eg: x=> x.Name = "g"
I have code block like this
public Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> SearchExpression()
{
var c = new ConstantExpression[_paramList.Count];
var b = new BinaryExpression[_paramList.Count];
BinaryExpression comparisonExpression = null;
var entity = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TEntity));
for (int i = 0; i < _paramList.Count; i++)
{
var value = Convert.ChangeType(_paramList[i].Item2 /*"g"*/, _paramList[i].Item3 /*System.String*/);
c[i] = Expression.Constant(value); //"g"
// PROBLEM IS HERE
b[i] = Expression.Equal(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1 /*Name*/, c[i]);
// PROBLEM IS HERE
}
_paramList.Clear();
comparisonExpression = b.Aggregate(Expression.And);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(comparisonExpression, entity);
}
works like charm but I need Expression.Like (Like "g" not Equal "g")
Expression.Like(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1), c[i])
but C# expression tree does not support Like method
UPDATE :
I wrote something like this :
Expression.Call(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1),
typeof(String).GetMethod("Contains"), new Expression[] { c[i] });
but I need BinaryExpression not MethodCallExpression
You can make your code work by adding an equals expression over the method call, like so:
b[i] = Expression.Equal(
Expression.Call(Expression.Property(entity, _paramList[i].Item1),
typeof (String).GetMethod("Contains"),
new Expression[] {c[i]}), Expression.Constant(true));
In pseudo code this reads as:
b[i] = entity => entity.someProperty.Contains(c[i]) == true;
Which will return a binary expression for you.
This answer does not consider your array and the 'and' aggregation, but this should be considered as a separate issue.
Consider this class:
class MyEntity { string Name { get; set; } }
We want to query:
select ... from MyEntity where Name like '%query%';
The following method is a general implementation of the above query pattern:
static Expression<Func<TEntity, bool>> Like<TEntity>(string propertyName, string queryText)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof (TEntity), "entity");
var getter = Expression.Property(parameter, propertyName);
//ToString is not supported in Linq-To-Entities, throw an exception if the property is not a string.
if (getter.Type != typeof (string))
throw new ArgumentException("Property must be a string");
//string.Contains with string parameter.
var stringContainsMethod = typeof (string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] {typeof (string)});
var containsCall = Expression.Call(getter, stringContainsMethod,
Expression.Constant(queryText, typeof (string)));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, bool>>(containsCall, parameter);
}
If you want to have a pattern of query% or %query you can use string.StartsWith and string.EndsWith instead of Contains.
Also, you can share the parameter across multiple calls if you adjust the signature.
The current implementation throws an exception if the data type of the property is not a string. Look at this answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/3292773/668272 for converting numbers to strings.
I've done this in a scripting language I wrote, which allows you to say things like name like 'bob%'. The trick is that you need to map it to a method call which takes the value and regular expression and call this from within the Expression.
If you take a look at the LikeEvaluator class in my Wire scripting language you'll see how I did it:
static class LikeEvaluator
{
private static readonly MethodInfo ApplyLikeMethodInfo=typeof(LikeEvaluator).GetMethod("ApplyLike");
private static readonly MethodInfo ApplyLikeNoCaseMethodInfo=typeof(LikeEvaluator).GetMethod("ApplyLikeNoCase");
public static Expression Like(CaseMode caseMode, Expression lhs, Expression pattern)
{
Expression x=null;
if(caseMode==CaseMode.Sensitive)
{
x=Expression.Call(ApplyLikeMethodInfo,lhs,pattern);
}
else
{
x=Expression.Call(ApplyLikeNoCaseMethodInfo,lhs,pattern);
}
return x;
}
public static bool ApplyLike(string text, string likePattern)
{
string pattern=PatternToRegex(likePattern);
return Regex.IsMatch(text,pattern,RegexOptions.None);
}
public static bool ApplyLikeNoCase(string text, string likePattern)
{
string pattern=PatternToRegex(likePattern);
return Regex.IsMatch(text,pattern,RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
}
public static string PatternToRegex(string pattern)
{
pattern=Regex.Escape(pattern);
pattern=pattern.Replace("%",#".*");
pattern=string.Format("^{0}$",pattern);
return pattern;
}
}
Related
I have the following problem in my lambda expression: I need to rename the property because it will be passed from entity to entity. In other words: I need to use the same expression in more than one query in different entities.
