck. I've got a Web API that I benchmark using VS integrated Load Test project. There's one catch though, I need conditional logic. For example:
if Svc1 returns param1, then next requests should go to Svc2.
I'm using ExtractionRule to extract the parameter from web API call, and if present, add that in Context and LoadTestUserContext. Here's the code:
public override void Extract(object sender, ExtractionEventArgs e)
{
var serializer = new JsonNetSerializer();
var str = e.Response.BodyString;
var result = serializer.Deserialize<SpinResult>(str);
if (result.BonusRemainingTrials > 0)
{
e.WebTest.Context.Add("bonus", result.BonusRemainingTrials);
var userContext = (LoadTestUserContext)e.WebTest.Context["$LoadTestUserContext"];
userContext["bonus"] = result.BonusRemainingTrials;
e.Success = true;
}
}
and here's test conditional logic:
Everything works fine, until server returns the parameter, after which load test should invoke the second service (Svc2), which doesn't happen. No matter if "bonus" parameter assigned or not, the test always invokes Svc1. Any help why it's so stubborn?
Many thanks.
Related
So I'm building an app with twilio voice, and I've got all the phonecall stuff working. But I'm having a little trouble understanding which parameters my callback should have.
I've registered the URL as described in the docs:
options.From = formatPhoneNumber(callout.callback_number);
options.To = formatPhoneNumber(offer.employee_phone_number);
options.Url = TwilioCallBotController.TwilioCalloutScriptURL;
options.StatusCallback = TwilioCallBotController.StatusCallbackURL;
options.StatusCallbackEvents = new []{"initiated", "ringing", "answered", "completed" };
options.StatusCallbackMethod = "POST";
I've also made a callback method here, but I'm not having much luck finding out how the parameters are supposed to work with their API. I'm kindof at a loss as to what could be the reason behind this one not working:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult TwilioStatusCallback()
{
var twiml = new Twilio.TwiML.TwilioResponse();
twiml.Say("This is a test");
string CallSid = Request.Form["CallSid"];
string CallStatus = Request.Form["CallStatus"];
Debug.WriteLine("Status Callback Delivered");
Shift_Offer shoffer = db.Shift_Offers.Where(s => s.twillio_sid == CallSid).ToList()[0];
shoffer.status = CallStatus.ToString();// + DateTime.Now.ToString();
return TwiML(twiml);
}
Edit:
So it turns out that the API is very sensitive about the method signature (the call was previously throwing a method not found exception in a number of microsoft DLLs, including System.Web and System.Web.Mvc.
So I've actually gotten the software to call the method by using an empty method signature (no parameters).
However I'm still having trouble getting the parameters from the HTTPPOST
Edit: So upon further investigation I've managed to inspect the Request. The values I'm after exist in Request.Form["foo"], but they don't seem to be getting put into the two strings I have declared. I've removed the ["HttpPost"] attribute to try to troubleshoot the issue, but I'm really at a loss as to why I can see the values in the debugger, but they're not translating into memory.
public ActionResult TwilioStatusCallback()
{
var twiml = new Twilio.TwiML.TwilioResponse();
string sid = Request.Form["CallSid"];
string status = Request.Form["CallStatus"];
Shift_Offer shoffer = db.Shift_Offers.Where(s => s.twillio_sid == sid).ToList()[0];
shoffer.status = status;// + DateTime.Now.ToString();
return TwiML(twiml);
}
Last issue was that the database wasn't being saved.
Just added a db.SaveChanges() and we're good.
I have a bit of complicated situation. I must create analyzers/ code fix providers for situations such as a parameter is only assigned but never used or local variable are never used.
For the parameter situation, I'm going for the method declaration and looking at the parameter list to get all the analyzer. I'm going through assignment expressions within the method and I filter the parameters that were assigned with an helper method.
Where it gets fuzzy is I have no clue or to know when a local variable/parameter is used or not. I've gone through symbols but they can't tell me that variable used/ not used. I could try to find how many times a variable's name was mentioned inside a method by turning the method declaration syntax context in a string and look for the parameters that were assigned but that's simply such a BAD idea.
I'm really stuck and I would some help for this from anyone who had previous experience with this kind of situation.
For people who might ask, I'm mostly looking for the missing logic for the analyzer. I have no idea how the code fix provider will work. If you have an idea of what I could do, feel free to include it in your answer ! As of now, I was thinking that a local variable that's not used could be deleted from a method and the same could go for an unused parameter. I'm not sure at the moment.
UPDATE
I'm now trying to use the DataFlow API but it's not working for me at the moment. The oldest answer of this thread gave me a starting point but it's actually not working.
