Is it possible to define table inside sql statement? - c#

Is there a way to have a custom table inside select statement?
Something like this:
select id from (1, 2, 3, 4) tbl
Assuming tbl is alias and the custom table has one column with 1, 2, 3, 4 rows.
Is this possible without creating a physical temp table?

Yes, you can do it (numbers table) like that in Oracle:
with tbl as (
-- generates table with id column with 1, 2, 3, 4 values
select level id
from dual
connect by level <= 4)
select id
from tbl
you can put the same in different syntax:
select id
from (select level id
from dual
connect by level <= 4) tbl
if you need arbitrary values, say 1, 5, 14, 127 you can achieve it like that:
with tbl as (
select 1 from dual
union all
select 5 from dual
union all
select 14 from dual
union all
select 127 from dual
)
select id
from tbl
Or
select id
from (select 1 from dual
union all
select 5 from dual
union all
select 14 from dual
union all
select 127 from dual) tbl
If you want to have syntax like from (1, 2, 3) you have to declare a type
create or replace type NumberTable is table of number;
...
select *
from table(NumberTable(1, 2, 3, 4)) tbl

create or replace type char_int is table of integer;
/
with numbers as (select column_value
from table(char_int(1,2,5,6,7)))
select numbers.column_value
, object_name
, object_id
from all_objects
join numbers on (substr(object_id,1,1) = numbers.column_value);
;
Output:
<snip>
1 V$HS_AGENT 1999
2 V$HS_SESSION 2001
<snip>

Related

How to check values is existed on table using SQL Query

Table
RawID data
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 D
I have value RawID list (2,4,5). I want to know (2,4,5) is existed or not.
i have tried below
SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS(SELECT * FROM table WHERE rawid IN (2,4,5)) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
But 2, 4 is existed on table, it returned '1'.
But i want to get '0' because (2,4,5) all value is not existed on table.
if (1,2,3), return 1
if (2,3), return 1,
if (1,3,4) return 1
if (1,5) return 0
if (2,6) return 0
Could you give to me idea to check that all data is existed on table or not using SQL Query??
check for number no rows that matches the input. Example for rawid 2, 4, 5 there should be 3 rows
select case when (select count(*) from table where rawid in (2, 4, 5)) = 3
then 1
else 0
end
select case when (select count(*) from table where rawid in (2, 3)) = 2
then 1
else 0
end
If you want flexibility, you can do:
with vals as (
select *
from (values (2, 4, 5)) v(val)
)
select (case when count(*) = max(c.cnt) then 1 else 0 end)
from t join
vals
on t.rawid = v.val cross join
(select count(*) as cnt from vals) c;
This looks a little more complicated than other solutions, but you only have to change the values() line in the query for it to work on any number of values.
(This assumes that rowid has no duplicates.)

