Develop Reference

How can I know if some method has called that has a specific attribute in c#

class SampleClass
{
[SampleAttribute]
public void SampleMethod()
{
}
}
If there is a method like the above code. How can I know the method has called that has a specific attribute(In this case the attribute is 'SampleAttribute')? I know how to find methods that have specific attributes. But I don't know how to figure out when the method has called that has a specific attribute

You can do it in a few ways. But first, let's add some value to the SampleAttribute, to be sure, that everything is working:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, Inherited = false, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class SampleAttribute : Attribute
{
public SampleAttribute(string text)
{
Text = text;
}
public string Text { get; private set; }
}
And specify the attribute value to the method:
public class SampleClass
{
[SampleAttribute("This is attribute text")]
public void SampleMethod() { }
}
Now, using the reflection mechanism, we can extract the attribute value from the object:
var sampleClass = new SampleClass();
ExtractSampleAttributeValue(sampleClass);
private static string ExtractSampleAttributeValue(SampleClass sampleClass)
{
var methods = sampleClass.GetType().GetMethods();
var sampleMethod = methods.FirstOrDefault(method => method.Name == nameof(sampleClass.SampleMethod));
var sampleAttribute = Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(sampleMethod, typeof(SampleAttribute)) as SampleAttribute;
return sampleAttribute.Text;
}
Or even pass the method as the parameter:
var sampleClass = new SampleClass();
ExtractSampleAttributeValue(sampleClass.SampleMethod);
private static string ExtractSampleAttributeValue(Action sampleMethod)
{
var sampleAttribute = Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(sampleMethod.Method, typeof(SampleAttribute)) as SampleAttribute;
return sampleAttribute.Text;
}

Method that prints text contained in a tsv file to console

I am trying to print two methods that i have created but i cant figure out how to do it.
My project consists of Language.cs file in addition to Program.cs
This method in Language.cs:
public static void PrettyPrintAll(IEnumerable<Language> langs)
{
foreach (var printsAll in langs)
{
Console.WriteLine(printsAll.Prettify());
}
}
Prints out this method that is also in Language.cs:
public string Prettify()
{
return $"{Year}, {Name}, {ChiefDeveloper}, {Predecessors}";
}
this method prints out every query result (is also in Language.cs):
public static void PrintAll(IEnumerable<Object> sequence)
{
foreach (var prints in sequence)
{
Console.WriteLine(prints);
}
}
Language class code other than the methods above:
namespace ProgrammingLanguages
{
public class Language
{
public static Language FromTsv(string tsvLine)
{
string[] values = tsvLine.Split('\t');
Language lang = new Language(
Convert.ToInt32(values[0]),
Convert.ToString(values[1]),
Convert.ToString(values[2]),
Convert.ToString(values[3]));
return lang;
}
public int Year
{ get; set; }
public string Name
{ get; set; }
public string ChiefDeveloper
{ get; set; }
public string Predecessors
{ get; set; }
public Language(int year, string name, string chiefDeveloper, string predecessors)
{
Year = year;
Name = name;
ChiefDeveloper = chiefDeveloper;
Predecessors = predecessors;
}
All the methods are within the Language.cs file.
My issue is that i do not understand how to print them, i have tried in many ways but always get an error code The name 'PrintAll' does not exist in the current context or something like that.
In main this is how i have tried to call the method PrintAll:
var stringLanguage = languages.Select(languagePrint => $"{languagePrint.Year}
{languagePrint.Name} {languagePrint.ChiefDeveloper}");
PrintAll(stringLanguage);

The static method PrintAll() belongs to the class Language and calling it from another class requier to prepend the class name first, such as Language.PrintAll()
public static void Main()
{
// some code ...
var stringLanguage = languages.Select(languagePrint => $"{languagePrint.Year} {languagePrint.Name} {languagePrint.ChiefDeveloper}");
// PrintAll(stringLanguage); <-- This won't work because there is no method PrintAll() in the current class
// This now refers to the correct class where the method belongs
Language.PrintAll(stringLanguage);
}
Another way to do that would be to include the static part of the class Language in the class where Main is (I assume the class Program) :
// replace namespace by the correct namespace of the class
using static namespace.Language;
class Program
{
public static void Main()
{
// some code ...
var stringLanguage = languages.Select(languagePrint => $"{languagePrint.Year} {languagePrint.Name} {languagePrint.ChiefDeveloper}");
// This now works because the static parts were imported
PrintAll(stringLanguage);
}
}
However, I discourage using this, because this may lead to confusion