For example:
var expr = x => x.Id == converterId
To be
var expr = x => x.ConverterId == converterId
I have tried to do the following
var oldParam = expr.Parameters[0];
var newParam = Expression.Parameter(oldParam.Type, "ConverterId");
This code replaces x not Id`
This isn't trivial, but can be done my writing (subclassing) an ExpressionVisitor, and overriding VisitMember, making the substitution for a different Expression.Property, but using the original target expression (from the expression in the original lambda)
However, for simple cases, it is probably easier to forget that, and just build the expression-tree manually from first principles, rather than using a lambda.
The following shows both approaches:
using System;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
static class P
{
static void Main()
{
// the compiler-generated expression-tree from the question
Console.WriteLine(Baseline(42));
// build our own epression trees manually
Console.WriteLine(ByName(42, nameof(Foo.Id)));
Console.WriteLine(ByName(42, nameof(Foo.ConverterId)));
// take the compiler-generated expression tree, and rewrite it with a visitor
Console.WriteLine(Convert(Baseline(42), nameof(Foo.Id), nameof(Foo.ConverterId)));
}
static Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> Baseline(int converterId)
{
// note this uses a "captured variable", so the output
// looks uglier than you might expect
return x => x.Id == converterId;
}
static Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> ByName(int converterId, string propertyOrFieldName)
{
var p = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Foo), "x");
var body = Expression.Equal(
Expression.PropertyOrField(p, propertyOrFieldName),
Expression.Constant(converterId, typeof(int))
);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<Foo, bool>>(body, p);
}
static Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> Convert(
Expression<Func<Foo, bool>> lambda, string from, string to)
{
var visitor = new ConversionVisitor(from, to);
return (Expression<Func<Foo, bool>>)visitor.Visit(lambda);
}
class ConversionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly string _from, _to;
public ConversionVisitor(string from, string to)
{
_from = from;
_to = to;
}
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression node)
{
if(node.Member.Name == _from)
{
return Expression.PropertyOrField(
node.Expression, _to);
}
return base.VisitMember(node);
}
}
}
class Foo
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int ConverterId { get; set; }
}
I would like to generate dynamically a selector expression from some lambdas.
I want to declare a list of lambda expression like this
Expression<Func<MyEntity, object>> select1 = myentity => myentity.Label;
Expression<Func<MyEntity, object>> select2 = myentity => myentity.User.Name;
Expression<Func<MyEntity, object>> select3 = myentity => myentity.Fields.Where(1 == 1).Select(f => f.Code).FirstOrDefault();
And let's say i have a class :
class MyClass
{
public string Label { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }
public string CodeField { get; set; }
}
I want to compose dynamically the selector expression using the declared expressions.
The goal is that I want to choose the data to recover, not all together.
Expression.Lambda<Func<MyEntity, MyClass>> selectExpression = ??
req.Select(selectExpression).ToList();
I want to generate a selector expression to have something like this
return req.Select(myentity => new MyClass {
Label = myentity.Label,
UserName = myentity.User.Name,
CodeField = myentity.Fields.Where(1 == 1).Select(f => f.Code).FirstOrDefault()
}).ToList();
Can i do this?
I succeeded for example like this but it's not the way that i'm look for
var entityT = Expression.Parameter(typeof(MyEntity), "entity");
var propertyA = Expression.Property(entityT, typeof(MyEntity).GetProperty("Label"));
var propertyB = Expression.Property(entityT, typeof(MyEntity).GetProperty("User"));
var propertyC = Expression.Property(propertyB, typeof(UserEntity).GetProperty("Name"));
var binding = Expression.MemberInit(Expression.New(typeof(MyClass)),
new[]
{
Expression.Bind(typeof(MyClass).GetProperty("Label"), propertyA),
Expression.Bind(typeof(MyClass).GetProperty("UserName"), propertyC),
});
var selectExpression = Expression.Lambda<Func<Benef, MyClass>>(binding, entityT);
return req.Select(selectExpression).ToList();
In the same idea, I was tempted to do this, it compiles but does'nt work:
var binding = Expression.MemberInit(Expression.New(typeof(T)),
new[]
{
Expression.Bind(typeof(T).GetProperty("Label"), select1.Body),
Expression.Bind(typeof(T).GetProperty("UserName"), select2.Body),
});
I have this error :
"variable 'myentity' of type 'MyEntity' referenced from scope '', but it is not defined"
Thank you for your answers.