Query for match all records in list SQL Server

I have a table bawe_services. i want to fetch all data that match with given keys
like i have fields
id | Service_id |bawe_id
1 2 2
2 3 3
3 2 3
if i pass service =2 i need all record of service_id=2 if i pass service=1,2,3 than i want 0 rows because 1 service is not given by any bawe so. i got 0 rows.
I use this query
select * from aspnet_bawe_services where ser_id in(1,2,3)
Thanx in advance
The count of the parameters in the "in" statement must match the having equal number.
select bawe_id from [dbo].[aspnet_bawe_services]
where Service_id in (2)
group by bawe_id
having count(Service_id)=1;
bawe_id
-----------
2
3
select bawe_id from [dbo].[aspnet_bawe_services]
where Service_id in (2,3)
group by bawe_id
having count(Service_id)=2;
bawe_id
-----------
3
select bawe_id from [dbo].[aspnet_bawe_services]
where Service_id in (1,2,3)
group by bawe_id
having count(Service_id)=3;
bawe_id
-----------
(0 row(s) affected)
TRY THIS: It's really tedious but unique requirement and I think to accomplish this, we have to use function
1-Function returns distinct count of service_id
2-Function to split comma separated value and return in table format
--Function returns distinct count of service_id
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[getCount](#service_id varchar(500))
RETURNS INT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #count int
SELECT #count = COUNT(DISTINCT(t.service_id))
FROM tmptos t
INNER JOIN [dbo].[SplitValue](#service_id, ',') tt on t.service_id = tt.items
RETURN #count
END;
--Function to split comma separated value and return in table format
--Function copied from
--separate comma separated values and store in table in sql server
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[SplitValue](#String varchar(MAX), #Delimiter char(1))
RETURNS #temptable TABLE (items VARCHAR(MAX))
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #idx int
DECLARE #slice varchar(8000)
SELECT #idx = 1
if len(#String)<1 or #String is null return
WHILE #idx!= 0
BEGIN
set #idx = charindex(#Delimiter,#String)
IF #idx!=0
set #slice = left(#String,#idx - 1)
else
set #slice = #String
IF(LEN(#slice)>0)
INSERT INTO #temptable(Items) values(#slice)
SET #String = right(#String,len(#String) - #idx)
IF LEN(#String) = 0 break
END
RETURN
END;
--Table with Sample Data
create table tmptos(id int, Service_id int, bawe_id int)
insert into tmptos values
(1, 2, 2),
(2, 3, 3),
(3, 2, 3)
declare #service_id varchar(50) = '2,3'
select *
from tmptos t
inner join [dbo].[SplitValue](#service_id, ',') tt on t.Service_id = tt.items
where [dbo].[getCount](#service_id) = (select count(distinct(items)) from [dbo].[SplitValue](#service_id, ','))
OUTPUT:
id Service_id bawe_id items
1 2 2 2
2 3 3 3
3 2 3 2
It's bit lengthy but works perfectly.
select * from aspnet_bawe_services
where Service_id in (1,2,3)
and
( select count(distinct Service_id) from aspnet_bawe_services where Service_id in (1,2,3) ) = 3
last number in query (in this case "3") is elements count, which you have in IN list.
You can get the service ids that you want using group by and having:
select service_id
from t
where bawe_id in (1, 2, 3)
group by service_id
having count(distinct bawe_id) = 3;
The "= 3" is the number of ids in the IN list.
You can then use in or join or exists to get the full records:
select t.*
from t
where t.service_id in (select service_id
from t
where bawe_id in (1, 2, 3)
group by service_id
having count(distinct bawe_id) = 3
);

How to set an integer value to one if a record exist in database C# Sql Query

getName_as_Rows is an array which contains some names.
I want to set an int value to 1 if record found in data base.
for(int i = 0; i<100; i++)
{
using (var command = new SqlCommand("select some column from some table where column = #Value", con1))
{
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("#Value", getName_as_Rows[i]);
con1.Open();
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
}
I am looking for:
bool recordexist;
if the above record exist then bool = 1 else 0 with in the loop.
If have to do some other stuff if the record exist.
To avoid making N queries to the database, something that could be very expensive in terms of processing, network and so worth, I suggest you to Join only once using a trick I learned. First you need a function in your database that splits a string into a table.
CREATE FUNCTION [DelimitedSplit8K]
--===== Define I/O parameters
(#pString VARCHAR(8000), #pDelimiter CHAR(1))
RETURNS TABLE WITH SCHEMABINDING AS
RETURN
--===== "Inline" CTE Driven "Tally Table" produces values from 0 up to 10,000...
-- enough to cover VARCHAR(8000)
WITH E1(N) AS (
SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL
SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL
SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1
), --10E+1 or 10 rows
E2(N) AS (SELECT 1 FROM E1 a, E1 b), --10E+2 or 100 rows
E4(N) AS (SELECT 1 FROM E2 a, E2 b), --10E+4 or 10,000 rows max
cteTally(N) AS (--==== This provides the "zero base" and limits the number of rows right up front
-- for both a performance gain and prevention of accidental "overruns"
SELECT 0 UNION ALL
SELECT TOP (DATALENGTH(ISNULL(#pString,1))) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) FROM E4
),
cteStart(N1) AS (--==== This returns N+1 (starting position of each "element" just once for each delimiter)
SELECT t.N+1
FROM cteTally t
WHERE (SUBSTRING(#pString,t.N,1) = #pDelimiter OR t.N = 0)
)
--===== Do the actual split. The ISNULL/NULLIF combo handles the length for the final element when no delimiter is found.
SELECT ItemNumber = ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY s.N1),
Item = SUBSTRING(#pString,s.N1,ISNULL(NULLIF(CHARINDEX(#pDelimiter,#pString,s.N1),0)-s.N1,8000))
FROM cteStart s
GO
Second, concatenate your 100 variables into 1 string:
"Value1", "Value 2", "Value 3"....
In Sql Server you can just join the values with your table
SELECT somecolumn FROM sometable t
INNER JOIN [DelimitedSplit8K](#DelimitedString, ',') v ON v.Item = t.somecolumn
So you find 100 strings at a time with only 1 query.
Use var result = command.ExecuteScalar() and check if result != null
But a better option than to loop would be to say use a select statement like
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TABLE WHERE COLUMNVAL >= 0 AND COLUMNVAL < 100,
and run ExecuteScalar on that, and if the value is > 0, then set your variable to 1.