How to change value in one class if value changes in another

Let's say I have a parameter in my ViewModel:
public string ChosenQualityParameter
{
get => DefectModel.SelectedQualDefectParameters?.Name ?? "Не выбран параметр";
}
and I have a class DefectModel with parameter SelectedQualDefectParameters.Name in it. I want to change the UI binded to ChosenQualityParameter, when theName parameter changes too.
But I don't know how to do this properly. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

You might define your ViewModel class like this:
public class ViewModel
{
private DefectModel _defectModel;
public ViewModel(DefectModel defectModel)
{
_defectModel = defectModel;
}
public string ChosenQualityParameter
{
get => _defectModel.SelectedQualDefectParameters?.Name ?? "Не выбран параметр";
}
}
I personally do not like such dependencies in viewmodels, but it might get the job done here. It seems to work in a console application anyway:
using System;
public class Parameters
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class DefectModel
{
public Parameters SelectedQualDefectParameters { get; set; }
}
public class ViewModel
{
private DefectModel _defectModel;
public ViewModel(DefectModel defectModel)
{
_defectModel = defectModel;
}
public string ChosenQualityParameter
{
get => _defectModel.SelectedQualDefectParameters?.Name ?? "Не выбран параметр";
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
var defectModel = new DefectModel
{
SelectedQualDefectParameters = new Parameters
{
Name = "test"
}
};
var viewModel = new ViewModel(defectModel);
Console.WriteLine(viewModel.ChosenQualityParameter);
defectModel.SelectedQualDefectParameters.Name = "changed";
Console.WriteLine(viewModel.ChosenQualityParameter);
Console.ReadKey();
}
}

Thanks to #Knoop and #BartHofland, I've solved my issue by using INotifyPropertyChanged in my DefectModel and SelectedQualDefectParameters classes.
For setting ChosenQualityParameter I used MessagingCenter to send new value.

.Net 4.0 Optimized code for refactoring existing "if" conditions and "is" operator

I have following C# code. It works fine; but the GetDestination() method is cluttered with multiple if conditions by using is operator.
In .Net 4.0 (or greater) what is the best way to avoid these “if” conditions?
EDIT: Role is part of the business model, and the destination is purely an artifact of one particular application using that business model.
CODE
public class Role { }
public class Manager : Role { }
public class Accountant : Role { }
public class Attender : Role { }
public class Cleaner : Role { }
public class Security : Role { }
class Program
{
static string GetDestination(Role x)
{
string destination = #"\Home";
if (x is Manager)
{
destination = #"\ManagerHomeA";
}
if (x is Accountant)
{
destination = #"\AccountantHomeC";
}
if (x is Cleaner)
{
destination = #"\Cleaner";
}
return destination;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string destination = GetDestination(new Accountant());
Console.WriteLine(destination);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
REFERENCES
Dictionary<T,Delegate> with Delegates of different types: Cleaner, non string method names?
Jon Skeet: Making reflection fly and exploring delegates
if-else vs. switch vs. Dictionary of delegates
Dictionary with delegate or switch?
Expression and delegate in c#

Having virtual property which would be overriden in derived classes should do the trick:
class Role
{
public virtual string Destination { get { return "Home"; } }
}
class Manager : Role
{
public override string Destination { get { return "ManagerHome;"; } }
}
class Accountant : Role
{
public override string Destination { get { return "AccountantHome;"; } }
}
class Attender : Role
{
public override string Destination { get { return "AttenderHome;"; } }
}
class Cleaner : Role
{
public override string Destination { get { return "CleanerHome;"; } }
}
class Security : Role { }
I didn't make the property abstract, to provide default Home value when it's not overriden in derived class.
Usage:
string destination = (new Accountant()).Destination;
Console.WriteLine(destination);
Console.ReadLine();

