Related
Using C#, I have a string that is a SQL script containing multiple queries. I want to remove sections of the string that are enclosed in single quotes. I can do this using Regex.Replace, in this manner:
string test = "Only 'together' can we turn him to the 'dark side' of the Force";
test = Regex.Replace(test, "'[^']*'", string.Empty);
Results in: "Only can we turn him to the of the Force"
What I want to do is remove the substrings between quotes EXCEPT for substrings containing a specific substring. For example, using the string above, I want to remove the quoted substrings except for those that contain "dark," such that the resulting string is:
Results in: "Only can we turn him to the 'dark side' of the Force"
How can this be accomplished using Regex.Replace, or perhaps by some other technique? I'm currently trying a solution that involves using Substring(), IndexOf(), and Contains().
Note: I don't care if the single quotes around "dark side" are removed or not, so the result could also be: "Only can we turn him to the dark side of the Force." I say this because a solution using Split() would remove all the single quotes.
Edit: I don't have a solution yet using Substring(), IndexOf(), etc. By "working on," I mean I'm thinking in my head how this can be done. I have no code, which is why I haven't posted any yet. Thanks.
Edit: VKS's solution below works. I wasn't escaping the \b the first attempt which is why it failed. Also, it didn't work unless I included the single quotes around the whole string as well.
test = Regex.Replace(test, "'(?![^']*\\bdark\\b)[^']*'", string.Empty);
'(?![^']*\bdark\b)[^']*'
Try this.See demo.Replace by empty string.You can use lookahead here to check if '' contains a word dark.
https://www.regex101.com/r/rG7gX4/12
While vks's solution works, I'd like to demonstrate a different approach:
string test = "Only 'together' can we turn him to the 'dark side' of the Force";
test = Regex.Replace(test, #"'[^']*'", match => {
if (match.Value.Contains("dark"))
return match.Value;
// You can add more cases here
return string.Empty;
});
Or, if your condition is simple enough:
test = Regex.Replace(test, #"'[^']*'", match => match.Value.Contains("dark")
? match.Value
: string.Empty
);
That is, use a lambda to provide a callback for the replacement. This way, you can run arbitrary logic to replace the string.
some thing like this would work. you can add all strings you want to keep into the excludedStrings array
string test = "Only 'together' can we turn him to the 'dark side' of the Force";
var excludedString = new string[] { "dark side" };
int startIndex = 0;
while ((startIndex = test.IndexOf('\'', startIndex)) >= 0)
{
var endIndex = test.IndexOf('\'', startIndex + 1);
var subString = test.Substring(startIndex, (endIndex - startIndex) + 1);
if (!excludedString.Contains(subString.Replace("'", "")))
{
test = test.Remove(startIndex, (endIndex - startIndex) + 1);
}
else
{
startIndex = endIndex + 1;
}
}
Another method through regex alternation operator |.
#"('[^']*\bdark\b[^']*')|'[^']*'"
Then replace the matched character with $1
DEMO
string str = "Only 'together' can we turn him to the 'dark side' of the Force";
string result = Regex.Replace(str, #"('[^']*\bdark\b[^']*')|'[^']*'", "$1");
Console.WriteLine(result);
IDEONE
Explanation:
(...) called capturing group.
'[^']*\bdark\b[^']*' would match all the single quoted strings which contains the substring dark . [^']* matches any character but not of ', zero or more times.
('[^']*\bdark\b[^']*'), because the regex is within a capturing group, all the matched characters are stored inside the group index 1.
| Next comes the regex alternation operator.
'[^']*' Now this matches all the remaining (except the one contains dark) single quoted strings. Note that this won't match the single quoted string which contains the substring dark because we already matched those strings with the pattern exists before to the | alternation operator.
Finally replacing all the matched characters with the chars inside group index 1 will give you the desired output.
I made this attempt that I think you were thinking about (some solution using split, Contain, ... without regex)
string test = "Only 'together' can we turn him to the 'dark side' of the Force";
string[] separated = test.Split('\'');
string result = "";
for (int i = 0; i < separated.Length; i++)
{
string str = separated[i];
str = str.Trim(); //trim the tailing spaces
if (i % 2 == 0 || str.Contains("dark")) // you can expand your condition
{
result += str+" "; // add space after each added string
}
}
result = result.Trim(); //trim the tailing space again
I have two strings :-
String S1 = "This is my\r\n string."
String S2 = "This is my\n self."
I want to have a generic method to replace any existence of "\n" to "\r\n". But it should not replace any part of the string if it already has "\r\n".
Use regular expression with negative lookbehind:
string result = Regex.Replace(input, #"(?<!\r)\n", "\r\n");
It matches all \n which are not preceded by \r.