Basically you need to extract expressions from each lambda and connect it with parameter from MyClass.
Something like: Expression.Bind(typeof(MyClass).GetParameter("x"), selectX.Body).
The only difficulty is that all selectX.Body needs to point to the same paramter, so each body expression needs to be adjusted.
Here is sample code:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var mapped = entities
.Select(MakeExpression<MyEntity, MyClass>(select1, select2, select3))
.ToList();
}
// Create lambda expression
private static Expression<Func<TEntity, TModel>> MakeExpression<TEntity, TModel>(params Expression<Func<TEntity, object>>[] select)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TEntity));
// Map expressions [select1, ..., selectN] with properties
// For keeping things simple I map nth expression with nth property
// eg. select1 with first property from MyClass
var body = Expression.MemberInit(
Expression.New(typeof(TModel)),
typeof(TModel)
.GetProperties()
.Select((p, i) => Expression.Bind(p, MakeParam(param, select[i])))
.ToArray()
);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TEntity, TModel>>(body, param);
}
// Replace parameter from given expression with param
// All expressions must have same MyEntity parameter
private static Expression MakeParam<TEntity>(ParameterExpression param, Expression<Func<TEntity, object>> select)
{
Expression body = select.Body;
return new ParamVisitor<TEntity>(param).Visit(body);
}
}
class ParamVisitor<TEntity> : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly ParameterExpression _param;
public ParamVisitor(ParameterExpression param)
{
this._param = param;
}
protected override Expression VisitParameter(ParameterExpression node)
{
if (node.Type == typeof(TEntity))
{
return this._param;
}
return base.VisitParameter(node);
}
}
I'm building a generic interface to expose selected string properties out of a class, and then I want to search for a text inside every one of those fields, to check if it's a match.
Here's my IFieldExposer interface:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
public interface IFieldExposer<T>
{
IEnumerable<Func<T, string>> GetFields();
}
Now, I implement it like this in my DataClass to expose the properties I would like to iterate. Note that I'm also exposing a property from my ChildClass:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
class DataClass : IFieldExposer<DataClass>
{
public string PropertyOne { get; set; }
public string PropertyTwo { get; set; }
public ChildClass Child { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<Func<DataClass, string>> GetFields()
{
return new List<Func<DataClass, string>>
{
a => a.PropertyOne,
b => b.Child.PropertyThree
};
}
}
class ChildClass
{
public string PropertyThree { get; set; }
}
I've also created extension methods for IFieldExposer<T> because I want to keep it simple and be able to simply call obj.Match(text, ignoreCase) everywhere else in my code. This method should tell me if my object is a match for my text. Here's the code for the ExtensionClass, which isn't working as expected:
using System;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Reflection;
public static class ExtensionClass
{
public static bool Match<T>(this IFieldExposer<T> obj, string text, bool ignoreCase)
{
Func<bool> expression = Expression.Lambda<Func<bool>>(obj.CreateExpressionTree(text, ignoreCase)).Compile();
return expression();
}
private static Expression CreateExpressionTree<T>(this IFieldExposer<T> obj, string text, bool ignoreCase)
{
MethodInfo containsMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains", new Type[] { typeof(string) });
var exposedFields = obj.GetFields();
if (ignoreCase)
{
// How should I do convert these to lower too?
// exposedFields = exposedFields.Select(e => e.???.ToLower());
text = text.ToLower();
}
Expression textExp = Expression.Constant(text);
Expression orExpressions = Expression.Constant(false);
foreach (var field in exposedFields)
{
//How should I call the contains method on the string field?