Here's one option:
private static readonly Dictionary<Type, string> DestinationsByType =
new Dictionary<Type, string>
{
{ typeof(Manager), #"\ManagerHome" },
{ typeof(Accountant), #"\AccountantHome" },
// etc
};
private static string GetDestination(Role x)
{
string destination;
return DestinationsByType.TryGetValue(x.GetType(), out destination)
? destination : #"\Home";
}
Note:
This doesn't cope with null parameters. It's not clear whether or not you actually need it to. You can easily add null handling though.
This doesn't copy with inheritance (e.g. class Foo : Manager); you could do that by going up the inheritance hierarchy if necessary
Here's a version which does deal with both of those points, at the cost of complexity:
private static string GetDestination(Role x)
{
Type type = x == null ? null : x.GetType();
while (type != null)
{
string destination;
if (DestinationsByType.TryGetValue(x.GetType(), out destination))
{
return destination;
}
type = type.BaseType;
}
return #"\Home";
}
EDIT: It would be cleaner if Role itself had a Destination property. This could either be virtual, or provided by the Rolebase class.
However, it could be that the destination is really not something the Role should concern itself with - it could be that Role is part of the business model, and the destination is purely an artifact of one particular application using that business model. In that sort of situation, you shouldn't put it into Role, as that breaks separation of concerns.
Basically, we can't tell which solution is going to be most suitable without knowing more context - as is so often the way in matters of design.

Approach 1 (Selected): Using dynamic keyword to implement multimethods / double dispatch
Approach 2: Use a dictionary to avoid if blocks as mentioned in Jon Skeet’s answer below.
Approach 3: Use a HashList with delegates if there is condition other than equality (For example, if input < 25). Refer how to refactor a set of <= , >= if...else statements into a dictionary or something like that
Apporach 4: Virtual Functions as mentioned in MarcinJuraszek’s answer below.
MultiMethods / Double Dispatch approach using dynamic keyword
Rationale: Here the algorithm changes based on the type. That is, if the input is Accountant, the function to be executed is different than for Manager.
public static class DestinationHelper
{
public static string GetDestinationSepcificImplm(Manager x)
{
return #"\ManagerHome";
}
public static string GetDestinationSepcificImplm(Accountant x)
{
return #"\AccountantHome";
}
public static string GetDestinationSepcificImplm(Cleaner x)
{
return #"\CleanerHome";
}
}
class Program
{
static string GetDestination(Role x)
{
#region Other Common Works
//Do logging
//Other Business Activities
#endregion
string destination = String.Empty;
dynamic inputRole = x;
destination = DestinationHelper.GetDestinationSepcificImplm(inputRole);
return destination;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string destination = GetDestination(new Security());
Console.WriteLine(destination);
Console.WriteLine("....");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}

This is a strongly typed, imperative language so if statements and type checking are going to happen.
Having said that, have you considered a virtual method on Role that can be overridden to provide a destination string?
A further alternative, a lookup table!
Dictionary<Type, string> paths = new Dictionary<TYpe, string>()
{
{ typeof(Manager), #"\ManagerHomeA" }
{ typeof(Accountant), #"\AccountantHomeC" }
{ typeof(Cleaner), "Cleaner" }
}
string path = #"\Home";
if(paths.ContainsKey(x.GetType())
path = paths[x];

One way to do it would be to use a map instead of an if:
//(psuedocode)
private Dictionary<Type, string> RoleMap;
void SomeInitializationCodeThatRunsOnce()
{
RoleMap.Add(typeof(Manager), #"\ManagerHome");
RollMap.Add(typeof(Accountant), #"\AccountantHome");
// ect...
}
string GetDestination(Role x)
{
string destination;
if(!RoleMap.TryGet(x.GetType(), out destination))
destination = #"\Home";
return destination;
}
Further reading: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/BackToBasicsMovingBeyondForIfAndSwitch.aspx