Try something like this:
var unused = "ยง";
S2 =
S2
.Replace("\r\n", unused)
.Replace("\n", unused)
.Replace(unused, "\r\n");
Assuming you have well-behaved standard input text, i.e. no consecutive \r, you can simply use:
var result = S1.replace("\n","\r\n").replace("\r\r","\r")
This won't work in general cases, obviously
I have string in my c# code
a,b,c,d,"e,f",g,h
I want to replace "e,f" with "e f" i.e. ',' which is inside inverted comma should be replaced by space.
I tried using string.split but it is not working for me.
OK, I can't be bothered to think of a regex approach so I am going to offer an old fashioned loop approach which will work:
string DoReplace(string input)
{
bool isInner = false;//flag to detect if we are in the inner string or not
string result = "";//result to return
foreach(char c in input)//loop each character in the input string
{
if(isInner && c == ',')//if we are in an inner string and it is a comma, append space
result += " ";
else//otherwise append the character
result += c;
if(c == '"')//if we have hit an inner quote, toggle the flag
isInner = !isInner;
}
return result;
}
NOTE: This solution assumes that there can only be one level of inner quotes, for example you cannot have "a,b,c,"d,e,"f,g",h",i,j" - because that's just plain madness!
For the scenario where you only need to match one pair of letters, the following regex will work:
string source = "a,b,c,d,\"e,f\",g,h";
string pattern = "\"([\\w]),([\\w])\"";
string replace = "\"$1 $2\"";
string result = Regex.Replace(source, pattern, replace);
Console.WriteLine(result); // a,b,c,d,"e f",g,h
Breaking apart the pattern, it is matching any instance where there is a "X,X" sequence where X is any letter, and is replacing it with the very same sequence, with a space in between the letters instead of a comma.
You could easily extend this if you needed to to have it match more than one letter, etc, as needed.
For the case where you can have multiple letters separated by commas within quotes that need to be replaced, the following can do it for you. Sample text is a,b,c,d,"e,f,a",g,h:
string source = "a,b,c,d,\"e,f,a\",g,h";
string pattern = "\"([ ,\\w]+),([ ,\\w]+)\"";
string replace = "\"$1 $2\"";
string result = source;
while (Regex.IsMatch(result, pattern)) {
result = Regex.Replace(result, pattern, replace);
}
Console.WriteLine(result); // a,b,c,d,"e f a",g,h
This does something similar compared to the first one, but just removes any comma that is sandwiched by letters surrounded by quotes, and repeats it until all cases are removed.
Here's a somewhat fragile but simple solution:
string.Join("\"", line.Split('"').Select((s, i) => i % 2 == 0 ? s : s.Replace(",", " ")))
It's fragile because it doesn't handle flavors of CSV that escape double-quotes inside double-quotes.
Use the following code:
string str = "a,b,c,d,\"e,f\",g,h";
string[] str2 = str.Split('\"');
var str3 = str2.Select(p => ((p.StartsWith(",") || p.EndsWith(",")) ? p : p.Replace(',', ' '))).ToList();
str = string.Join("", str3);
Use Split() and Join():
string input = "a,b,c,d,\"e,f\",g,h";
string[] pieces = input.Split('"');
for ( int i = 1; i < pieces.Length; i += 2 )
{
pieces[i] = string.Join(" ", pieces[i].Split(','));
}
string output = string.Join("\"", pieces);
Console.WriteLine(output);
// output: a,b,c,d,"e f",g,h
I have a string like
[123,234,321,....]
Can i use a regular expression to extract only the numbers ?
this is the code i am using now
public static string[] Split()
{
string s = "[123,234,345,456,567,678,789,890,100]";
var temp = s.Replace("[", "").Replace("]", "");
char[] separator = { ',' };
return temp.Split(separator);
}
You can use string.Split for this - no need for a regular expression, though your code can be simplified:
var nums = s.Split('[', ']', ',');
Thought you may want to exclude empty entries in the returned array:
var nums = s.Split(new[] { '[', ']', ',' },
StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
There's an overload to Trim() that takes a character.
You could do this.
string s = "[123,234,345,456,567,678,789,890,100]";
var nums = s.Trim('[').Trim(']').Split(',');
If you want to use a regular expression, try:
string s = "[123,234,345,456,567,678,789,890,100]";
var matches = Regex.Matches(s, #"[0-9]+", RegexOptions.Compiled);
However, regular expressions tend to make your code less readable, so you might stick with your original approach.
