int[] numbers = { 5, 4, 1, 3, 9, 8, 6, 7, 2, 0 };
int oddNumbers = numbers.Count(n => n % 2 == 1);
var firstNumbersLessThan6 = numbers.TakeWhile(n => n < 6);
var firstSmallNumbers = numbers.TakeWhile((n, index) => n >= index);
These are C# code taken from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397687.aspx
I understand the first two lambda expressions just fine by considering n as an element of the array "numbers".
However the third lambda expression is really confusing with "index". Is (n,index) one of the lambda parameters well established for arrays? Is this a convention?
When TakeWhile iterates over the collection:
n is the value of the element
index is the index of the element
int[] numbers = { 5, 4, 1, 3, 9, 8, 6, 7, 2, 0 };
// As TakeWhile iterates over the array:
// "n" is the value of the element
// "index" is the index of the element
var firstSmallNumbers = numbers.TakeWhile((n, index) => n >= index);
foreach(var n in firstSmallNumbers)
Console.WriteLine(n);
Output:
5 4
Run this at: https://dotnetfiddle.net/4NXRkg
Related
suppose I have an array
int[] nums = new int[]{2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 8}
How do I use the delegate with the lambda expression to sum up the odd number in the array? I can do that with a for loop with a condition to check whether the number is odd and sum them up easily. Just wondering if there's any way to make the code shorter with delegate and lambda expression.
Thanks
var nums = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
var sum = nums.Sum(delegate(int i) { return i % 2 == 0 ? 0 : i; });
I believe this is what your asking for. Unless you want to create the delegate method outside of the lambda section in which case you could do something like this:
var nums = new int[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
var del = new Func<int,int>((i) => i % 2 == 0 ? 0 : i);
var sum = nums.Sum(i => del(i));
Use LINQ's Sum() and check whether the current number is odd:
var oddsSum = nums.Sum(x => x % 2 * x);
or more verbose using Where() filtering:
var oddsSum = nums.Where(x => x % 2 == 1).Sum();
I have an array of numbers {3, 6, 1, 5, 5, 6} I am trying to get every other number starting with the last number.
The correct result would then be 6, 5, 6 the only way I have been able to get this to work is to use Reverse.
int[] digitList = {3, 6, 1, 5, 5,6};
var rev = digitList.Reverse().Where((x, i) => i % 2 == 0).Reverse().ToList();
// Correct results in 6,5,6
var l = digitList.Where((x, i) => i % 2 == 0).ToList();
// Incorrect results in 3,1,5
Is there a way of doing this without the Reverse? How can i tell Where() to start at the other end?
If the count is odd, then every other number from the start, if it's even then take every other number from the second one (or skip the first), that removes the need for a reverse operation. For example:
int[] digitList = { 3, 6, 1, 5, 5, 6 };
//Skip 1 if count is odd, otherwise skip zero
var skipCount = digitList.Count() % 2 == 0 ? 1 : 0;
var l = digitList
.Skip(skipCount)
.Where((x, i) => i % 2 == 0)
.ToList();
You have to check for odd/even length arrays; to amend your current code you
should change the == 0 condition:
int[] digitList = { 3, 6, 1, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
var rev = digitList
.Where((x, i) => i % 2 != digitList.Length % 2) // not "== 0"
.ToList();
For example, I have a sequence of points
List points = new List {0, 1, 2, 4, 5 ,7};
And I want to convert it to a sequence of ranges (My type Range(leftPoint, rightPoint)). For the example, results are
List<Range> ranges: {0, 1} {1, 2} {2, 4} {4, 5} {5, 7}
You could use LINQ (presuming the list is already sorted):
List<Range> rangeList = Enumerable.Range(0, points.Count - 1)
.Select(i => new Range(points[i], points[i + 1]))
.ToList();
Why not just use a simple for-loop?
for(var i = 0; i < points.Count() - 1; i++)
ranges.Add(new Range(points[i], points[i+1]))
List<int> points = new List<int> { 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 };
List<List<int>> listOfRanges = new List<List<int>>();
listOfRanges.Add(points.GetRange(0, 2));
listOfRanges.Add(points.GetRange(1, 2));
listOfRanges.Add(points.GetRange(2, 2));
listOfRanges.Add(points.GetRange(3, 2));
listOfRanges.Add(points.GetRange(4, 2));
You can iterate over it like so:
List<int> points = new List {0, 1, 2, 4, 5 ,7};
List<Range> listOfRanges = new List<Range>();
int index = 0
foreach (int value in points) {
listOfRanges.add(new Range(points[i], points[i+1]));
index++;
}
You might get a null comparison exception on the last iteration of the loop as points[i+1] doesn't exist - if so just handle this with a simple if statement.
This is assuming by points you mean a list of integers. I'll update if I find you meant something different.
You can use LINQ to zip the two lists that we get when we:
Take everything except the last element
Take everything except the first element
These correspond to (in the case of your example):
0, 1, 2, 4, 5
1, 2, 4, 5 ,7
Here is how you do it in code:
var result =
points
.Take(points.Count - 1) //points except last element
.Zip(
points.Skip(1), //points except first element
(l, r) => new Range(l, r))
.ToList();
I need to find a way to return the longest match found in number of sets/lists (values returns only once) when the order of items is important.
the list is not cyclic.