Recursively update values based on rows parent id SQL Server

I have the following table structure
| id | parentID | count1 |
2 -1 1
3 2 1
4 2 0
5 3 1
6 5 0
I increase count values from my source code, but i also need the increase in value to bubble up to each parent id row until the parent id is -1.
eg. If I were to increase count1 on row ID #6 by 1, row ID #5 would increase by 1, ID #3 would increase by 1, and ID #2 would increase by 1.
Rows also get deleted, and the opposite would need to happen, basically subtracting the row to be deleted' value from each parent.
Thanks in advance for your insight.
I'm using SQL Server 2008, and C# asp.net.
If you really want to just update counts, you could want to write stored procedure to do so:
create procedure usp_temp_update
(
#id int,
#value int = 1
)
as
begin
with cte as (
-- Take record
select t.id, t.parentid from temp as t where t.id = #id
union all
-- And all parents recursively
select t.id, t.parentid
from cte as c
inner join temp as t on t.id = c.parentid
)
update temp set
cnt = cnt + #value
where id in (select id from cte)
end
SQL FIDDLE EXAMPLE
So you could call it after you insert and delete rows. But if your count field are depends just on your table, I would suggest to make a triggers which will recalculate your values
You want to use a recursive CTE for this:
with cte as (
select id, id as parentid, 1 as level
from t
union all
select cte.id, t.parentid, cte.level + 1
from t join
cte
on t.id = cte.parentid
where cte.parentid <> -1
) --select parentid from cte where id = 6
update t
set count1 = count1 + 1
where id in (select parentid from cte where id = 6);
Here is the SQL Fiddle.