Expression fieldExpression = Expression.Lambda<Func<string>>(Expression.Call(Expression.Constant(obj), field.Method)); //this doesn't work
Expression contains = Expression.Call(fieldExpression, containsMethod, textExp);
orExpressions = Expression.Or(orExpressions, contains);
}
return orExpressions;
}
}
Please check the comments in the code above. I would like to know how to convert all my string properties to lowercase (if desired) and how to call string.Contains in each one of them. I get this error when I create my fieldExpression:
Method 'System.String <GetFields>b__12_0(DataClass)' declared on type 'DataClass+<>c' cannot be called with instance of type 'DataClass'
I don't have experience working with Expression Trees. I've spent hours reading docs and other answers for similar issues but I still can't understand how to achieve what I want... I have no clue what to do now.
I'm testing this in a console app so here's the main class if you want to build it yourself:
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var data = new DataClass
{
PropertyOne = "Lorem",
PropertyTwo = "Ipsum",
Child = new ChildClass
{
PropertyThree = "Dolor"
}
};
var dataList = new List<DataClass> { data };
var results = dataList.Where(d => d.Match("dolor", true));
}
}
EDIT
I forgot to mention that my dataList should be IQueryable and I want to execute my code in SQL, that's why I'm trying to build the expression trees myself. So it appears my example code should be:
var dataList = new List<DataClass> { data };
var query = dataList.AsQueryable();
var results = query.Where(ExtensionClass.Match<DataClass>("lorem dolor"));
while my method becomes: (I'm following #sjb-sjb's answer and changed the GetFields() method in IFieldExposer<T> to a SelectedFields property)
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Match<T>(string text, bool ignoreCase) where T : IFieldExposer<T>
{
ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "obj");
MemberExpression selectedFieldsExp = Expression.Property(parameter, "SelectedFields");
LambdaExpression lambda = Expression.Lambda(selectedFieldsExp, parameter).Compile();
[...]
}
And then it seems that I have to dinamically call selectedFieldsExp with Expression.Lambda. I came up with:
Expression.Lambda(selectedFieldsExp, parameter).Compile();
and that works, but I don't know how to properly call DynamicInvoke() for the lambda expression.
It throws Parameter count mismatch. if I call it without parameters and Object of type 'System.Linq.Expressions.TypedParameterExpression' cannot be converted to type 'DataClass'. if I do DynamicInvoke(parameter).
Any ideas?
Before getting to the implementation, there are some design flaws that needs to be fixed.
First, almost all query providers (except LINQ to Object which simply compiles the lambda expressions to delegates and executes them) don't support invocation expressions and custom (unknown) methods. That's because they do not execute the expressions, but translate them to something else (SQL for instance), and translation is based on pre knowledge.
One example of invocation expression are Func<...> delegates. So the first thing you should do is to use Expression<Func<...>> wherever you currently have Func<...>.
Second, the query expression trees are built statically, i.e. there is no real object instance you can use to obtain the metadata, so the idea of IFieldExposer<T> won't work. You'd need a statically exposed list of expressions like this:
class DataClass //: IFieldExposer<DataClass>
{
// ...
public static IEnumerable<Expression<Func<DataClass, string>>> GetFields()
{
return new List<Expression<Func<DataClass, string>>>
{
a => a.PropertyOne,
b => b.Child.PropertyThree
};
}
}
Then the signature of the method in question could be like this
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Match<T>(
this IEnumerable<Expression<Func<T, string>>> fields, string text, bool ignoreCase)
with usage like this
var dataList = new List<DataClass> { data };
var query = dataList.AsQueryable()
.Where(DataClass.GetFields().Match("lorem", true));
Now the implementation. The desired expression could be built purely with Expression class methods, but I'll show you an easier (IMHO) method, which composes expression from compile time expression by replacing the parameter(s) with other expression(s).
All you need is a small helper utility method for replacing lambda expression parameter with another expression:
public static partial class ExpressionUtils
{
public static Expression ReplaceParameter(this Expression expression, ParameterExpression source, Expression target)
{
return new ParameterReplacer { Source = source, Target = target }.Visit(expression);
}
class ParameterReplacer : ExpressionVisitor
{
public ParameterExpression Source;
public Expression Target;
protected override Expression VisitParameter(ParameterExpression node)
=> node == Source ? Target : base.VisitParameter(node);
}
}
Internally it uses ExpressionVistor to find each instance of the passed ParameterExpression and replace it with the passed Expression.