Try with using string.Split method;
string s = "[123,234,345,456,567,678,789,890,100]";
var numbers = s.Split('[',']', ',');
foreach(var i in numbers )
Console.WriteLine(i);
Here is a DEMO.
EDIT: As Oded mentioned, you may want to use StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries also.
string s = "[123,234,345,456,567,678,789,890,100]";
MatchCollection matches = Regex.Matches(s, #"(\d+)[,\]]");
string[] result = matches.OfType<Match>().Select(m => m.Groups[1].Value).ToArray();
Here the # is used to signify a verbatim string literal and allows the escape character '\' to be used directly in Regular expression notation without escaping itself "\".
\d is a digit, \d+ mean 1 or more digits. The parenthesis signify a group so (\d+) means I want a group of digits. (*See group used a little later)
[,\]] square brackets, in brief, mean choose any one of my element so it will choose either the comma , or a square bracket ] which I had to escape.
So the regular expression will find the expressions of sequential digits followed by a , or ]. The Matches will return the set of matches (which we use because there are multiple set) then we go through each match - with some LINQ - and grab the index 1 group which is the second group, "But we only made one group?" We only specified one group, the first group (index 0) is the entire regular expression match, which in our case, will include the , or ] which we don't want.
while you can and probably should use string.Split as other answers indicate, the question specifically asks if you can do it with regex, and yes, you can :-
var r = new Regex(#"\d+", RegexOptions.Compiled );
var matches = r.Matches("[123,234,345,456,567,678,789,890,100]");
I have a problem dealing with the # symbol in Regex, I am trying to remove #sometext
from a text string can't seem to find anywhere where it uses the # as a literal. I have tried myself but doesn't remove the word from the string. Any ideas?
public string removeAtSymbol(string input)
{
Regex findWords = new Regex(______);//Find the words like "#text"
Regex[] removeWords;
string test = input;
MatchCollection all = findWords.Matches(test);
removeWords = new Regex[all.Count];
int index = 0;
string[] values = new string[all.Count];
YesOutputBox.Text = " you got here";
foreach (Match m in all) //List all the words
{
values[index] = m.Value.Trim();
index++;
YesOutputBox.Text = YesOutputBox.Text + " " + m.Value;
}
for (int i = 0; i < removeWords.Length; i++)
{
removeWords[i] = new Regex(" " + values[i]);
// If the words appears more than one time
if (removeWords[i].Matches(test).Count > 1)
{
removeWords[i] = new Regex(" " + values[i] + " ");
test = removeWords[i].Replace(test, " "); //Remove the first word.
}
}
return test;
}
You can remove all occurences of "#sometext" from string test via the method
Regex.Replace(test, "#sometext", "")
or for any word starting with "#" you can use
Regex.Replace(test, "#\\w+", "")
If you need specifically a separate word (i.e. nothing like #comp within tom#comp.com) you may preceed the regex with a special word boundary (\b does not work here):
Regex.Replace(test, "(^|\\W)#\\w+", "")
You can use:
^\s#([A-Za-z0-9_]+)
as the regex to recognize Twitter usernames.
Regex to remove #something from this string: I want to remove #something from this string.
var regex = new Regex("#\\w*");
string result = regex.Replace(stringWithAt, "");
Is that what you are looking for?
I've had good luck applying this pattern:
\B#\w+
This will match any string starting with an # character that contains alphanumeric characters, plus some linking punctuation like the underscore character, if it does not occur on a boundary between alphanumeric and non-alphanumeric characters.
The result of executing this code:
string result = Regex.Replace(
#"#This1 #That2_thing this2#3that #the5Others #alpha#beta#gamma",
#"\B#\w+",
#"redacted");
is the following string:
redacted redacted this2#3that redacted redacted#beta#gamma
If this question is Twitter-specific, then Twitter provides an open source library that helps capture Twitter-specific entities like links, mentions and hashtags. This java file contains the code defining the regular expressions that Twitter uses, and this yml file contains test strings and expected outcomes of many unit tests that exercise the regular expressions in the Twitter library.
Twitter's mention-matching pattern (extracted from their library, modified to remove unnecessary capture groups, and edited to make sense in the context of a replacement) is shown below. The match should be performed in a case-insensitive manner.
(^|[^a-z0-9_])[#\uFF20][a-z0-9_]{1,20}
Here is an example which reproduces the results of the first replacement in my answer:
string result = Regex.Replace(
#"#This1 #That2_thing this2#3that #the5Others #alpha#beta#gamma",
#"(^|[^a-z0-9_])[#\uFF20][a-z0-9_]{1,20}",
#"$1redacted",
RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
Note the need to include the substitution $1 since the first capture group can't be directly converted into an atomic zero-width assertion.