My SQL query that works as expected:
SELECT SUM(outcome), toaddress
FROM lot l
JOIN incomingpayment ip
ON l.incomingpayment_id = ip.id
WHERE outcome > 0
GROUP BY ip.toaddress
ORDER BY SUM(outcome) DESC
I am trying to turn this into a LINQ statement, without great success anyway:
var result =
from l in session.Query<Lot>().ToList()
join ip in session.Query<IncomingPayment>().ToList()
on l.IncomingPayment equals ip
where l.Outcome > 0
group ip by new {ip.ToAddress}
into g
select new
{
Address = g.Key,
SumAmount = g.Sum(x => x.Outcome)
};
Outcome in the last line is a Lot's field and since I'm grouping IncomingPayment (group ip...) it's not available at the g.Sum() call.
What am I missing here?
You could try this:
var result = from g in (from l in session.Query<Lot>().ToList()
join ip in session.Query<IncomingPayment>().ToList()
on l.IncomingPayment equals ip.Id
where l.Outcome > 0
select new { Address = ip.ToToAddress, Outcome = l.Outcome})
group g by g.Address
select new
{
Address = g.Key,
SumAmount = g.Sum(x => x.Outcome)
};
Or more consisely:
Lots = session.Query<Lot>().ToList();
IncomingPayments = session.Query<IncomingPayment>().ToList();
var result = Lots.Join(IncomingPayments,
x=>x.IncomingPayment,
y=>y.Id,
(x,y) => new
{
Address = x.ToToAddress,
OutCome = y.Outcome
}).GroupBy(x => x.Address,
x => x.Outcome,
(kew, group) =>
{
Address = key,
SumAmount = group.Sum()
});
Related
I'm trying to convert my sql query to linq, i confused about sum and grouping,
this is my query
SELECT
produk.supplier,
SUM(transaksi.jumlah_transaksi),
SUM(transaksi.nominal_transaksi),
operasional.nominal
FROM
transaksi INNER JOIN produk ON transaksi.id_produk = produk.id_produk
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT
operasional.id_supplier,
SUM(nominal) AS nominal
FROM
operasional) operasional
ON operasional.id_supplier = produk.id_supplier
GROUP BY produk.supplier
output should be
like this
Progress
i am just trying with linq query like this without grouping
var result = from t in db.transaksi
join p in db.produk on t.id_produk equals p.id_produk
from op in
(
from o in db.operasional
select new
{
id_supplier = o.id_supplier,
nominal = o.nominal
}
).Where(o => o.id_supplier == p.id_supplier).DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
nama_supplier = p.supplier,
jumlah_transaksi = t.jumlah_transaksi,
nominal_transaksi = t.nominal_transaksi,
biaya_operasional = op.nominal
};
and result query from my linq still like this
SELECT
`p`.`supplier`,
`t`.`jumlah_transaksi`,
`t`.`nominal_transaksi`,
`t1`.`nominal`
FROM
`transaksi` `t`
INNER JOIN `produk` `p`
ON `t`.`id_produk` = `p`.`id_produk`
LEFT JOIN `operasional` `t1`
ON `t1`.`id_supplier` = `p`.`id_supplier`
Solved
and this is my full linq
var result = from t in db.transaksi
join p in db.produk on t.id_produk equals p.id_produk
from op in
(
from o in db.operasional
group o by o.id_supplier into g
select new
{
id_supplier = g.First().id_supplier,
nominal = g.Sum(o => o.nominal)
}
).Where(o => o.id_supplier == p.id_supplier).DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
nama_supplier = p.supplier,
jumlah_transaksi = t.jumlah_transaksi,
nominal_transaksi = t.nominal_transaksi,
biaya_operasional = op.nominal
};
var grouped = result
.GroupBy(x => x.nama_supplier)
.Select(x => new
{
nama_supplier = x.Key,
jumlah_transaksi = x.Sum(s => s.jumlah_transaksi),
nominal_transaksi = x.Sum(s => s.nominal_transaksi),
biaya_operasional = x.Select(s => s.biaya_operasional).First()
});
Try to use GroupBy (in following code result is your query from code above):
var grouped = result
.GroupBy(x => x.nama_supplier)
.Select(x => new {
nama_supplier = x.Key,
sum1 = x.Sum(s => s.jumlah_transaksi),
sum1 = x.Sum(s => s.nominal_transaksi),
nominal = x.Select(s => s.biaya_operasional).First()
})
Code is not checked so use it just as idea.
