Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm struggling with WCF over engineering. It seems to me like a strange code layer, that do something useful, like giving you the possibility to call methods over http.
But in other hands, it increases useless code, useless methods calls, and so on.
Its like buying a japanese car, you will pay cheaper, but it will cost you more than you imagined.
Joking aside, I would like to know if I'm missing the real point here, or there is a better solution ?
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
According to StackOverflow Update: 560M Pageviews A Month, 25 Servers, And It's All About Performance (perhaps getting its information from Marco Cecconi The Architecture of Stack Overflow at 29:00),
Some coding is in IL, not C#.
I am not asking about anything specific to Stack Overflow site, but, generally speaking, when would IL-written code be faster than C#-written code?
My understanding, from reading the posts of Eric Lippert, most of the optimizations in .NET are done when JIT'd:
We let the jitter team worry about optimizing the heck out of the code when it is actually spit into machine code; that’s the place where you can get real wins. — What does the optimize switch do?
What sort of optimizations can be made from hand-coded IL?
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm using XmlManager to
do xml manipulations in several methods in a class.where I should declare XmlManager variable ?
1.locally within each method and do intialization.
2 declare at globally and initiate at the method level
As it is, in this question, there's absolutely NO difference whatsoever because there's neither performance gain nor significant design issues.
Maybe if the question is put into context there could be reason to choose one approach over the other, but as it stands now. None of the approach is better than the other one
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to know how to make an GUI OS using C# (becuose it`s the language I know the best).
I would like to make it as most as my own.
I know that a good start is to to help to improve completed OS (like a Cosmos) but I would like to do that part of the job by myself. What have the done? How did they made that(boot and some more things)???That is a thing I don`t know.
An operating system usually takes years of work by a team of people. Moreover, you cannot do this with C#, as it's too high level to realistically facilitate the type of development you're talking about.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
My MainViewModel has to deal with a lot of commands with complex actions inside, therefore its extension has grown inevitable. For keep the code organized I tend to use #region to group similar o related tasks.Does this considered an overuse of this feature or it's perfectly normal? You may say that it depends on me, if I feel right about it. I think that it helps a lot but I would like to know what do others. Here is a screenshot of how the code look like:
The bad practice is a massive single class. #region is simply hiding / coping with it.
If there are groups of methods, delegate them to another class.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
hi
i am taking a look now # Business Logic Toolkit for .NET http://bltoolkit.net .
but the strange thing is that i dont see anyone using it but from the documentation it seems very nice.
so my question is why there is no one using this library?
i want to use it but i am afraid there is somethings wrong that dont let the people use it.
thanks
Hi i think the problem is that bltoolkit more popular in russia development comunity. Other problems are: no dependecy injection, no full linq support.