I came up with my own way :
private static bool IsLocalVariableBeingUsed(VariableDeclaratorSyntax variableDeclarator, SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext syntaxNode)
{
var model = syntaxNode.SemanticModel.Compilation.GetSemanticModel(variableDeclarator.SyntaxTree);
var methodBody = variableDeclarator.AncestorsAndSelf(false).OfType<MethodDeclarationSyntax>().First();
var lastMethodNode = methodBody?.ChildNodes().LastOrDefault();
if (lastMethodNode == null)
return false;
var readWrite = syntaxNode.SemanticModel.AnalyzeDataFlow(variableDeclarator, lastMethodNode);
}
But this also is not working. When using a test with NUnit :
var input = #"
class TestClass {
void TestMethod ()
{
int i;
}
}";
I get the following message when the runtime gets to either readWrite or result(from oldest answer):
System.ArgumentOutRangeException Index was out of range Must be non negative and lesser than the size of the collection"
But before that in my analyzer, when I try to validate my node to make sure it's not null and create the appropriate elements for the data flow API, there's no code break (not sure if that is the appropriate term) but at the moment I cannot progress.
You can see whether or not most variable are used (read/written) via the DataFlowAnalysis APIs. I've written an introduction to this API on my blog.
I believe in your case, you're looking for variables that are never read.
var tree = CSharpSyntaxTree.ParseText(#"
public class Sample
{
public void Foo()
{
int unused = 0;
int used = 1;
System.Console.Write(used);
}
}");
var Mscorlib = PortableExecutableReference.CreateFromAssembly(typeof(object).Assembly);
var compilation = CSharpCompilation.Create("MyCompilation",
syntaxTrees: new[] { tree }, references: new[] { Mscorlib });
var model = compilation.GetSemanticModel(tree);
var methodBody = tree.GetRoot().DescendantNodes().OfType<MethodDeclarationSyntax>().Single().Body;
DataFlowAnalysis result = model.AnalyzeDataFlow(methodBody);
var variablesDeclared = result.VariablesDeclared;
var variablesRead = result.ReadInside.Union(result.ReadOutside);
var unused = variablesDeclared.Except(variablesRead);
foreach(var variable in unused)
{
Console.WriteLine(variable);
}
Building on JoshVarty's answer, to get this to work in a diagnostic, I would register a SyntaxNodeAction for all MethodDeclaration Syntax Kinds and then look inside the body for unused variables:
public override void Initialize(AnalysisContext context)
{
context.RegisterSyntaxNodeAction(AnalyzeIt, SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration);
}
private static void AnalyzeIt(SyntaxNodeAnalysisContext context)
{
var method = context.Node as MethodDeclarationSyntax;
var dataFlow = context.SemanticModel.AnalyzeDataFlow(method.Body);
var variablesDeclared = dataFlow.VariablesDeclared;
var variablesRead = dataFlow.ReadInside.Union(dataFlow.ReadOutside);
var unused = variablesDeclared.Except(variablesRead);
if (unused.Any())
{
foreach (var unusedVar in unused)
{
context.ReportDiagnostic(Diagnostic.Create(Rule, unusedVar.Locations.First()));
}
}
}
Below I have some code that that I cannot Unit test because it tries to read settings from IIS7 and unfortunately our nightly build machine does not have IIS7. The only thing I can think of is to pass the ServerManager into the method, but then again in the caller I will have a ServerManager that will make that method unable to be unit tested. We use MOQ for our Mock library.
public ISection GetCurrentSettings(string location, Action<string> status)
{
#region Sanity Checks
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(location))
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("location");
}
if (status == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("status");
}
#endregion
ISection section = null;
_logger.Debug(string.Format("Retrieving current IIS settings for app at {0}.", location));
status("Getting current IIS settings.");
using (ServerManager manager = new ServerManager())
{
var data = (from site in manager.Sites
from app in site.Applications
from vdir in app.VirtualDirectories
where vdir.PhysicalPath.Equals(location, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)
select new {Website = site, App = app}).SingleOrDefault();
if (data == null)
{
_logger.Debug(string.Format("Could not find an application at {0} in IIS. Going to load the defaults instead.", location));
//ToDo possibly load defaults
}
else
{
_logger.Debug(string.Format("Application found in IIS with website: {0} and a path of {1}", data.Website.Name, data.App.Path));
int port =
data.Website.Bindings.Where(b => b.EndPoint != null).Select(b => b.EndPoint.Port).Single();
section = new IISSection
{
ApplicationPoolName = data.App.ApplicationPoolName,
VirtualDirectoryAlias = data.App.Path,
WebsiteName = data.Website.Name,
WebsiteRoot = data.App.VirtualDirectories[0].PhysicalPath,
Port = port.ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture),
WillApply = true,
AnonymousUser = _userService.GetUserByType(UserType.Anonymous)
};
}
return section;
}
Without rewriting your code fully, the general idea would be to pass in an ISettingReader* (implemented as IisSettingReader), which would expose methods that would get the data you need from IIS. Then, you can stub in the ISettingReader to return what you need, by passing ISettingReader into the method/class
*Or, IServerManager as it seems to be the current name, but I am not sure if that is IIS specific
UPDATE
To be more specific, as Darin Dimitrov elaborated, you need to pull all of the dependencies outside of the method and pass them in via parameter/constructor/property injection. This will require a rewrite of the code as it stands in its current state.
If not (and I do suggest a rewrite), then you can use something like TypeMock, which supposedly can fake the dependencies INSIDE a class, but I have not used this myself and only know what I have read on it.