A match is a sequence of values that exists in all the lists and maintains the same order of elements in all the lists.
e.g. 1:
List<int> list1 = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9 };
List<int> list2 = new List<int> { 1, 2, 5, 6, 3, 4, 7, 9 };
List<int> list3 = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9 };
List<int> list4 = new List<int> { 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 };
result { 1, 2 }
e.g. 2:
List<int> list1 = new List<int> { 2, 3, 6, 8, 1, 18 };
List<int> list2 = new List<int> { 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 1, 18, 19, 17, 14 };
List<int> list3 = new List<int> { 2, 5, 6, 8, 1, 18, 16, 13, 14 };
List<int> list4 = new List<int> { 2, 6, 8, 1, 18, 19, 17, 14 };
result { 6, 8, 1, 18 }
The match doesn't have to be found at the beginning or at the end and can be on any part of any list.
I hope that I explained my problem good enough :)
Thanks!
You can build a map from pairs of ints to a count of how many of the lists they appear adjacent in.
Pseudo-code:
For each list L {
For each adjacent pair (x, y) in L {
Counts[x, y] += 1
}
}
Now you can iterate through the first list (or the shortest list), and find the longest run such that each adjacent pair (x, y) in the run with Counts[x, y] showing that the pair appears in every list.
Pseudo-code:
run = []
best_run = []
For x in L[0] {
if len(run) is zero or Counts[run[len(run)-1], x] == number of lists {
run = run + x
} else {
run = [x]
}
if run is longer than best_run {
best_run = run
}
}
This works given the assumption in the question that no integer appears twice in the same list.
This algorithm runs in O(N) time, where N is the sum of the lengths of all the lists.
Here's my approach.
First I need a way to compare lists:
public class ListCompare<T> : IEqualityComparer<List<T>>
{
public bool Equals(List<T> left, List<T> right)
{
return left.SequenceEqual(right);
}
public int GetHashCode(List<T> list)
{
return list.Aggregate(0, (a, t) => a ^ t.GetHashCode());
}
}
Next a method to produce all subsequences of a source list:
Func<List<int>, IEnumerable<List<int>>> subsequences = xs =>
from s in Enumerable.Range(0, xs.Count)
from t in Enumerable.Range(1, xs.Count - s)
select xs.Skip(s).Take(t).ToList();
Now I can create a list of lists:
var lists = new [] { list1, list2, list3, list4, };
Finally a query that pulls it all together:
var answer =
lists
.Skip(1)
.Aggregate(
subsequences(lists.First()),
(a, l) => a.Intersect(subsequences(l), new ListCompare<int>()))
.OrderByDescending(x => x.Count)
.FirstOrDefault();
Given the sample data provided in the question this produces the expected results.
First generate an ordered combination of int from the shortest list
Compare the lists other than shortest list with the combination. For easy comparison of lists I just convert to string and use string.Contains()
Return immediately if find the match as the items left are next order or the shorter one.
public static List<int> GetLongestMatch(params List<int>[] all)
{
var shortest = all.Where(i => i.Count == all.Select(j => j.Count).Min()).First();
var permutations = (from length in Enumerable.Range(1, shortest.Count)
orderby length descending
from count in Enumerable.Range(1, shortest.Count - length + 1)
select shortest.Skip(count - 1).Take(length).ToList())
.ToList();
Func<List<int>, string> stringfy = (list) => { return string.Join(",", list.Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()); };
foreach (var item in permutations)
{
Debug.WriteLine(string.Join(", ", item.Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()));
if (all.All(list => stringfy(list).Contains(stringfy(item))))
{
Debug.WriteLine("Matched, skip process and return");
return item;
}
}
return new List<int>();
}
Usage
var result = GetLongestMatch(list1, list2, list3, list4);
Result
2, 3, 6, 8, 1, 18
2, 3, 6, 8, 1
3, 6, 8, 1, 18
2, 3, 6, 8
3, 6, 8, 1
6, 8, 1, 18
Matched, skip process and return
I have one array and want split it in to two:
Now: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
New_1: [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
New_2: [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]
So take the one element and skip the next element.
Look easy but how can i do it with C#?
Thanks a lot
You can use linq, Enumerable.Where and get the array with elements that have even and odd indexes.
var New_1 = arr.Where((c,i) => i % 2 == 0).ToArray();
var New_2 = arr.Where((c,i) => i % 2 != 0).ToArray();
You can get the index of element of collection and apply condition to check if index is even or odd and get the arrays according.
Enumerable.Where Method (IEnumerable, Func) filters a sequence of values based on a predicate.
Each element's index is used in the logic of the predicate function.
The first argument of predicate represents the element to test. The
second argument represents the zero-based index of the element within
source, msdn
How about something like
int[] arr = new int[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9};
int[] arr1 = arr.Where((x, i) => i % 2 == 0).ToArray();
int[] arr2 = arr.Where((x, i) => i % 2 == 1).ToArray();
int[] arr = new int[] { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 };
int i = 0;
List<int[]> twoArr = arr.GroupBy(x => i++ % 2).Select(g => g.ToArray()).ToList();