Selecting multiple row from one row in SQL

I have the following output with me from multiple tables
id b c b e b g
abc 2 123 3 321 7 876
abd 2 456 3 452 7 234
abe 2 0 3 123 7 121
abf 2 NULL 3 535 7 1212
Now I want to insert these values into another table and the insert query for a single command is as follows:
insert into resulttable values (id,b,c), (id,b,e) etc.
For that I need to do a select such that it gives me
id,b,c
id,b,e etc
I dont mind getting rid of b too as it can be selected using c# query.
How can I achieve the same using a single query in sql. Again please note its not a table its an output from different tables
My query should look as follows: from the above I need to do something like
select b.a, b.c
union all
select b.d,b.e from (select a,c,d,e from <set of join>) b
But unfortunately that does not work
INSERT resulttable
SELECT id, b, c
FROM original
UNION
SELECT id, b, e
FROM original
Your example has several columns named 'b' which isn't allowed...
Here, #tmporigin refers to your original query that produces the data in the question. Just replace the table name with a subquery.
insert into resulttable
select
o.id,
case a.n when 1 then b1 when 2 then b2 else b3 end,
case a.n when 1 then c when 2 then e else g end
from #tmporigin o
cross join (select 1n union all select 2 union all select 3) a
The original answer below, using CTE and union all requiring CTE evaluation 3 times
I have the following output with me from multiple tables
So set that query up as a Common Table Expression
;WITH CTE AS (
-- the query that produces that output
)
select id,b1,c from CTE
union all
select id,b2,e from CTE
union all
select id,b3,g from CTE
NOTE - Contrary to popular belief, your CTE while conveniently written once, is run thrice in the above query, once for each of the union all parts.
NOTE ALSO that if you actually name 3 columns "b" (literally), there is no way to identify which b you are referring to in anything that tries to reference the results - in fact SQL Server will not let you use the query in a CTE or subquery.
The following example shows how to perform the above, as well as (if you show the execution plan) revealing that the CTE is run 3 times! (the lines between --- BELOW HERE and --- ABOVE HERE is a mock of the original query that produces the output in the question.
if object_id('tempdb..#eav') is not null drop table #eav
;
create table #eav (id char(3), b int, v int)
insert #eav select 'abc', 2, 123
insert #eav select 'abc', 3, 321
insert #eav select 'abc', 7, 876
insert #eav select 'abd', 2, 456
insert #eav select 'abd', 3, 452
insert #eav select 'abd', 7, 234
insert #eav select 'abe', 2, 0
insert #eav select 'abe', 3, 123
insert #eav select 'abe', 7, 121
insert #eav select 'abf', 3, 535
insert #eav select 'abf', 7, 1212
;with cte as (
---- BELOW HERE
select id.id, b1, b1.v c, b2, b2.v e, b3, b3.v g
from
(select distinct id, 2 as b1, 3 as b2, 7 as b3 from #eav) id
left join #eav b1 on b1.b=id.b1 and b1.id=id.id
left join #eav b2 on b2.b=id.b2 and b2.id=id.id
left join #eav b3 on b3.b=id.b3 and b3.id=id.id
---- ABOVE HERE
)
select b1, c from cte
union all
select b2, e from cte
union all
select b3, g from cte
order by b1
You would be better off storing the data into a temp table before doing the union all select.
Instead of this which does not work as you know
select b.a, b.c
union all
select b.d,b.e from (select a,c,d,e from <set of join>) b
You can do this. Union with repeated sub-select
select b.a, b.c from (select a,c,d,e from <set of join>) b
union all
select b.d, b.e from (select a,c,d,e from <set of join>) b
Or this. Repeated use of cte.
with cte as
(select a,c,d,e from <set of join>)
select b.a, b.c from cte b
union all
select b.d, b.e from cte b
Or use a temporary table variable.
declare #T table (a int, c int, d int, e int)
insert into #T values
select a,c,d,e from <set of join>
select b.a, b.c from #T b
union all
select b.d, b.e from #T b
This code is not tested so there might be any number of typos in there.
I'm not sure if I understood Your problem correctly, but i have been using something like this for some time:
let's say we have a table
ID Val1 Val2
1 A B
2 C D
to obtain a reslut like
ID Val
1 A
1 B
2 C
2 D
You can use a query :
select ID, case when i=1 then Val1 when i=2 then Val2 end as Val
from table
left join ( select 1 as i union all select 2 as i ) table_i on i=i
which will simply join the table with a subquery containing two values and create a cartesian product. In effect, all rows will be doubled (or multiplied by how many values the subquery will have). You can vary the number of values depending on how many varsions of row You'll need. Depending on the value of i, Val will be Val1 or Val2 from original table. If you'll see the execution plan, there will be a warning that the join has no join predicates (because of i=i), but it is ok - we want it.
This makes queries a bit large (in terms of text) because of all the case when, but are quite easy to read if formatted right. I needed it for stupid tables like "BigID, smallID1, smallID2...smallID11" that was spread across many columns I don't know why.
Hope it helps.
Oh, I use a static table with 10000 numbers, so i just use
join tab10k on i<=10
for 10x row.
I apologize for stupid formatting, I'm new here.

Categories

Resources