I have this sql query that does exactly what i want but i need it in linq. It returns a few AVC rows and counts how many PersonAVCPermission that has status 1 linked to it
SELECT a.Id, a.Name, a.Address, COUNT(p.AVCID) AS Count
FROM AVC AS a
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT PersonAVCPermission.AVCId
FROM PersonAVCPermission
WHERE PersonAVCPermission.Status = 1
) AS p
ON a.Id = p.AVCId
GROUP BY a.Id, a.Name, a.Address
I have this query in linq and it does the same thing except when there are no PersonAVCPermission it still counts 1
var yellows = odc.PersonAVCPermissions.Where(o => o.Status == (int)AVCStatus.Yellow);
var q = from a in odc.AVCs
from p in yellows.Where(o => o.AVCId == a.Id).DefaultIfEmpty()
group a by new { a.Id, a.Name, a.Address } into agroup
select new AVCListItem
{
Id = agroup.Key.Id,
Name = agroup.Key.Name,
Address = agroup.Key.Address,
Count = agroup.Count(o => o.Id != null)
};
Im guessing that with DefaultIfEmpty() it places null rows in the list that then gets counted so i try to exclude them with (o => o.Id != null) but it still counts everything as at least one
If i dont use DefaultIfEmpty() it skips the rows with count 0 completely
How can i exclude them or am i doing it completely wrong?
How about using .Any() and a Let?
var yellows = odc.PersonAVCPermissions.Where(o => o.Status == (int)AVCStatus.Yellow);
var q = from a in odc.AVCs
let Y = (from p in yellows.Where(o => o.AVCId == a.Id) select p).Any()
where Y == true
group a by new { a.Id, a.Name, a.Address } into agroup
select new AVCListItem
{
Id = agroup.Key.Id,
Name = agroup.Key.Name,
Address = agroup.Key.Address,
Count = agroup.Count(o => o.Id != null)
};
You don't need the join, nor the grouping:
var q = from a in odc.AVCs
select new AVCListItem
{
Id = a.Id,
Name = a.Name,
Address = a.Address,
Count = yellows.Where(o => o.AVCId == a.Id).Count()
};
I am getting data from multiple tables by joining and i want to group data on particular column value but after group by statement i can access my aliases and their properties. What mistake i am making?
public List<PatientHistory> GetPatientHistory(long prid)
{
using(var db = new bc_limsEntities())
{
List<PatientHistory> result =
(from r in db.dc_tresult
join t in db.dc_tp_test on r.testid equals t.TestId into x
from t in x.DefaultIfEmpty()
join a in db.dc_tp_attributes on r.attributeid equals a.AttributeId into y
from a in y.DefaultIfEmpty()
where r.prid == prid
group new {r,t,a} by new {r.testid} into g
select new PatientHistory
{
resultid = r.resultid,
bookingid = r.bookingid,
testid = r.testid,
prid = r.prid,
attributeid = r.attributeid,
result = r.result,
Test_Name = t.Test_Name,
Attribute_Name = a.Attribute_Name,
enteredon = r.enteredon,
Attribute_Type = a.Attribute_Type
}).ToList();
return result;
}
}
You're doing this wrong way. As been said by Jon after grouping the sequences with aliases r,t,a doesn't exist. After grouping you receive the sequence g with sequances of r,t,a in each element of g. If you want get one object from each group (for example most recent) you should try this:
List<PatientHistory> result =
(from r in db.dc_tresult
join t in db.dc_tp_test on r.testid equals t.TestId into x
from t in x.DefaultIfEmpty()
join a in db.dc_tp_attributes on r.attributeid equals a.AttributeId into y
from a in y.DefaultIfEmpty()
where r.prid == prid
group new {r,t,a} by new {r.testid} into g
select new PatientHistory
{
resultid = g.Select(x => x.r.resultid).Last(), // if you expect single value get it with Single()
// .... here add the rest properties
Attribute_Type = g.Select(x => x.a.Attribute_Type).Last()
}).ToList();
I appreciated this question so I thought I would add another potential usage case. I would like feedback on what the cleanest approach is to getting table information through a group operation so that I can project later in the select operation. I ended up combining what the OP did which is to pass objects into his group clause and then used the g.Select approach suggested by YD1m to get table information out later. I have a LEFT JOIN so I'm defending against nulls :
