Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working with several developers who develop .net components for me.
I manage the licensing mechanism and want to hide the implementation.
I would like to just provide them the interface, with for example the methodIsLicenseValid() so they must use it in the code but cannot access the implementation.
Which pattern or technology should I use to reach that objective?
You should be using a Web Service to expose the methodIsLicenseValid(), and let your devs invoke it whenever necessary.
This will be suitable for your production environment anyways and also will allow you to change the implementation of the methodIsLicenseValid(), without causing hasles to the devs, as opposed to providing a library/dll to them
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Dear editors, Why you mark this question as Opinion-based? I have no opinion, I just asked a basic question.
I have a basic confusion with C# 8 Interface implementation concept, As you know Interface is not more than a Contract, Why we need to default implementation? Is it correct conceptually? Why a Contract must have an Implementation?
Suppose we inherited from an interface in different places if we wanted to add a new member
and we don’t want to affect any existing class with this change.
This is how we define interface with current version of C# and we are stuck.
In C# 8.0 we can solve the problem by providing implementation to method.
Default implementations is powerful language feature coming to C# 8.0. Although it may seem dangerous for some developers then others will certainly be happy with it. Those who are writing libraries and components for public use may find default implementations specially useful as they let us avoid breaking changes in interfaces.
Document
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
i want my interface to look more elegant though professional and i want to make it good as web/android UI's. But how do i do it? I have heard about TELERIK UI. but i have no idea about how to use it. I have downloaded it and initialised it but do not know what and how to do next. any help would be really appreciated.Thanks.
You can start here
http://www.telerik.com/winforms/winforms-guide
http://www.telerik.com/videos/wpf
If you are not super attached to Telerik you can also look at Electron for native desktop apps (as it should have slightly easier learning curve):
http://electron.atom.io/
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am implementing MS-WOPI host with MS-WOPI client being Office Web Apps. I want to provide Word editing functionality and need to implement MS-FSSHTTP protocol.
I read the documentation http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd943623(v=office.12).aspx and
I also tried to fined some examples, but didn't get the success.
Could someone provide a simple example of MS-FSSHTTP implementation?
Here is a sample implementation using CobaltCore. Pretty much a combination of my answers about WOPI/FSSHTTP on this website in one project.
https://github.com/thebitllc/WopiBasicEditor
I think you're asking for the impossible. There is no such thing as a simple fsshttp server. Look at the videos on MSDN from conferences where they've discussed it. The fsshttp team estimates it will take over a year to properly build out a protocol server. It is not a project for the faint of heart.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to develop a module for DotNetNuke 7 however 90% of the tutorials use templates which I really want to avoid. The other 10% are just simple hello world modules.
I was wondering if anyone could share a simple module project with database access and database queries that I could study or simply tell me what I need to do to go about doing this.
All of the modules on the DNN Forge are open source, if you want to peruse their source code. We also have some simple (and not simple) modules on our GitHub account (the simplest being Tell-A-Friend, Jackrabbit, and Take-Out)
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
How would I go about implementing something in C# for iOS, that looks and feels like the MonoTouch.Dialog controls, without actually using Monotouch.Dialog?
It is the same amount of code if you use ObjC or Xamarin.iOS. Just slightly different syntax.
Your alternatives are
MT.Dialog (if you want to do the UI in code). This will dramatically reduce the complexity and MT.Dialog was designed exactly for the creation of quick and simple settings screens. In most cases, you will want to subclass the predefined elements to get best results.
Static UITableViewCells if you want to use Interface Builder. This allows you to create your UI in IB (or the iOS Designer built into Xamarin Studio). You can find tutorials on the web, like this one.