Role should have a virtual function that would return destination:
public virtual string GetDestination()
{
return "Home";
}
And all the classes should override this function and return the correct string. Then in the code you would have:
var role = new Accountant();
string destination = role.GetDestination();
I hope that helps. There may be typos, I am writing from head.

you can either use an interface definition or an abstract method / property
with interface:
public interface IDestinationProvider
{
sting Destination { get; }
}
string GetDestination(Role role)
{
var provider = role as IDestinationProvider;
if (provider != null)
return provider.Destination;
return "Default";
}
with an abstract base class
abstract class Role
{
public abstract string GetDestination();
}
class Manager : Role
{
public virtual string GetDestination() { return "ManagerHomeA"; }
}
string GetDestination(Role role)
{
return #"\" + role.GetDestination();
}
or with attributes:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class DestinationAttribute : Attribute
{
public DestinationAttribute() { this.Path = #"\Home"; }
public string Path { get; set; }
}
[Destination(Path = #"\ManagerHome")]
public class Manager : Role { }
string GetDestination(Role role)
{
var destination = role.GetType().GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DestinationAttribute), true).FirstOrDefault();
if (destination != null)
return destination.Path;
return #"\Home";
}

How to implement code like SomeObject.SomeFunction().SomeOtherFunction();

Today, I searched a line of code which was written like:
SomeObject.SomeFunction().SomeOtherFunction();
I am unable to understand this. I tried to search it on Google about this but no luck.
Please help me to understand this.

SomeObject has a function called SomeFunction(). This function returns an object (of an unknown type for us, based on your example). This object has a function called SomeOtherFunction().
The question "how to implement" is a bit vague to answer, though.

Consider the following
public class FirstClass
{
public SecondClass SomeFunction()
{
return new SecondClass();
}
}
public class SecondClass
{
public void SomeOtherFunction()
{
}
}
So the following are equivalent.
FirstClass SomeObject = new FirstClass();
SomeObject.SomeFuntion().SomeOtherFunction();
OR
FirstClass SomeObject = new FirstClass();
SecondClass two = SomeObject.SomeFuntion();
two.SomeOtherFunction();

This is called Fluent coding or method chaining and is a method of programming that allows you to chain commands together. It is very common in LINQ where you might have something like this:
var result = myList.Where(x => x.ID > 5).GroupBy(x => x.Name).Sort().ToList();
This would give you all the records greater than 5, then grouped by name, sorted and returned as a list. The same code could be written in long hand like this:
var result = myList.Where(x => x.ID > 5);
result = result.GroupBy(x => x.Name);
result = result.Sort();
result = result.ToList();
But you can see this is much more long winded.

This style of programming called FluentInterface style.
Eg:
internal class FluentStyle
{
public FluentStyle ConnectToDb()
{
// some logic
return this;
}
public FluentStyle FetchData()
{
// some logic
return this;
}
public FluentStyle BindData()
{
// some logic
return this;
}
public FluentStyle RefreshData()
{
// some logic
return this;
}
}
And the object can be created and method can be consumed as below;
var fluentStyle = new FluentStyle();
fluentStyle.ConnectToDb().FetchData().BindData().RefreshData();

This type of chaining may involve extension methods. These allow addition of new methods to existing classes (even those that you don't have the source code for).
e.g.
public static class StringExtender
{
public static string MyMethod1(this string Input)
{
return ...
}
public static string MyMethod2(this string Input)
{
return ...
}
}
....
public string AString = "some string";
public string NewString = AString.MyMethod1().MyMethod2();

This can be done using extension methods
public class FirstClass
{
}
public class SecondClass
{
}
public class ThridClass
{
}
public static class Extensions
{
public static SecondClass GetSecondClass(this FirstClass f)
{
return new SecondClass();
}
public static ThridClass GetThridClass(this SecondClass s)
{
return new ThridClass();
}
}
}
AND then you can ues
FirstClass f= new FirstClass();
f.GetSecondClass().GetThridClass();