// SQL Query
//DECLARE #idCamp as Integer = 1
//
//select *,
//(select
//count(idActivityMaster)
//FROM tbActivityMasters
//WHERE dftidActivityCategory = A.idActivityCategory) as masterCount
//FROM tbactivitycategories A
//WHERE idcamp = #idCamp
//ORDER BY CategoryName
int idCamp = 1;
var desiredResult =
(from c in tbActivityCategories
.Where(w => w.idCamp == idCamp)
from m in tbActivityMasters
.Where(m => m.dftidActivityCategory == c.idActivityCategory)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // LEFT OUTER JOIN
where c.idCamp == idCamp
group new {c, m} by new { m.dftidActivityCategory } into g
select new
{
idActivityCategory = g.Select(x => x.m == null ? 0 : x.m.dftidActivityCategory).First(),
idCamp = g.Select(x => x.c.idCamp).First(),
CategoryName = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryName).First(),
CategoryDescription = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryDescription).First(),
masterCount = g.Count(x => x.m != null)
}).OrderBy(o=> o.idActivityCategory);
desiredResult.Dump("desiredResult");
If I just use a basic group approach I get the results but not the extra column information. At least I can't find it once I group.
var simpleGroup = (from c in tbActivityCategories
.Where(w => w.idCamp == idCamp)
.OrderBy(o => o.CategoryName)
from m in tbActivityMasters
.Where(m => m.dftidActivityCategory == c.idActivityCategory)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // LEFT OUTER JOIN
where c.idCamp == idCamp
group m by m == null ? 0 : m.dftidActivityCategory into g
select new
{
// How do I best get the extra desired column information from other tables that I had before grouping
// but still have the benefit of the grouping?
// idActivityCategory = g.Select(x => x.m == null ? 0 : x.m.dftidActivityCategory).First(),
// idCamp = g.Select(x => x.c.idCamp).First(),
// CategoryName = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryName).First(),
// CategoryDescription = g.Select(x => x.c.CategoryDescription).First(),
// masterCount = g.Count(x => x.m != null)
idActivityCategory = g.Key,
masterCount = g.Count(x => x != null)
});
simpleGroup.Dump("simpleGroup");
Please tear this up. I'm trying to learn and it just seems like I'm missing the big picture here. Thanks.
UPDATE : Cleaned up by moving the work into the group and making the select more straight forward. If I had known this yesterday then this would have been my original answer to the OP question.
int idCamp = 1;
var desiredResult =
(from c in tbActivityCategories
.Where(w => w.idCamp == idCamp)
from m in tbActivityMasters
.Where(m => m.dftidActivityCategory == c.idActivityCategory)
.DefaultIfEmpty() // LEFT OUTER JOIN
where c.idCamp == idCamp
group new { c, m } by new
{ idActivityCategory = m == null ? 0 : m.dftidActivityCategory,
idCamp = c.idCamp,
CateGoryName = c.CategoryName,
CategoryDescription = c.CategoryDescription
} into g
select new
{
idActivityCategory = g.Key.idActivityCategory,
idCamp = g.Key.idCamp,
CategoryName = g.Key.CateGoryName,
CategoryDescription = g.Key.CategoryDescription,
masterCount = g.Count(x => x.m != null)
}).OrderBy(o => o.idActivityCategory);
desiredResult.Dump("desiredResult");
Given the following:
DP_DatabaseTableAdapters.EmployeeTableAdapter employeetableAdapter = new DP_DatabaseTableAdapters.EmployeeTableAdapter();
DP_Database.EmployeeDataTable employeeTable = employeetableAdapter.GetData();
var leadEmployees = from e in employeeTable
where e.IsLead == true
select e;
DP_DatabaseTableAdapters.LaborTicketTableAdapter tableAdapter = new DP_DatabaseTableAdapters.LaborTicketTableAdapter();
DP_Database.LaborTicketDataTable table = tableAdapter.GetDataByDate(date.ToString("MM/dd/yyyy"));
var totHours = from l in table
join e in leadEmployees on l.EmployeeID equals e.EmployeeID
group l by l.EmployeeID into g
orderby g.Key
select new
{
EmployeeID = g.Key,
HoursWorked = g.Sum(s => s.HoursWorked)
};
Total hours correctly filters the results based on the leadEmployee's list of people who have the IsLead bit set to true.