With this helper method, the implementation could be like this:
public static partial class ExpressionUtils
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> Match<T>(this IEnumerable<Expression<Func<T, string>>> fields, string text, bool ignoreCase)
{
Expression<Func<string, bool>> match;
if (ignoreCase)
{
text = text.ToLower();
match = input => input.ToLower().Contains(text);
}
else
{
match = input => input.Contains(text);
}
// T source =>
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "source");
Expression anyMatch = null;
foreach (var field in fields)
{
// a.PropertyOne --> source.PropertyOne
// b.Child.PropertyThree --> source.Child.PropertyThree
var fieldAccess = field.Body.ReplaceParameter(field.Parameters[0], parameter);
// input --> source.PropertyOne
// input --> source.Child.PropertyThree
var fieldMatch = match.Body.ReplaceParameter(match.Parameters[0], fieldAccess);
// matchA || matchB
anyMatch = anyMatch == null ? fieldMatch : Expression.OrElse(anyMatch, fieldMatch);
}
if (anyMatch == null) anyMatch = Expression.Constant(false);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(anyMatch, parameter);
}
}
The input => input.ToLower().Contains(text) or input => input.Contains(text) is our compile time match expression, which we then replace the input parameter with the body of the passed Expression<Func<T, string>> lambda expressions, with their parameter replaced with a common parameter used in the final expression. The resulting bool expressions are combined with Expression.OrElse which is the equivalent of the C# || operator (while Expression.Or is for bitwise | operator and in general should not be used with logical operations). Same btw for && - use Expression.AndAlso and not Expression.And which is for bitwise &.
This process is pretty much the expression equivalent of the string.Replace. In case the explanations and code comments are not enough, you can step through the code and see the exact expression transformations and expression building process.
There is no need to get into the complexities of dynamically creating an Expression, because you can just invoke the Func delegate directly:
public interface IFieldExposer<T>
{
IEnumerable<Func<T,string>> SelectedFields { get; }
}
public static class FieldExposerExtensions
{
public static IEnumerable<Func<T,string>> MatchIgnoreCase<T>( this IEnumerable<Func<T,string>> stringProperties, T source, string matchText)
{
return stringProperties.Where(stringProperty => String.Equals( stringProperty( source), matchText, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
}
}
class DataClass : IFieldExposer<DataClass>
{
public string PropertyOne { get; set; }
public string PropertyTwo { get; set; }
public ChildClass Child { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<Func<DataClass, string>> SelectedFields {
get {
return new Func<DataClass, string>[] { #this => #this.PropertyOne, #this => #this.Child.PropertyThree };
}
}
public override string ToString() => this.PropertyOne + " " + this.PropertyTwo + " " + this.Child.PropertyThree;
}
class ChildClass
{
public string PropertyThree { get; set; }
}
Then to use it,
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var data = new DataClass {
PropertyOne = "Lorem",
PropertyTwo = "Ipsum",
Child = new ChildClass {
PropertyThree = "Dolor"
}
};
var data2 = new DataClass {
PropertyOne = "lorem",
PropertyTwo = "ipsum",
Child = new ChildClass {
PropertyThree = "doloreusement"
}
};
var dataList = new List<DataClass>() { data, data2 };
IEnumerable<DataClass> results = dataList.Where( d => d.SelectedFields.MatchIgnoreCase( d, "lorem").Any());
foreach (DataClass source in results) {
Console.WriteLine(source.ToString());
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
Following up on my comment above, I think you could do it like this:
class DataClass
{
…
static public Expression<Func<DataClass,bool>> MatchSelectedFields( string text, bool ignoreCase)
{
return #this => (
String.Equals( text, #this.PropertyOne, (ignoreCase? StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase: StringComparison.Ordinal))
|| String.Equals( text, #this.Child.PropertyThree, (ignoreCase? StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase: StringComparison.Ordinal))
);
}
}
Then the query is just
Expression<Func<DataClass,bool>> match = DataClass.MatchSelectedFields( "lorem", ignoreCase);
IEnumerable<DataClass> results = dataList.Where( d => match(d));
I wouldn't usually post a second answer but I thought it would be useful to see how to avoid dynamic modification of Expressions.
Caveat: I didn't actually try to compile it.
I am dealing with the scanario of Nullable types during formation of dynamic query expressions. These expressions would fetch filtered data from any SQL Tables( interfacing with Code First classes using EF ).