Use Moq.
This will allow you to create a mocked version of ISettings rather than having to create a real one. It has the added advantage of allowing you to specify your own functionality as well.
I want to be able to mock the object that is returned by SPServer.Local but I can't seem to do it in typemock. At the moment when I debug, I see that SPServer.Local returns a null object of type SPServer. Shouldn't typemock be swapping out this instance with my fake instance? Is there something I'm doing wrong? The code runs fine on the sharepoint server.
[TestInitialize]
public void Setup()
{
fakeSite = Isolate.Fake.Instance<SPSite>(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);
Isolate.Swap.NextInstance<SPSite>().With(fakeSite);
fakeServer = Isolate.Fake.Instance<SPServer>(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);
Isolate.Swap.NextInstance<SPServer>().With(fakeServer);
sharePointStorageRepository = new SharePointStorageRepository();
}
[TestMethod]
[Isolated]
public void CreateHRFolderMethodCreatesHRFolder()
{
// arrange
// some arrange logic here
// act
var actual = sharePointStorageRepository.Create();
// assert
Assert.AreEqual(expected, actual);
}
This is the bit of code that is being run:
internal static Guid GetSiteGuid(string serverRelativeUrl, string webApplicationName)
{
Guid? guid = null;
SPServer myServer = SPServer.Local;
foreach (var serviceInstance in myServer.ServiceInstances.Where(si => si.Service is SPWebService)){
var service = (SPWebService) serviceInstance.Service;
var webapp = service.WebApplications.SingleOrDefault(wa => wa.DisplayName == webApplicationName);
if (webapp != null){
var site = webapp.Sites.SingleOrDefault(wa => wa.ServerRelativeUrl == serverRelativeUrl);
if (site != null) guid = site.ID;
}
}
if (!guid.HasValue){
throw new FileNotFoundException(
String.Format(
"Cannot find Site Collection with WebApplication \"{1}\" and ServerRelativeUrl \"{2}\" running on \"{0}\"",
myServer.Address, webApplicationName, serverRelativeUrl));
}
return guid.Value;
}
Thanks all!
I don't work in SharePoint, but something I noticed: You're not actually mocking the return of SPServer.Local anywhere. I think that's the missing step. I'm also not entirely sure you need to SwapNextInstance since I don't see anywhere that is actually creating an SPServer object.
That would change your test code to:
[TestInitialize]
public void Setup()
{
// I don't see where you're using SPSite, so I assume it's in code
// not being shown; otherwise you can remove this.
fakeSite = Isolate.Fake.Instance<SPSite>(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);
Isolate.Swap.NextInstance<SPSite>().With(fakeSite);
fakeServer = Isolate.Fake.Instance<SPServer>(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);
// INSTEAD OF THIS: Isolate.Swap.NextInstance<SPServer>().With(fakeServer);
// DO THIS:
Isolate.WhenCalled(() => SPServer.Local).WillReturn(fakeServer);
sharePointStorageRepository = new SharePointStorageRepository();
}
That WhenCalled method will mean that any time anyone asks for SPServer.Local, it'll return your fake instance.
Note that I see in the code being tested that you get the ServerInstances property. I don't see any specific return values getting set up, so I assume you're controlling the rest of the stuff in the omitted "arrange" logic.
I am connecting to an ODATA Service via a C# ASP.NET application, which has service operations such as:
GetItems(int? itemID, double? price)
I can consume this without issues in my browser, e.g.
http://api.mycompany.com/companycatalogue/GetItems?itemID=4
I understand how to use LINQ to Entities to consume an ODATA service, but can't find a decent explanation of how to consume service operations like the one above in C#. I have made a web reference to the service in my Visual Studio solution.
So far, I have something like this for my usual consuming of the data:
using CompanyCatalogue; //my web reference
...
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
CompanyCatalogueEntities dataContext = new CompanyCatalogueEntities (new Uri("http://api.mycompany.com/companycatalogue/"));
var result = from i in dataContext.Items select i; //just an example
//this is where I get into problems
var operationResults = CompanyCatalogue.GetItems(6, 20.5); //I just made this up
}
Any pointers?
OK, got the answer:
using CompanyCatalogue; //my web reference
...
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
CompanyCatalogueEntities dataContext = new CompanyCatalogueEntities();
DataServiceQuery<GetItemsResult> q = dataContext.CreateQuery<GetItemsResult>("GetItems")
.AddQueryOption("paramName", 6)
.AddQueryOption("paramName2", 20.5);
List<GetItemsResult> items = q.Execute().ToList();
}
This may be help for you.
This sample code used to consume the service operation in the WFC Data Service. This service operation(GetRowCount) returns the integer(int) type value. input para name is "code"
var q = context.CreateQuery<int>("GetRowCount").AddQueryOption("code", "'" + serviceProvider.Code + "'");
int RecordCount = context.Execute<int>(new Uri(q.RequestUri.ToString().Replace("GetRowCount()", "GetRowCount"))).FirstOrDefault();
Have you tried using HttpWebRequest?