I would like to know how to do this with a where clause, I have attempd to use leadEmployees.Contanis but it wants a whole EmployeeRow...
How can I add what looks to be part of an IN clause to a where filter to replace the join?
var totHours = from l in table
where ??????
group l by l.EmployeeID into g
orderby g.Key
select new
{
EmployeeID = g.Key,
HoursWorked = g.Sum(s => s.HoursWorked)
};
The contains will only want a whole EmployeeRow if you are selecting whole employee roles. You can either:
leadEmployees.Select(e => e.id).contains
OR
leadEmployees.Count(e => e.id == l.id) > 0
Both will work. (Excuse slightly rushed lack of consideration for syntax accuracies).
This should work:
var leadEmployees = from e in employeeTable
where e.IsLead == true
select e.EmployeeID;
var totHours = from l in table
where leadEmployees.Contains(l.EmployeeID)
group l by l.EmployeeID into g
orderby g.Key
select new
{
EmployeeID = g.Key,
HoursWorked = g.Sum(s => s.HoursWorked)
};
I'm unable to convert this SQL query into a working linq statement
select sum(cena), id_auta, max(servis)
from dt_poruchy left outer join mt_auta on dt_poruchy.id_auta=mt_auta.id
where dt_poruchy.servis>=3 group by id_auta;
I tryed something like this but i cant handle the select statement
var auta = from a in MtAuta.FindAll()
join p in DtPoruchy.FindAll() on a equals p.MtAuta into ap
from ap2 in ap.DefaultIfEmpty()
where ap2.SERVIS >= 3
group ap2 by ap2.ID into grouped
select new {
I'll appreciate any help!
Based on the limited information provided (which tables are certain fields from?), here is what I came up with.
var auta = from a in MtAuta.FindAll()
let p = a.DtPoruchys.Where(s => s.SERVIS >= 3)
select new
{
Id = a.Id,
CenaSum = p.Sum(c => c.Cena),
Servis = p.Max(s => s.SERVIS)
};
I've reached this solution (supposing "cena" belongs to MtAuta.FindAll()):
var auta = from e in
(from a in DtPoruchy.FindAll()
where a.SERVIS >= 3
join p in MtAuta.FindAll() on a.MtAuta equals p.Id into ap
from ap2 in ap.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
Cena = ap.cena,
IdAuta = a.MtAuta,
Servis = a.servis
})
group e by e.IdAuta into g
select new
{
Cena = g.Sum(e => e.cena),
IdAuta = g.Key,
Servis = g.Max(e => e.servis)
};
I am not sure which table cena and servis are coming from but to create grouped sum you do something like.
select new { Sum = grouped.Sum( x => x.cena ) }
and to get max
select new { Max = grouped.Group.Max( x => x.servis ) }
Here is a good reference for you.
MSDN - 101 LINQ Samples
I've modified your solution little bit and i got it working like this:
var auta = from jo in
(
from a in MtAuta.FindAll()
join p in DtPoruchy.FindAll() on a equals p.MtAuta into ap
from ap2 in ap.DefaultIfEmpty()
where ap2.SERVIS >= 3
select new
{
Cena = ap2.CENA,
Idauto = ap2.ID_AUTA,
Servis = ap2.SERVIS
}
)
group jo by jo.Idauto into g
select new
{
Cena = g.Sum(jo => jo.Cena),
IdAuto = g.Key,
Servis = g.Max(jo => jo.Servis)
};
I just curious if this is the best solution?