I have normal object ( e.g Consignment operating on several properties along with Nullable properties).
My expression formation goes well untill I encounter some Nullable types. On these nullables, I am getting
The binary operator NotEqual is not defined for the types 'System.Nullable`1[System.Single]' and 'System.Single'.
For removing this exception, I am using all appraoches regarding convertion posted on different threads.
Invoking lambda expressions in Expression trees
Trying to filter on a Nullable type using Expression Trees
These all are generating expressions with added word "Convert" ( i.e Convert(someValue) ) and in result I always have expression
t=>(t.Consignment.Id = 45000 && t.Consignment.someProperty>=45 Or t.Consignment.Weight! = Convert(5000)).
Of course I need the whole above expression WITHOUT "Convert". Because this "Convert" will not fetch the data from tables accordingly.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! What should left to do? I already know conversion, but this makes the whole expression useless, because it won't project the records because of needless "Convert"
Added
Expression NotEqual<T>(Expression PropertyType, ConstantExpression a_Constant, ParameterExpression parameter)
{
if(IsNullableType(Property.Type) &&!IsNullableType(a_Constant.Type))
{
var converted = a_Constant.Type != Property.Type ? (Expression)Expression.Convert(a_Constant, Property.Type): (Expression)a_Constant;
// here above statement returns (Convert(50000)) and all I want (50000), but i tried all combinitions from Expression in order to form this constant as expression, it always throws exception what I mentioned originally.
var body = Expression.MakeBinary(ExpressionType.NotEqual, PropertyType, converted);
//MakeBinary statement returns {(t.Weight != Convert(5000000))} but I need {(t.Weight != 5000000)}
var expr = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(body, parameter);
return expr;
}
}
Code:
public class Consignment
{
public float? Weight { get; set; }
}
public static class GenericQueryExpressionBuilder
{
private static Expression NotEqual<T>(Expression memberExpression, ConstantExpression a_Constant, ParameterExpression parameter)
{
ConstantExpression constantExpression = null;
if (IsNullableType(memberExpression.Type) && !IsNullableType(a_Constant.Type))
{
//var converted = a_Constant.Type != memberExpression.Type ? (Expression)Expression.Convert(a_Constant, memberExpression.Type) : (Expression)a_Constant;
Expression constantExp = Expression.Property(a_Constant,typeof(T),"Weight");
**// above statement throws exception I commented.**
var body = Expression.MakeBinary(ExpressionType.NotEqual, memberExpression, converted);
//here I want "t=>(t.Weight!=5000.0) INSTEAD of t=>(t.Weight!=Convert(5000.0))"
var expr = Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(body, parameter);
return expr;
}
else if (!IsNullableType(memberExpression.Type) && IsNullableType(a_Constant.Type))
memberExpression = Expression.Convert(memberExpression, a_Constant.Type);
return Expression.NotEqual(memberExpression, constantExpression);
}
static bool IsNullableType(Type t)
{
return t.IsGenericType && t.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Nullable<>);
}
private static Expression GetExpression<T>(ParameterExpression param, string a_strPropertyName, string Operator, object Value)
{
MemberExpression member = Expression.Property(param, a_strPropertyName);
ConstantExpression constant = Expression.Constant(Value);
try
{
return GenericQueryExpressionBuilder.NotEqual<T>(member, constant, param);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException)
{
return null;
}
return null;
}
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> GetExpression<T>(Consignment consignment)
{
Expression expression = null;
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
string PropertyName = "Weight";
string Operation = "NotEqual";
object Value = consignment.Weight;
expression = GenericQueryExpressionBuilder.GetExpression<T>(parameter, PropertyName, Operation, Value);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(expression, parameter);
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Consignment consignment = new Consignment();
consignment.Weight = 50000.0f;
var deleg = GenericQueryExpressionBuilder.GetExpression<Consignment>(consignment).Compile();
}
}
Here's a short but complete example showing how to build the c => c.Weight.HasValue && c.Weight.Value != 5000f expression tree. I've removed a lot of irrelevant code from the question:
using System;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
public class Consignment
{
public float? Weight { get; set; }
}
public class Test
{
private static Expression NotEqual(Expression memberExpression,
ConstantExpression constantToCompare)
{
// Other cases removed, for simplicity. This answer only demonstrates
// how to handle c => c.Weight != 5000f.
var hasValueExpression = Expression.Property(memberExpression, "HasValue");
var valueExpression = Expression.Property(memberExpression, "Value");
var notEqual = Expression.NotEqual(valueExpression, constantToCompare);
return Expression.AndAlso(hasValueExpression, notEqual);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Consignment consignment = new Consignment();
consignment.Weight = 50000.0f;
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Consignment), "c");
var weight = Expression.Property(parameter, "Weight");
var constant = Expression.Constant(5000f, typeof(float));
var weightNotEqualExpression = NotEqual(weight, constant);
var lambda = Expression.Lambda<Func<Consignment, bool>>
(weightNotEqualExpression, parameter);
Console.WriteLine(lambda);
}
}
My issue is I need to query on the value of a property in a generic class. The property is tagged with an attribute.
See the following code:
var rowKeyProperty = EFUtil.GetClassPropertyForRowKey<T>();
var tenantKeyProperty = EFUtil.GetClassPropertyForTenantKey<T>();
var queryResult =
objContext.CreateObjectSet<T>().Single(l => (((int) tenantKeyProperty.GetValue(l, null)) == tenantKey) &&
(((int)rowKeyProperty.GetValue(l, null)) == KeyValue));
The rowKeyProperty and tenantKeyProperty are of type System.Reflection.PropertyInfo.
I understand why I am getting the error. When the linq query is translated to SQL, it can't understand the property.GetValue.
However, I'm completely stumped as to a work around here. Does anyone have any ideas how to achieve this? Thx.
You need to actually build up the Expression objects to represent the expression that you want this to mimic, in this case the expression you want to represent is:
l => l.SomeProperty == SomeValue
So you need to build up each component of that bit by bit, from creating the parameter, defining the equality operator, the property access, the constant value, etc.
public static Expression<Func<TItem, bool>> PropertyEquals<TItem, TValue>(
PropertyInfo property, TValue value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TItem));
var body = Expression.Equal(Expression.Property(param, property),
Expression.Constant(value));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TItem, bool>>(body, param);
}
Once you have all of that you can call it using the data that you have:
var queryResult = objContext.CreateObjectSet<T>()
.Where(PropertyEquals<T, int>(tenantKeyProperty, tenantKey))
.Where(PropertyEquals<T, int>(rowKeyProperty, KeyValue))
.Single();
Appendix here... Following #Servy answer and based on this topic with a nice answer by #TomBrothers, you can use the same logic to make a StartsWith (or similar) function:
public static Expression<Func<TItem, bool>> PropertyStartsWith<TItem>(PropertyInfo propertyInfo, string value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TItem));
var m = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(param, propertyInfo);
var c = Expression.Constant(value, typeof(string));
var mi = typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith", new Type[] { typeof(string) });
var body = Expression.Call(m, mi, c);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TItem, bool>>(body, param);
}
In this case, it forces value to be a string.
It is more correct to specify the type in Expression.Constant(value, typeof(TValue)))
public static Expression<Func<TItem, bool>> PropertyEquals<TItem, TValue>(
string property, TValue value)
{
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TItem));
var body = Expression.Equal(Expression.Property(xParameter, property), Expression.Constant(value, typeof(TValue)));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TItem, bool>>(body, xParameter);
}
Or, like this, to check the property. ChangeType
public static Expression<Func<TItem, bool>> PropertyEquals<TItem, TValue>(
string property, TValue value)
{
var xParameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TItem));
var type = typeof(TItem).GetProperty(property).PropertyType;
value = ChangeType<TValue>(value);
BinaryExpression body = Expression.Equal(Expression.Property(xParameter, property), Expression.Constant(value, type));
return Expression.Lambda<Func<TItem, bool>>(body, xParameter);
}
What is it for. I check all class references to classes, I look for "..ID" entries. Somewhere I have a type "int" and "int?".
public class BudgetLimit : BaseRecord
{
[Required]
public int DepartmentID { get; set; }
public virtual Department Department { get; set;}
public int? ProjectID { get; set; }
public virtual Project Project { get; set; }
}
You add .AsEnableable after the LINQ statement.
e.g objectdata.AsEnumerable()
enter link description here